Edusehat - : Akuakultur

Your opportunity to Join in a FREE Webinar with FAO-SCA to Discuss Seafood Fraud

Edusehat — Sat, 30 May 2026 11:20:17 +0700

By: SCA

𝗔𝗾𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗳𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗱: 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲?

Thursday 18 June 2026

Aquatic food fraud covers a wide range of deceptive practices, including mislabeling, species substitution, and false claims about origin, production method, quality, sustainability, or traceability, among many others. Beyond economic losses, it can undermine consumer trust, fair competition, public health and sustainability.

As part of the FAO #GLOBEFISH Webinar Series 2026, this upcoming online session will explore how market demand, price incentives, and supply-chain complexity create conditions for fraudulent practices, and what governments, industry, retailers, researchers and standard-setting bodies are doing to strengthen transparency, traceability and authenticity. The webinar will feature:

Expert presentations.
Live polling.
A moderated panel discussion.
Audience Q&A.

Of interest for stakeholders working across fisheries, aquaculture, seafood trade, food safety and sustainability.

Participation is open upon registration: July 17^th, 2026

𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲: 10:00–12:00 CEST (1800hrs Melbourne)

𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁: Online via Zoom

𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲: English Register here https://lnkd.in/eY_un56X

If you’ve registered, please complete a short pre-webinar survey to share your perspectives on fraud affecting fisheries and aquaculture products: https://lnkd.in/e3rjMhan

Look forward to seeing you there

Canadian Cascadia Seaweed Announces the Official Opening of an Advanced Seaweed Processing Facility in Port Edward

Edusehat — Sat, 30 May 2026 11:20:12 +0700

The Canadian company Cascadia Seaweed announced a few days ago the official opening of an advanced seaweed processing facility in Port Edward, British Columbia, marking a major milestone in the Company’s development as a vertically integrated seaweed production and biomanufacturing business.

“This facility represents a significant milestone in building a fully integrated seaweed-based agricultural inputs company in Canada,” says Michael Williamson, CEO and Co-founder of Cascadia Seaweed. “We’ve built this business step by step from cultivation through to advanced processing, overcoming the challenges of scaling within this sector. With the facility now operational, our focus shifts toward expanding market adoption and growing our presence in agriculture markets, starting with North America.”

The Port Edward processing facility emerged within a broader context as a strategic opportunity to establish northern processing capacity. The facility had completed its final stages of commissioning, with secondary processing equipment installed. The grand opening celebration took place on May 14, marking an important milestone in the development of Cascadia‘s northern processing capability. Full operational capacity is expected by summer 2026.

Long Story

The relationship between Cascadia Seaweed and the Metlakatla First Nation and the Metlakatla Development Corporation (MDC) began in 2021, as early discussions emerged around the potential for a northern hub of aquaculture and processing operations. What started as exploratory conversations has evolved over several years of sustained engagement, site visits, technical collaboration, and joint evaluation of infrastructure opportunities in the Prince Rupert region.

They explain that, from the outset, discussions with MDC have focused on exploring how existing marine infrastructure and licensed tenures could be repurposed to support a more diversified and resilient coastal economy. Over time, this dialogue has included trials, funding collaborations, environmental baseline work, and ongoing evaluation of integrated aquaculture systems, including kelp cultivation and a processing capacity.

A consistent theme throughout this period has been the shared focus on long-term opportunity rather than short-term transactions. This has included parallel progress on permitting, early-stage site trials, and technical planning for processing infrastructure capable of handling rapidly perishable seaweed biomass at scale.

Strengthened Presence

The Port Edward processing facility emerged within this broader context as a strategic opportunity to establish northern processing capacity. In 2024, Cascadia strengthened its regional presence with the appointment of Dan Pedde as Project Manager, Northern Developments.

In March 2025, Cascadia signed the lease for the Port Edward facility, formally advancing the project from planning into construction and commissioning. Since then, the facility has progressed through installation, commissioning, and early system validation, including turning on the power in January 2026 and first “practice runs” of seaweed processing in March 2026.

They explain that, as with many first-of-kind infrastructure projects, the build phase has included execution challenges with contractors, including equipment delays and resulting scope adjustments. These changes led to a revised project plan and modest budget escalation, while ultimately increasing direct control over installation and commissioning activities.

By spring 2026, the facility had completed its final stages of commissioning, with secondary processing equipment installed. The grand opening celebration took place on May 14, 2026, marking an important milestone in the development of Cascadia‘s northern processing capability. Full operational capacity is expected by summer 2026.

Importantly, Cascadia and MDC continue to explore potential joint venture structures for both farming and processing operations. The relationship continues to evolve, grounded in ongoing collaboration, shared objectives, and a long-term view of regional industry development.

Cascadia Seaweed grow local species of seaweed on marine farms in partnership with coastal First Nations. They then harvest that seaweed and manufacture liquid biostimulants for farmers across North America. “Our products enhance nutrient use efficiency while achieving the same or even better yields, providing a clear return on investment for farmers.

WellFish Tech Received Approval From the Norwegian Food Safety Authority for Its Non-Lethal Salmon Blood Sampling

Edusehat — Sat, 30 May 2026 11:20:07 +0700

Two studies demonstrated that the procedure does not compromise fish survival, growth, or welfare when executed by trained personnel using their standardized protocol

WellFish Tech, a biotechnology company based in Paisley, Scotland, has obtained regulatory clearance from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet) for a non-lethal blood sampling method used on Atlantic salmon in aquaculture. According to the firm, this is the first instance in which Mattilsynet has approved such a non-lethal sampling technique, ending a restriction that had been in place for multiple years.

The company completed the required protocol revision the last May 4. The updated standard operating procedure is now the governing document for all non-lethal food sampling activity carried out under the WellFish Tech service.

“We are proud of the rigorous work that underpins this approval. This has been a collaborative effort with the scientific community and regulators, with one goal: better fish health. Having a non-lethal diagnostic method formally recognized in Norway is a meaningful step for the industry,” said Charlie Granfelt, CEO of WellFish Tech.

After the news broke, they thanked to Magnus Blø, Randi Fivelstad, Hilde R. Storhaug, “and the wider team who put in the work to get this over the line, and to Mattilsynet for a rigorous and thorough process”.

Temperatures Between 5 and 8 Degrees Celsius

The company stated that the approval followed field and laboratory trials designed to provide the animal welfare evidence required by the regulatory body. Trials conducted in Spring 2025 evaluated the method’s effect on fish in water temperatures between 5 and 8 degrees Celsius, conditions described by the company as among the most challenging for welfare and wound recovery.

A separate controlled warm-water trial carried out at AquaBioTech Group‘s facility in Malta supplied complementary data for higher temperatures. Both studies demonstrated that the procedure does not compromise fish survival, growth, or welfare when executed by trained personnel using WellFish Tech‘s standardized protocol.

Performed Under the Professional Authorized Fish Health Personnel

The development of the company becomes the first method of its kind to meet Norway’s welfare documentation requirements. The approval removes a prohibition that had been in place for several years and allows fish health personnel to collect diagnostic blood samples from live salmon and return the fish to the production environment.

WellFish Tech has created a tool that uses blood samples to deliver a range of data for salmon farmers, including mortality forecasting for the upcoming seven, fourteen, and twenty-eight days, along with other predictive insights. The non-lethal sampling method allows farmers to return the fish to the production environment, unlike current procedures that require the fish to be euthanized.

The clearance applies specifically to Atlantic salmon weighing over 500 grams. It permits a maximum sample volume of 1 milliliter per fish and mandates a minimum interval of fourteen days between repeated samples from the same individual. The company noted that the method must be performed under the professional responsibility of authorized fish health personnel.

Hidden Information

According to Wellfish Tech, their services give back to the customers time and add previously hidden information through analysis of biomarkers, just like in human blood work. By revealing the inner workings of fish not on a sporadic, but routine basis, a holistic and continued picture of the health condition of your fish emerges. “This gives your team time to plan crucial production decisions according to the condition of the fish, making sure to minimize losses and maximize resource efficiency,” they assure.

“Analysis provided by WellFish Tech is proving to be a valuable salmon health management tool by providing early warning and insights into which vital functions are affected and how fish may be supported, as well as measurements of prognosis, making a significant contribution to our fish health strategy and influencing management decisions,” commented Dave Cockerill, Director of Biology, Bakkafrost Scotland.

From Ocean Depths to Farm Ponds: How Lallemand’s Marine Microbial Treasure Is Fueling the Next Wave of Aquaculture Innovation

Edusehat — Sat, 30 May 2026 04:10:06 +0700

* By Lallemand Animal Nutrition

Evolving global aquaculture demand requires paradigm shift toward scientifically validated, preventive health solutions. Driven by a dedicated innovation ecosystem, Lallemand Animal Nutrition leverages its specialized library of over 12,500 marine microorganisms to deliver advanced solutions for gut microbiome management and mucosal immunity. This continuous cycle of cross-functional research translates deep-ocean biological assets into industrially reliable microbial products, securing long-term operational resilience and sustainable growth across intensive farming environments.

Beneath the surface of the world’s oceans lies a vast, largely untapped reservoir of microbial life, one that is increasingly shaping the future of aquaculture. At the heart of Lallemand’s field-led, marine-rooted microbial approach to aquaculture innovation is a distinctive biological asset. The Lallemand Marine Culture Collection (LMCC) is a living library of more than 12,500 marine microorganisms assembled over decades of sampling expeditions to some of the world’s most extreme and biologically rich marine environments. This collection is a key pillar of Lallemand’s aquaculture innovation strategy, complementing a broader range of non-veterinary microbial solutions derived from both marine and terrestrial sources. Notably, several strains from the LMCC are also used across other Lallemand business units beyond aquaculture, underscoring the collection’s value as a cross-functional scientific asset. Together, these capabilities position Lallemand as one of the most scientifically credible and forward-looking partners in the global aquaculture industry.

Reshaping Aquaculture Production

The urgent challenges confronting aquaculture producers today are well documented: rising production costs, tightening environmental, welfare and regulatory standards, mounting expectations for antibiotic-free production, and the persistent difficulty of maintaining animal health, water and soil quality across highly diverse production environments. Producers from Norwegian salmon fjords to Asian and Latin American shrimp and fish ponds are looking beyond conventional management approaches for biological solutions that are effective, consistent, and scalable. The question is: where will better solutions come from, and can the science behind them be trusted to deliver under real-farm conditions?

Meeting these expectations requires an approach to innovation that combines a genuine understanding of production realities with a differentiated biological knowledge base, and holds products to rigorous field- level validation before they reach the market. This is precisely the approach that defines Lallemand Animal Nutrition’s aquaculture strategy.

Innovation at Lallemand starts on the farm, where daily conversations with producers reveal the challenges that tomorrow’s solutions must solve.

The Marine-Origin Advantage

The LMCC is home to more than 12,500 strains of marine microorgan- isms — bacteria, yeasts, and molds — sourced from a wide range of habitats, including shallow coastal ecosystems, deep-sea sediments, and polar waters. Built over decades of targeted sampling expeditions, the collection represents one of the most extensive repositories of marine microbial diversity assembled for biotechnological application.

What makes marine-origin strains particularly valuable for aquaculture is precisely what shaped them: extreme and fluctuating salinity, variable temperature regimes, limited oxygen availability, and intense competition within complex aquatic microbial communities. These evolutionary pressures have equipped marine microorganisms with metabolic profiles that may offer distinct functional benefits from those of terrestrial-origin strains — properties that may confer distinct performance advantages in the aquatic environments where farmed species live.

This does not mean that all of Lallemand’s aquaculture solutions originate from the LMCC. Some well-established strains are of terrestrial origin with documented performance records. Terrestrial-origin strains remain important for some applications, while marine-origin strains broaden the functional toolbox for aquatic environments. The LMCC essentially serves as a complementary, strategically differentiated screening source that broadens the range of functional candidates available for development and opens biological avenues that terrestrial-only libraries cannot.

Field-Led Innovation: Starting Where It Matters Most

Unlike technology-push models that develop solutions in search of problems, Lallemand’s innovation cycle is largely demand-driven. A global team of aquaculture specialists — with expertise in both fish and shrimp production systems — operates across Europe, Asia, and Latin America, maintaining continuous engagement with farms, hatcheries and processing facilities. These specialists function as trained observers who translate operational pain points into precise scientific questions that directly shape R&D priorities.

This field intelligence is reinforced by Lallemand’s active participation in major international aquaculture congresses and technical forums, where the company engages with emerging scientific developments and evolving market needs. The result is an innovation roadmap continuously recalibrated to what producers actually require such as better support for gut microbiome, mucosal integrity or again animal resilience under environmental or management-related stress, reliable water and soil-quality maintenance, and microbial solutions that integrate seamlessly into existing farm management protocols. Every R&D project within Lallemand’s aquaculture portfolio traces back to a challenge identified in the field.

With over 12,500 strains collected from the world’s most demanding marine environments, the LMCC is not just a laboratory asset — it is a living atlas of microbial potential, built to anticipate the solutions that aquaculture will need tomorrow.

Scientific Rigor at Every Stage

Identifying a promising microbial strain is just the beginning. Every candidate — whether sourced from the LMCC or from terrestrial origins — is subjected to a rigorous, multistage evaluation protocol before it can advance toward product development. Functional potential criteria are defined according to the intended application: supporting gut microbiota balance, immune response, organic matter degradation, ammonia management, competitive exclusion of undesirable bacteria, or other targeted functions.

Alongside functional performance, candidates are screened for safety: absence of transmissible antibiotic resistance genes, absence of virulence factors, and demonstrated stability under the physical and chemical stresses of industrial fermentation and formulation. Industrial suitability and scalability — including the ability to survive and maintain activity during large-scale production and downstream processing — is evaluated in parallel, ensuring that only candidates with genuine commercial potential proceed.

The Oban facility in Scotland serves as the operational hub of the LMCC and a key scientific platform for this screening work. Operating at biosafety level 2 (P2 certification), the laboratory is equipped with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for the identification and quantification of microbial metabolites, and a suite of bioassays configured for high throughput functional evaluation. The collection’s long-term integrity is maintained through rigorous preservation protocols: every strain is stored in triplicate using different preservation methods and physically separate locations, ensuring full traceability and resilience against loss.

Five Lallemand Centers of Excellence contribute specialized expertise spanning fundamental microbiology to applied nutrition science, supported by a global network of academic institutions, research centers, and specialist partners. This collaborative infrastructure accelerates discovery and provides independent scientific validation, while a dedicated internal R&D team translates findings into product development pathways.

In five years, Lallemand Animal Nutrition has conducted over 30 in vivo trials across multiple countries and species, ensuring that every product reaching the market has been validated under the conditions producers actually face.

Lallemand’s innovation cycle.

From Controlled Conditions to Farm Performance

Scientific performance in controlled laboratory settings is merely a prerequisite. Lallemand’s commitment to evidence-based innovation is measured by the scope and rigor of its in vivo validation program. Two fulltime scientists are dedicated exclusively to aquaculture trial management, overseeing field and controlled experiments designed to evaluate support for gut and immune function, performance outcomes, stress resilience, and water quality management across diverse production contexts. In the field, more than 30 trials have been conducted in the past five years alone, on both fish and shrimp in multiple countries across wide- ranging production environments and factors like water temperatures, salinity regimes, biosecurity contexts, and management intensities. This geographic and biological breadth is deliberate. Having experienced the complexity of good animal health maintenance and microbial management for more than 40 years, we know that development of sustainable and efficient solutions requires a deep understanding of microbes as well as farm specificities. Only when robust results are demonstrated across varied real-world environments does a solution earn its place in Lallemand’s market-ready portfolio.

Lalsea Biorem and the LMCC in Action

Lalsea Biorem, Lallemand’s non-veterinary bioremediation solution for aquaculture pond management, offers the most concrete illustration of how the LMCC’s biological depth translates into practical, producer- level outcomes. Its development required systematic screening of thousands of LMCC strains against a demanding, specifically defined set of functional criteria.

Selected strains had to demonstrate robust microbial activity across a salinity range of 0 to 50 ppt — covering both freshwater and hypersaline production environments — and perform reliably under aerobic, anaerobic, and microaerobic conditions typical of oxygen-variable pond ecosystems. Functional screening targeted strains with broad enzymatic capacity to support degradation of the organic matter that accumulates in pond sediments, alongside demonstrated ammonium assimilation capacity to contribute to water quality management and reduce algal bloom risk. Overall microbial dynamics – including activity involving opportunistic microorganisms – were also evaluated as part of the screening framework for water quality management.

Each shortlisted candidate was validated under simulated farming conditions before the final product formulation was established. The result is a non-veterinary microbial solution with demonstrated effectiveness in both shrimp and fish ponds across multiple continents — a direct expression of both the LMCC’s unique biological diversity and the rigor of Lallemand’s end-to-end innovation and validation process.

Anticipating Tomorrow’s Challenges

What distinguishes the LMCC from a passive biological archive is the active, forward-looking scientific strategy that governs its use. Lallemand’s research agenda includes proactive screening of the collection against challenges that aquaculture is anticipated to face over the next years and decades such as the impact of non-conventional ingredients, of a warming world, of the application of One-health approach on animal and aquatic health, performance and microbial communities. Emerging production contexts — including recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) and increasingly intensive pond management — also inform pre-emptive screening priorities. This anticipatory approach provides Lallemand with a structural advantage: when market needs crystallize around a new challenge, the company is ready. It draws on a collection that has been systematically characterized over decades, a scientific team already familiar with the most relevant candidates, and an industrial platform capable of scaling validated solutions in months rather than years. The LMCC is, therefore, not only a resource for today’s products — but also the strategic foundation of tomorrow’s innovation pipeline.

The ocean, long the source of life on Earth, is now becoming the source of solutions for aquaculture’s most pressing challenges — and Lallemand holds the key to that treasure.

An Innovation Ecosystem Built for the Long Term

From field insights to scientific design, from marine microbial libraries to proven farm-level products, Lallemand Animal Nutrition has built an innovation ecosystem that is both rigorous and responsive. The company’s aquaculture portfolio — addressing support for gut microbiome management, mucosal and immune function, stress resilience, hatchery performance, and water quality — reflects a consistent commitment to solutions that are scientifically validated, industrially reliable, and practically relevant.

The LMCC is one of several distinctive assets within this ecosystem, representing both the biological breadth needed to address today’s challenges and the scientific depth to anticipate tomorrow’s. Its value goes beyond the diversity of strains it contains to the decades of scientific expertise, cross-functional collaboration, and disciplined innovation process built around it. For aquaculture producers seeking solutions built on a transparent, rigorous scientific foundation, Lallemand’s integrated approach — from ocean collection to validated non-veterinary microbial products — represents a differentiated value proposition. One that is responsive to today’s production realities and designed to remain relevant as the industry evolve.

Discover how Lallemand’s innovation ecosystem — from the Marine Culture Collection to market-ready products — can support your aquaculture operation.
Visit: www.lallemandanimalnutrition.com

FAO Puts Seafood Consumers at the Centre —Why That Changes Everything

Edusehat — Wed, 27 May 2026 00:30:41 +0700

By Seafood Consumers Association

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the that could reshape the global seafood sector — if industry, regulators and consumers are paying attention. In its newly released Medium-Term Plan 2026–29 and Program of Work and Budget 2026–27, FAO identifies consumer awareness as one of four global “priority triggers” needed to transform agrifood systems. That might sound like bureaucratic language, but for seafood it represents a significant shift: consumers are no longer treated as passive end-users, but as active drivers of system-wide change.

For decades, seafood policy and market structures have been largely producer- and trader-centric. Consumers sat at the end end of the chain, expected to trust labels, menus and marketing with limited ability to verify what they were buying. FAO’s new framing challenges that model — and creates a clear mandate for reform in areas that seafood consumers have long raised: standardized naming, origin labelling, traceability and fraud prevention.

For organizations like the Seafood Consumers Association (SCA), this is not a theoretical development. It aligns squarely with the practical re- forms needed to restore trust, reward honest fishers and build a transparent, accountable seafood system. Importantly, it also presents Australia with an opportunity to lead.

Four Triggers for Transformation

FAO’s Director-General, Qu Dongyu, sets out four “priority triggers” designed to catalyze meaningful change across global agrifood systems:

Institutions and governance.
Consumer awareness.
Income and wealth distribution.
Innovative technologies and approaches.

FAO describes these as “effective starting points for transformative processes”. From a seafood consumer perspective, they also read like a checklist of the sector’s most persistent problems — and its biggest opportunities.

A quick meal of Oysters.

Consumers cannot reward well-managed fisheries or responsible aquaculture if the only information provided is “fish of the day” or a generic “battered fillet”. Environmental and health consciousness cannot be leveraged if labels and menus obscure rather than clarify.

1. Institutions and Governance: Making Transparency Non- Negotiable

FAO’s first trigger focuses on stronger, more transparent and accountable institutions. In seafood, that goes well beyond fisheries management plans and stock assessments. It cuts directly to the everyday consumer experience — and long-standing weaknesses in how seafood is governed at the point of sale.

Across retail and food service, consumers still encounter:

» Inconsistent or vague species names.

» Poor or absent country-of-origin information.

» Blurred distinctions between wild and farmed product.

» Limited visibility of production methods.

» Weak enforcement of existing naming and labelling rules.

These gaps make it easier for mislabeled, substituted or illegally sourced seafood to enter legitimate supply chains. They also place an unfair burden on consumers, who are effectively asked to “trust the system” without being given the information needed to verify claims.

From FAO’s perspective, governance is not credible unless it delivers transparency. For SCA, this reinforces a core message: standardized, enforceable seafood labelling is governance reform, not cosmetic tidying-up. When institutions require clear, consistent naming and origin disclosure, they move the system from “trust us” to “show us”.

2. Consumer Awareness: From Passive Eaters to Active Market Shapers

FAO’s second trigger — consumer awareness — speaks most directly to the seafood sector’s future. FAO explicitly recognizes that informed consumers can influence how food is produced, sourced and marketed.

In seafood, the appetite is already there. Consumers increasingly want to know:

» Is this fish legal?

» Where was it caught or farmed?

» Is it Australian or imported?

» Is it wild or farmed — and impact on shelf life?

Concern about seafood fraud, species substitution and IUU (Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated) fishing is no longer confined to specialists. It is part of mainstream consumer consciousness.

The problem is not awareness; it is information failure. Consumers cannot reward well-managed fisheries or responsible aquaculture if the only information provided is “fish of the day” or a generic “battered fillet”. Environmental and health consciousness cannot be leveraged if labels and menus obscure rather than clarify.

FAO’s message is clear: consumer awareness only works if consumers are given usable, trustworthy information. This is where SCA’s long- standing advocacy — for standard names, clear origin labelling and truth in wild-caught versus farmed claims — becomes a practical expression of FAO’s global strategy.

1. Income and Wealth Distribution: Fair Value for Honest Fishers

FAO’s third trigger addresses income and wealth distribution — an area often overlooked in seafood debates. Fraud, mislabeling and IUU fishing are sometimes framed as consumer deception issues alone. They are not.

These practices directly harm:

» Commercial fishers who comply with quotas, reporting requirements and safety rules.

» Processors and retailers who in- vest in compliance and traceability.

» Communities dependent on legitimate fisheries.

Illegally or misleadingly marketed seafood undercuts honest operators, distorts prices and creates the false impression that legally caught seafood is “too expensive”. Over time, this erodes trust and demand across the entire sector.

Transparent, standardized labelling is one of the simplest ways to rebalance value. When species, origin and production method are clear, it becomes harder for non-compliant product to hide behind generic descriptions. That supports fairer returns for those who play by the rules — a point FAO’s income distribution trigger makes explicit.

From SCA’s perspective, consumer transparency is not just about informed choice; it is about market fairness.

1. Innovative Technologies: Traceability Consumers Can Actually Use

FAO’s fourth trigger focuses on in- novation — but with an important condition: new technologies must be accessible and inclusive, not just efficient for large players.

Seafood is already rich in traceability innovation:

» Digital catch documentation.

» Electronic logbooks.

» Blockchain pilots.

» DNA testing and verification tools.

Yet much of this innovation remains invisible to consumers. Traceability systems often serve regulators, auditors and corporate buyers, while shoppers and diners still see minimal information at the point of decision.

If FAO’s trigger is taken seriously, the next step is obvious: bring trace- ability to the front of the label. That could include:

» QR codes linking to verified spe- cies, origin and production data.

» Simple, standardized icons for key attributes.

» Clear, consistent digital records accessible on request.

Crucially, these systems must work for small-scale and Indigenous fishers, not exclude them through cost or complexity. Designing traceability that is both robust and inclusive is one of the sector’s biggest challenges — and one FAO has squarely put on the table.

From FAO’s perspective, governance is not credible unless it delivers transparency. For SCA, this reinforces a core message: standardized, enforceable seafood labelling is governance reform, not cosmetic tidying-up. When institutions require clear, consistent naming and origin disclosure, they move the system from “trust us” to “show us”.

What This Means for Seafood — and for Australia

Taken together, FAO’s four triggers send a powerful message:

» Transparency is foundational, not optional.

» Consumers are legitimate drivers of change.

» Fair markets depend on eliminating fraud.

» Technology must serve accountability, not just efficiency.

For the Seafood Consumers Association, this global framing strengthens our work in three ways. It aligns consumer-focused reform with UN- endorsed priorities. It reinforces that information is a governance and fairness issue, not a marketing extra. And it opens the door to collaboration — across industry, government and the supply chain.

FAO’s plan will not, by itself, stop a single mislabeled fillet. But it changes the narrative. Consumers are no lon- ger an afterthought; they are a trigger for transformation.

The task now is to turn that recognition into practice — building seafood systems that are transparent enough to earn trust, fair enough to reward honesty, and resilient enough to serve future generations.

That is a future worth working towards.

* Seafood Consumers Association www.seafoodconsumers.global

Aquaculture UK Gears Up for Largest Ever Exhibition in Glasgow

Edusehat — Mon, 25 May 2026 08:55:26 +0700

By: Aquaculture UK

The UK’s leading aquaculture show is gearing up for a bigger than ever exhibition this year as it prepares to launch at its new home in Glasgow.

With more than 250 exhibitors from over 20 countries already signed up, Aquaculture UK, to be held from June 16-17 at the Scottish Event Campus (SEC), is expected to attract record crowds from across the country and around the world.

The biennial show’s move from its long-term base in Aviemore to Glasgow is proving to be popular with old and new exhibitors, providing more space and easier access, said Cheri Arvonio, event director at show organizer Diversified Communications.

“With three months to go still, the stage is set for an even more dynamic experience in what has become a highlight in the aquaculture sector’s calendar.”

“Our new base in Glasgow can offer better transport links, unlimited accommodation and legendary hospitality and our exhibitors are seizing the opportunity to reach new markets.”

“The whole team at Diversified is looking forward to a new-look show with all the familiar elements that have made Aquaculture UK such a success to date.”

The only event of its kind in the UK, the exhibition and conference bring together the entire aquaculture community to see first-hand the latest developments in the industry.

Joining national pavilions from Chile, Canada, and Denmark will be Norway, providing a platform for aquaculture pioneers such as Aquabyte, Tidal, Optoscale, Hoseth Technology, Aquapredict, OK Marine, Oceanbox, Sentec, Sensor-Globe, Lumic, Aqua-Service and Salsnes Filter.

Also new is the Ireland pavilion, featuring a broad cross-section of suppliers, including Nova Q, Seaquest, Killybegs Cluster, MMG, Celtic Sea Minerals, Ker Group, Mooney Boats, SNG, Aquamonitrix, and Impact9.

Among other first-time exhibitors, Aberdeen based Subsea Commercial Services will be showcasing its environmental DNA (eDNA) Automated Sampler, an autonomous system developed for marine and freshwater environments.

Salar Pursuits will offer updates on its Smoltscreen, a permeable lining for net pens that protects salmon against lice, jellyfish and algal blooms.

Underwater technology specialists Sonardyne will provide insights into the future of autonomous marine robotics and explore the potential for its tracking, navigation, command, control and communication systems in the aquaculture sector.

And marine engine suppliers Yamaha Motor Europe and Royston & Volvo Penta will be making their show debuts, as will Aquatic Now, Greenville, Golan Pipes Scandinavia, Seneye, Duguva, Akvapartner, and CRE & Hydro Group.

In the new Innovation Zone, Edinburgh Innovations will explore the most exciting ideas and technologies emerging from the University of Edinburgh, which produced MiAlgae, the start-up that makes fish-free omega 3 out of algae by repurposing whisky by-products.

The key suppliers that are the backbone of the sector will be out in force again, covering the spectrum of the supply chain, from feed to pharmaceuticals, and from biomass cameras to boats and barges.

Among the big names will be Inverlussa Marine Services, one of Scotland’s leading shipping companies; equipment suppliers Scale AQ, Gael Force Group, and Akva Group; pharmaceutical giants MSD Animal Health and Pharmaq; feed companies BioMar and Cargill; and the institute of Aquaculture, which has recently opened one of Europe’s most flexible and technically advanced research platforms for both RAS and flow-through systems.

As well as the exhibition, Aquaculture UK will host the Innovation Theatre, a launch pad for fledgling scientific and technical concepts and sector start-ups. And in the Keynote Theatre, a full conference program, to be announced soon, will examine the themes and challenges driving the aquaculture agenda.

The Aquaculture Awards, which celebrate the achievements of those working in the sector, will be presented at a gala dinner on Tuesday, June 16, at Glasgow’s Hilton Hotel.

Reflecting on two hectic days at the 2024 show, Lisa Glenday Murdoch of Aberdeen based Brimmond said: “Aquaculture UK is very much the right audience for us – all the people we would like to have a conversation with are here.”

NOTES

Aquaculture UK, which is free to attend, will be held at the SEC in Glasgow, Scotland, from June 16-17, 2026. Show opening times are: Tuesday June 16, 9.30am – 5pm; Wednesday June 17, 9.30am – 4pm.

For more information visit https://aquacultureuk.com/

GenoMar Strengthens Animal Welfare Through Partnership With FAI

Edusehat — Mon, 25 May 2026 08:55:22 +0700

By: GenoMar

GenoMar is strengthening its approach to animal welfare across all operations through a strategic partnership with FAI — a globally recognized organization with scientific expertise in animal welfare across multiple species and production systems.

A Science-Based Approach to Animal Welfare

FAI combines scientific knowledge with practical implementation experience across terrestrial and aquatic species. That expertise is now advancing welfare practices in tilapia production — an area where GenoMar is taking a leading role.

“FAI’s training and digital tools have been highly effective in implementing animal welfare standards across all our tilapia breeding and genetics operations. This drives stronger performance and more sustainable production,” says Marina Delphino, Fish Health & Quality Solutions Manager at GenoMar Genetics Group.

Training and Implementation: From Brazil to Asia

All GenoMar units in Brazil have completed training, building internal capacity around best practices in animal welfare. The next phase is already underway, expanding training and implementation across operations in Colombia and Asia — ensuring consistent standards across regions while respecting local realities.

Digital Tools Driving Continuous Improvement

The partnership also includes a digital tool for structured, continuous assessment of welfare indicators — helping teams identify opportunities for improvement and monitor progress over time. GenoMar’s participation is recognized on FAI’s public platform:

https://fai.academy/en/company-welfare-badges

**How GenoMar Monitors Animal Welfare**

Animal welfare is embedded into every stage of production at GenoMar. Using FAI’s assessment framework and digital tool, teams evaluate welfare conditions through practical, observable indicators across key areas such as:

Fish behavior — swimming patterns, responsiveness, signs of stress.
Physical condition — appearance, injuries, deformities, body condition.
Handling practices — grading, transfer, and crowding, conducted to minimize stress.
Environmental conditions — water quality and stocking densities.
Operational processes — consistency of routine management across teams and units.

Employees carry out these assessments through a standardized app that enables real-time data collection and scoring — letting GenoMar diagnose current conditions, track progress, and support data-driven decisions across all teams.

By embedding these practices into daily operations, GenoMar treats animal welfare as a continuous, measurable, and science-based process — aligned with its broader mission of responsible aquaculture and sustainable food production.

Advocates for Open Ocean Aquaculture Bring Facts, Food to Capitol Hill in Major MARA Act Fly-In

Edusehat — Mon, 25 May 2026 08:55:18 +0700

By Stronger America Through Seafood

As global demand for protein rises, advocates highlight need for federal legislation to expand domestic seafood production, drive jobs, and strengthen economies

Open ocean aquaculture advocates came to Washington, D.C., to highlight their solution for meeting the growing demand for sustainable protein. With U.S. wild-caught fisheries having reached their sustainable limit, seafood industry leaders made the case for a complementary approach to meeting rising consumer demand. Industry leaders joined coalition Stronger America Through Seafood (SATS) for a legislative fly-in and seafood reception on Capitol Hill on May 13, educating Members of Congress and staff on the need to establish a clear legislative pathway for open ocean aquaculture in U.S. federal waters and the benefits of expanding domestic production.

“If the U.S. wants to keep up with countries like China, Indonesia, and India who are actively prioritizing and expanding their aquaculture industries, federal legislation is needed to establish a clear, coordinated framework for responsible expansion,” said Drue Banta Winters, campaign manager of SATS. “Now is the time for Congress to act on growing more American-raised seafood in a way that helps build dockside infrastructure for wild-catch fishermen and creates new opportunities for Americans across the entire seafood supply chain.”

The bipartisan Marine Aquaculture Research for America (MARA) Act of 2025 (S.2586/H.R. 5746) would advance a science-based approach to the development of commercial-scale open ocean aquaculture farms in U.S. federal waters. Introduced in July 2025 by Senators Roger Wicker (R-MS) and Brian Schatz (D-HI) and Representatives Mike Ezell (R-MS-04), Ed Case (D-HI-01), Kat Cammack (R-FL-03), and Jimmy Panetta (D-CA-19), the bill would strengthen America’s seafood industry and help increase domestic seafood production for families across the country.

The U.S. continues to fall further behind global competitors, currently ranking 20th in seafood production. The country imports most of its seafood, with roughly half sourced from overseas aquaculture. Due to overlapping environmental reviews across multiple agencies and the lack of a clear permitting framework, the U.S. does not currently have a single operating commercial-scale finfish farm in federal waters.

The MARA Act builds on years of bipartisan effort and is supported by a coalition of environmentalists, seafood industry leaders, award-winning chefs, and academics who all agree that America needs a way to responsibly expand domestic seafood production.

“We have the strongest bipartisan momentum for federal legislation to expand open ocean aquaculture in years, reflecting growing agreement that the U.S. must do more to sustainably produce more of its own seafood,” said Winters.

Participants in the SATS fly-in and seafood reception included Cargill, Innovasea, Sysco, and Zeigler Bros. The companies highlighted the significant benefits open ocean aquaculture would bring to communities nationwide. Coastal states would benefit from increased investment in port infrastructure and stronger working waterfronts, with more seafood flowing through their ports. Inland states would see growing demand for American farmers producing key fish feed ingredients such as soybeans, corn, peas, wheat, and barley. Across the country, open ocean aquaculture would create new jobs and support the seafood supply chain, from hatcheries and farms to equipment manufacturing, feed production, processing, and restaurants.

The MARA Act would:

Establish an assessment program to evaluate commercial-scale demonstration projects.
Create a dedicated Office of Aquaculture within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service to coordinate federal permitting for a U.S. aquaculture program.
Set clear timelines and establish a consolidated environmental review process during the permitting approval process.

“We know there are numerous priorities in front of Congress right now, and open ocean aquaculture should be among them. Our members came to Washington to ensure Congress recognizes and acts on the bipartisan legislation that sits before it. This needs to move forward this year, for the sake of our ecosystems, our farmers, and families who rely on sustainable protein to meet their dietary needs,” concluded Winters.

Producer Connect Workshops in Asia Strengthen Readiness for ASC Farm and Feed Standards

Edusehat — Mon, 25 May 2026 08:55:14 +0700

By: Aquaculture Stewardship Council

Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) recently held two successful Producer Connect Workshops in Bangkok and Tokyo, with ASC experts supporting Asian producers and partners as they prepare for the transition to the new Farm Standard and Feed Standard.

Designed as practical, solutions-focused sessions, the workshops brought together producers, feed companies and supply chain partners to discuss and explore how ASC’s evolving requirements can be implemented effectively across Asia’s diverse aquaculture sector.

In Bangkok, more than 150 participants gathered for a full day of discussion, practical learning, and debate. In Tokyo, around 40 participants joined in person, with a further 100 participating online. Together, the workshops demonstrated the strong engagement and readiness of Asia’s aquaculture sector to help shape the future of ASC-certified production.

Delegates from 80 companies joined the Producer Connect Workshop in Bangkok, learning and sharing lessons about responsible seafood farming Turning standards into action ASC experts on environmental responsibility, animal welfare and feed production worked directly with producers to translate the standards’ requirements into practical next steps for farms and feed mills. Producers engaged directly with mock audit exercises, self-assessment tools, and case-based examples designed to support confident implementation on the ground.

The workshops also created an opportunity to discuss the practical challenges that producers in the region may face and to explore possible solutions with the ASC team during the transition period.

Koji Yamamoto, General Manager Japan & Producer Engagement Lead South-East Asia, said, “The energy and engagement we saw in Bangkok and Tokyo underline the critical role Asia’s producers will play in shaping the future of aquaculture. The workshops were about supporting producers and transforming standards into practical tools, and practical tools into real impact on farms and in feed mills. What stood out most was the openness to learn, to question, and to improve together. That is what meaningful progress in aquaculture looks like.

“There was a strong sense of shared direction. Producers and partners are not only adapting to new requirements—they are actively shaping how responsible aquaculture will evolve in the years ahead.”

Following excellent participant feedback, the Producer Outreach team is already planning the next Producer Connect workshop in Vietnam this September, further supporting the region’s transition toward the ASC Farm and Feed Standards.

Empowering Small-Scale Seafood Producers

During the Bangkok workshop, ASC also celebrated the successful completion of the AIP2ASC project, which helps farms progress toward responsible aquaculture and certification standards. In Indonesia, UD AGEL Kencana worked with JALA and Yayasan Sinergi Akuakultur Indonesia (YSAI), while in Thailand, Sa-nga Farm 2 partnered with Okeanos Food Company Limited and Thai Union Group. With support from the Improver Program by ASC, both farms successfully advanced to ASC certification.

Another key highlight was the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) between ASC, Laylanta Seafood Co. Ltd., and Bangkok Marriott Marquis Queen’s Park to support small-scale seafood producers and promote responsible seafood production.

The partnership aims to improve barramundi cage culture in Songkhla Lake, Thailand, through the AIP2ASC framework under the Improver Program by ASC. The project began in the first quarter of 2026 and will run for three years, with the goal of achieving ASC certification and expanding responsible aquaculture practices across the wider area.

Learning Beyond the Room

The workshops extended beyond the conference setting for ASC team members through carefully selected site visits that brought the standards to life.

In Thailand, the team visited the Ranot feed mill, an ASC-certified facility operated by Thai Union, where social and environmental requirements are embedded into daily production. The team also visited Laylanta farm sites in Thailand, which are currently engaged in the Improver Program by ASC.

ASC Team Visits a Farm in Thailand

In Japan, visits to an ASC-certified coho salmon farm operated by Marukin and a certified feed mill, Nosan, in Miyagi prefecture offered a closer look at how responsible aquaculture is being implemented in diverse contexts.

ASC team members visiting Marukin Farm to engage with the producer and better understand the realities and challenges of responsible aquaculture

As ASC continues rolling out the Farm Standard and Feed Standard globally, the Producer Connect Workshops in Thailand and Japan highlighted the vital role Asia’s aquaculture sector will play in driving progress across the industry. By bringing together producers, feed companies and partners for practical learning, open discussion and shared problem-solving, ASC is helping build the knowledge, confidence and collaboration needed to support long-term improvement across the region. With further workshops and producer engagement activities planned across Asia, ASC remains committed to supporting the sector through every stage of the transition.

About the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC)

Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), an independent non-profit organization, is driving the improvement of environmental and social practices in seafood farming through its leading, third-party assured certification program.

ASC certification delivers measurable impact in aquaculture through science-based requirements—developed and revised through multi-stakeholder processes—covering biodiversity, animal welfare, greenhouse gas emissions, feed ingredient sourcing and human rights, all independently verified.

The ASC sustainability label on products provides proof that the seafood originates from farms certified to the robust ASC environmental and social standard, enabling credible substantiation of sourcing claims and making it the most globally recognized and trusted label for farmed seafood.

ASC is setting the standard for farmed seafood. www.asc-aqua.org

Bakkafrost Scotland Officially Opens Its Multi-Million-Pound Applecross Facility

Edusehat — Mon, 25 May 2026 08:55:10 +0700

The state-of the art development in Wester Ross is now the United Kingdom’s largest freshwater RAS

The Princess Royal of the United Kingdom (UK) has officially opened Bakkafrost Scotland’s multi-million-pound Applecross facility, marking a major step forward in sustainable Scottish salmon production. The state-of the art development in Wester Ross is the UK’s largest freshwater recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) and is central to the company’s ambition to become the most sustainable Scottish salmon producer.

The facility plays a pivotal role in Bakkafrost Scotland’s ‘one summer at sea’ production strategy, which allows salmon to spend longer growing in ideal controlled freshwater conditions before transferring to sea as larger, stronger smolt. According to the company, the approach is a gamechanger for salmon farming in Scotland, significantly reducing the time fish spend at sea and therefore reducing exposure to the natural challenges.

Ian Laister, managing director of Bakkafrost Scotland, said at the opening: “Applecross represents a significant long-term investment in the future of sustainable salmon farming in Scotland. It reflects our determination to become the most sustainable Scottish salmon producer, it demonstrates how innovation, animal welfare, engineering, renewable energy, and skilled local employment can come together in modern food production.”

Operating 24 hours a day, the Applecross site supports around 40 skilled permanent roles, including biology, veterinary, engineering, energy and technical operations. Employees worked closely with local and international specialists to design, build, and now operate the facility, developing new skills in RAS management, renewable energy integration, and advanced fish health monitoring.

Precise Control

During construction, Bakkafrost Scotland worked extensively with local and regional suppliers, contractors and haulers, supporting jobs across the Highlands and Islands and embedding local knowledge into the project. The company said collaboration with Scottish engineering, civil construction, and energy firms was critical to delivering the complex build in a remote rural location.

Using RAS technology, the Applecross facility provides precise control of water quality, temperature, and flow, enabling improved husbandry, enhanced smolt health screening, and more effective vaccination, supporting higher fish welfare standards. The site uses significantly less water than traditional hatcheries, with water continuously recirculated through filtration, oxygenation, disinfection, and natural biofilter systems.

It also includes a multi-million pounds waste to fertilizer conversion system, using UK first pyrolysis technology to transform sludge removed from the RAS process into biochar. This will be the first globally for use in aquaculture. The carbon-rich product can be used locally to improve soil quality for forestry, supporting more circular food systems and significantly reducing waste. The facility is powered directly by renewable energy, including on-site solar and hydro generation.

The Potential to Be a Real Gamechanger

As part of the Applecross development a 26 kilometers private wire was installed across the Beallach na Bà to connect the site directly to renewable hydro power. At the same time Bakkafrost Scotland invested in local road improvements, enhancing safety and accessibility with new passing places and signs, delivering lasting infrastructure benefits for the wider community.

“The ‘one summer at sea’ model has the potential to be a real gamechanger for the sector, improving survival, reducing biological challenges and making better use of natural resources. We were honored to welcome Her Royal Highness The Princess Royal and proud to showcase the people, technology, and community partnerships behind this facility,” commented Laister during the event.

The Princess Royal was welcomed to Applecross by Managing Director Laister, before meeting employees from across the business, including biology, veterinary, engineering, and marine operations teams. She also met representatives from The Applecross Trust before unveiling a plaque to mark the official opening. She also learned how advanced technology is helping improve fish welfare, reduce environmental impact and support high-skilled rural jobs.

Minnesota and Texas Host National Aquaculture Leadership Academy

Edusehat — Mon, 25 May 2026 08:55:05 +0700

The academy is expected to train at least 60 aquaculture extension professionals from Sea Grant programs, Land Grant universities, and federal agencies

Minnesota Sea Grant and Texas Sea Grant programs announced they will co-host the Aquaculture Leadership Academy in 2026 and 2027 and bring together aquaculture extension professionals from across the United States (US) for separate weeklong training sessions in each state focused on freshwater and marine aquaculture systems. Support for the academy comes from a USD 350,000 award administered by the Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant.

Sea Grant’s Aquaculture Leadership Academy is designed to strengthen the national aquaculture workforce by helping early- and mid-career extension professionals build technical knowledge, leadership skills, and professional networks. Participants will engage directly with fish farmers, hatchery managers, seafood businesses, researchers, educators, and policy experts in both the Great Lakes and Gulf Coast regions.

“Minnesota may not be the first-place people think of when they hear the word aquaculture, but we have a growing and innovative industry that includes baitfish production, hatcheries, recirculating systems, aquaponics, and seafood businesses,” said Julia Grenn, Minnesota Sea Grant project lead and fisheries and aquaculture extension educator.

“This partnership with Texas Sea Grant allows participants to experience the diversity of aquaculture across the country while building relationships that will strengthen the industry nationwide,” she said.

Freshwater Aquaculture Systems

Programming in Minnesota will focus on freshwater aquaculture systems common in the Great Lakes region, including recirculating aquaculture systems, aquaponics, baitfish production, hatcheries, and seafood distribution. Participants will tour the Minnesota Sea Grant Aquaculture Lab at the University of Minnesota St. Paul campus, visit commercial aquaculture operations, learn about seafood processing and marketing, and take part in activities focused on extension education, communication, and leadership development.

Minnesota sessions will include tours and discussions with businesses and organizations including Minnesota Department of Natural Resources hatchery staff, commercial baitfish and aquaculture producers, seafood distributors, and University of Minnesota researchers. Participants also will receive training in media communication, graphic design, conflict resolution, aquaculture policy, and business development.

Saltwater Aquaculture

On the other hand, Texas Sea Grant will lead Gulf Coast programming focused on saltwater aquaculture, including oyster, shrimp, finfish, and seaweed production. Participants will tour hatcheries, seafood processing facilities, oyster farms, and marine research centers while learning about coastal aquaculture systems and seafood markets.

“Aquaculture’s future depends not only on what we grow in the water, but on the leaders we grow through collaboration, education, and shared experience across every region of the country,” said Texas Sea Grant Extension Director Chris Hale. “The Aquaculture Leadership Academy is building more than industry knowledge; it is building the relationships, leadership, and innovation needed to strengthen aquaculture communities across America. We are excited to welcome Extension professionals to Texas and Minnesota, yet even more so, we look forward to the impact these professionals will make after applying their knowledge and skills locally.”

Collaborative Strength

The project reflects the collaborative strength of the National Sea Grant network, which connects university-based programs across coastal and Great Lakes states to support research, education, and community engagement related to water resources and coastal economies. By combining the expertise of Great Lakes and Gulf Coast Sea Grant programs, the academy will expose participants to aquaculture systems and challenges that vary widely by region.

“This program demonstrates how Sea Grant programs work together across regions to solve problems and support emerging industries,” said Amy Schrank, Minnesota Sea Grant associate director, extension program leader and co-project lead. “Participants will leave with practical skills, new professional connections, and a broader understanding of how aquaculture supports communities and economies throughout the country.”

The academy is expected to train at least 60 aquaculture extension professionals from Sea Grant programs, Land Grant universities, and federal agencies. The long-term goal is to build a stronger national support network for aquaculture producers and coastal communities.

Minnesota Sea Grant has played a growing role in advancing aquaculture education and outreach in Minnesota and the Great Lakes region. Current efforts include leading the Great Lakes Aquaculture Collaborative, operating the Minnesota Sea Grant Aquaculture Lab in St. Paul, supporting aquaculture workforce development, conducting fish health and business training workshops, and developing resources like the FreshFishFinder.org website that connect consumers with regional seafood producers.

How Transportation Networks Help Keep Aquaculture Businesses Running

Edusehat — Fri, 22 May 2026 01:45:08 +0700

Aquaculture has become one of the fastest-growing sectors in global food production. From fish farms and shellfish operations to aquatic plant cultivation, aquaculture businesses play a major role in supplying seafood to restaurants, grocery stores, and consumers around the world.

While farming methods and sustainability often receive the most attention, transportation networks are just as important to the success of the industry. Without reliable logistics systems, aquaculture businesses would struggle to move equipment, supplies, harvested seafood, and maintenance materials efficiently between locations.

Strong transportation infrastructure helps these businesses maintain production schedules, protect product quality, and meet increasing consumer demand in competitive markets.

Moving Fresh Seafood Quickly

Fresh seafood needs to reach markets within strict timeframes to maintain quality and safety standards. Fish, oysters, shrimp, and other products often travel through several stages before reaching consumers, making efficient logistics essential throughout the process.

Transportation providers help maintain freshness by using refrigerated vehicles, coordinated shipping schedules, and carefully planned delivery routes. Temperature-controlled logistics systems are especially important because even small disruptions during transport can affect product quality.

Reliable transportation not only reduces waste but also helps aquaculture businesses maintain customer trust and deliver consistent products to retailers and restaurants.

Supporting Remote Aquaculture Operations

Many aquaculture farms are located in coastal or rural areas where infrastructure may be more limited. These remote locations often depend heavily on transportation services to stay connected with suppliers, distributors, and processing facilities.

Regular deliveries are essential for keeping operations running smoothly. Farms need consistent access to feed, water filtration supplies, nets, cages, fuel, and maintenance equipment. Delays in receiving these materials can affect production schedules and create operational challenges. Transportation networks allow remote aquaculture businesses to remain competitive despite geographic limitations.

Transporting Specialized Equipment

Modern aquaculture operations use a wide range of specialized equipment to maintain water quality, feeding systems, harvesting operations, and environmental monitoring.

Some of this equipment can be expensive, fragile, or difficult to transport, requiring careful logistical coordination. Pumps, filtration systems, storage tanks, and harvesting machinery may all need to be moved between facilities or delivered to remote farming sites.

Commercial transportation providers help businesses manage these logistical demands efficiently. Even industries outside seafood production contribute to broader transportation capacity, with services such as Sacramento car transporters supporting commercial logistics systems across multiple sectors.

Maintaining Cold Chain Integrity

Cold chain logistics are one of the most important parts of seafood transportation. Because seafood products spoil quickly when temperatures are not properly controlled, transportation companies play a major role in maintaining quality throughout delivery routes. Proper refrigerated transport systems help businesses meet food safety standards while reducing product loss and protecting brand reputation. Consistent temperature management also extends shelf life, allowing seafood to reach wider markets without sacrificing quality.

Helping Businesses Reach Larger Markets

Reliable transportation networks allow aquaculture businesses to expand beyond local markets and supply seafood to regional, national, and international customers. Without efficient logistics systems, many farms would struggle to compete on a larger scale. Transportation infrastructure supports export operations, wholesale distribution, restaurant supply chains, and grocery deliveries, helping businesses reach more consumers while growing their operations. Access to broader markets also increases seafood availability for consumers and helps support the continued growth of the aquaculture industry.

Final Thoughts

Transportation networks are essential to the success of modern aquaculture businesses. From moving equipment and supplies to delivering fresh seafood safely and efficiently, logistics systems support nearly every part of the industry.

Reliable transportation helps aquaculture companies maintain product quality, reduce delays, expand into larger markets, and improve operational efficiency. As global seafood demand continues to grow, strong transportation infrastructure will remain one of the key factors keeping aquaculture businesses productive, competitive, and connected to consumers around the world.

The post How Transportation Networks Help Keep Aquaculture Businesses Running first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

Video

Edusehat — Thu, 21 May 2026 22:10:06 +0700

INCAR² Brings the World’s Leading Marine Epigenetics Meeting to Chile

Edusehat — Thu, 21 May 2026 18:35:03 +0700

By: The INCAR² Center

The INCAR² Center will host the Fourth International Symposium on Epigenetics in Marine and Aquatic Research (EPIMAR 2027), to be held in Puerto Varas, Chile, from May 25 to 28, 2027.

Puerto Varas, in the heart of Chilean Patagonia, will serve as the meeting point for researchers from around the world at EPIMAR 2027, an event that aims to become a global platform for advancing epigenetics and epigenomics in marine and aquatic systems.

Organized by the Interdisciplinary Center for Aquaculture Research – Applied Research (CIA-INCAR²), this symposium is the fourth edition of an international initiative that began in 2020 in Montpellier, France. Previous editions were held in Woods Hole, United States (2022), and Barcelona, Spain (2025). Now, Chile takes on the challenge of hosting this important international scientific event.

EPIMAR 2027 will bring together a global community of scientists interested in the epigenetic and epigenomic mechanisms that influence the biology, adaptation, health, and evolution of marine organisms. The symposium will include oral presentations and poster sessions addressing topics such as “Epigenetic responses to pollution and climate change,” “Environmental memory, adaptation, and inheritance,” “Integrating multi-omic data in marine systems,” “Emerging tools in marine epigenomics,” and “Epigenetics applied to aquatic resource management.”

The natural setting of Puerto Varas will provide an ideal environment for exchanging ideas, building collaborations, and discussing emerging challenges in marine epigenomics, particularly in the context of climate change, environmental stressors, and the sustainable use of aquatic resources.

The organizing committee comprises INCAR² Principal Investigator Dr. Valentina Valenzuela Muñoz; INCAR² Director Dr. Cristian Gallardo Escárate; and Associate Researcher Dr. Diego Valenzuela Miranda.

The Scientific Committee for EPIMAR 2027 is composed of an outstanding group of internationally recognized experts in marine sciences, epigenetics, and related fields. Members include Céline Cosseau (University of Perpignan, France); Enrico D’Aniello (Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Italy); Noelia Díaz (ICM-CSIC, Spain); José María Eirin-López (Florida International University, USA); Cristian Gallardo (INCAR² and University of Concepción, Chile); Laia Navarro-Martín (IDAEA-CSIC, Spain); Francesc Piferrer (ICM-CSIC, Spain); Holie Putnam (University of Rhode Island, USA); Guillaume Rivière (University of Caen-Normandy, France); Steven Roberts (University of Washington, USA); Josep Rotllant (IIM-CSIC, Spain); Valentina Valenzuela (INCAR², UdeC, Chile) Diego Valenzuela (INCAR², UdeC, Chile); and Jérémie Vidal-Dupiol (IFREMER, France). Together, they bring extensive expertise and leadership to guide the scientific vision of the symposium.

The organizers invite researchers from universities, research centers, and industry who are interested in the epigenomics of marine organisms to actively participate in this symposium and contribute to the development of this rapidly expanding field.

For more information, visit the official EPIMAR 2027 website.

www.centroincar.cl/epimar2027

Pivotal Roles of Fish Nutrition and Feeding: Recent Advances and Future Outlook for Brazilian Fish Farming

Edusehat — Tue, 19 May 2026 08:55:06 +0700

By Aquaculture Magazine Editorial Team

As global aquaculture shifts toward ecological responsibility, Brazil’s nutritional strategies are evolving to reduce reliance on traditional fishmeal through the use of microalgae and plant-derived compounds. This articleexaminesrecentresearchonmacroalgaeandbioactivepeptides as pillars of a resilient production system. By prioritizing gut health and immune modulation, these advancements offer a sustainable framework for optimizing fish welfare and long-term environmental health.

Fish farming plays a central role in global aquaculture by generating employment, supporting economic growth, and enhancing food security.

As the sector expands, advances in aquafeed technology and the use of feed additives have become essential to improving fish growth, health and production efficiency.

Feed additives such as vitamins, minerals and amino acids ensure that diets meet the nutritional requirements of farmed fish, while growth promoters enhance performance and feed conversion. Functional additives including probiotics, prebiotics, phytobiotics and algae-based compounds. Strengthen the immune system, increase resistance to diseases, and improve survival rates. Some additives also reduce stress and enhance overall welfare, contributing to more stable production systems.

Enzymes play a role in improving digestion and nutrient absorption, reducing feed waste and increasing efficiency. Similarly, microalgae are promising alternatives to traditional fishmeal and fish oil, as they provide essential fatty acids, proteins, and bioactive compounds that support growth, immunity, and product quality.

Plant-derived compound, such as essential oils and herbal extracts, are increasingly used as natural alternatives to synthetic chemicals. These compounds improve growth, immune response, and disease resistance while promoting a healthier production environment.

Probiotics and prebiotics further enhance gut health and microbiota balance, leading to better nutrient utilization and increase resistance to pathogens. Their use has shown positive effects on survival, intestinal health, and immune responses in several fish species.

Overall, the development of functional and sustainable feeds is crucial for the future of aquaculture. Current research focuses on replacing conventional ingredients with natural and environmentally friendly alternatives, improving efficiency while reducing ecological impact. These innovations are particularly important in rapidly growing regions such as Brazil but are applicable to aquaculture systems worldwide.

Feed additives such as probiotics and phytobiotics are essential for modern aquaculture, strengthening the fish immune system and increasing resistance to pathogens. These functional compounds improve gut health and microbiota balance, leading to superior survival rates and more stable production environments.

Pivotal Roles of Feed in Fish Farming

Feed additives are essential components in aquaculture, used to improve feed quality, enhance fish health, and optimize production performance (Figure 1). These additives are classified according to their functions and mechanisms of action, playing a key role in sustainable and efficient fish farming.

Improved digestibility and nutrient absorption

Feed additives such as digestive enzymes significantly enhance nutrient utilization by breaking down complex compounds like proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates. Enzymes including proteases, lipases, and carbohydrates improve digestion and compensate for limited endogenous enzyme production, particularly in juvenile fish. This leads to better feed efficiency, growth performance, and reduced waste.

For example, enzyme supplementation is species such as pirarucu improved growth and nutrient digestibility, while phytase enhances the utilization of plant-based ingredients. Similarly, protein hydrolysates from poultry liver and sardines have been shown to improve nutritional efficiency and productivity in various fish species.

Overall, improving digestibility results in optimized growth, lower feed costs, and reduced environmental impact, contributing to more sustainable aquaculture systems.

Increased immunity and health

Functional feed additives play a crucial role in enhancing fish immunity and overall health. Probiotics, such as Lactobacillus and Bacillus species, improve gut microbiota balance, nutrient absorption, and disease resistance by inhibiting pathogenic microorganisms and stimulating immune responses. Prebiotics further support beneficial bacteria, creating a favorable intestinal environment.

Immunomodulators, including essential fatty acids (EPA, DHA, and ARA), nucleotides. and plant extracts, regulate immune cell activity and improve resistance to infections. Organic acids contribute to pathogen control and improved digestion, while antioxidants such as vitamins A,D, and E, along with minerals like zinc and selenium, reduce oxidative stress andstrengthen immune function.

Bioactive peptides also enhance immune responses by activating immune cells and providing antimicrobial effects. Additionally, improve digestion through enzyme supplementation indirectly supports immune health by reducing physiological stress.

In summary, feed additives are fundamental to modern aquaculture, improving both nutritional efficiency and fish health. By enhancing digestion, boosting immunity and reducing environmental impact, they support more productive, resilient, and sustainable fish farming systems (Figure 1).

Macroalgae species, including Ulva and Gracilaria, are emerging as potent biotechnological tools due to their immunostimulant and growth-promoting properties. They serve as natural sources of carotenoids and essential amino acids, enhancing fillet quality and antioxidant responses in species like Nile tilapia.

NutritionalApproachesin Brazilian Marine Fish Farming

Nutritional strategies in Brazilian marine aquaculture have evolved to improve fish growth, health, and sustainability, particularly for economically important species such as mullet, snook, and sardines. Research shows that not all dietary additives are beneficial. For instance, guar gum and citrus pectin at higher inclusion levels negatively affected growth performance, nutrient composition, and feed intake in juvenile mullet, while also altering liver metabolism without improving communities. In contrast, citral supplementation enhanced growth, digestive enzyme activity, antioxidant responses, and survival in mullet and sardines, although it was not recommended for common snook.

Probiotics such as Bacillus subtilis demonstrated immunostimulant effects in snook, though without significant growth improvements. Organic salts, particularly sodium acetate, improved growth performance and reduced bacterial loads in fat snook, highlighting their potential as functional additives. Similarly, ascorbic acid supplementation improved reproductive parameters like sperm quality, even when growth was unaffected. Exogenous enzymes also showed promise by mitigating soybean mealinduced intestinal issues and enhancing nutrient utilization.

Marine ornamental fish production presents additional challenges due to reliance on wild capture, raising sustainability concerns such as overfishing and habitat damage, and specialized dietary requirements. Experimental diets and additives play a key role in addressing these issues. Thyroid hormones have been shown to accelerate metamorphosis, improve survival, and enhance development in species like clownfish and barber goby, although excessive doses can cause deformities.

Probiotics and enriched live feeds improved growth and survival in seahorses, especially when combined with microalgae or copepods. Carotenoids such as astaxanthin significantly enhanced pigmentation and immune function, with natural sources proving more effective than synthetic ones. Exogenous enzymes like pancreatin improved digestion, intestinal development, and growth performance in both seahorses and clownfish larvae. Organic acids contributed to better intestinal morphology and nutrient absorption, although their long-term effects require further study.

Microalgae emerged as a critical nutritional component, improving survival, growth, and fatty acid composition in larvae, while also serving as a sustainable alternative to traditional feed ingredients. Additionally, micronutrients such as iodine were essential for preventing physiological disorders like goiter in certain species.

Overall, advances in nutritional strategies, including functional additives and alternative feed sources, are essential for improving aquaculture productivity and sustainability while reducing dependance on wild populations.

Recent Advances for Feeding in Brazilian Fish Farming

In recent years, macroalgae have gained attention as a functional feeding strategy in aquaculture due to their nutritional, immunostimulant, antiviral, antibacterial, and growth-promoting properties. Studies on species such as Ulva ohnoi, Sargassum filipendula, Undaria pinnatifida, Chaetomorpha clavate, and Kappaphycus alvarezii have demonstrated positive effects on the growth and immunity of Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei), suggesting similar potential benefits for fish. However, research on macroalgae use in fish diets remains limited in Brazil.

Costa and Miranda-Filho (2020) highlighted the importance of marine macroalgae as sources of carotenoids, which influence not only coloration but also growth, reproduction, and overall health in aquatic species. Experimental studies with fish show promising but nuanced results. For instance, Pontes et al. (2020) found that including 10% Ulva fasciate meal in juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diets did not affect gastrointestinal transit, indicating it is a safe inclusion level. Similarly, Costa et al. (2013) reported improved feed conversion and carcass yield in tilapia when diets included 20 g Kg-1 of Ascophyllum nodosum.

In contrast, Mendonca et al. (2019) observed that while Gracilaria domingensis enhanced immune responses in juvenile mullet (Mugil liza) growth was negatively affected at inclusion levels above 10%. A 5% inclusion level was identified as optimal, improving immune competence without compromising growth. Fish fed macroalgae also showed increased levels of immune-related antibodies.

Macroalgae also influence physiological and biochemical parameters. Cian et al. (2019) found that Pyropia columbina improved antioxidant responses in juvenile pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus), reducing oxidative stress markets without affecting growth. Meanwhile, Ulva fasciata supplementation in Seriola dordalis did not alter growth but improve fillet quality by increasing DHA and reducing linoleic acid content, along with changes in hematological parameters at higher inclusion levels.

Additionally, Ulva species may serve as natural sources of tryptophan phenylalanine, potentially reducing stress in fish farming systems (Calheiros et al., 2019). Overall, macroalgae show strong biotechnological potential as feed additives, enhancing fish health, immunity, and product quality, although further research is needed in Brazil.

Future outlook for nutrition and feeding in Brazilian fish farming

The future outlook for nutrition and feeding in Brazilian fish farming looks very promising. With the ongoing expansion of the Brazilian fish farming industry, there is anticipated to be a notable rise in research efforts and the introduction of new products to the market. The fish farming sector in Brazil is experiencing rapid growth, with investments being made in water resource management technologies and the development of specific diets for native species, which will help ensure the sector’s sustainability.

These prospects indicate a dynamic future with significant growth opportunities for fish farming in Brazil. Recent highlights of the Brazilian evolution in the search for sustainable alternatives for the aquafeed industry include feed additives such as citral, β-glucan-enriched complex, Ocimum basilicum essential oil, Bacillus spp and organic benzoic acid, propionic acid, Curcuma longa hydrolate and Lactobacillus plantarum, Inulin, Lippia sidoides essential oil, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus.

Despite the advancements in Brazilian research reported in this study, it is crucial to incorporate these advancements into the aquafeed industry to enhance the growth and sustainability of the sector. Quality ingredients are necessary for formulating fish diets, even though they can be costly. Proper selection of feed ingredients and additives is vital for the health and growth of fish. Nutrition for native species remains a challenge in the Brazilian aquaculture industry. Government support and targeted public policies for the fish feed sector could drive development and innovation. These challenges present obstacles, but also opportunities for innovation and expansion in the Brazilian fish feed industry.

This is a summarized version developed by the editorial team of Aquaculture Magazine based on the review article titled “PIVOTAL ROLES OF FISH NUTRITION AND FEEDING: RECENT ADVANCES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR BRAZILIAN FISH FARMING” developed by:. Aline Brum, Caio Magnotti, Mônica Yumi Tsuzuki, Elen Monique de Oliveira Sousa, José Luiz Pedreira Mouriño, Maurício Laterça Martins. Rafael Garcia Lopes, Roberto Bianchini Derner and Marco Shizuo Owatari ─ Federal University of Santa Catarina. The original article was published on JANUARY, 2025, through FISHES. The full version, including tables and figures, can be accessed online through this link: https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10020047

Nutreco Expands Its Smart Shrimp Ecosystem

Edusehat — Tue, 19 May 2026 05:20:23 +0700

• Eruvaka’s expansion now spans 12 countries while their tools ensure USD 1.25 billion in harvest value

• The platform’s technology includes AI-based sonic feeding, automatic feeders, and water quality monitoring

The international company Nutreco has announced a major expansion of its smart aquaculture ecosystem. Its subsidiary, Eruvaka, that currently operates in 12 countries, helping aquaculture producers adopt smart solutions to increase productivity and reduce risk at commercial scale, and is still growing. The impact of their technological integration originated an enormous production volume in 2025: with approximately 370,000 metric tons of shrimp, with a market value of USD 1.25 billion, were farmed using the platform.

“Shrimp farming has become an AI- and data-driven business, and there is no room for error. Technology alone does not solve volatility. The real impact comes from integrating smart feeding systems with biological expertise, grower experience, feed formulation, and robust local advisory support. That ecosystem enables farmers to make faster, more informed decisions in challenging market conditions,” said Kunal Choudhary, CEO of Eruvaka.

Since Nutreco completed the acquisition of full ownership in 2023, Eruvaka has evolved from a technology provider into a globally integrated platform. It currently supports approximately 20,000 annual harvests, with more than 45,000 hectares of shrimp ponds managed through connected systems and over 60,000 smart feeding devices in operation.

Biomass Increases of Between 40% and 60%

According to them, while persistent price volatility continues to challenge shrimp producers worldwide, the platform represents one of the largest installed bases of smart feeding systems in the industry, reflecting a shift toward precision by producers seeking consistency in an unpredictable market.

In a landscape where pressure on margins is forcing many operations to reevaluate their models, Nutreco’s integrated approach has become a safeguard for profitability. In select markets, producers using the system have achieved biomass increases of between 40% and 60%. Coupled with improved feed efficiency, these operations have seen an increase in farm profits of between 20% and 40%.

It seems that also the environmental benefits are significant. Field studies demonstrated reductions in the carbon footprint of between 10% and 30% through optimized feeding practices. By combining real-time pond data with precise delivery, the system promotes stable conditions and greater farm reliability — factors critical to shrimp survival rates.

Strategic Importance of the Integration

Unlike standalone digital tools, Eruvaka’s technology — which includes AI-based sonic feeding, automatic feeders, and water quality monitoring — is integrated within the broader nutritional framework of Skretting (a Nutreco company). This allows the group to move beyond the simple deployment of equipment toward proactive farm optimization.

“For Skretting, the integration of Eruvaka demonstrates how we are evolving as a business. By bringing together digital innovation, nutrition expertise, producer experience, and local advisory support, we empower farmers with better knowledge, create a measurable impact on performance and sustainability, and help maintain resilient aquaculture systems in the long term,” commented Maarten Bijl, CEO of Skretting.

Proactive Farm Optimization

Eruvaka was founded in 2012 by Indian entrepreneur Sreeram Raavi. The company’s products allow farmers to actively monitor pond parameters and remotely control automated equipment. This significantly reduces farming risk and increases feed efficiency, shrimp growth and farm profitability.

Nutreco first partnered with Eruvaka in 2018, and this continued expansion reinforced its long-term commitment to the ‘feed-to-farm’ value chain. “By combining AI innovation with nutritional science, Nutreco is enabling a global shift from reactive support toward proactive farm optimization, strengthening the resilience of the global shrimp supply,” they say.

Since then, Nutreco‘s aquaculture division Skretting is working directly with Eruvaka to implement the latest in precision farming technology, firstly in Latin America and then in Asia.

New Country, Growing Impact: First ASC-Certified Feed Mills in Venezuela

Edusehat — Tue, 19 May 2026 05:20:17 +0700

By Aquaculture Stewardship Council

Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) continues to see building global momentum for its Feed Certification Program, with the first two ASC-certified feed mills in Venezuela.

Agropecuaria Nivar became the country’s first ASC-certified feed mill, quickly followed by Proparca who achieved certification soon after – both producing shrimp feed. This milestone signals growing demand for more sustainable aquafeed in the region, with Venezuelan feed mills now certified to supply ASC-conforming feed and marking further progress for Latin America, a key hub in the global shrimp supply chain.

More than 130 feed mills are now in the ASC Feed Program worldwide. With ASC-certified farms required to use ASC-conforming feed, expanding supply is critical to enabling the continued growth of responsible aquaculture.

Marcos Moya, Outreach Lead at ASC, said, “We congratulate both Agropecuaria Nivar and Proporca for achieving ASC Feed Certification. By choosing the most robust and transparent certification in aquafeed manufacturing, they demonstrate their commitment to environmental and social responsibility.”

A representative from Agropecuaria Nivar added, “For Grupo Nivar, ASC Feed Mill certification represents validation of our commitment to responsible feed production, product traceability, and aquaculture sustainability. This achievement reinforces our vision of adding value to our customers and to the development of the aquaculture sector in Venezuela.”

Agropecuaria Nivar team presented with ASC Feed Certificate at SEG 2026

Proporca’s spokesperson concluded, “Achieving certification under the ASC Feed Standard is a source of great pride and a milestone that goes beyond operational excellence. This international recognition validates our commitment to producing aquaculture feed in line with the most stringent standards of traceability, environmental responsibility and social commitment. It’s a key step in our growth strategy.”

“By aligning with world-class standards, we not only strengthen the trust of our business partners but also ensure that the shrimp industry has access to inputs that support its own certification and long-term sustainability. This achievement reaffirms our vision: to lead with quality, act with transparency, and produce responsibly for the future of food.”

Momentum is building in the region: two additional feed mills in Venezuela are already in audit for ASC Feed Certification.

About the ASC Feed Standard

The ASC Feed Standard is the first of its kind to set binding global requirements for all feed ingredients – from fishmeal and fish oil to plant-based ingredients such as soy, palm oil, and wheat. Companies must demonstrate that these are sourced from responsibly managed fisheries or sustainable agricultural sources.

About the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC)

The ASC label on pack showcases ASC-certified farms and feed mills — impact-focused and transparent operations delivering measurable and verifiable change. They meet science-based, rigorous requirements that foster accountability and trust across the seafood value chain, from feed ingredients to farm to fork.

ASC is an independent non-profit organization setting the global standard for responsible farmed seafood. Our comprehensive environmental and social requirements drive continuous improvement in aquaculture practices.

ASC is advancing the leading certification program for responsible farmed seafood, partnering to increase demand for ASC-labelled products, and championing innovation through industry collaboration.

Find out more: www.asc-aqua.org

Aquaintech Marks 30 Years as a Global Leader in Sustainable Aquaculture Solutions

Edusehat — Tue, 19 May 2026 05:20:12 +0700

By Aquaintech

Aquaintech today celebrates 30 years of advancing sustainable aquaculture through its Bacillus– based microbial solutions designed to improve water quality and support resilient, high-performance aquatic farming systems worldwide.

Since its founding in 1996, Aquaintech has grown from a specialized water quality innovator into a global biotechnology company focused on practical, biology-driven solutions for aquaculture. Over three decades, the company has built a strong reputation for delivering field-proven microbial solutions in tablet, powder, and liquid formats that help farmers maintain stable, productive, and sustainable aquatic environments.

Today, Aquaintech is the largest supplier of aquaculture microbial solutions in Ecuador, with a growing international presence across Vietnam, Mexico, India, New Caledonia, and other markets. The company supports diverse shrimp and fish farming systems operating under a wide range of environmental conditions.

At the core of its portfolio are Bacillus-based products widely used to support microbial balance, improve water stability, and enhance system resilience across pond-based aquaculture systems, shrimp and fish farms, and hatchery environments.

Aquaintech also offers customized formulations and private-label solutions developed in close collaboration with farmers and industry partners. These solutions are tailored to specific regional conditions, species requirements, and operational challenges, reflecting the company’s customer- centric approach to real-world aquaculture needs.

“As we mark 30 years, our focus remains on delivering practical, science-based solutions that directly address farmer challenges,” said Dr. Newman, CEO and Founder of Aquaintech. “Our strength lies in combining proven Bacillus technologies with the ability to adapt formulations to local conditions and customer requirements.”

Looking ahead, Aquaintech is focused on expanding its global presence, diversifying into new aquaculture markets, and strengthening its leadership in sustainable microbial water quality solutions.

About Aquaintech

Aquaintech is a global aquaculture solutions company founded by Dr. Newman, specializing in Bacillus-based microbial technologies for water quality management. With operations across multiple international markets, the company provides field-proven, customizable solutions that support sustainable and productive aquaculture systems worldwide.

Dr. Newman is also a contributor to several leading aquaculture industry publications, reflecting his ongoing engagement with applied aquaculture science and industry knowledge sharing.

The Norwegian Cod Farming Company Ode Acquires Mowi Facility in Vanylven

Edusehat — Tue, 19 May 2026 05:20:06 +0700

• **Some weeks before, they acquired Lumarine, that currently operates the largest juvenile cod production facility in the country**

The Norwegian cod farming company Ode just announced that has entered into an agreement to acquire Mowi’s facility in Vanylven, Norway. They reported that Mowi will continue operating the facility through the summer with its current stock of ballan wrasse. After that, Ode will take over the facility and its employees and convert the operations to cod juvenile and broodstock production.

“Ode is a strong player in cod farming and will further develop the facility in a responsible and sustainable manner,” said Regional Director Asgeir Hasund of Mowi Norway.

For his part, Ode CEO Ola Kvalheim commented: “The company has a strong need for increased onshore capacity, and Sighaug fits perfectly into our portfolio with its skilled and experienced employees, proximity to several of Ode’s farming sites, and opportunities for further development and investment.”

Without Interruption

Kvalheim emphasized that Ode sees Sighaug as an important facility in the company’s value chain for farmed cod. The facility, together with several of its employees, has previously produced cod juveniles with very strong results.

“We are confident that we can build on what Mowi has developed over the past years. The facility can easily be converted back to cod and is well suited for both juvenile and broodstock production. Together with Mowi, we are immediately starting the process of applying for a change of species approval to cod. We hope for a swift process with the relevant authorities so that operations can resume without interruption in activity,” assured Kvalheim.

According to Mowi’s Regional Director Hasund, they “are pleased to have found a good solution for the facility and its employees. This will ensure continued operations in Vanylven,” he said while he also thanked the facility’s employees for their efforts over many years, and especially for their work in recent times.

Euronext NOTC-Listed Seafood Company Lumarine

Some weeks before the announcement, Kistefos-controlled Holding Akvaservice, together with shareholders representing more than 90% of the shares, entered into an agreement to sell their shares to Ode. The remaining shareholders have been offered the opportunity to sell their shares on the same terms. Lumarine currently operates Norway’s largest juvenile cod production facility at Tjeldbergodden in Aure municipality, also in Norway. The facility produced approximately 1,500 tons of juvenile cod last year.

Ode and Lumarine have worked closely together since 2022, and the acquisition represents an important step in Ode’s continued development as a leading and fully integrated producer of farmed cod, they highlighted.

The company plans to invest significantly in further modernization and scaling of production to 5,000 tons of juvenile cod by 2027. Such capacity will be necessary to support a potential annual production volume of around 100,000 tons of market-size cod within the next five years.

“We are very pleased to announce this acquisition. We know Lumarine, the organization, and the facility well after a very successful collaboration over the past five years. Bringing this fully into Ode is a natural and strategically sound step for us. It represents a key milestone in strengthening our fully integrated value chain for cod production,” said Kvalheim.

Through this acquisition, Ode is laying the foundation for future growth and a clear modernization and professionalization of juvenile cod production. Lumarine has significant potential for further development and expansion beyond the 5,000 tons planned after the acquisition. According to them, Ode looks forward to further developing the strong professional environment at Tjeldbergodden and strengthening cooperation with the local community in Aure.

“We look forward to fully integrating the organization and production into Ode. This provides greater predictability, allows us to invest in improved biological control, and strengthens our ability to deliver even better juvenile fish in the future. At the same time, we are welcoming highly skilled employees who already have extensive experience with cod juvenile production and who know Ode and our way of working through the long-standing cooperation between the companies,” finished Kvalheim.

Lumarine’s juvenile cod production uses a flow-through system in which seawater is heated through heat exchange with surplus heat from local industry. This enables a highly sustainable production model with low biological and technological risk. Experience with cod production since 2022 has been positive and provides a strong foundation for further development under Ode.

83% of Feed Samples Show Multi-Mycotoxin Contamination

Edusehat — Mon, 18 May 2026 07:50:14 +0700

By dsm-firmenich Animal Nutrition & Health

New dsm-firmenich data reveals rising co-contamination risks across global feed Supply and escalating threat to food security

dsm-firmenich Animal Nutrition & Health has released the results of the World Mycotoxin Survey from January to March 2026, highlighting a sharp rise in multi-mycotoxin contamination across feed ingredients worldwide.

Analysis of 4,465 samples from 66 countries shows that 83% of samples contain 10 or more mycotoxins, with an average of 21 mycotoxins and metabolites per sample. The findings underline a shift from single-toxin to complex co-contamination risks, increasing pressure on feed safety, animal performance, and food production systems.

4,465 samples were collected and analyzed from 66 countries around the world, resulting in 26,751 analyses.

Mycotoxins are naturally produced by the fungi that can contaminate feed raw materials in the field and during storage. When ingested by animals, mycotoxins have a wide range of negative effects such as impaired reproduction, digestive disorders, carcinogenicity, and reduced performance.

Key findings

Co-contamination is widespread: 83% of samples contained 10 or more mycotoxins.

Fusarium toxins dominate globally: 9 out of 10 samples were contaminated.
In North America, livestock and aquaculture face extreme to high risk of exposure to B-Trichos, FUM, and ZEN, with occurrence rates of 83%, 57%, and 79%, respectively.
In Central and South America, high risk is associated with FUM and ZEN, with average contamination levels of approximately 2,411 ppb and 81 ppb, respectively.
South Asia continues to face high to extreme risk of exposure to aflatoxins, B-Trichos, FUM, OTA, and ZEN, with 51–75% classified as high risk and 76–100% as extreme risk.
In the China/Taiwan region, FUM was detected in 93% of samples, while East Asia recorded a 91% occurrence rate and extreme prevalence of B-Trichos at 96%.
In Central and Southern Europe, B-Trichos shows high occurrence rates of 91% and 94%, respectively. Southern Europe is also experiencing challenges with high levels of FUM, detected in 97% of samples.

These results highlight the need for comprehensive multi-analyte testing and targeted mitigation strategies to address the growing complexity of contamination patterns.

Ursula Hofstetter, Head of Mycotoxin Risk Management at dsm-firmenich stated, “These latest findings once again highlight the widespread and persistent nature of mycotoxin contamination in feed ingredients across the globe. With risks continuing to pose a threat to animal welfare, productivity, and sustainability. Therefore, proactive risk management and regular monitoring are more important than ever to maintain the profitability of both the feed industry and animal protein production sectors.”

The survey also includes further details on:

Trends in mycotoxin occurrence over the years.
Prevalence levels for each mycotoxin in each region.
Global and local risk levels for each mycotoxin.
Risk levels posed to each species.
Comparison of prevalence levels from January-December 2024.
Insights on mycotoxin levels in grains and soy from major producing countries.
More information about Spectrum 380®, the most advanced mycotoxin analysis method used as a research tool and performed at the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU).
Overview on the occurrence of the most frequent mycotoxins, their masked and modified forms as well as emerging mycotoxins; based on results delivered by the most comprehensive commercially available multi-mycotoxin method, Spectrum Top®50.

About the Survey

Since 2004, dsm-firmenich Animal Nutrition & Health has analyzed thousands of global feed samples annually to understand and monitor contamination levels of the different mycotoxins in a variety of feed ingredients. This information is shared in the quarterly dsm-firmenich World Mycotoxin Survey, which accurately identifies mycotoxin risks based on animal species and location.

Effective mycotoxin risk management should include frequent testing along with a multi-strategy mitigation approach.

To download to the dsm-firmenich World Mycotoxin Survey from January to March 2026, follow the link here.

About dsm-firmenich Animal Nutrition & Health

In 2024, dsm-firmenich shared its plan to find a new owner for the Animal Nutrition & Health (ANH) business, including vitamins. ANH, a dsm-firmenich company, is a global leader in animal nutrition and health, as well as vitamins, carotenoids, and aroma ingredients. ANH is an innovation leader and increased its sales to USD 3.85 billion with a team of more than 7,800 people, driven by its strong purpose: feeding the planet without costing the earth. Together, we make it possible.

www.dsm-firmenich.com/ANH

Texas Aquaculture Association Endorses Nate Sheets for Texas Agriculture Commissioner

Edusehat — Mon, 18 May 2026 07:50:10 +0700

By The Texas Aquaculture Association

The Texas Aquaculture Association (TAA) is proud to announce its endorsement of Nate Sheets for Texas Agriculture Commissioner, citing his strong commitment to supporting Texas agriculture, rural communities, and the future of aquaculture in the state.

“As Texas agriculture continues to evolve, it is critical to have leadership that understands the importance of all sectors of our industry, including aquaculture,” said Brian Brawner, President of the Texas Aquaculture Association. “Nate Sheets recognizes the value of aquaculture to Texas’ economy, food supply and rural communities, and we believe he will be a strong advocate for producers across the state.”

The Texas aquaculture community contributes to food production, economic development and sustainable resource management throughout Texas. TAA members include producers of shrimp, oysters, redfish, catfish, tilapia, hybrid striped bass, crawfish, baitfish, sport fish and ornamental fish, as well as pond and lake managers, suppliers, researchers, students and other industry partners dedicated to advancing aquaculture and seafood production in the state.

TAA board members noted that Sheets’ focus on innovation, market development, regulatory consistency, research support, responsible resource management and rural economic growth aligns closely with the priorities of the Texas aquaculture industry. His sincere interest in ensuring the future of aquaculture has been demonstrated by his visits with TAA members, including most recently touring multiple farms in Palacios to learn more about its importance in Texas.

“We are proud to endorse Nate Sheets for Texas Agriculture Commissioner and look forward to working with him to strengthen opportunities for Texas agriculture and aquaculture,” Brawner added.

For more information about the Texas Aquaculture Association, please visit https://texasaquaculture.org.

About the Texas Aquaculture Association

The Texas Aquaculture Association is dedicated to promoting, protecting, and advancing the aquaculture industry in Texas through education, advocacy, and collaboration among producers and industry partners.

LACQUA 2026: Sustainable Aquaculture, Blue Future for Latin America and the Caribbean

Edusehat — Mon, 18 May 2026 07:50:05 +0700

By LACQUA 2026 Organizing Committee

The Latin American and Caribbean Chapter of the World Aquaculture Society (LACC-WAS), together with the Government of El Salvador, the Salvadoran Blue Economy Authority (ASEA), with the support of the Salvadoran Tourism Corporation, and strategic partners from the regional aquaculture sector, have joined efforts to organize the Latin American and Caribbean Aquaculture Congress – LACQUA 2026, which will take place from October 27–30, 2026 in San Salvador, El Salvador.

LACQUA 2026 will bring together experts on globally relevant topics for the development, sustainability, and growth of aquaculture in Latin America and the Caribbean. It will also feature one of the most important trade shows in the region, offering a wide range of supplies, technologies, and services for the sector.

This congress is established as a key platform for the exchange of knowledge, innovation, and experiences among researchers, students, producers, companies, government institutions, and international organizations.

The main thematic areas will include:

Aquatic species culture (fish, shrimp, and other species)
Production systems (RAS, biofloc, aquaponics, IPRS, cages)
Sustainable aquaculture and environment
Health, diseases, and immunology
Physiology, genetics, and biotechnology
Nutrition and feeding
Processing, economics, and climate change
Education and professional development
Women in aquaculture

Additionally, the congress will include technical meetings and networking spaces to promote regional and international collaboration.

The abstract submission system is now open, with a deadline of July 31, 2026:
https://www.was.org/Meeting/Abstract/Submit/LACQUA26

All submissions will be peer-reviewed, and accepted papers will be published in the official conference proceedings. More details regarding key dates and submission guidelines will be announced soon.

Further information on the program, registration, sponsorship, and trade exhibition will be shared in upcoming bulletins.

We look forward to your participation!

Consumers Trust – Dealing With Fraud

Edusehat — Thu, 14 May 2026 06:30:04 +0700

* By FishProf

FishProf has been studying the Association for Consumer Research (ACR) reports regarding seafood and the impacts of fraud on consumer trust.

ACR brings together researchers from universities, government, and industry to deepen understanding of everyday decision-making, including how culture, identity, and context shape what ends up on our plates. For seafood, that means behavioral studies on trust, labeling, risk perception, and “healthy but scary” proteins help explain why people say they like seafood but still under-buy it or avoid it at home.

Key seafood-relevant insights emerging for FishProf — three strands of consumer-research literature that align closely with ACR’s broader agen-da are especially relevant for seafood consumers:

Health is still number one, but “seafood” feels intimidating. Large-scale retail and consumer-trends reports (e.g., FMI’s Power of Seafood series) show that most consumers see seafood as healthy and nutritious, yet many still view it as expensive, complex, or hard to prepare. This “perception vs. practice” gap is exactly the kind of behavioral puzzle consumer researchers interrogate, and it points to a need for clearer in-store guidance, simple recipes, and better price-signaling at the seafood counter.

Transparency and trust drive, but don’t always follow. Evidence from sustainability-label research shows that consumers want to buy responsibly farmed or produced seafood, yet they often fail to act on that intention unless clear, trusted labels are visible on pack. Behavioral work on attention, nudges, and “smart defaults” suggests that well-designed certification labels and simple provenance cues can help seafood consumers align their values with what they actually purchase.

Plant-based and novel “sea-food-not-from-the-sea” is gaining attention. Recent behavioral studies on plant-based seafood alternatives examine how consumers respond to ingredient information, processing, and labels, and they find that more informed consumers are more likely to accept plant-based options. As these products enter mainstream seafood aisles, ACR-style research helps clarify whether consumers are switching because of taste, health, or environmental concerns — and how best to communicate that in a way that supports honest choice.

Substitution often involves products from poorly managed fisheries with higher environmental impacts and lower safety profiles. Non-specific labels like “white fish” correlate with higher mislabeling rates, undermining the viability of sustainable, responsibly farmed options.

FMI’s USA’s consumer insight work is especially relevant when layered with evidence on fraud in weights, substitution, and mislabeling. Mislabeling changes not just what consumers think they are eating, but what they actually support in terms of fisheries, habitats, and management practices.

Studies of seafood fraud find that substitutes often come from less managed fisheries, with higher environmental impacts and sometimes lower nutritional or safety profiles than the named species.

In Australia, researchers have shown that over one in ten seafood products mislabeled and that vague, nonspecific labels (e.g., “white fish” or broad umbrella terms) correlate with higher mislabeling rates and weaker consumer choice for sustainable options.

From a consumer behavior perspective, even occasional fraud can erode trust. If people suspect that what is on the label may not match what is on the plate, they are more likely to:

» Avoid seafood altogether,

» Default to familiar, generic products (e.g., “frozen fillets”), or

» Rely on brand or retailer reputation rather than the label or species name.

Seafood fraud extends beyond deception to serious safety risks, potentially exposing consumers to undeclared allergens, toxins, and pathogens. Fraudulent claims regarding origin or production methods disadvantage legitimate operators and distort fair market competition.

This undercuts the very “empowerment” FishProf believes the industry should be advocating for: consumers want to vote with their wallets for sustainable, safe, and fairly priced seafood, but fraud and opaque labelling turn that vote into a lottery.

Strengthened, mandatory labelling standards and clearer taxonomic information would not only cut fraud but also make the FMI style value and convenience strategies more effective by giving consumers a straighter line between what they see on the pack and what they get on the fork.

The United Nations Fisheries & Agriculture Organization (UNFAO) are following through on their recent Technical Paper 742 ‘Fraud in the Fisheries & Aquaculture Sectors’ by organizing a webinar on 17 June 2026. This is being organized by FAO’s primary market intelligence and analysis platform for fisheries and aquaculture, FAO GLOBEFISH. It will examine how market demand, price incentives, and supply-chain complexity interact to enable fraudulent practices, and what governments, industry, retailers, researchers, and standard-setting bodies are doing to address them.

SAVE THE DATE Wed 17 June 2026 – 1000 EU Central time 2 hours – UN FAO Webinar on SEAFOOD FRAUD – free event but you will need to register. This will be recorded and a follow-up report will be issued.

They say “The global fisheries and aquaculture sector operates at a scale that makes it structurally vulnerable to fraud. Aquatic product output exceeded 185 million tons in 2022, with trade spanning more than 230 countries and territories and a combined value of USD 195 billion. The breadth of species in commerce, the length and opacity of international value chains, and the multiplicity of inspection and control authorities create conditions in which fraud can persist relatively easily. The scope of the problem and the forms it takes illegal behaviors, counterfeiting, adulteration, dilution, mislabeling, false claims relating to origin or production method leading to unreported/ unregulated activities and species substitution.

Why do consumers value sustainability yet hesitate at the seafood counter?
The answer lies in the behavioral “perception vs. practice” gap fueled by fraud and confusing labeling. This document examines how species substitution and “label fatigue” impact purchasing decisions. By simplifying certifications and using explainable on-pack cues, retailers can bridge the trust gap and empower consumers to buy with confidence.

Can you determine the species when the fish is filleted and skinned?

Up to 20 percent of fisheries and aquaculture products may be mislabeled globally, with fraud particularly prevalent in processed products, restaurants, and catering services, where visual identification is difficult, and species identity can be concealed.”

Are Seafood Certifications Helpful or a Confusing Maze?

FishProf thinks the proliferation of eco-labels and sustainability certifications raises a critical question for consumers: do these labels help or confuse?
Research on seafood eco‑labels suggests that while many consumers like the idea of sustainability schemes, they are often overwhelmed by inconsistent terminology, overlapping standards, and conflicting “green” claims. For example, different schemes may:

» Use different data sets,

» Hold divergent views on particular fishing methods, or

» Exclude certain species‑and‑gear combinations without making that logic transparent.

With aquatic output exceeding 185 million tons across 230 territories, the sector is structurally vulnerable to counterfeiting. Estimates suggest up to 20% of global products are mislabeled, especially in processed goods and catering services.

This can lead to situations where one product carries multiple labels, another has none despite being responsibly sourced, and a third carries a single, hard-to-interpret symbol. The result is not just confusion but a risk of “label fatigue”: consumers either ignore all labels or default to the most familiar brand, regardless of what the certification actually means. From a consumer-advocacy standpoint, there are three clear priorities:

» Simplify and harmonize. Where possible, certification schemes should align around core principles (e.g., stock status, management effectiveness, bycatch, and social safeguards) and avoid unnecessarily diverse scoring or “traffic-light” systems that are hard to read at the fish counter.

» Mandate minimum disclosure. Even where voluntary labels coexist, governments can require basic, non-confusing information on species, origin, and method — so that consumers can compare, even if they do not fully under-stand every logo.

» Make labels “explainable.” On-pack quick-scan cues (QR codes, short web links, or aisle-end signage) can turn busy-time decisions into moments of learning, helping consumers move from “I don’t know what this means” to “I can trust this”.

Seafood fraud erodes consumer empowerment and industry growth. When labels are inaccurate, consumers avoid seafood or default to generic products. Mandatory labeling standards are essential to restore market confidence and align values with behavior

Consumers cheated by retailers. The Dory on offer here in a Queensland fishmonger shop is actu-ally Basa likely from Viet Nam. The problem is it should be sold as Basa… not Dory.

The proliferation of sustainability certifications creates “label fatigue” through inconsistent terminology. To benefit consumers, certification schemes must align around core principles and use digital tools like QR codes to ensure transparency and explainability.

This has not been done as clearly certifiers have created a business between the harvesters/producers and the consumer. Profits are being made and despite past promises there is no plan to create one standard that would make decisions easier for consumers.

FishProf will go as far as saying that confusion is what the certifiers and NGO’s desire as this creates opportunity. Governments are letting their industries and their consumers down by allowing for environmental sustainability to be driven by organizations outside their own countries.

For FishProf, the key insight is that consumer-research and retail-strategy work (like FMI’s Power of Seafood series) must be paired with stronger rules on fraud and standardization in certification. Otherwise, even the most behaviorally informed supermarket layout or digital campaign will be undermined by a market where consumers cannot reliably trust what they see on the label — and that is not a choice-friendly system at all.

References and sources consulted by the author on the elaboration of this article are available under previous request to our editorial staff.

Meet CAT at World Aquaculture Singapore 2026

Edusehat — Wed, 13 May 2026 23:25:08 +0700

June 2–5 | Booth 211

The CAT team is heading to Singapore for World Aquaculture 2026, where we’ll be sharing the latest in genetic innovation and insights into how our tailored breeding solutions are driving value, supporting sustainability, and helping our clients achieve long-term breeding success.

Chat to us about our full range of services, including our integrated Next-Gen Breeding approach that combines genome editing, genotyping, and selective breeding.

We’re looking forward to reconnecting with partners and meeting new producers to explore what’s next and showcase how our solutions accelerate genetic gain and deliver more consistent, profitable outcomes.

Join us at one of our talks or stop by Booth 211.

CAT Talks at World Aquaculture 2026

We’ll be presenting in sessions across all three days:

MATT KRAMER
Genome Editing for High-Value Traits in Commercial-Scale Breeding Programs
Session: Genomics, Omics and Aquaculture Biotechnology
Date: Wednesday, June 3

OSCAR HENNIG
Local Genetics, Global Impact: What We Can Learn from Ecuador
Session: Shrimp Breeding, Genetics and Seed Production
Date: Thursday, June 4

PANAGIOTIS KOKKINIAS
Utilizing Advanced Genetic Improvement Tools to Maximize Returns in Finfish Species
Session: Selective Breeding and Quantitative Genetics
Date: Friday, June 5

DEBBIE PLOUFFE
Genome Editing in Aquaculture: Global Regulatory Trends and the Path to Commercialization

Session: General Contributed Session
Date: Thursday, June 4

Visit Us at Booth 211

Between sessions, stop by Booth 211 to meet the team and talk through your breeding goals and challenges. Whether that’s exploring which genotyping tools deliver the most value, looking to start a new breeding program, or wanting to understand which traits can be targeted by integrating genome editing, we’re here to help.

See you there.

The post Meet CAT at World Aquaculture Singapore 2026 appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Center for Aquaculture Technologies Expands Global Breeding Team with New Quantitative Geneticist in Australia

Edusehat — Wed, 13 May 2026 23:25:07 +0700

Center for Aquaculture Technologies (CAT) continues to grow its global genetics team with the appointment of Dr. Iulia Blaj as Quantitative Geneticist, based in Australia.

The addition of Dr. Blaj strengthens CAT’s expanding breeding and genetics services team as demand continues to grow for advanced aquaculture breeding solutions worldwide.

In her new role, Dr. Blaj will advance data analysis across CAT’s breeding partners, helping design and evaluate statistical and genomic models that translate complex data into practical breeding decisions for clients.

CAT currently manages more than 20 breeding programs globally across a wide range of aquatic species. Supported by a growing portfolio of 50+ genotyping and sequencing tools, CAT helps producers improve disease resistance, growth, robustness, and long-term sustainability through tailored breeding strategies designed by each client’s goals.

Dr. Blaj brings extensive expertise in quantitative genetics and statistical genomics, with experience spanning both academia and industry across livestock and plant breeding sectors.

Commenting on her appointment, Dr. Blaj said:“Genomics is one of the most powerful tools the aquaculture industry has to shape its future. By integrating the right methods with meaningful and rigorous data interpretation, we can help producers make better decisions and enable the development of healthier, more resilient stocks. I’m excited to join the CAT team and contribute to work that creates lasting value and real impact across aquaculture.”

Dr. John Buchanan, CEO of CAT, welcomed the appointment, noting that the company’s continued growth reflects increasing industry demand.

“We are very pleased to welcome Iulia to CAT. Her appointment adds valuable quantitative genetics expertise to our growing global team and strengthens the support we provide to breeding programs around the world,” said Dr. Buchanan. “As more aquaculture producers increasingly adopt genomic technologies and data-driven breeding strategies, expanding our technical resources is critical to ensuring we continue delivering practical, commercially ready solutions for our clients.”

As the aquaculture industry continues to evolve and the global demand for seafood grows, CAT remains focused on equipping producers with science-based breeding strategies that drive productivity, resilience, and sustainability.

Dr. Iulia Blaj

The post Center for Aquaculture Technologies Expands Global Breeding Team with New Quantitative Geneticist in Australia appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Aquaculture 4.0: Unlocking the Last Mile of Growth

Edusehat — Wed, 13 May 2026 09:00:05 +0700

* By Antonio Garza de Yta, Ph.D.

Aquaculture has proved it can grow fish; now it must prove it can grow confidence. The missing link isn’t biological, it’s finance, insurance, and risk transparency. Until capital providers can see and price risk reliably, the sector will remain capital constrained and underinsured.

Aquaculture has proved it can grow fish; now it must prove it can grow confidence. For years, the sector has pushed er on genetics, feeds, health, and farm design, yet it still underdelivers on its full potential. Why? Because the missing link isn’t biological, it’s finance, insurance, and risk transparency. Until capital providers can see, quantify, and price risk reliably, aquaculture will remain capital-constrained, underinsured, and slower than it should be. Aquaculture 4.0 is the pathway out of that trap: digitalization not just for efficiency, but for bankability and insurability.

To cross this last mile, we must move from a sector that has long looked like a black box to outsiders to one that is measurably transparent. With new tools, we’ve made the box translucent — but lenders and underwriters don’t finance translucence; they finance clarity. That clarity depends on three pillars that turn data into trust and trust into capital:

(1) Infrastructure, (2) Data, and (3) Systems Integration.

Data standardization is critical for financial credibility. Moving beyond handwritten records to a standardized schema allows underwriters to verify biological performance. Defining what to measure and how to verify it ensures that on-farm data becomes a bridge to institutional investment.

The Three Pillars of Digital Transparency in Aquaculture

1. Infrastructure: The rails that carry trust

You cannot digitize thin air. The first pillar is infrastructure, both digital and physical. On the digital side, farms need dependable connectivity, rugged sensors for water quality and biomass, onfarm edge devices that capture data in lowbandwidth settings, secure cloud environments that scale across cohorts and geographies, and a unified digital infrastructure that standardizes information, turns raw signals into operational intelligence, and enables the transparency required for finance and insurance. On the physical side, the insights must be actionable: aeration, automatic feeders, biosecurity upgrades, harvesting machines, coldchain, and reliable power, so recommended changes can actually be implemented.

Infrastructure is also where finance can lead rather than lag. Blended finance, resultsbased lending, and green/ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) facilities can under write connectivity, sensor networks, and critical equipment precisely because those assets reduce uncertainty, improve performance, and enable auditable reporting. In other words, infrastructure is not just cost; it is the foundation of risk reduction and the onramp to cheaper capital and insurable operations.

2. Data: From readings to decision grade intelligence

Data is the language of risk. Yet, too often, aquaculture data is incomplete, inconsistent, or trapped in spreadsheets and WhatsApp chats. Aquaculture 4.0 demands timely, standardized, longitudinal data, not only on water quality and feed, but on biosecurity practices, genetics, growth curves, survivals, FCR, energy use, and cost structure. It must be traceable (who/what/when/where) and auditable (can a third party confirm it?).

When farms pair structured data-sets with bioeconomic and financial models, they convert measurements into decision grade intelligence: accurate harvest forecasting, scenario-based cashflow projections, and probabilistic risk profiles. That is the moment the sector shifts from “trust me” to “verify me”, and verification is what unlocks term sheets, lowers interest rates, and makes biological insurance design feasible. For producers, this isn’t paperwork; it’s bargaining power, data-backed credibility that improves prices, contract terms, and access to working capital.

3. Systems integration: One version of the truth

A single sensor does not make a smart pond, and a smart pond does not make a bankable enterprise. The third pillar is systems integration — linking sensors, farm Enterprise Resource Planning (ERPs), hatchery records, feed logistics, lab diagnostics, processing data, and even buyer specifications into a coherent, interoperable flow. Integration enables apples-to-apples benchmarking, automates compliance reporting, and continuously feeds credit risk scoring and parametric insurance models with high-quality inputs.

At scale, integration supports digital twins at farm, cluster, or regional level so that regulators can monitor disease risk in near realtime, suply chain actors can plan capacity with better visibility, and financiers can track portfolio health against measurable KPIs. Systems integration is where transparency becomes trust, because every stakeholder, farmer, feed mill, buyer, lender, insurer, sees one version of the truth.

Why This Matters for Finance and Insurance

Capital does not require zero risk; it requires knowable risk. Infrastructure ensures risks are observed continuously; data ensures they are measured consistently; systems integration ensures they are shared credibly. Together, these pillars convert uncertainty into probability, and probability into price; the price of credit, the price of coverage, the price of capital. Three knockon effects follow:

i. Credit becomes scalable. Data-grounded production and cashflow forecasts justify longer tenors and lower rates.

ii. Insurance becomes viable. Earlywarning surveillance and verified performance histories let underwriters price biological risk, design products that pay, and assemble portfolios that perform.

iii. ESG becomes measurable. Energy, emissions, water, welfare, and traceability move from claims to counts, attracting impact capital and premium buyers.

Aquaculture 4.0 is the pathway to bankability and insurability through digitalization.To cross this last mile, the industry must transition from a ‘black box’ to measurable transparency.

From Translucent to Transparent, and Bankable

Aquaculture’s opacity was never a choice; it was a function of fragmentation: thousands of actors, variable standards, patchy connectivity, and handwritten records. The tools now exist to change that; if we align around the three pillars. The practical playbook is straightforward:

» Fund the rails: prioritize connectivity, sensors, and reliable power.

» Standardize the schema: define what to measure, how often, and how to verify.

» Connect the systems: integrate onfarm, lab, logistics, and finance data into a single workflow; share the right data with the right stakeholder at the right time.

Aquaculture doesn’t need a new revolution in biology. It needs to connect what we already have, prove what we already do, and scale what already works. That is Aquaculture 4.0, not digital for digital’s sake, but digital for bankability and insurability. When we deliver infrastructure, data, and systems integration, we move decisively from translucent to transparent — and in that clarity, finance and insurance finally find a home. That is how we unlock the last mile of growth.

* Antonio Garza de Yta is Vice President of the International Center for Strategic Studies in Aquaculture (CIDEEA), President of Aquaculture Without Frontiers (AwF), Past President of the World Aquaculture Society (WAS), Former Secretary of Fisheries and Aquaculture of Tamaulipas, Mexico, and Creator of the Certification for Aquaculture Professionals (CAP) Program with Auburn University.

Regulatory Pathways and the Road to Commercialization of Genome Editing in Aquaculture: A Conversation with Debbie Plouffe

Edusehat — Tue, 12 May 2026 22:20:08 +0700

As global demand for seafood continues to climb, the aquaculture industry faces a familiar yet intensifying challenge: how to produce more nutritious protein while reducing environmental impacts and biological risks. Innovation is no longer optional; it is foundational. Among emerging solutions, genome editing is rapidly gaining attention as a powerful, practical tool for modern breeding programs.

To explore its commercial potential and evolving regulatory landscape, we spoke with Debbie Plouffe, Vice President of Business Development at the Centre for Aquaculture Technologies (CAT). A leader in genetic innovation in aquaculture, CAT is already working with commercial producers to integrate genome editing into breeding programs. In her role, Debbie provides regulatory guidance, supporting CAT clients to navigate and accelerate the responsible commercialization of genome editing in farmed aquatic species.

Debbie Plouffe, Center for Aquaculture Technologies

Q: Debbie, let’s start with a fundamental question. What is the difference between genetic modification and genome editing?

Plouffe: It’s an important distinction in the regulatory framework and a great place to start. Genetic modified organism, or GMO, typically refers to introducing new DNA, creating changes in a genetic sequence that wouldn’t occur naturally. Genome editing, on the other hand, is about making precise changes within an organism’s existing DNA.

With genome editing, and specifically in the scenario CAT will use the technology, no new DNA is added. We are creating changes that could happen through natural reproduction or conventional selective breeding in a shorter timeframe. It is precision breeding, not the creation of transgenics.

Q: Why have many regulators treated genome editing differently from GMOs?

Plouffe: Because the outcomes can be fundamentally different. In many genome editing applications, particularly SDN-1, the changes are indistinguishable from those that could occur naturally or through conventional breeding. No new DNA is present in the final organism.

As a result, many regulators are shifting toward risk-based frameworks that focus on the characteristics of the final product, rather than the technology used to create it. Countries such as the United States, Canada, Brazil, Japan, and Australia are already moving in this direction, which is helping open the door for responsible innovation.
We’re already seeing this approach in practice. Genome editing is being used commercially across agriculture and aquaculture, from crops like canola, banana, and rice to livestock such as pigs, cattle, and fish, demonstrating that these frameworks can support safe, real-world deployment.

This shift is important not just from a regulatory perspective, but also for building confidence more broadly, as regulatory clarity is often the foundation for acceptance of new technologies.

Q: You mentioned SDN-1. Can you explain what that means?

Plouffe: SDN-1, or Site-Directed Nuclease-1, is a form of genome editing that makes very small, precise changes to an organism’s existing DNA without adding any new genetic material. It works by creating a targeted cut in the DNA, which the cell then repairs naturally, resulting in a small change. These edits are similar to variations that could occur naturally or through conventional breeding, just achieved with greater precision and much faster.

Q: What does this all mean for commercial aquaculture operations?

Plouffe: It’s a game-changer. The key advantages of genome editing are precision and speed. In many aquaculture species, where generation times can span several years, conventional breeding delivers progress in relatively small, incremental steps across generations. Genome editing allows us to make significant improvements in a single generation, dramatically accelerating the pace of genetic gain.

Genome editing allows producers to target specific traits that are advantageous for farming such as growth efficiency and yield, disease resistance, or environmental tolerance, and achieve results in a fraction of the time required by conventional breeding alone.

Importantly, it also opens the door to traits that are difficult, slow, or even impossible to achieve through traditional breeding, including traits with low heritability, single-sex populations without hormone use, and reproductive sterility.
At CAT, our genome editing solutions include our Sterility+ technology, which delivers 100% sterility in aquaculture species. This acts as a robust biological containment measure, helping protect wild populations and ecosystems, while also supporting regulatory confidence that environmental risks, particularly those associated with enhanced production traits, are effectively managed.

In short, the benefits are clear: improved productivity and resilience for farmers, sustainable innovation for the industry, and consistent access to high-quality, affordable seafood for consumers, delivered more efficiently, with fewer resources, less waste, and reduced pressure on wild fisheries.

Q: What does the typical regulatory pathway look like for genome-edited products today?

Plouffe: As I mentioned, the regulatory process is becoming more structured and predictable in many jurisdictions, though it still varies by region. At CAT, we start by developing a regulatory strategy for each product based on where the animals are produced and, if applicable, where they will be sold. This may involve preparing a scientific dossier for submission, followed by agency review and, in some cases, post-approval compliance.

Importantly, seafood producers and breeders no longer have to navigate this alone. Clearer frameworks are emerging, and that’s critical for accelerating commercial adoption; something CAT actively supports.

Q: So, how is CAT supporting clients through this advancing landscape?

Plouffe: Our role goes beyond the technical skill of integrating genome editing into practical breeding programs. We often hear that our partners and their stakeholders are concerned about acceptance of genome editing in food production, and regulatory approval is really the foundation of that acceptance. So, we partner closely with our clients to define and execute clear regulatory strategies and achieve regulatory determinations.

Ultimately, our focus is on creating a clear and efficient path to market.

Q: Looking ahead, where do you see genome editing in aquaculture over the next five years?

Plouffe: Over the next five years, genome editing, particularly SDN-1 approaches, will move from innovation to implementation. As regulatory frameworks continue to align, these technologies will be integrated into breeding programs and deliver products at commercial scale.

This isn’t about replacing traditional breeding, but enhancing it; adding precision and speed to existing programs. The opportunity is clear, but timing matters. Companies that invest now in regulatory strategy and stakeholder engagement will be best positioned as the market continues to open.

Debbie concluded, “Genome editing has moved beyond research; it now has a clear path to commercialization. As regulatory clarity improves, it is becoming a practical tool to help aquaculture scale sustainably. For an industry facing real resource constraints, this is going to be an important part of the solution.”

The post Regulatory Pathways and the Road to Commercialization of Genome Editing in Aquaculture: A Conversation with Debbie Plouffe appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

The Philippine SEAFDEC Aquaculture Center Achieves World’s First Natural Captive Spawning of Mackerel Tuna

Edusehat — Tue, 12 May 2026 04:20:11 +0700

They make it a promising candidate for sustainable aquaculture

The Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center Aquaculture Department (SEAFDEC/AQD) in Tigbauan (Iloilo, Philippines) has reproduced naturally in captive conditions a mackerel tuna. This is the first time that scientist achieve it. The tuna (Euthynnus affinis), known also as kawakawa and in the Philippines as ‘tulingan’, spawned at the research center without the use of hormone injections.

“This achievement brings us closer to establishing a full-cycle culture technology for kawakawa from egg to larva, juvenile, adult, and back to spawning,” said Dan Baliao, Chief of SEAFDEC/AQD.

For his part, Takahiro Sajiki, deputy chief of SEAFDEC/AQD and co-manager of the Japanese Trust Fund that supported the research project, assured: “Tuna species pose exceptional challenges for aquaculture due to their highly migratory behavior, rapid swimming speeds, and acute sensitivity to confinement stress.”

He highlighted that these traits have limited breeding efforts, forcing most tuna farming operations to rely on wild-caught juveniles.

Years of Careful Observation

Mackerel tuna, widely consumed in Southeast Asia, a small neritic tuna long considered nearly impossible to breed under captive conditions, has also been particularly difficult to maintain and develop to maturity in enclosed systems.

The milestone is the result of systematic, long-term research and broodstock management at SEAFDEC/AQD, despite early challenges with stress-related mortality and poor adaptation to domestication.

According to Irene Cabanilla-Legaspi, the SEAFDEC/AQD researcher who has led the kawakawa project since 2020: “Rather than relying on artificial spawning induction, we refined broodstock care, continuously monitored the fish, and used controlled environmental techniques to create conditions conducive to natural reproduction”.

“Years of careful observation and environmental control culminated in the release of eggs by captive kawakawa in an enclosed tank,” she added.

Long Process

The broodstock were sourced from juvenile kawakawa collected using an “otoshi-ami” fish trap in Antique Province. Before transport, the fish underwent several days of conditioning to prepare them for confinement stress and the long journey to tank facilities in the SEAFDEC/AQD Tigbauan Main Station, informed the scientific institution.

“Transport protocols were strictly followed to maximize survival. Water temperature was lowered, each fish was handled individually, and temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen levels were monitored hourly. Water samples were also collected for bacterial analyses,” explained Leobert de la Peña, head of SEAFDEC/AQD’s Research Division. These measures resulted in high survival rates, even three days after transport, according to the research team.

At the hatchery, the juveniles were maintained in tanks with carefully regulated water quality and feeding regimes to minimize stress and promote fast growth and maturation. Over time, the fish adapted to captive conditions and released viable eggs, confirming that kawakawa can complete the reproductive cycle in a fully enclosed system without hormonal intervention.

Sustainable Tuna Production

Kawakawa tuna is valued for its firm flesh with a similar flavor and texture to bluefin tuna. However, unlike large oceanic tuna species such as bluefin, it matures rapidly and thrives in coastal waters, making it a promising candidate for sustainable aquaculture. Notably, it also has high levels of the nutrient docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

“Developing reliable breeding and culture techniques for kawakawa could reduce dependence on wild-caught stocks and help stabilize tuna production,” Baliao said. “However, we may need more years of dedication and persistence to replicate these results to ensure consistency, and scale them up to commercial production.”

The first spawning event under fully captive conditions was recorded in July 2025, with repeated spawning observed through September. The research was conducted under the Japanese Trust Fund–supported project, ‘Development of Full-Life Cycle Culture and Stable Production Technology of Kawakawa (Euthynnus affinis).’

New Study in the US Confirms That Seaweed Integration Boosts Efficiency and Cuts Waste in Aquaculture

Edusehat — Tue, 12 May 2026 04:20:06 +0700

Researchers of University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science provide guidance for the producers

A new study of the University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science found that cultivating seaweed species alongside marine finfish in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) operations can significantly reduce − and even eliminate − key waste products from marine finfish farming. In the IMTA seaweeds receive nutrient-rich effluent from fish production, they confirmed.

According to the scientist, the results demonstrate the potential of IMTA in these regions and offers potential mitigation solutions for many of the most prominent sustainability concerns regarding the development of marine aquaculture operations for fed-species such as marine finfish.

In that sense, Haley Lasco, the leader author of the study and a marine biology graduate student at the Rosenstiel School − and currently a scientist at the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, assured: “With the significant interest in the development of marine aquaculture throughout the Southeast United States (US) and Caribbean, these findings can be used to guide the selection of extractive macroalgae species in operations culturing marine finfish.”

The study offers new insights into how aquaculture producers can improve sustainability by farming macroalgae species in a complementary system alongside finfish. “Our findings support more sustainable aquaculture operations and help producers make smarter choices about macroalgae for IMTA,” added Lasco.

Pilot-Scale

To conduct the study, the researchers established a pilot-scale Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture system at the Rosenstiel School’s Experimental Hatchery facility on Virginia Key, Florida, to evaluate the performance of four candidate macroalgae species under consistent marine finfish effluent conditions.

The flow-through IMTA system used a consistent source of nutrient-rich effluent from a yellowtail snapper (Ocyurus chrysurus) grow-out tank maintained at commercial-scale density and feeding rates. Each macroalgae species was grown in three replicate tanks receiving the same effluent, enabling controlled comparisons of nutrient removal, nutritional composition, and market potential under conditions representative of commercial aquaculture.

At the end of each two-week trial, macroalgae were evaluated for growth and analyzed for protein, fat, fiber, ash, minerals, metals, and carbon and nitrogen content, including stable isotope ratios. Results provide new insights into macroalgae performance under real-world conditions and demonstrate the potential to reduce total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) in marine finfish aquaculture effluent to below detectable levels.

“This work shows how integrating macroalgae into marine finfish aquaculture systems can reduce waste while producing a valuable secondary crop. It provides a practical framework for selecting species based on specific production goals, improving environmental performance while creating opportunities for better production economics and more diversified products using an IMTA approach,” said for his part John Stieglitz, a research associate professor in the Department of Marine Biology and Ecology, who led the project as principal investigator.

The Goal: To Mimic Natural Ecosystems

Let’s remember that IMTA is a production system where different species from different trophic levels are farmed together in a complementary system with a goal to mimic natural ecosystems, thus improving sustainability, reducing waste, and increasing overall productivity. This form of aquaculture allows for the waste of one organism to be utilized by another organism across trophic levels, creating a system with less waste and therefore a lower environmental impact.

The primary aim of this study was to provide an understanding of which macroalgae species from the Southeast US and Caribbean regions perform the best in these different categories, providing stakeholders with a guide to select a desirable species of macroalgae to utilize and implement in their operations.

Already Published

The study titled “Evaluation of native macroalgae species of the Southeast U.S. and Caribbean for use in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA)” was published in the journal Aquaculture International February 10, 2026. The authors include Lasco, Hilary G. Close, Ronald H. Hoenig, Phillip R. Gillette, Daniel D. Benetti, and John of the University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric and Earth Science.

Funding for the study was provided by subawards from the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission (GSMFC) in cooperation with NOAA Fisheries Service.

Phibro Animal Health Corporation Launches Companywide Sustainable Solutions Platform; Introduces VERRATAIN™ Verified Sustainability Solutions Through Strategic VAXA Technologies Partnership

Edusehat — Sat, 09 May 2026 00:45:11 +0700

TEANECK, N.J.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Phibro Animal Health Corporation (Nasdaq: PAHC) today announced the launch of its new Sustainable Solutions Platform (SSP), a companywide initiative designed to help animal protein, dairy and petfood producers address greenhouse gas emissions through practical, science-based solutions that integrate seamlessly into existing feed and production systems.

As part of the SSP launch, Phibro is introducing Verratain Verified Sustainability Solutions, the Company’s first master brand for sustainable products that can significantly lower emissions across animal protein and petfood supply chains. The initial Verratain product line is being launched through a strategic partnership with VAXA Technologies and is based on VAXA Technologies’ low carbon, high value microalgae feed materials that enable efficient supply chain decarbonization.

The first two products under the Verratain brand are Verratain Spirulina and Verratain Omega Oil, which are low-carbon microalgae feed ingredients. When these products are incorporated into the animal’s diet as a nutrition source, producers can materially reduce the carbon intensity of animal feed to allow organizations to meet their sustainability goals while supporting animal health. “Our Verratain Verified Sustainability Solutions represent a natural evolution of Phibro’s portfolio as our customers increasingly seek credible, scalable sustainability solutions,” said Dani Bendheim, incoming Chief Executive Officer of Phibro Animal Health Corporation. “These offerings complement our existing animal health and nutrition solutions while directly addressing the evolving sustainability needs of animal protein and petfood producers and their downstream customers.”

Targeting a Major Scope 3 Emissions Hotspot

The World Benchmarking Alliance reports that 165 of the world’s 350 most influential food and agriculture companies have disclosed Scope 3 climate commitments, which typically call for 20–30% reductions in value‑chain emissions by 2030. At scale, this implies an estimated $80–300 billion per‑year decarbonization value signal under SBTi‑aligned internal carbon pricing. (Source: World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2024. Scope 3 Navigator for Agri-Food. Available: https://cecodes.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/WBCSD-AF-C-suite-Scope-3-Navigator-deck.pdf Accessed: May 1, 2026).

Feed is typically the largest source of Scope 3 emissions for livestock, poultry and aquaculture producers. By focusing on feeding a low carbon alternative nutrient source, Verratain directly targets one of the most significant emissions drivers in animal protein supply chains.

Verratain Spirulina and Verratain Omega Oil are produced by VAXA Technologies in their proprietary state of the art indoor cultivation platform directly connected to renewable geothermal energy, clean water resources, and controlled growing conditions. The production process yields low‑carbon feed material that is designed to seamlessly integrate with existing feeding systems. The program utilizes life cycle assessment-based solutions to create effective Scope 3 decarbonization which is incorporated into the product’s life-cycle assessments, in accordance with leading international standards such as the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.

Leadership to Build and Scale the Platform

To lead the Sustainable Solutions Platform and the Verratain portfolio, Phibro recently appointed Peter Bunce as Head of Sustainable Solutions. Bunce brings more than two decades of experience in agricultural sustainability and voluntary carbon markets, including building large‑scale programs that connect farmers with downstream consumer packaged goods companies and retailers.

“I joined Phibro because of its deep integration across global protein and dairy supply chains, where scalable solutions can deliver meaningful emissions reductions,” said Bunce. “After many years working in agricultural voluntary emissions markets, I have rarely seen innovations that combine impact and practicality like Verratain.”

Advancing a More Efficient and Resilient Food System

The launch of the Verratain product line marks a pivotal commercial milestone for Phibro’s sustainability initiatives. The Company anticipates the commencement of initial sales within the coming months, providing early adopters with a first-to-market opportunity to integrate these low-carbon microalgae solutions into their production systems.

Looking ahead, Phibro views the Sustainable Solutions Platform as a long‑term growth business that will expand beyond the initial products and partnership. To learn more about Verratain and our science-based solutions or to schedule a call with our sustainability team, please visit us at www.pahc.com/verratain or contact us at verratain@pahc.com.

About VAXA Technologies

VAXA is a food tech / climate tech company that has successfully industrialized its patented, carbon-negative microalgae production platform, to deliver proven, scalable solutions. By leveraging renewable energy, waste streams, and machine learning, VAXA produces high-value ingredients that physically remove emissions from the global supply chain, allowing partners to decarbonize at the source. Unlike traditional, resource-heavy algae production, VAXA’s modular, indoor facility in Iceland achieves a 100x higher decarbonization impact using less than 1% of the resources required by conventional methods, utilizing a bio secured optimized environment to ensure a consistent, food-grade output that provides a reliable, superior supply chain for corporations looking to improve their products and meet their sustainability goals.

For more information on VAXA visit www.vaxa.life / www.vaxaimpact.com.

About Phibro Animal Health Corporation

Phibro Animal Health Corporation is a leading global diversified animal health and nutrition company. The Company strives to be a trusted partner to livestock producers, farmers, veterinarians, and consumers who raise or care for farm and companion animals by providing solutions that help maintain and enhance animal health. For more information, visit www.pahc.com.

Contacts Contact for Phibro Animal Health Corporation
Phibro Animal Health Corporation
Glenn C. David
Chief Financial Officer
+1-201-329-7300

Ace Aquatec Chile Appoints Gonzalo Eduardo Boehmwald Trigo as General Manager LATAM

Edusehat — Sat, 09 May 2026 00:45:06 +0700

By Ace Aquatec

Ace Aquatec SpA has appointed Gonzalo Eduardo Boehmwald Trigo as General Manager LATAM, strengthening its leadership team to accelerate and build on its established growth across Chile and South America.

In this role, Gonzalo will drive regional expansion, deepen key customer relationships, and lead the commercial delivery of Ace Aquatec’s rapidly growing equipment and service offering in this region, unlocking new business opportunities across the aquaculture sector.

Ace Aquatec has already achieved strong uptake of its stunning and biomass products in Chile, working with some of the leading salmon producers in the region and globally. Gonzalo will be supporting existing and new customers as we take the business through its next phase of growth in Latin America (LATAM).

With more than 20 years of global experience in salmon aquaculture, Gonzalo brings a strong track record in commercial leadership, international market development, and operational excellence. He holds an Aquaculture Engineering degree from Universidad Andrés Bello and a Diploma in Business Management from Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, with extensive experience across Chile, Norway, Canada, the UK, and LATAM.

Commenting on his appointment, Gonzalo Eduardo Boehmwald Trigo said: “I am excited to join Ace Aquatec at a time of strong global growth for the aquaculture sector. Latin America represents a key region for innovation and sustainable development, and I look forward to working closely with our customers and partners to deliver solutions that enhance productivity, fish welfare, and long-term value.”

Nathan Pyne-Carter, Chief Executive Officer of Ace Aquatec, said: “Gonzalo’s appointment strengthens our ability to scale key technologies such as A-BIOMASS®, A-HARVESTCAM® and our in-water stunning systems across Latin America. His experience in complex salmon farming environments will support the deployment of our data-driven tools that enhance biomass accuracy, optimise feeding strategies, and improve fish welfare outcomes. This aligns directly with our focus on delivering measurable performance gains through precision aquaculture technologies.”

Tara McGregor-Woodhams, Chief Sales and Marketing Officer of Ace Aquatec, said: “Gonzalo has a strong track record in driving revenue growth, developing client-centric strategies, and leading multidisciplinary teams. His deep industry expertise and international experience make him an excellent fit for this role. This appointment reinforces Ace Aquatec’s commitment to strengthening its presence in Latin America and delivering innovative solutions to the aquaculture industry.”

About Ace Aquatec

Ace Aquatec is a cutting-edge aquaculture technology company focused on creating welfare-first products to make fish farming more efficient and sustainable.

Backed by bluegrowth fund Aqua-Spark, Chroma Ventures (who brought Minecraft to console), deeptech fund Earth Capital, Stolt Ventures and Scottish Enterprise, we are on a mission to accelerate global adoption of sustainable and welfare-focused aquaculture practices.

For more information about Ace Aquatec, visit www.aceaquatec.com

Monitoring the Effectiveness of Probiotic/Bioremediator Usage in Aquaculture

Edusehat — Fri, 08 May 2026 06:35:05 +0700

* By Stephen Newman, Ph.D.

This technical analysis by Dr. Stephen Newman evaluates the strategic role of microbial amendments in global aquaculture. By distinguishing between environmental bioremediation and “true” probiotics, the study highlights the superior efficacy of spore-based Bacillus species. It provides a science-based framework for monitoring product performance, emphasizing enzyme profiles over spore counts to ensure operational success and long-term sustainability in production environments.

Introduction

The use of microbial amendments has become a standard operating practice (SOP) in many aquaculture production paradigms, including fish, shrimp, crabs and bivalves, among others, globally including but not limited to ponds, raceways, hatcheries, and broodstock production. Many dozens of companies offer a wide variety of bacteria with claims that range from field proven science based to nonsensical that are all too often geared towards the farmer and not the production environment.

Prior to discussing how one should determine the effectiveness of a given product, reiterating some of the prior observations that I have written about and that are essential for getting the big picture, is relevant for perspective. I want to make one point very clear. I am in no way disparaging the use of a wide range of products that have proven efficacy.

My argument is that, for a number of science-supported reasons, the biochemical nature of spore-based Bacillus products allows them to work as well as, if not better than, many of these. Their ease of use, combined with the nature of the market, makes them the logical choice for most users of bioremediators in aquatic production environments. Our lead tableted product has been in use for 20 years and the concept has been widely copied.

Spore-forming Bacillus species are the logical choice for bioremediation due to their enzymatic versatility and shelf stability. These microbes degrade organic sludge effectively across diverse salinities and temperatures, providing a cleaner environment that maximizes animal growth and lowers Feed Conversion Ratios (FCR).

Discussion

There are a number of approaches to the use of these products. Many vendors offer powdered products for addition to ponds. These are rarely added directly (although some use them this way) but are typically soaked in water before application. This can be a quick approach, as an example, primarily to activate Bacillus spores via a heat shock, or a much longer approach, where-in the suspension is brewed for hours and up to a day. This is done in order to add high levels of actively growing bacteria all at once.

Tablets have been widely adopted as they have been found to be a very, if the not the most efficient way to deliver Bacillus spores to pond bottoms. Some companies offer tablets with other none Bacillus species, typically spray or freeze dried, potentially with limited shelf lives or requiring specific storage conditions (such as refrigeration). Many companies sell liquid products containing photosynthetic bacteria such as Rhodopseudomonas palustris being in wide usage in SE Asia.

Over the last several decades there has been a rapid increase in the numbers of publications in the peer reviewed literature on the use of a wide variety of organisms as “probiotics” for use in aquaculture. While arguments can be made that some of these are better at narrowly based applications, the preponderance of the data strongly suggests that the best for broad ranging bioremediation is spore forming Bacillus species, which can be sold in shelf stable dry forms without loss of viability. Representative examples are depicted in Figure 1 below.

See Table 1 for a written comparison.

Observations: Bacillus based spores are the best products for bioremediation in aquaculture for a number of reasons. Bacillus species are enzymatically highly versatile and when specific (often proprietary) strains, are used properly, they are the easiest products to use and provide a multitude of impacts in the field. They can be applied to the water column as suspensions of powdered products and directly to pond bottoms as tablets. Photosynthetic bacteria in liquid suspensions are widely used in India and China despite the fact that solid science supports that specific strains of Bacillus species, sold as spores, in a tableted form, work as well or better in general and the consumer is not paying for water.

At the risk of being accused of being pedantic (again), end users often do not understand that when someone sells them a microbial product labeled as a probiotic that this does not necessarily mean that the product functions in the manner that they think that it does. The term is widely used to refer to any microorganisms (bacteria or fungi) that are used in any capacity with any expected outcome in any environment.

Historically, most people when they hear the term probiotic think of blends of bacteria (and/or yeast) that are ingested orally, colonize the gut, alter the microbiome and impact animal health. While the literature suggests that there are examples where impacts are seen on animal health, it is unclear if this is a result of non-specific immune stimulation or a “true” probiotic impact. Most of the products sold and in use today are for the environment, acting typically through bioremediation.

Most aquaculture microbial products act on the production environment through bioremediation rather than stable gut colonization. Ingestion serves primarily as a vehicle for delivering active bacteria into the feces, helping to maintain water quality and reduce niches for potential pathogens.

Observations: The use of microbial products in aquaculture is focused primarily on the production environment. A cleaner stable environment allows animals to maximize their ability to grow, consume feed more efficiently with resulting lower FCRs and ultimately generate higher profits. Ingestion is best considered as a vehicle for delivering spores and metabolically active bacteria in the feces. Stable colonization of the gut by feeding viable bacteria in the field has not been scientifically validated. Repeat applications are required and attempting to modify the microbiome in production environments that by their nature are highly variable is at best. challenging.

Proper use of Bacillus spores has the potential for a wide range of beneficial impacts many of which have been ascribed to the “probiotic” impact but typically occur in the absence of oral application. Figure 2 below outlines the perceived differences although there is solid evidence that these are not distinct properties and that they overlap. Bacillus species can bioremediate and at the same time have been shown to impact nonspecific immunity with the impacts described below for probiotics. It should be noted that many if not most non toxin producing bacteria strains whether living or dead can stimulate non-specific protective immunity.

Another key feature of bacteria in general is that they are very a diverse, complex and highly evolved group of organisms. The bacterial species that have been designated by the American Association of Feed Officials (AAFCO) in the US as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) are the strains that are present in many of the commercial products.

This does not include just Bacillus but also includes many others. Most of these have strains that would not be appropriate for use. It is clearly stated that for a strain to be GRAS it must not be toxigenic, i.e. it cannot contain genes that are associated with the potential for toxin production or result in disease.

Many if not most of the large numbers of suppliers have little understanding of the complex nature of bacteria. Most laymen think of bacteria as being simple and are aware of the few that can cause problems and those that they consume in their yogurt. There are many vendors that are not concerned, either as a result of ignorance, or apathy, that the risks of using the wrong strains are very real.

Many of the species that are GRAS have strains that would not legally be allowed to be considered GRAS. Buying product from companies that understand this potential for harm and that have professional microbiologists involved in the manufacture, sales and distribution is important for ensuring that GRAS strains are in a given product. It would be naïve to think that the sale of non-GRAS strains does not occur.

Observations: The use of specific bacterial species and strains that are GRAS depends on their not being able to negatively impact animal health either directly because of toxin production or indirectly because of their impact on other components of the microbiome. Bacillus can grow under a wide range of environmental conditions that span the range of production paradigms. Strains that contain toxins and lysogenic phages should never be used. These can pose a serious risk to the production environment. As I have reiterated many times, “Caveat Emptor”, i.e. let the buyer beware.

As discussed elsewhere the impact of a given product depends on a number of factors. Perhaps the single most important is the enzyme profile of the strains. Enzymes are catalytic proteins that speed up chemical reactions. They need cofactors that vary between enzymes, such as metals and vitamins to ensure that they function properly. Without these the enzymes don’t work and the bacteria cannot gain the nutrients that they need to live.

The term “profile” refers to types and quantities of enzymes as expressed by the bacteria. It is essential that the enzyme profiles are able to degrade the many substrates found in accumulated sludge in production systems. The best strains accomplish this via the production of a wide range of enzymes at high levels. Strains that are not well suited have limited production both of the types and quantities of these catalytic proteins.

Of course, as well, the bacteria need to be able to grow under the conditions that they are being used in. Note that some environments, such as those with high water exchange flow rates require the use of innovative approaches such as slow-release substrates or similar approaches that don’t flush the added bacteria out before they have time to act.

Another critical element is how the product is applied. Aquaintech Inc. pioneered, almost 20 years ago, the use of tableted Bacillus spores in aquaculture as this allowed direct application of the spores at high levels to affected areas.

Product efficacy is dictated by the enzyme profile — the type and quantity of catalytic proteins — rather than high spore counts. High-quality strains produce proteases, amylases, and lipases at levels necessary to degrade accumulated organic matter, regardless of the total number of spores per gram.

Observations: Where the product is used, when in the cycle it is used, how much is used and how often it is used all directly impact the end results. While there are some who would have you believe that there is little difference between products and that low-cost products are the same as higher priced products this is usually puffery and a ploy to garner market share. High quality strains cost more. There are many companies in China and India that sell Bacillus strains, some quite inexpensive. The quality of these strains may be suspect especially when pricing of the product is significantly less than that of others in the market place. Buying a USD 5.00 a kg product carries risk when established products run USD 25 or more per kg.

Another important distinction between products is that the number of spores in a given product does not impact efficacy in a manner that one allows one to claim, based on science, that higher spore counts equate with better impacts. Most of the spores don’t germinate and they all do not germinate in the same time frame. A product that claims to have many times the average count of spores per gram of a product that is widely in use does not necessarily mean that it is any better than one with the 4 or 5 billion spores per gram. It could be considered to be puffery to make the claim that it does in the absence of science-based proof.

Yet another import consideration is that there is no relationship between the numbers of species used and efficacy. Efficacy is related to enzyme production and the availability of nutrients and enzyme cofactors. While some strains product enzymes that others do not, there can be considerable overlap between species as to their enzyme profiles.

Observations: Figure 3 demonstrates why spore counts are not what dictate product efficacy. Only a relatively small number of spores germinate determine efficacy. How efficient the vegetative cells are in degrading accumulated organic matter depends on the nutrient loads and enzyme cofactors. Since an unnaturally high level of spores is being added at once this also sets off a cascade of events that include protozoa that feed on germinating bacteria and bacteriophages that destroy vegetative cells. This is how the system in the pond maintains balance. In hatchery tanks the Bacillus can form biofilms since they are being added daily. In production systems such as ponds this is not normally going to happen.

Due to the inherent variability of the environments in which these types of products are employed, higher spore counts are typically employed than likely would be needed to be in some of the environments where they are used. The fact that the products need to be applied repeatedly strongly suggests that there are variables in play that ensure than many of the spores are not ever going to become metabolically active bacteria.

The microbiome in a pond is a very complex assemblage of bacteria, fungi, viruses and protozoa. It includes the water column and the sediment. Even lined ponds will have microbiomes associated with the liners. By their very nature mature microbiomes resist change. The levels and properties of the Bacillus strains that are in PRO4000X are in excess of what would be required under all possible applications.

Observations: Adding bacteria to environments that already have mature microbiomes is the common practice. This limits the potential of the added bacteria (in the instance of Bacillus, their spores) to germinate and compete. Furthermore, it sets off a cascade of events that inherently limit their growth including nutrient limitation and strain specific phages (bacterial viruses) and protozoa that feed off the vegetative cells. Regardless of what one is adding they will not become stable components of the microbiome.

Scientific studies have shown that most of spores do not germinate although they may remain in the environment and could germinate if the conditions allowed it. Because of the complex nature of the microbiome this is not certain and the factors that impact nutrient loads are a major reason why they need to be added repeatedly during the cycle.

Responsible aquaculture requires using only “Generally Recognized as Safe” (GRAS) bacterial strains. Strains must be non-toxigenic and free of lysogenic phages to avoid harming animal health. Professional microbiological oversight is critical to ensure product safety and prevent environmental risks.

Observations: There are a wide variety of parameters that should be monitored regularly (outlined in Figure 4 and in more detail in the Appendix) as a normal approach to progressive and responsible crop management. For many farmers most of these are far beyond their technical abilities and they have to focus on only a few parameters that can be measured without the need for a lab. Due to the inherent nature of aquaculture production systems, outdoor open to the environment production systems (the most common type of culture) can be highly variable. This variability can be reflected in the impact of adding microbial products and explains some of the variation that can be seen in large scale applications.

Expectations of outcomes of the use of these tools is based on the versatility of the strains and how the product is used. PRO4000X, the first tableted spore-based product has been used in more than a dozen countries with a range of beneficial results.

Observations: While some companies actively claim that the impact of their products is that of true probiotics, as defined above, most of these claims are based on lab studies that do not adequately address what happens in a real-world production environments. There is scant scientific evidence based on what is happening in the field to support these claims. While it may be possible to effectively alter the microbiome in small ponds or tanks where high loads of specific bacteria can be added routinely and cost effectively this is simply not an economic or biologic reality in most production paradigms.

The vast majority of products that are being sold act on the environment. Many bacteria and fungi impact the non-specific afferent of animal immune systems. In fact, this impact is so common that it could be considered to be a generic impact. The large number of publications that demonstrate that a very wide range of organisms have this type of an impact support this.

As the Appendix details the impacts can have wide ranging positive benefits on the overall crop resulting in increased profits. Aquaintech has almost 20 years of accumulated data from many billions of animals at different life stages in a dozen countries. Additionally, there a number of peer reviewed science publications that outline a wide variety of benefits. Our customers have reported a wide variety of impacts. These include but are not limited to:

Benefits from client observations on the use of PRO4000X

✓ Dramatic reductions in accumulated organic matter in nursery and production ponds, shrimp (Penaeus monodon, Litopenaeus (Penaeus) vannamei, P. stylirostrus, Macrobrachium rosenbergii), fish including Tilapia and Barramundi and others, crabs, clams, etc. This has been observed in ponds, dirt, lined, and concrete, as well as plastic and other types of tanks, RAS systems, etc. Cleaner environments in production environments due to less accumulated organic matter increases water quality and reduces niches for potential pathogens.

✓ Increased growth rates (one customer reported almost a 15% increase in weekly growth rates)

✓ Increased survivals, better FCRs, cleaner animals with less fouling issues at partial harvests. These benefits can be attributed to the impact of the Bacillus species on the ability of other bacteria with similar nutritional requirements to utilize these nutrients.

✓ Cleaner broodstock tanks, healthier animals better able to tolerate handling and stress. Prevention of exoskeleton lesions due to handling.

✓ Stabilization of ammonia and nitrite/nitrate levels. Less spikes means healthy animals with less stress.

✓ Restores sediments to health by eliminating dead spots that can generate deadly hydrogen sulfide.

✓ Reduction or elimination of off flavor and odor issues.

✓ In shrimp hatcheries, effective control of vibrio loads, smooth molting of larvae, control of Zoeae syndrome, reduction of ammonia and nitrites.

✓ Nonspecific immune stimulation resulting in enhanced survival against the vibrio that causes AHPNS, Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Alterations of gene expression favoring the observed impact. Ask for references.

Long-term field data confirms that tableted Bacillus spores significantly reduce organic waste in ponds and hatcheries. Observed benefits include stabilized ammonia levels, increased weekly growth rates by up to 15%, and enhanced survival against pathogens like Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Conclusions

Added microbiological products to aquaculture production systems come in several different forms and there are large numbers of organisms that have a range of impacts. The Bacillus species have several distinct advantages, provided the products are formulated with GRAS strains. They form spores which allows them to be sold in shelf stable forms such as tablets which do not require refrigeration or special storage conditions to extend shelf lives.

The enzyme profiles of select strains allows them to degrade a very wide variety of substrates. Bacillus species are an important source for industrial enzymes that are secreted into the environment. They are able to tolerate a wide range environmental conditions with enzymes that work across a broad spectrum of temperatures and salinities. They are a major source of industrial enzymes, some vitamins and nutraceuticals and are widely consumed in fermented foods such as natto.

Their ability to form spores and the range of degradative enzymes including proteases, amylases, lipases, cellulases and many others make them ideal sources of microbial bioremediation for the wide range of aquaculture production systems. Not all strains are the same and many strains do not produce either the desirable enzymes or adequate levels, and some contain toxins and lysogenic phages. Because of the enzyme production variability, there is no correlation between high spore counts and efficacy nor is a product with more species/strain in it necessarily better for it.

* Stephen G. Newman has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Maryland in Conservation and Resource Management (ecology) and a Ph.D. from the University of Miami, in Marine Microbiology. He has over 40 years of experience working within a range of topics and approaches on aquaculture such as water quality, animal health, biosecurity with special focus on shrimp and salmonids. He founded Aquaintech in 1996 and continues to be CEO of this company to the present day. It is heavily focused on providing consulting services around the world on microbial technologies and biosecurity issues. sgnewm@aqua-in-tech.com www.aqua-in-tech.com www.bioremediationaquaculture.com www.sustainablegreenaquaculture.com.

Integrating Genomic Selection into Pacific Oyster Breeding Program

Edusehat — Wed, 06 May 2026 22:10:10 +0700

Australian Seafood Industries (ASI) is transitioning from traditional family-based selection to a fully operational genomic selection framework. Working in collaboration with the Center for Aquaculture Technologies (CAT), and the University of Tasmania, this work represents an advanced implementation of genomics in a commercial molluscan breeding program. Initial analyses suggest meaningful improvements in selection accuracy, particularly for traits that are difficult or expensive to measure directly.

What is Genomic Selection, and Why Does It Matter?

Genomic selection is a method that uses dense DNA marker information to predict the genetic potential of individual animals. In practical terms, it allows us to make more accurate breeding decisions earlier and with greater precision.
Traditional family-based breeding relies on estimated breeding values (EBVs), which are based on family performance. While effective, this approach limits resolution, particularly for complex traits like disease resistance or thermotolerance, because it cannot distinguish between individuals within the same family.
Genomic selection addresses this by calculating genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) at the individual level. This enables within-family selection and allows us to capture genetic variation that was previously inaccessible.
The transition to genomic selection allows the ASI program to capture unrealised genetic gain that already exists within the population. It also removes the constraint of selecting the best families, enabling identification and propagation of the highest-performing individuals within those families, fundamentally increasing the rate of genetic improvement.

Henry Hewish, General Manager, ASI

From Traditional Breeding to Genomics-Driven Decisions

ASI’s breeding program has historically delivered steady genetic gains in traits such as growth rate, survival, shell shape, and condition. The transition to genomic selection is expected to significantly accelerate these gains by improving selection accuracy.
Initial analyses already suggest meaningful improvements, particularly for traits that are difficult or expensive to measure directly. Importantly, genomic selection also supports the maintenance of genetic diversity by enabling selection across a broader range of families, an essential factor for long-term sustainability and resilience.

Building the Foundation: Data and Models

Over the past year, ASI, CAT, and the University of Tasmania have established a multi-year reference population that combines phenotypic and genomic data. This dataset underpins genomic prediction models and ensures accurate GEBVs across traits and environments.

Broodstock populations have also been genomically characterised, with pedigree verification and genotype imputation to a common marker set. These data are integrated into single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models, which combine genomic and pedigree information while maintaining continuity with historical data.

ASI© Broodstock preparing for Genotyping – tagged

Adapting Operations for Genomic Selection

Implementing genomic selection requires more than new data, it requires operational change. Tissue sampling, tagging, and genotyping workflows have been aligned with commercial hatchery timelines. At the same time, spawning protocols have shifted from family-based to individual-based designs.

Why Oysters Are Well Suited to Genomic Selection

The scientific basis for genomic selection is well established. In terrestrial livestock, it has become the dominant breeding approach due to its ability to increase accuracy and accelerate long-term genetic gain.
Oysters are particularly well suited to these methods due to their high fecundity. However, molluscan systems also present unique challenges, including:

The need for lethal phenotyping for certain traits
Strong genotype-by-environment interactions
Complex disease pressures such as Pacific Oyster Mortality Syndrome (POMS)

Despite these challenges, the ASI program has made strong progress since POMS reshaped breeding objectives in 2013.

Early Results and What Comes Next

Early results are promising. Genomic prediction models for survival and performance traits are now in place for both South Australian and Tasmanian populations, supported by thousands of genotyped individuals and hundreds of parental families.

Looking ahead, the next phase will focus on validating realised genomic gains under commercial conditions and refining prediction models as more data are incorporated. The ultimate goal is to deliver consistent, measurable improvements in productivity and robustness for oyster producers.

Bridging Research and Industry

What makes this work particularly significant is that it represents a shift from genomic selection as a research concept to a routine commercial tool.

The ASI program demonstrates that, with the right infrastructure and data pipelines, genomic selection can be implemented at scale in molluscan aquaculture.

This collaboration represents a significant step forward for shellfish genetics. By combining rigorous scientific methodology with practical implementation, the collaborative program is helping to bridge the gap between research and industry, shaping future approaches to Oyster breeding.

The post Integrating Genomic Selection into Pacific Oyster Breeding Program appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Regulatory Pathways and the Road to Commercialization of Genome Editing in Aquaculture: A Conversation with Debbie Plouffe of CAT

Edusehat — Wed, 06 May 2026 22:10:08 +0700

Q: Debbie, let’s start with a fundamental question. What is the difference between genetic modification and genome editing?

Q: Why have many regulators treated genome editing differently from GMOs?

This shift is important not just from a regulatory perspective, but also for building confidence more broadly, as regulatory clarity is often the foundation for acceptance of new technologies.

Q: You mentioned SDN-1. Can you explain what that means?

Q: What does this all mean for commercial aquaculture operations?

Q: What does the typical regulatory pathway look like for genome-edited products today?

Q: So, how is CAT supporting clients through this advancing landscape?

Ultimately, our focus is on creating a clear and efficient path to market.

Q: Looking ahead, where do you see genome editing in aquaculture over the next five years?

The post Regulatory Pathways and the Road to Commercialization of Genome Editing in Aquaculture: A Conversation with Debbie Plouffe of CAT appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global Brings More Than 35,500 Industry Professionals, the Largest Attendance in the Event’s History

Edusehat — Wed, 06 May 2026 07:20:26 +0700

By Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global

With over 52,980 net square meters of exhibit space, the 32^nd edition brought together 2,290 exhibiting companies from 85 countries, offering seafood professionals a premier platform to connect in person, conduct business and discover the latest industry developments.

The next Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global will be held in Barcelona from 20-22 April 2027.

Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global, the world’s largest and most diverse seafood trade event, concluded its 32^nd edition with more than 35,500 seafood professionals in attendance. Over the course of three days, suppliers, buyers and industry stakeholders from around the globe gathered to exchange insights, explore innovations and address the key opportunities and challenges shaping the future of the sector.

This year’s edition represented the largest in the event’s history in terms of attendance and exhibit space with more than 2,290 exhibiting companies from 85 countries and 65 national and regional pavilions, covering more than 52,980 net square meters of exhibit space. Held at Fira de Barcelona’s Gran Vía venue, the expo spanned halls 1 through 5, as well as the galleria between halls 4 and 5. The event is estimated to have generated an economic impact exceeding USD 188.22 million for the city.

The strong international presence underscored the global reach of the expo, with a diverse representation of countries including Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, Ecuador, France, Greece, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Morocco, Norway, Netherlands, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam and more. The event also welcomed delegation visits from around the world including the Department of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries of the Government of Catalonia; the Ministry of Fisheries Canada; the Icelandic Ministry of Industry and Innovation; the Ministry of Fisheries of Ireland; the Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Maritime Policy; the Consulate of South Korea in Las Palmas; the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food; the United Kingdom’s Minister of Food Safety and more.

“The energy and high level of engagement across the exhibition floor at this year’s edition clearly highlighted the value of in-person connections for the industry as a whole,” said Wynter Courmont, Group Vice President, Seafood at Diversified. “Participants from across the value chain took advantage of the event to reinforce existing relationships, explore new business opportunities and stay ahead of the trends shaping the future of the seafood industry.”

Exhibitors at Seafood Expo Global presented a wide range of seafood products, including fresh, frozen, canned, value-added, processed and packaged offerings, highlighting innovation across all categories. Meanwhile,Seafood Processing Global brought together companies covering the full spectrum of processing solutions, from packaging materials and machinery to refrigeration systems, processing equipment, sanitation technologies, transport, logistics, quality control services and more.

High-volume buyers of seafood from retail, foodservice and distribution took part in this year’s Key Buyer program. Companies included Aeon Topvalu Co., Ltd. (Japan), Aldi (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Portugal, Spain), Aramark & Avendra International (Spain), Bidfood (Czech Republic, Hong Kong SAR, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom), Carnival UK (United Kingdom), Carrefour (France, Spain, Turkey), Elior (France, Italy, United Kingdom), Gategroup (Luxembourg, Spain), HelloFresh (Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom), Kura Sushi (United States), Lidl (Finland, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, Spain), Mercadona (Spain), Metro (France, Germany, Hong Kong SAR, Hungary, Italy, Moldova, Romania, Serbia, Turkey), Pomona PassionFroid (France), Sodexo (France, Italy, United Kingdom), Sysco (France, Hong Kong SAR, Ireland, Italy, United Kingdom), Viking Cruises (Andorra, Germany, Switzerland), Wonderfield Group (Spain, United Kingdom) and more.

Industry Trends, Innovation and Knowledge Exchange

The conference program offered seafood professionals a comprehensive look at the industry from every angle, spanning sustainable sourcing and supply chain transparency, responsible aquaculture and fisheries innovation, worker welfare and brand-driven business growth among others. Sessions ranged from expert discussions on responsible marine ingredient sourcing, ESG-driven innovation in blue food systems, meaningful worker engagement across seafood supply chains, how strategic branding and category creation are redefining commercial growth beyond commodities and more.

A highlight of the program was the keynote address, “High Stakes, Shifting Tides: The Global Outlook on Seafood, Trade, Economic Pressure Points and Opportunities,” delivered by Dr. Nomi Prins, economist and geopolitical strategist. Her presentation provided a forward-looking analysis of the economic forces influencing the global seafood market and how companies can capitalize on new trade paths and product diversification to meet robust demand in 2026.

A major new feature of this year’s edition was the of the Aquaculture Innovation Zone, a dedicated space focused on the future of aquaculture. The zone included an Innovation Theater with product pitches, programming and networking opportunities. The new area brought together companies, startups and researchers working on solutions in areas such as fish health, water quality monitoring, AI-driven analytics and sustainable production systems.

Awards, Networking and Event Highlights

The Seafood Excellence Global Awards celebrated the best products represented at the expo, with 35 finalists from 16 countries. Vičiūnai Group (Lithuania) and Frais Embal (France) received the top distinctions. Vičiūnai Group was awarded Best Retail Product for Smoked Herring Slices – Natural Flavor, while Frais Embal earned Best HORECA Product for its Salmon Roll.

The networking events “Connecting Women in Seafood” and “Aquaculture Meet-Up” brought together professionals from across the sector to exchange experiences, foster inclusion and build stronger industry connections.

Among the event highlights was the culinary demonstration “The Mediterranean Sea, Our Pantry,” led by Michelin-starred Barcelona chef Albert Raurich, who presented a unique fusion of Mediterranean and Japanese culinary techniques.

Attendees also enjoyed the lively oyster shucking competition, as well as daily product showcases and tastings, including the Seafood Excellence Global Awards display.

In line with its commitment to sustainability and community support, Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global partnered with el Banc dels Aliments (the Barcelona Food Bank) to collect seafood donations from exhibitors.

Looking ahead, the next Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global will take place in Barcelona from 20-22 April 2027, at Fira de Barcelona’s Gran Vía venue. For further information visit www.seafoodexpo.com/global.

About Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global

Seafood Expo Global and Seafood Processing Global make up the world’s largest seafood trade show. Thousands of buyers and sellers from around the world attend the three-day annual event to meet, connect, and do business. Buyers include importers, exporters, wholesalers, restaurants, supermarkets, hotels, and other companies in the retail and foodservice sectors. Exhibitors showcase the latest innovations in seafood products, processing and packaging machinery, and services for the seafood industry. SeafoodSource.com is the official media of the event. The organizer is Diversified, the international leader in seafood events and media. www.seafoodexpo.com/global

About Diversified

Diversified is a global B2B events and media company that strengthens business communities by fostering a space, in person and online, for professionals and businesses to connect and grow. The company serves as a trusted partner across several industries including active lifestyle, business management, clean energy, commercial marine, healthcare, seafood, technology and more. The company’s global seafood portfolio of expositions and media includes Seafood Expo North America/Seafood Processing North America, Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global, Seafood Expo Asia/Seafood Processing Asia and SeafoodSource.com. Established in 1949 and headquartered in Portland, Maine, the global company has divisions and offices around the world in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Diversified is a third-generation, family-owned business. For more information, visit: www.divcom.com.

Australia’s Black-Market Seafood Problem: A Failure of Compliance, Traceability and Accountability

Edusehat — Wed, 06 May 2026 07:20:21 +0700

By Seafood Consumers Association

Australia likes to present itself as a world leader in fisheries management. In many respects, that claim is justified: our stocks are often well assessed, harvest strategies are strong, and the science base is better than in many countries. But the recent NSW crackdown on black-market seafood in Sydney restaurants is a reminder that even the best systems fail when compliance is weak and illegal trade is tolerated for too long.

The NSW operation inspected 15 premises across Sydney and found illegal or improperly labelled abalone in seven of them. Officers seized 106 abalone, including frozen black lip abalone and dried abalone, with an estimated retail value far above the modest quantity seized. More importantly, the government itself stated that the estimated illegal, unreported and unregulated catch of abalone in 2025/26 was 30 tons, and that legal commercial catch had to be reduced by 12% because of poaching pressure. That is not a marginal issue. That is resource theft at scale.

For consumers, black-market seafood is not an abstract regulatory breach. It is a direct attack on trust. When a restaurant buys illegal product, the customer is not just being sold something they did not order; they are being pushed into a chain of false claims, hidden provenance, and unknown safety risks. Illegal seafood may bypass food handling rules, shellfish monitoring, labelling requirements, and traceability obligations. In practical terms, that means consumers can end up paying premium prices for product that has no verified origin, no legitimate chain of custody, and no assurance that it was handled under proper hygiene controls.

This is especially damaging because Australia’s seafood industry depends heavily on reputation. Licensed commercial fishers, aquaculture producers, processors and wholesalers invest significant money in compliance, traceability, tagging, reporting, and biosecurity. Illegal operators undercut all of that. They avoid license costs, avoid quota constraints, and avoid the record-keeping required to demonstrate legality. The result is unfair competition against lawful operators and pressure on the communities that depend on them.

The NSW case also exposes a broader policy weakness. If a government can tell us that 30 tons of abalone are being lost to illegal activity, then a three-day compliance blitz is clearly not enough on its own. Strong enforcement matters, but enforcement has to be continuous, intelligence-led and backed by modern traceability systems. If buyers know there is a significant chance they will be detected, the market dries up. If not, the black market simply adapts.

The black market is not confined to one species or one state. Queensland has faced repeated concerns about black jewfish, a species prized for both flesh and swim bladder. ABC reporting in 2019 described black jewfish swim bladders as fetching between USD 500 and USD 900 per kilogram, with commercial catch rising rapidly over a short period and regulators worried about a stock collapse. Earlier Queensland parliamentary material also noted the species’ vulnerability to overfishing because of its large size, high value, and predictable aggregations. WA has seen repeated prosecutions involving illegal sales of rock lobster, abalone and recreationally caught fish, including substantial fines and license suspensions.

Victoria’s fisheries compliance system is also moving in the wrong direction. Recent restructuring at the Victorian Fisheries Authority has reduced frontline fisheries officers, closed stations and shifted resources toward “engagement” at the expense of on-water enforcement, just as illegal take and black-market activity require more, not less, scrutiny. That raises a serious question for seafood consumers: if there are fewer officers checking catches, landings, restaurant supply and traceability, how will the public know the law is actually being enforced?

Commercial quotas and management settings already assume a degree of illegal take, but that does not make smuggling acceptable; it simply means consumers and legitimate operators are paying the price for weak compliance. The problem is compounded by a ministerial and portfolio environment increasingly shaped by recreation, climate and outdoor-activity priorities, which are not always compatible with the harder realities of commercial fishing and aquaculture. In that context, Victoria’s seafood consumers deserve clear assurance that legal supply chains are being protected and that the public interest is not being subordinated to recreational politics.

The lesson is simple: illegal seafood trade is not a victimless side hustle. It is organized theft from a shared resource. It harms consumers, damages legitimate businesses, undermines sustainability, and erodes the public’s faith in the entire seafood sector. It also weakens the credibility of governments that claim to have some of the world’s best fishery managers. If management is so strong, why are illegal products still finding their way into restaurants, wholesalers and back-of-house supply chains? Where is the audit between production/harvest and food safety/sustainability?

For the Seafood Consumers Association, the answer is not to weaken commercial fisheries or punish law-abiding operators with more red tape. The answer is to protect the legal market. That means stronger point-of-sale verification, mandatory purchasing records, tighter restaurant traceability obligations, more visible penalties for buyers as well as sellers, and routine intelligence-led inspections in high-risk species and high-risk venues. It also means public education, because consumers should be able to expect that a seafood meal is legal, traceable and safe.

There is also a reputational issue. Australia promotes its seafood as premium, safe and sustainable. That claim is only credible when governments are willing to confront illegal trade honestly and consistently. A one-off crackdown may generate headlines, but the real test is whether the illegal supply chain is closed, not merely interrupted. Until then, the black market will continue to drain community resources and punish the honest businesses that do the right thing.

Australia’s fisheries and aquaculture system is built around a cost-recovery model, meaning licensed commercial operators and quota holders effectively help pay for the management, research and compliance systems that regulate their industries. That makes illegal take and black-market seafood especially damaging. It is not just theft from the resource, but theft from a system that honest operators are already funding. When smuggling, poaching or unrecorded sales go unchecked, the burden falls on law-abiding fishers, consumers and the public purse, while illegal product undercuts legitimate supply chains and weakens confidence in the credibility of Australia’s seafood governance.

The seafood sector does not need slogans. It needs compliance, transparency and enforcement with teeth. Consumers deserve nothing less.

Seafood Consumers Association: CEO, Roy Palmer

Email: seafoodsdg@outlook.com Phone: +61 492825012

References and sources consulted by the author on the elaboration of this article are available under previous request to our editorial staff.

Salmon Producer Bakkafrost Achieves 100% ASC Certification

Edusehat — Wed, 06 May 2026 07:20:11 +0700

• After the Faroe Islands, the Group now reaches the same standard in Scotland

• The company recently entered in the Global 100 Most Sustainable Companies list by Corporate Knights

Bakkafrost Group proudly announced that the Company is now 100% ASC certified across its entire salmon farming operations in both Faroe Islands and Scotland. They achieved full Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) certification in the Faroe Islands in 2020 following several years of dedicated and focused work. In Scotland, the Group is now reached the same standard, making an important milestone for the business and our long-term commitment to responsible aquaculture.

The ASC certification is one of the most rigorous and globally recognized standards for environmental and social responsibility in aquaculture. For Bakkafrost achieving 100% ASC certification demonstrates the Group’s commitment to producing salmon with the highest standards of environmental care, responsible farming, fish welfare and social responsibility with full traceability across the value chain.

“Reaching 100% ASC certification across the Group is a significant milestone for Bakkafrost. It reflects the hard work of our teams and our commitment to responsible salmon farming, high standards, and continuous improvement in everything we do,” said Anna Johansen, Group QESH Director at Bakkafrost.

Independent Assurance

But the benefits of the certification are also for customers and consumers, as the certification provides independent assurance that salmon from Bakkafrost comes from operations that are independently audited against recognized standards for responsible farming. It strengthens trust in the company’s approach to sustainability, fish welfare, transparency across our operations.

Reaching 100% ASC certification across the Group is an important milestone and reflects our continued commitment to responsible salmon farming, high standards, and continuous improvement across all our operations.

It strengthens trust in the company’s approach to sustainability, biosecurity, transparency, and continuous improvement. From now on, they said, Bakkafrost Group will continue to prioritize responsible growth, innovation, and leadership in sustainability as the business develops its operations in both regions.

Bakkafrost enters Global 100 Most Sustainable Companies list by Corporate Knights

Some weeks ago, Bakkafrost has been named in the Corporate Knights 2026 Global 100 list, the annual ranking of the world’s most sustainable companies. In the 2026 Global 100, Bakkafrost is ranked 83rd worldwide and 2nd in the Food and Beverage Manufacturing Group. The Global 100 list is compiled by the research and media company Corporate Knights and was published at the annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos.

Inclusion in the 2026 Global 100 reflects continued, organization-wide work to strengthen sustainable performance across operations and the value-chain. The list highlights sustainable performance and reflects Bakkafrost‘s strategy of ensuring that every part of the value chain meets the highest international standards for sustainability and transparency. Bakkafrost aims to use resources responsibly, minimize environmental impact, respect people, and create value for stakeholders and society.

The Corporate Knights Global 100 is an annual ranking of the world’s 100 most sustainable companies. It assesses publicly traded companies with revenues above USD 1 billion and highlights measurable performance linked to companies’ products and services. The 2026 Global 100 list is available on Corporate Knights’ website: 2026 Global 100 list.

Top Quality Salmon Products

Bakkafrost is a leading producer of superior quality salmon from the Faroe Islands and Scotland. They offer a wide range of healthy and nutritious salmon products from their own facilities. 2The cool and steady sea temperatures of the North Atlantic Current in the Faroe Islands and Scotland provides perfect conditions for raising healthy and robust Atlantic salmon,” they say.

Bakkafrost is one of the world’s most vertically integrated salmon farming companies. Bakkafrost controls all aspects of production – from feed to finished value added products. This ensures unrivalled traceability and consistent high quality. Their longstanding experiences in the seafood industry and their focus on providing their customers with top quality salmon products has made Bakkafrost well reputed as a reliable and responsible partner.

“We are committed to maintaining the highest standards in relation to fish welfare, sustainability and sound stewardship of the environment. We are dedicated to providing consumers worldwide with top quality tasty and nutritious salmon products,” they assure.

BioMar Strengthens R&D at ATC Hirtshals to Support New Species and Global Growth

Edusehat — Wed, 06 May 2026 07:20:05 +0700

• While initially focused on cold-water species, they already conducted successful trials with yellowtail kingfish and are now including species like barramundi

• The research center has 15 experimental trial units, 27 recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) and more than 350 tanks

BioMar reported that they are expanding their research and development activities at its Aquaculture Technology Centre (ATC) in Hirtshals, Denmark, to support the introduction of new species into its global portfolio. As the company grows into new markets, the need for targeted scientific research on key species such as yellowtail kingfish and barramundi is increasing, strengthening BioMar’s ability to deliver species-specific nutritional solutions worldwide.

ATC Hirtshals is the largest research facility within BioMar and one of the most advanced aquaculture research centers in Europe. The site includes 15 experimental trial units, 27 recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), and more than 350 tanks, enabling controlled and large-scale testing across a wide range of species and life stages.

“Expanding into new species is a natural step as aquaculture continues to evolve,” said Simon Wadsworth, Global R&D Director at BioMar. “Our role is to generate the scientific knowledge needed to support farmers with reliable, well-documented nutritional solutions adapted to each species and production environment.”

The planned projects will focus on developing feeding strategies, improving biological performance, and strengthening predictive performance models for barramundi. This work will contribute to building operational knowledge that can be transferred across regions and production systems.

Leading Position in High-Value Marine Species

ATC Hirtshals has a strong track record working with major species such as salmon, trout, seabass and seabream throughout the different stages of their life cycle, including the hatchery stage at the Larviva Hatchery Hub. BioMar holds a leading position in high-value marine species, with more than 30 years supplying seabass and seabream producers and around 20 years of dedicated nutritional trials at Hirtshals covering the full production cycle.

Over the years, this work has spanned nutritional requirements, raw material documentation, environmental challenges and feeding optimization, building the deep, long-standing expertise in Mediterranean marine species that provides a solid foundation for developing and validating feed solutions across BioMar‘s global markets.

While initially focused on cold-water species, ATC Hirtshals has increasingly expanded its work with warm-water species. In recent years, successful trials have been conducted with yellowtail kingfish, a species of growing global importance and of relevance for our business in Europe and Australia.

Building on this experience, BioMar is now expanding its research portfolio to include several new key species, where the first step is barramundi. This species represents a key opportunity in several targeted markets, particularly in Australia and southeast Asia, and will be the focus of upcoming innovation at our Hirtshals facility.

Integrated Into the Global Innovation Framework

For his part, David Whyte, Managing Director of BioMar Australia, comments: “For BioMar Australia, barramundi and yellowtail kingfish are two of the most promising species in Australian aquaculture. They are central to the growth of the country’s warm-temperate and tropical sector and we need to support the fish’s nutritional requirements under Australia’s range of production systems and environments. Our commitment to the success of Aquaculture in our region is underpinned by the exciting work planned at Hirshals”.

According to them, thanks to this expansion in its R&D scope, “BioMar continues to reinforce its ability to support customers across a broader range of markets. The work carried out in Hirtshals is integrated into BioMar’s global innovation framework, ensuring that insights generated at the centre contribute directly to feed development and performance optimization worldwide.”

How Modern Farmers Mitigate the Effects of Agriculture on the Environment?

Edusehat — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:55:07 +0700

The effects of agriculture on the environment have been well studied, with hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific papers published on the topic in the past few years. Farming has been found to accelerate climate change, introduce toxins into watersheds, and negatively impact local biodiversity.

Each year, the global food system grows increasingly larger and more complex, and the need for greater sustainability during agricultural production has increased concurrently. Without a concerted effort from growers, distributors, and consumers, the food supply that communities across the world depend on will be at risk.

Fortunately, modern farmers are leading the charge toward a more sustainable food system for their local communities and the world at large. Let’s consider some of the innovative practices farmers use to mitigate the environmental effects of agriculture. Pioneered by small-scale local farms, these techniques are now being adopted worldwide to promote long-term ecosystem health.

Reducing Carbon Footprints

According to the USDA, agriculture contributes about 10.6 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, totaling hundreds of millions of metric tons of carbon dioxide and its equivalents per year. These emissions are generated by every aspect of the agricultural process, from the carbon dioxide directly produced by the machinery used during production and distribution to the nitrous oxide created by fertilizers and livestock manure. Promoting long-term sustainability is a matter of reducing these greenhouse gas emissions wherever possible.

One major contributor to carbon dioxide production during agriculture is the tilling process itself. Whenever the soil is disturbed, microbes living inside it release the byproducts of decomposition, including greenhouse gases. Modern farmers have employed multiple techniques for ensuring that this CO2 remains sequestered in the soil. For example, they often plant cover crops as a source of protection from erosion and runoff. These cover crops also help to absorb carbon, preventing it from reentering the atmosphere.

Conserving Water

Fresh water is one of the rarest and most valuable commodities on the planet. Only 3 percent of the water in the world is freshwater, and the majority of that is impossible to access for human use, as it is frozen in ice caps or held in the atmosphere or deep underground. That means only about 0.5 percent of the world’s water is usable by humans.

Of that 0.5 percent, the agriculture industry is by far the largest user of freshwater on the planet, employing about 70 percent of the worldwide water supply. Unfortunately, much of this water is also wasted. The numbers are truly staggering: Some estimates suggest as much as 60 percent, or more, is lost as a result of inefficient agricultural practices.

Mitigating the effects of agriculture on the environment requires vastly improving water management on farms, a task that modern farmers are now working to undertake. Innovative methods of watering crops, such as drip irrigation, are being implemented worldwide. Irrigation scheduling software can also be used to ensure water is supplied to crops when it is needed the most and in exactly the right amounts.

Precision Farming

A great deal of the environmental impact of farming can be minimized by the process of precision farming. This technique utilizes modern technology to reduce waste and eliminate the inefficiencies that plague traditional farms. This technology allows for the collection of vast amounts of data from any agricultural project. For example, GPS technology can be used to create extremely accurate maps of a given area, enabling farmers to determine which areas are best suited for specific crops.

Precision farming techniques also employ software to analyze and predict groundwater levels, helping farmers to determine crops’ exact irrigation needs, down to the drop. This both reduces the farm’s overall water usage and eliminates harmful runoff that can carry pollutants into the local water supply. Precision farming is also used to track and predict the life cycles of pest insects, helping farms use smaller quantities of harmful pesticide chemicals than they have in the past.

Crop Rotation

Another farming practice that reduces resource usage in agriculture is crop rotation. This involves changing the type of crop grown in a specific field on an annual or seasonal basis.

Growing the same crops in the same location season after season can strain local environments. This eventually depletes the soil of necessary nutrients. It also provides pest insects with a tempting and predictable environment in which to establish themselves. Crop rotation addresses these concerns by recycling and restoring the soil, increasing the diversity of plant life available in the area, and disrupting pest life cycles.

The benefits are multifold. Interrupting pest life cycles reduces pest species populations, which in turn minimizes the amount of harmful pesticides introduced to the local environment. Soil regeneration and increased plant diversity mean a stronger local ecosystem overall. All of this supports the presence of beneficial local wildlife, including pollinators, which can then further reinforce the health of both the crops and the surrounding environment.

Small-scale farming operations, including the sustainable potato farms in Washington State, have successfully employed crop rotation to boost yields and strengthen local environments. Now these tried-and-true techniques are being employed on larger farms worldwide.

Using Renewable Energy

Farms can also cut down on their carbon emissions and reduce their environmental impacts by utilizing renewable energy sources to power operations. There are dozens of ways renewable energy can be used during the agricultural process.

One of the best and most effective is installing solar panels on the farmland. Solar panels absorb solar radiation during the day, which can help meet the energy requirements of the farm. They also provide a source of shade for the crops, which can protect them from excessive heat and further improve the output and efficiency of the growing operation.

Whether you are a generational farmer with a small-scale growing operation or the owner of a large-scale agricultural business, the sustainable practices listed above can help your farm save money, increase yields, and reduce the environmental impact of the growing process. Consider implementing them to support the health of your local ecosystem and be a part of the future of agriculture.

Quality That Shows in the Harvest: How to Choose Products That Deliver Real Results

Edusehat — Mon, 27 Apr 2026 23:35:06 +0700

By Aquaculture Magazine Editorial Team

Modern aquaculture, particularly tilapia farming, is experiencing a period of high technical demands. Rather than merely seeking to increase production volumes, producers now seek stability, predictability, and consistent results that allow them to plan their operations with less risk. In this context, the maturation and reproduction phase has become one of the most critical aspects of the production system. Small physiological variations can result in significant economic differences.

Given this scenario, choosing nutritional and functional products is no longer a secondary decision. Not all products perform equally, nor are they all manufactured to the same quality standards. Experience gained from field trials demonstrates that product quality — including formulation, process control, certifications, and consistency — is a determining factor in reducing reproductive variability and improving farming results.

This article focuses on tilapia maturation and analyzes how incorporating a certified, high-quality product like MegaTure-F directly impacts reproductive indicators. Results from a renowned Ecuadorian aquaculture company confirm that when quality is the cornerstone of product development, the benefits are clearly and measurably reflected on the farm.

Tilapia Maturation: A Highly Sensitive Process

Reproduction in tilapia is a biologically demanding process. During maturation, broodstock must allocate significant energy toward gamete formation while coping with confinement, handling, environmental fluctuations, and metabolic stress. Imbalances in this process negatively impact fertility, egg quality, and fry viability.

One of the least visible yet most critical factors at this stage is oxida- tive stress. Free radicals cause cellular damage in reproductive tissues and glands, forcing the animal to divert energy toward defense mechanisms instead of reproduction. This “hiddencost” reduces the system’s biological efficiency and increases variability between production cycles.

Reducing this defensive energy expenditure requires attention to both nutrition and the quality of the products used. Only stable formulations with high-purity ingredients and controlled processes can effectively influence these physiological mechanisms without causing side effects.

In tilapia breeding, using feed manufactured under strict quality standards is essential for achieving reproductive stability, biological efficiency, and consistent results in each production cycle.

When it comes to the maturation of tilapia, critical decision are key. The difference lies not only in nutrition, but also in the quality of the product that underpins each production outcome.To achieve reproductive stability, reduce variability, and maximize biological performance, it is essential to choose inputs manufactured to strict standards with verifiable certifications and consistent field performance. Experience in Ecuador shows that quality is not an abstract concept; it is measured by viable fry, reproductive efficiency, and sustainable results.

Product Quality: The Attribute That Makes All the Difference

In aquaculture, quality is an operational necessity, not just a marketing slogan. Aquaculturists value products that perform consistently from batch to batch, remain stable over time, and produce measurable results in real-world farming conditions. This is indeed one of the most highly recognized value attributes by Megasupply’s customers, according to user and potential client surveys.

MegaTure-F was developed with this in mind — quality as the foundation of performance. The product holds four SGS certification seals attesting to its manufacture under strict quality standards, ingredient traceability, and process control. These certifications validate the formulation and guarantee the product’s stability, consistency, and safety for continuous use.

In a market where many products promise results but few deliver them over time, certified quality is a real differentiator. Consistent products are key to reducing production variability, one of the main challenges in tilapia farming.

In tilapia breeding, using feed manufactured under strict quality standards is essential for achieving reproductive stability, biological efficiency, and consistent results in each production cycle.

Selecting products with verifiable certifications is not just a formality; it guarantees performance. Controlling the formulation, ingredients, and processes translates into lower physiological stress, improved fertility, and reduced reproductive variability.

MegaTure-F: Quality Applied to Reproductive Physiology

MegaTure-F is a high-quality nutritional emulsion formulated specifically for breeding animals. It works by combining vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants in precise amounts. Selenium and the enzyme glutathione peroxidase play key roles in neutralizing hydrogen peroxide (Figure 1).

From a physiological perspective, this action results in:

✓ Protection of reproductive cells.

✓ Reduction of oxidative damage.

✓ Metabolic energy savings

✓ Increased energy availability for gamete production.

This approach does not force reproduction; rather, it optimizes the animal’s natural biological efficiency. The quality of the product ensures these processes occur stably, without peaks or abrupt drops in reproductive performance.

Design of Field Trials in Ecuador

The findings presented in this article are based on a field trial conducted from 2023 to 2024 at a leading Ecuadorian aquaculture company. The study evaluated the impact of MegaTure-F on tilapia broodstock diets under real-world farming conditions.

Key features of the study

✓ Start date: September 25, 2023.

✓ Base diet: GISIS TILAPIA balanced feed for broodstock (36% protein).

✓ Treatment: Addition of MegaTure- F at controlled doses (15 ml/kg).

The sample includes six batches of broodstock with variable biomass (weights ranging from 267 g to 5,929 g). The experimental design enabled comparison of previous cycles with treated cycles and evaluation of key indicators of fertility, hatching, and total fry production. The methodological consistency of the trial reinforces the validity of the obtained results.

Results from field trials demonstrate that quality is more than just marketing talk. It is a technical factor that directly impacts hatchery efficiency, the production of viable fry, and the stability of the reproductive system, even when using the same infrastructure.

Results: When Quality Translates into Numbers

The results of the field trial clearly demonstrate sustained improvements in all evaluated reproductive indicators, confirming the direct impact of product quality on crop performance.

Improved fertility in females

✓ A 20% increase in the percentage of females that spawned (Figure 2).

✓ A 49% increase in the volume of eggs collected (Figure 2).

These results reflect improved re- productive efficiency. They are associated with better physiological condition in the breeding stock.

Hatching efficiency and viability

✓ A 54% increase in the viable hatch rate.

✓ A notable case was when one batch’s hatch rate rose from 30% to 85%.

One of the most significant findings was the reduction in variability between batches, which demonstrates the stability provided by a high-quality product.

Total fry production

✓ An 89.9% increase in the total number of hatched fry.

✓ Production nearly doubled using the same infrastructure.

From a commercial standpoint, this is a key point: the quality of the product made it possible to maximize yield without the need for additional investments in facilities.

Normalized productivity

The number of fries per kilogram of females increased by 33%, confirming that the improvement was genuine and not merely volumetric.

Quality, stability, and reduced variability

One of the biggest challenges in tilapia breeding is variability between production cycles. Fluctuations in fertility, hatching, and survival create operational uncertainty and affect planning.

The results obtained with MegaTure-F demonstrate that product quality directly contributes to greater reproductive stability.

✓ Greater reproductive stability.

✓ Less variation in results between batches.

✓ Greater predictability in fry production.

Megasupply’s customers particularly value this, recognizing quality as a key attribute for reducing risks and improving production decision- making.

Megasupply: A Company Built on Quality

Field results are not an isolated occurrence, but rather a reflection of a business philosophy. Megasupply has established its presence in the aquaculture market by offering high-quality products, as evidenced by stable formulations, international certifications, and technical support. When market perception aligns with field results, the message becomes credible and effective.

Megasupply‘s value proposition is based on the clear principle that product quality is the foundation of farm performance. This quality is recognized by our customers and is reflected in our stable formulations, international certifications, and consistent results under real production conditions.

Conclusions

Experience with tilapia breeding in Ecuador confirms that product qual- ity is not an abstract concept, but rather a decisive factor in production outcomes. Using MegaTure-F improved fertility, hatching efficiency, and total fry production. This reduced variability and increased the stability of the breeding system. These results, obtained under real-world farming conditions, demonstrate the effectiveness of a product manufactured under strict quality standards and supported by international certifications. In aquaculture, choosing quality is an investment that yields real, sustainable results, not an additional cost.

This article is sponsored by: MEGASUPPLY

This is a summarized version developed by the editorial team of Aquaculture Magazine based on the review article titled “ESTUDIO DE CASO: OPTIMIZACIÓN DE ÍNDICES REPRODUCTIVOS EN TILAPIA” y “MEGATURE-F: EMULSIÓN NUTRICIONAL PARA CAMARONES Y PECES EN MADURACIÓN SEXUAL” developed by: MEGASUPPLY.
Página web: www.megasupply.net
Email: orders@megasupply.net

Coldep Demonstrates 95% Norovirus Reduction in Seawater Using Its VAL AQUA Technology

Edusehat — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:05:18 +0700

By Coldep

First scientific demonstration of norovirus extraction from seawater by vacuum flotation.

As part of the NoVLess project, conducted with a consortium of six scientific and institutional partners, French water treatment company Coldep has demonstrated that its VAL AQUA technology reduces norovirus levels in seawater by 95% in just 120 minutes. The experiments, carried out at the Mediterranean Marine Environment Station (SMEL) in Sète, France, between 2025 and 2026, following a protocol reviewed by IFREMER, represent the first scientific proof that a vacuum flotation process can extract norovirus from seawater. For a shellfish industry that has had no proven technical solution against this viral threat, these results open a concrete path forward.

Coldep announces the results of the NoVLess project, carried out with a consortium of six scientific and institutional partners: its VAL AQUA technology achieved a 95% reduction in norovirus levels in seawater within 120 minutes.

The experiments were conducted between 2025 and 2026 at the Mediterranean Marine Environment Station (SMEL) in Sète, France, following a protocol reviewed by IFREMER, France’s national reference institute for marine science. They constitute the first scientific demonstration that a vacuum flotation process can extract norovirus from seawater.

For the global shellfish industry, these results mark a turning point. Until now, no technical solution had proven effective against norovirus, which causes recurring contamination events, prolonged harvesting area closures and significant economic losses for producers worldwide.

Robust, Reproducible Results Across Two Seasons

95% viral load reduction in treated water within 120 minutes (from 37 to 8 million genomic copies per liter).
x21 concentration factor in the collector (from 12M to 254M GU/L, +1.3 log) — confirming the physical microbubble extraction mechanism.
Mass balance verified: The viral reduction in treated water correlates directly with accumulation in the collector. The mechanism is physical and confirmed.
Two seasons tested: Summer conditions (April–May 2025) and winter conditions (January 2026, with viral loads 15 times higher) for robust assessment.
Independent dual analysis: Every sample analyzed by two independent laboratories — IAGE (digital RT-PCR) and LDV34/Hérault Departmental Veterinary Laboratory (quantitative RT-PCR). Cross-validated, concordant results.
Protocol reviewed by IFREMER, France’s national reference institute for marine science.

Regarding oysters: VAL AQUA acts on the water, not on the shellfish’s metabolism. By removing viruses from the tank water, it eliminates the source of recontamination and thereby supports natural depuration.

“Norovirus particles are just 30 nanometres in size. Until now, no one had demonstrated that a flotation process could extract particles that fine from seawater. That is what the NoVLess project establishes. And we did it under real conditions, across two seasons, with winter viral loads fifteen times higher than summer. The results hold”,— Bertrand Barrut, CTO, Coldep.

A Global Challenge for the Shellfish Industry

Norovirus is the leading cause of acute gastroenteritis worldwide and is responsible for over 40% of foodborne illness outbreaks linked to shellfish consumption. Because oysters are filter feeders, they naturally concentrate viral particles present in their environment.

This is not a localised problem. From Ireland to Australia, from Chile to Spain, shellfish-producing regions face the same pattern: winter contamination events, prolonged harvesting closures, economic damage to producers, and growing regulatory pressure — with no validated technical solution available until now.

Two Concrete Deployment Pathways

Upstream — VAL AQUA installed at wastewater treatment plant outlets to eliminate viruses before discharge into coastal waters and shellfish farming zones.

Downstream — continuous water treatment in holding and depuration tanks to prevent recontamination and support natural depuration.

A Proven Technology, Now Backed by Nijhuis Saur Industries

The VAL process (vacuum airlift flotation), at the core of VAL AQUA, is patented and Solar Impulse-labelled since 2021. Its first deployment in shellfish farming dates back to 2018. Today, over 100 aquaculture sites worldwide are equipped — including fish farms (RAS), shellfish operations and public aquariums.

Since October 2025, Coldep is part of Nijhuis Saur Industries (NSI), a global leader in water treatment. This integration strengthens Coldep’s deployment capacity while preserving the agility of its Montpellier-based engineering team.

About Coldep

Coldep is a French company specialising in high-performance water treatment. Its patented VAL (Vertical Air Lift) technology originated from research conducted at IFREMER and INSA Lyon. Initially developed for aquaculture, it now extends to other high-potential applications including desalination pre-treatment and PFAS removal. Coldep has equipped over 100 sites worldwide and has been part of Nijhuis Saur Industries since October 2025. coldep.com

Aquaticode and Ilknak Enter Agreement to Deploy AI Phenotyping and Sorting for 300 Million Sea Bass and Sea Bream

Edusehat — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:05:14 +0700

By Aquaticode

Hatcheries producing sea bass and sea bream have traditionally relied on manual visual assessment to evaluate juveniles and identify weak or unviable individuals. At the volumes required by modern commercial operations, this approach is labor-intensive, highly variable, and unable to provide the biological consistency needed to optimize outcomes across large cohorts.

Aquaticode has entered into a commercial agreement with Ilknak to deploy its AquaLens technology for the phenotyping and sorting of 300 million sea bass and sea bream. Under the agreement, Aquaticode will lease its AquaLens systems to Ilknak, enabling AI-powered assessment and physical sorting of juveniles across Ilknak’s hatchery operations.

“Ilknak is one of the most signiﬁcant juvenile producers in the world, and this agreement is a clear signal of where the industry is heading,” said Stian Rognlid, CEO of Aquaticode. “AquaLens brings a level of biological precision to hatchery production that was not previously achievable at commercial scale. We are proud to be working with Ilknak and to be deploying this technology where it can have a direct impact on outcomes.”

AquaLens uses multi-sensor imaging and deep learning to assess individual ﬁsh in real time and sort out unviable individuals at the point of assessment. By identifying and physically removing weak or unviable ﬁsh early, producers can reduce unnecessary feed, labor, and tank capacity spent on ﬁsh that will not perform, improve cohort uniformity, and support better animal welfare outcomes from the earliest stage of production.

“Quality at the juvenile stage determines what is possible later in the production cycle,” said Georgios Meletiadis, CEO, Ilknak. “We have always invested in the best available technology, and AquaLens gives us a level of individual-level insight that was simply not available before. Applying this across 300 million ﬁsh represents a meaningful step forward for how we operate.”

Georgios Meletiadis, Ilknak CEO.

The agreement builds on Aquaticode’s growing presence in Mediterranean species. The Ilknak agreement represents a major step in the commercial deployment of AquaLens at scale across the Mediterranean aquaculture industry.

About Aquaticode

Aquaticode is the global leader in AI phenotyping and sorting for aquaculture. The company’s multi-sensor imaging and deep-learning systems provide real-time insight into ﬁsh health, robustness, and performance across species and production stages. With operations tripling year-on-year, Aquaticode is deployed with leading producers across multiple continents.

About Ilknak

Ilknak is one of the world’s leading producers of Mediterranean Sea bass and sea bream. Founded in 1996 and headquartered in Turkey, the company operates four modern hatcheries with a combined annual capacity of 300 million juveniles, and three offshore ﬁsh farms producing sea bass, sea bream, and pagrus. Ilknak is the biggest Mediterranean juvenile producer and seller worldwide, with a sales presence in Turkey, Greece, Italy and Albania.

Running For Resilience: 200 Miles for Aquaculture without Frontiers

Edusehat — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:05:10 +0700

By Aquaculture without Frontiers

In the television/streaming series Better Call Saul, the character Jimmy McGill often references far-flung places like Tajikistan to make his stories sound more impressive—more worldly, more convincing.

But audiences recognise what’s really happening: the story is doing the work, not the substance. There is none of that in the story of Ava Drake.

Through Running for Resilience, Ava Drake is not telling a story—she is living one. No embellishment. No distant references. Just commitment, effort, and purpose.

Supported by Aquaculture without Frontiers (AwF), Running for Resilience highlights a simple but powerful truth – real resilience is built through action, not narrative.

A Different Kind of Impact

In global development and food systems, there is often a temptation to amplify stories to reach for distant examples that sound more compelling than reality.

AwF takes a different approach. Working across communities worldwide, AwF focuses on:

Improving access to sustainable aquatic food.
Supporting livelihoods.
Strengthening local resilience.

These are not abstract concepts. They are practical, everyday actions that improve lives.

Why It Matters Now

At a time when global food systems are under pressure, resilience is no longer optional—it is essential.

Running for Resilience connects individual effort with global impact, demonstrating that:

Meaningful change starts locally.
Consistency matters more than scale.
Action is more powerful than words.

The concept has evolved from University of Stirling PhD candidate Ava Drake – “I’m not trying to tell a big story; I’m trying to make a small difference that adds up. Every step in this run is about resilience, for people and communities who rely on sustainable food systems.”

Aquaculture without Frontiers is engaged to ensure that funds obtained are maximised through governance processes. The AwF team of Dave Conley, Steve Dixon and Roy Palmer comment, “In a world full of big claims, Running for Resilience stands out because it is real. It reflects what we see every day—resilience built quietly, through food, livelihoods, and community.”

Running for Resilience is a reminder that we don’t need extraordinary narratives to create impact.

Resilience doesn’t need a storyline. It needs commitment.

Please join us on this journey with Ava – sponsorship space is still available (see below) but you can also donate at https://www.gofundme.com/f/avas-200mile-run-across-tajikistan-for-aquaculture-without

Sponsorship Package https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kRDqwNdl168VGmgHclx8hASZ_ieyRS0-/view

Contacts

Aquaculture without Frontiers

Australia/Oceania – Steve Dixon – email Steve.Dixon@see3group.com.au – Mobile +61 417 547 196

North America – Dave Conley – email dave@aquacomgroup.com – Mobile +1 613 294 3078

Global – Roy Palmer – email comms.awf@gmail.com – Mobile +61 419 528 733

Spotlight on African Women in Aquaculture as the AUDA-NEPAD, World Aquaculture Society (African Chapter) and Partners Commemorate the UN International Year of the Woman Farmer 2026

Edusehat — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:05:06 +0700

By Word Aquaculture Society (African Chapter)

Women are central to fisheries and aquaculture value chains in Africa, fulfilling critical roles across producing, harvesting, processing, trading, and retail, and often underpinning household food security and local economies. Women comprise a significant proportion — particularly in post-harvest segments — where their labour adds value, reduces losses, and sustains market systems, yet their contributions remain largely informal and undervalued.

According to AUDA-NEPAD, empowering women in fisheries and aquaculture value chains is a matter of equity, and also a strategic imperative for achieving inclusive economic growth, improved nutrition, and resilient aquatic food systems. Evidence shows that when women have equitable access to resources, finance, technology, and decision-making platforms, productivity increases, incomes rise, and benefits are more likely to be reinvested in families and communities. Strengthening women’s roles in fisheries and aquaculture also accelerates progress toward continental priorities, while unlocking the full potential of aquatic foods as a driver of sustainable development across Africa.

The United Nations has designated 2026 as the International Year of the Woman Farmer (IYWF 2026). The World Aquaculture Society African Chapter (WAS-AC), in collaboration with the African Union Development Agency – (AUDA-NEPAD) and its media partner Aquaculture Africa Media (AAM), have seized the opportunity to focus on women in fish farming; to highlight the crucial role they are playing in aquatic foods systems. In support to the IYWF commemorations, the FAO has created a Communications Handbook and Toolkit to guide its partners in developing strategic actions that may potentially amplify the celebrations of IYWF 2026. At the end of the year the WAS-AC plans to host a Special Side-Event at the upcoming Aquaculture Africa 2026 Conference in Tanzania (1-4 December 2026) to conclude the commemorations.

On March 24, 2026, a pioneering webinar session was held to raise awareness and promote initiatives aimed at enhancing women’s livelihoods in aquaculture. The session attracted nearly 300 participants from around the world, primarily from Africa. Keynote speakers included Dr. Khalid Salie (President of the WAS-AC); Dr. Foluke Areola, (President Elect of WAS); Dr. Bernice McLean (Head of the Blue Economy Unit at AUDA-NEPAD); and Ms. Jennifer Gee (FAO Gender Lead for Fisheries and Aquaculture). The speakers all highlighted the importance of implementing strategic and impactful actions that support the critical roles of women aquaculture producers in Africa, particularly in terms of food security, nutrition, and poverty eradication.

Following the opening session, a panel of identified women champions from several African countries, including Egypt, Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal, Kenya, and South Africa, spoke of their experience in aquaculture production. The champions had the opportunity to showcase their aquaculture enterprises, share their transformative journeys, discuss opportunities for scaling up, and highlight some of the challenges they face. The need for interventions to address long-term challenges such as increased access to land, credit, markets, education, training, and innovative technologies that can empower women was apparent. The solutions proposed included supportive regulations, institutions, and investments, as well as by encouraging collaboration among various stakeholders for women empowerment.

This webinar marks the beginning of a broader journey that AUDA-NEPAD, WAS-AC, and their partners plan to undertake this year. This journey will involve outreach initiatives to identify women aquaculture farmers across various regions of Africa, along with regional webinar sessions and other online engagements and activities – following up to the Communications Handbook and Toolkit. The commemoration will culminate in a final event at the Aquaculture Africa 2026 Conference (AFRAQ2026), scheduled to take place in Tanzania from December 1 to 4, 2026.

To learn more about the Webinar Session on Women in Aquaculture Production visit link. The webinar recording is available here.

Vičiūnai and Frais Embal take top honors at the 2026 Seafood Excellence Global Awards in Barcelona

Edusehat — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 04:30:14 +0700

Lithuania’s Vičiūnai Group and France’s Frais Embal have won top honors at the 2026 Seafood Excellence Global Awards held at Seafood Expo Global in Barcelona, the world’s largest seafood trade show. The winners were selected from among 35 finalists and announced at a special Seafood Excellence Global Awards reception. The competition recognizes the best products showcased at Seafood Expo Global, and the Seafood Excellence Global finalists were evaluated on taste and overall dining experience, packaging, marketability, convenience, nutritional value, and innovation. The judges’ evaluations were verified by the auditing firm PwC.

The top prize for Best Retail Product was awarded to Vičiūnai Group for its entry Smoked Herring Slices – Natural Flavor. This product is made with simple ingredients and is ready to eat straight from the package, featuring a clean, natural smoky flavor. The jury highlighted the balance between the flavor of the herring and the smoke, the excellent cut and packaging of the product, and the eye-catching packaging design.

Frais Embal won the grand prize for Best HORECA (hotel/restaurant/catering) Product for its Salmon Roll. This product consists of a thin, precisely cut rectangle of fresh salmon, ideal for sushi rolls and other culinary applications. Packaged in a modified atmosphere, the product offers uniform portions and streamlines preparation to improve restaurant operations and the dining experience for customers.

Four Special Awards

Meanwhile, Lerøy Seafood Group (Norway) received the Seafood Excellence Global Special Award for Convenience for its Fish Taco Sticks. With an intense flavor thanks to a unique blend of jalapeño and lime spices, these sticks are made with Atlantic haddock coated in a crispy gluten-free batter. They are designed to make it easy to incorporate fish into family taco dinners.

The Seafood Excellence Global Special Award for Retail Packaging went to Sykes Seafood Limited (United Kingdom) for its Argentine Red Shrimp with Chimichurri Butter product. The product combines Argentine red shrimp with a vibrant herb butter and crushed chili. It comes in a recyclable aluminum tray, perfect for the recommended oven-baking method. The packaging is complemented by an attractive cardboard sleeve that displays the finished product on the front and provides detailed consumer information on the back.

Iceco Fish (Lithuania) won the Seafood Excellence Global Award for Best Seafood Product Line for its range of herring tartares. The products are made with finely chopped, top-quality Atlantic herring, balanced with other high-quality ingredients. The line includes Original, Scandinavian, and Fine Herbs flavors, and is presented in recyclable tubs with cardboard sleeves featuring a modern and bold design.

Reunimer (Reunion Island) won the Seafood Excellence Global Award for Innovation for its Gravelax de Merlin. This product offers a refined interpretation of the Nordic curing technique applied to firm, lean marlin fillets. The fish is delicately cured with sea salt, sugar, fresh dill, and spices, resulting in a dense, velvety texture and a beautiful translucent pink hue.

Representatives From 16 Countries

The winners of the 2026 Seafood Excellence Global Awards were selected from among 35 finalists representing 16 countries from around the world. The winners and finalists were showcased in the Galleria, located between Halls 4 and 5 at Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global, which ran through April 23.

The jury for the Seafood Excellence Global 2026 competition consisted of Raül Cervera, Director of Seafood Purchasing for La Sirena stores in Spain; Madeleine Hüffelmann, Private Label Buyer for the Rewe Group in Germany; Damien Bocahu, Seafood Buyer for Picard Surgelés in France; and Percy Addo, Purchasing Manager for the Wonderfield Group in the United Kingdom. Cervera served as jury chair.

The Seafood Excellence Global finalists were evaluated on taste and overall dining experience, packaging, marketability, convenience, nutritional value, and innovation. The judges’ evaluations were verified by the auditing firm PwC.

New Survey Shows People Are Ready for Food Made from Seafood Sidestreams

Edusehat — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 04:30:10 +0700

By Hailia

The new study asked more than 1,500 people from the UK, Sweden, and Germany about their attitudes towards food products made from seafood sidestreams. The survey shows 74% of respondents have a positive or neutral attitude towards eating food made from filleting sidestreams, pointing to new growth opportunities for processors

European consumers are increasingly ready to incorporate products made from seafood sidestreams into their everyday diets, according to a new survey conducted for Nordic seafood technology company Hailia. The findings indicate that consumer acceptance, long considered a key barrier, may no longer limit the wider use of sidestreams, opening up new opportunities for seafood processors and food manufacturers to turn underutilized raw materials into scalable, value-added products. With the strongest support seen among younger (aged 24-34), urban, and highly educated consumers, the results indicate that these products are well-positioned to enter mainstream formats such as ready meals, workplace catering, and quick-service dining.

The study shows that respondents in Sweden and the UK have an overwhelmingly positive attitude towards these products, with 58% and 55%, respectively, seeing food products from sidestreams as a good thing. The German market follows slightly behind at 49%. Only 19% responded negatively to the idea of these products. For food processors facing increasing pressure to improve yield, reduce waste, and meet sustainability targets, the findings suggest that consumer acceptance may no longer be a key barrier to scaling sidestream-based product innovation.

When asked which situations or use cases products from sidestreams would be most suitable, a large proportion of respondents answered that they could see these products in ready meals, quick-service restaurants, and cafeterias in workplaces or public institutions. Many consumers also indicated openness to using such ingredients in home cooking, reinforcing their versatility across both consumer-facing products and business-to-business ingredient applications. Notably, 59% of respondents reported a positive attitude towards sidestream-based products in lunch catering, compared to just 16% who responded negatively, highlighting strong potential in institutional and contract catering segments.

Among the most common answers, respondents stated that these products would be a good alternative source for protein, make it easier to consume fish as part of convenient, everyday diets, and provide the sustainability and ethical benefits of using more of each fish for human consumption. The main concern raised was the perception that sidestream-based products are overly processed or “artificial.” In reality, the production involves familiar, straightforward steps: refining, mixing, and cooking, similar to how many everyday foods like meatballs, falafel, or nuggets are prepared. Much like turning raw ingredients into smoothies, patties, or pancakes at home, these products are made using standard food preparation techniques rather than complex industrial processes.

“We see clear signals that consumers are open to incorporating these products into their daily lives, but transparency is essential to building lasting trust,” says Michaela Lindström, CEO of Hailia. “Sidestreams are handled with the same care and quality standards as fillets, and the process itself is simple and familiar: refining, seasoning, forming, cooking. Nothing that wouldn’t happen in a professional kitchen. When people understand that, the hesitation tends to disappear. A majority are already on board, fewer than one in five are opposed, and the large group in the middle simply needs more familiarity with what these products actually are, and the chance to taste them.”

Michaela Lindström, CEO of Hailia.

The survey shows that positive attitudes are most common among younger age groups, particularly 18-34. Also, the majority of positive respondents reported living in urban areas and cities, where ready-made meals are common, and there is more openness to trying new foods. Families with children, people with higher education, people with high-protein diets, and the environmentally conscious also report more positive attitudes towards using sidestreams for food products than other reference groups.

Between the three countries, German respondents emphasize innovation, food quality, and process transparency as most important. In Sweden, the most common open answers focus on greater circularity and an emphasis on climate impact, while UK consumers are more concerned with practical applications and fish products as a source of protein.

“We expected that young, urban people would be more receptive to new food products, but we have seen that the answers are not that different between age groups and socioeconomic backgrounds. The survey shows that overall, people have a positive attitude towards innovative food products, and they see the benefits of trying new things,” Lindström continues.

1,512 people were interviewed for the study, undertaken by Consumer Compass for Hailia during a 14-day period in March 2026. Respondents were evenly split between the markets. The survey consisted of 50 questions in 10 sections. Respondents were asked a series of questions around their attitudes towards food products made from sidestreams in general, as well as their thoughts on health benefits, suitability, nutrition, and sustainability. Questions on attitudes towards processed food, as well as food safety and responsible consumption, were also part of the study.

About Hailia

Hailia Nordic Oy develops novel and resource-efficient seafood processing technologies, producing innovative seafood products. Founded in 2021, Hailia aims to revolutionize resource efficiency in the seafood industry by maximizing the use of underutilized fish raw materials. Hailia‘s technology transforms these materials into high-value seafood products, contributing to a more sustainable food system. The company also licenses its cutting-edge technology to international fish processing companies. The company’s investors and partners include Nordic Foodtech VC, Heino Group Oy, Tradeka-sijoitus Oy, Holdix Oy Ab, Ikorni Invest Oy Ab, and Dana Technology Aps. www.hailia.fi

Shifting Demographics and Enhanced Consumer Trust: The Seafood Trends Driving Rapid Growth in China

Edusehat — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 04:30:05 +0700

By Norwegian Seafood Council (NSC)

The Norwegian Seafood Council’s latest consumer trends report outlines the key drivers shaping China’s growing appetite for seafood.

The annual seafood consumer trends report from the Norwegian Seafood Council (NSC) has this year shifted its focus to the Chinese market. With a deep dive into this global superpower, Seafood Trends 2026: The China Report showcases market snapshots, interviews with NSC representatives and industry experts, and the latest insights on seafood consumption across China.

Global Trends Boosting the Chinese Seafood Market

With a population of more than 1.4 billion – concentrated in cities and urban areas around the southeast – China is a nation of diverse cultures and food preferences.

As in previous years, the NSC’s seafood consumer trends report outlines global megatrends and how they manifest for seafood consumers. So, how do these food trends show up in the Chinese seafood market?

✓ Growing middle class and declining birth rates.

✓ Growing number of single-person households.

✓ Supply chains, geopolitics and tariffs.

✓ Focus on convenience and health.

According to Sigmund Bjørgo, NSC Country Director in China: “These global megatrends create movement in the Chinese seafood market and play an important role in consumer purchasing decisions. These trends influence consumers’ trust, preference and overall behavior.

“China’s emergence as the fastest-growing market for Norwegian seafood exports in the past year has made it crucial to understand more of the mechanisms in Chinese consumer behavior behind this fast-growing market.”

Norwegian Seafood Council Annual Conference 2026 Sigmund Bjørgo China Director (Photo credit HaugenMedia).

Rapid Value Growth for Norwegian Seafood in China

In 2025, China emerged as the market with the highest value growth for Norwegian seafood, with an increase in export value of USD 311.26 million (31%) compared with the previous year. China purchased Norwegian seafood totaling USD 1.32 billion and stepped up from being the sixth largest market in 2024 to the third largest market in 2025.

Species	Proportion of Norwegian exports to China in 2025
Greenland halibut	78%
Redfish	52%
Cold-water prawns	26%
Haddock	24%
Mackerel	9%

Chinese Consumers’ Willingness to Try New Species

China’s vast size and population give way to a host of diverse cultures with different food traditions. The country’s eight regional ‘great cuisines’ are defined by heritage and flexibility, with different tastes based on centuries of tradition combined with a consumer willingness to try new things due to the variety on offer.

Bjørgo elaborates: “In fact, this is very much part of the Chinese philosophy of always being on the path of learning. This openness has only increased over recent decades as Chinese spending power has grown.”

This openness extends to imported food too, Bjørgo explains. But do imported foods always need to cater to local flavors and tastes?

In the case of salmon, Bjørgo says: “So far, salmon isn’t widely relevant to local tastes. In China salmon equals sashimi – full stop. And sashimi is by definition a foreign food. It is Japanese food and most people eat it for the first time in a Japanese restaurant. There isn’t even much focus on sushi – that is a small slice of the salmon category. It really is mainly sashimi.”

Though Norwegian salmon is cold-chain reliant, the fact that the product is favored by the rising middle class as a high-value species serves as further proof that this is a product that arrives fresh – and can be trusted.

Showcasing New Research and Industry Insight

In addition to insights from Bjørgo and NSC Marketing Advisor Savindar Xie, Seafood Trends 2026: The China Report features interviews with Rabobank analyst Novel Sharma and Undercurrent News journalist Louis Harkell, as well as the latest insights on the Chinese consumer.

Differing from previous reports, the NSC’s approach to consumer research this year was a case study of 24 shoppers, as they planned and shopped for their meals. The shoppers were split across the traditional tier-one cities of Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou and Shenzhen, and consumer habits were tracked across seven days of purchasing in October 2025.

According to NSC Consumer Analyst Lars Moksness: “We wanted to dive deeper into the specifics of consumer behavior and get detailed insights and answers from the people who participated. Through this new research, we’ve gained powerful new understanding of what influences the Chinese consumer.”

As China continues to evolve into one of the world’s fastest growing and most dynamic seafood markets, understanding the forces shaping consumer behavior is crucial. To explore these insights in greater detail, access Seafood Trends 2026: The China Report and discover the intricacies of this rapidly expanding market.

About the Norwegian Seafood Council 

The Norwegian Seafood Council (NSC) works with the Norwegian fisheries and aquaculture industries to develop markets for Norwegian seafood through local market intelligence, market development and reputational risk management.

The NSC is headquartered in Tromsø and maintains local representatives in some of Norway’s most important international markets. The Norwegian seafood industry finances the activities of the NSC via a tariff on all Norwegian seafood exports. The NSC is a public company owned by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries. 

The US Department of Agriculture Launches Its Office of Seafood

Edusehat — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:55:05 +0700

• The organism will play an important role in the development of the America First Seafood Strategy to promote production, marketing, sale and export of US fishery and aquaculture products.

United States (US) Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins recently announced the creation of the new US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Office of Seafood. This first of its kind office will prioritize customer service and ease of navigation for American seafood cultivators, producers, and processors to access USDA programs. The USDA Office of Seafood will play an important role in coordinating with the US Department of Commerce in the development of the America First Seafood Strategy to promote production, marketing, sale, and export of US fishery and aquaculture products and strengthen domestic processing capacity.

According to them, with the creation of the USDA Office of Seafood, the Federal government now enters a new era of seafood policy where American fishermen and seafood producers will be recognized by USDA as a key part of the US food supply.

“With the launch of the USDA Office of Seafood, we are honoring decades of hard work on the water and opening the door to new opportunities, stronger support, and a brighter future for the seafood industry. Today’s announcement, in addition to the historic tax cuts and investments in rural America made possible through the priorities and provisions in the Working Families Tax Cuts, is truly a new chapter for America’s fishermen,” said Rollins.

A Vital Part of the Nation’s Food Security

The announcement was made by Rollins alongside Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan and Maine Senator Susan Collins.

“The Department of the Interior is thrilled to support the establishment of the first-ever Seafood Office at the Department of Agriculture – an initiative that puts the people who help feed America first,” said Burgum. “American fishermen are the backbone of coastal economies and a vital part of our nation’s food security. By improving coordination across agencies, the Seafood Office will ensure these fishermen can fully access the tools and programs they need to thrive.”

Recognizing Farmers and Fishermen

One of the primary roles of the new office will be coordinating across USDA agencies to ensure seafood producers and fishermen are integrated into their programs and working alongside the US Department of Commerce and other Federal partners to revitalize the American seafood industry.

“Fishing is the very foundation of Maine’s heritage. Today, the seafood industry in our region generates more than USD 5 billion in income and supports hundreds of thousands of jobs, in addition to providing a nutritious food supply, delicious restaurant meals, and sustaining entire coastal communities,” said Collins. “I appreciate that USDA is recognizing our fishermen as farmers of the sea and establishing the Office of Seafood. The creation of this office is a long overdue, essential step to expanding seats at the table for our hardworking fishing families, who are a key piece of our nation’s history and our future as well.”

For his part, Sullivan contributed his point of view: “Alaska’s fishermen deserve the same federal attention, resources, and risk management tools afforded to America’s incredible farmers. The new USDA Office of Seafood — an action I’ve been strongly advocating for over the past decade — opens the door to that opportunity. This office is going to benefit everybody: all of Alaska’s fishermen, our small businesses, and our many coastal and Interior communities from across the state. I thank Rollins and Lutnick for working closely with me and my team over the past year to fully understand the challenges facing our fishermen and coastal communities and for taking meaningful action on their behalf. With this new office, we’re going to build a stronger partnership between USDA, Department of Commerce, the entire Executive Branch, and our fishermen, so they can continue to do what they do best: sustainably harvesting the freshest and healthiest wild seafood in the world.”

First-Ever

The Representative Cammack finalized: “Proud to be part of the launch of the inaugural, first-ever USDA Office of Seafood! Food security is national security which means prioritizing domestic production and strengthening our food supply here at home. From our Florida coasts to communities across the country, we’re cutting red tape, backing our fishermen, and ensuring American seafood competes — and wins — on the world stage. This office will not only elevate and support commercial production, but also advance commonsense conservation so future generations can thrive in this industry. As Chair of the Aquaculture Caucus, I’m grateful for the tenacious leadership driving this effort forward”.

Davos, Capital, and the Australian Seafood Paradox

Edusehat — Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:10:10 +0700

* By FishProf

FishProf noticed something quietly confronting in the global conversations emerging from Davos 2026: capital markets are beginning to treat food securitynotasasocialissue,butasamatter of economic and geopolitical stability. Food is being repriced — not because it is scarce today, but because systems that deliver it are fragile, inefficient, and poorly governed. This shift should ring alarm bells in many countries, but I use my country, Australia, as the example.

Australia is an island continent, surrounded by productive oceans, with one of the world’s largest Exclusive Economic Zones. It is similar in land mass to the United States yet supports a population of just 28 million compared to over 300 million in the US. Australia has more water resources than France, a nation of over 70 million people, and yet Australia imports more than 70% of the seafood it consumes.

FishProf believes this is not a production problem. It is a policy, governance, and vision failure.

Davos Reframes Food as Strategic Infrastructure

One of the strongest messages from Davos 2026 was that food systems are no longer viewed simply as marketdriven supply chains. They are now being reframed as strategic infrastructure, akin to energy, transport, or telecommunications.

Capital markets have noticed that food price volatility fuels inflation, undermines political stability, and directly impacts public health outcomes. Traditional tools — interest rates, subsidies, trade agreements — cannot stabilize food systems that are structurally misaligned.

FishProf noticed that aquaculture fits squarely within this new framing — yet in Australia, it continues to be treated as a niche sector burdened by fragmented regulation and inconsistent political support.

Australia by the numbers

» Land mass: ~7.7 million km² (similar to the USA).

» Population: ~28 million.

» Exclusive Economic Zone: ~8.2 million km² (one of the world’s largest).

» Seafood imports: 70–75% of seafood consumed in Australia.

» Exports: Predominantly high-value species (rock lobster, abalone, tuna).

Australia’s Seafood Dependence: A National Blind Spot

Australia’s reliance on imported seafood is often justified as a consumer preference or price issue. That explanation does not hold up.

FishProf noticed that Australia exports premium seafood — rock lobster, abalone, tuna — while importing lower-cost, everyday fish to feed its population. This is not inherently wrong, but it exposes a system optimized for trade value rather than food security.

At Davos, the warning was clear: countries that outsource their food resilience are exposing themselves to geopolitical, climate, and market shocks.

FishProf believes Australia has done exactly that with seafood.

Yellow Tail Kingfish Ceviche.

FishProf believes that if Australia treated seafood production as essential infrastructure — not a regulatory risk — capital, innovation, and scale would follow.

From “How Do We Stop You?” to “How Do We Help You?”

A recurring frustration across Australian aquaculture is regulatory culture. FishProf noticed that too often the starting question for regulators is: “How do we stop this from going wrong?”

rather than:

“How do we help this succeed responsibly?”

This mindset manifests as:

» Layered approvals across federal, state, and local levels.

» Lengthy timeframes that deter private investment.

» High compliance costs that favor incumbents over innovators.

At Davos, food system leaders acknowledged that excessive complexity, even when well-intentioned, undermines resilience by discouraging new production capacity.

FishProf believes Australia’s topheavy bureaucracy has become a hidden tax on domestic seafood production.

Feed Conversion Ratios (approximate)

» Beef: 6 – 10 kg feed per 1 kg weight gain.

» Pork: 3 – 4 kg.

» Chicken: 1.6 – 2 kg.

» Farmed fish (average): 1.1 – 1.5 kg.

» Shellfish: 0 kg (no formulated feed).

R&D Choices: Who Are We Really Feeding?

Australia invests heavily in aquaculture R&D, yet the direction of that investment raises uncomfortable questions.

FishProf noticed a strong focus on high-value carnivorous species. For example, millions of dollars invested in species such as pompano aimed largely at premium or export markets. Meanwhile, relatively little attention is paid to scalable, affordable, herbivorous or omnivorous species that could feed Australians every week.

Rabbitfish is one example. Hardy, fast-growing, herbivorous, and well suited to integrated systems, yet largely absent from national R&D priorities. As I write this, I notice a Northern Territory University advertising for a PhD to investigate this subject. On one hand this is good news as it means Rabbit Fish is on the R&D menu, but it is also bad news in that we are taking the slow train to get to the station.

FishProf believes this reflects a deeper problem: R&D is often aligned to commercial upside rather than national nutrition and food security outcomes.

Live crabs at market stall.

FishProf noticed that Australia has everything it needs to be a seafood-secure nation — except the will to align policy, science, and vision

Seaweed and Seagrass: The Missed Multipliers

At Davos, food systems were discussed not as single commodities but as interconnected platforms — where nutrition, climate mitigation, and economic resilience intersect.

Australia has world-class research capability in seaweed and seagrass — yet commercial deployment remains limited.

FishProf noticed that seaweed farming could:

» Support low-trophic aquaculture species.

» Reduce nutrient loads and improve water quality.

» Create new food, feed, and bioproduct streams.

» Strengthen coastal and regional economies.

Integrated systems combining herbivorous fish, shellfish, and seaweed are globally recognized as resilient and efficient — yet policy settings in Australia rarely encourage this kind of systems thinking.

FishProf believes Australia’s failure is not scientific — it is structural.

Sarah Holmyard, Offshore Shellfish UK, made a comment about attending the North Atlantic Seafood Forum recently highlighting her disappointment that such an insightful, well-run event was lacking a vision towards ‘space regenerative aquaculture’.

Sarah commented “If we are serious about feeding the future sustainably, regenerative aquaculture should not be a fringe topic. It delivers lowcarbon protein, enhances marine environments, and builds resilience in coastal communities. Put simply, it is one of the most powerful tools we have — yet it still isn’t talked about enough. Seafood is evolving quickly, and the choices we prioritize today will shape the sector for decades to come. Are we moving fast enough to support the solutions that can truly scale sustainable food production?”

Any industry/government or event planner should heed Sarah’s words.

Why shellfish matter

Shellfish such as oysters, mussels, clams, and scallops are among the most efficient animal protein sources on the planet.

» No external feed required.

» Filter plankton and nutrients naturally from the water.

» Improve water quality by removing excess nutrients.

» Low greenhouse gas footprint compared to terrestrial livestock.

Fishburger.

Where Is the Australian Blue Economy Vision?

Davos reinforced that countries making progress are those with cohesive national visions, where policy, finance, and regulation move in the same direction.

Australia talks about the blue economy — but rarely acts like it believes in one.

FishProf noticed that responsibility for aquaculture is scattered across portfolios: agriculture, environment, trade, industry, regional development — often working in silos.

The result?

» No clear national seafood selfsufficiency targets.

» No nutritional outcomes linked to aquaculture policy.

» No coordinated investment framework to scale production.

FishProf believes Australia doesn’t lack opportunity — it lacks alignment.

Food, Health, and Well-Being: The Missing Link

A major Davos theme was the convergence of food and health. Food is no longer just calories — it is preventative healthcare.

Seafood is one of the most nutrient-dense foods available, yet Australia’s dietary guidelines and food security strategies rarely link aquaculture expansion with public health outcomes.

FishProf noticed rising rates of diet-related chronic disease alongside declining seafood consumption in some demographics.

FishProf believes aquaculture should be framed as part of the health system — delivering:

» Omega-3s for cardiovascular health.

» Micronutrients critical for child development.

» Affordable protein for ageing populations.

This reframing would change how success is measured — from tons and export value to health and well-being delivered per capita.

Seaweed farming can:

» Absorb carbon and nutrients.

» Support integrated multi- trophic aquaculture (IMTA).

» Provide food, feed, fertiliser and bio-products.

» Create regional and Indigenous employment.

Global context

» Seaweed represents over 30% of global aquaculture volume.

» Australia produces less than 1%, despite vast suitable coastlines.

Learning from Davos: Capital Will Follow Clarity

The Davos message is blunt: capital will flow to food systems that demonstrate stability, scale, and strategic intent.

Australia currently sends mixed signals.

FishProf noticed that investors see opportunity in Australian aquaculture — but also see regulatory drag, policy inconsistency, and unclear national priorities.

FishProf believes that if Australia treated seafood production as essential infrastructure — not a regulatory risk — capital, innovation, and scale would follow.

Capital markets have noticed that food price volatility fuels infiation, undermines political stability, and directly impacts public health outcomes. Traditional tools — interest rates, subsidies, trade agreements — cannot stabilize food systems that are structurally misaligned.

Farmed Roe on Scallops – curry with rice (Home cooked).

FishProf’s Take: What Needs to Change

If Australia is serious about food security, aquaculture must move from the margins to the mainstream.

FishProf believes Australia must:

Set national seafood self-sufficiency goals.
Shift regulatory culture from control to collaboration.
Rebalance R&D toward low-trophic, affordable species that do not need expensive feeds.
Integrate seaweed and multi-trophic systems into policy.
Align aquaculture with health, nutrition, and regional development outcomes.

Food, Health, and Well- Being – Seafood’s health advantages

» High-quality protein.

» Omega-3 fatty acids (heart and brain health).

» Micronutrients often missing in modern diets.

» Lower saturated fat than most land meats.

Global context

» Seaweed represents over 30% of global aquaculture volume.

» Australia produces less than 1%, despite vast suitable coastlines.

Final Thought

Davos 2026 made one thing clear: food is being repriced because the old system no longer works.

FishProf noticed that Australia has everything it needs to be a seafood-secure nation — except the will to align policy, science, and vision.

FishProf believes the question is no longer “Can Australia feed it self from the sea?” It is “WHY AREN´T WE CHOOSING TO?

References and sources consulted by the author on the elaboration of this article are available under previous request to our editorial staff.

Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global Sets New Record Ahead of its 32nd Edition in Barcelona

Edusehat — Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:10:04 +0700

By Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global

The expo will take place in Barcelona, from 21 to 23 April, occupying more than 52,950 net square meters of exhibition space, a figure that is still growing.

Companies across the seafood supply chain and from around the world will showcase their latest innovations to international buyers. The event is estimated to generate an economic benefit of more than USD 189.55 million to the city.

The conference program will feature a keynote address by economist and geopolitical strategist Dr. Nomi Prins and will bring together more than 90 international seafood and industry experts.

Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global, organized by Diversified, announces its largest edition in the history of the event with more than 52,950 net square meters of exhibit space and still growing. Taking place from 21 to 23 April at the Gran Via venue of Fira de Barcelona, the expo is expected to welcome more than 2,300 exhibiting companies from 86 countries and 65 national and regional pavilions, bringing together seafood professionals from across the global supply chain.

“As company participation reaches record levels and continues to grow, the scale and diversity of this edition reflect the growing global appetite for innovation and collaboration across the supply chain,” said Wynter Courmont, Group Vice President, Seafood at Diversified. “With the debut of the Aquaculture Innovation Zone, we are creating a dedicated space for companies, investors, and policymakers to engage with the ideas and technologies that will define the future of seafood. We look forward to welcoming the world to Barcelona for an impactful event.”

The international presence confirmed for this edition highlights the event’s global reach, with new national and regional pavilions including Bulgaria, Mexico, Oman, Uruguay and Venezuela joining returning countries such as Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, Ecuador, France, Greece, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Morocco, Norway, Netherlands, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam and more.

Fira de Barcelona General Manager, Constantí Serrallonga, stated that “Their five years at Fira demonstrate how a leading international event like Seafood Expo Global finds the perfect environment at our venue to grow and enhance its reach and development. It is an example of how mutual trust, collaborative work, and a shared commitment to excellence multiply the show’s opportunities and strengthen the bonds and legacy within the host city and the entire food industry ecosystem.”

A Global Platform for the Seafood Industry

Halls 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and the Galleria (between halls 4 and 5) of the Gran Vía venue will showcase the latest innovations in seafood products, manufacturing and processing technology.Buyers from around the world, including retailers, foodservice companies, distributors and importers come to the Expo to source seafood products (fresh, frozen, canned, value-added, processed and packaged) from suppliers highlighted in Seafood Expo Global.

Leading seafood companies include AquaChile, Balfegó & Balfegó SL, Cermaq Norway AS, Cooke, Escal SA, Frime, Iceland Seafood International, Kyokuyo Co., Ltd, Leroy Seafood Group ASA, Mowi ASA, Multi X, Nordic Seafood A/S, Nueva Pescanova, Parlevliet & Van der Plas B.V., Ricardo Fuentes e Hijos, Royal Greenland A/S, SalMar AS, Samherji hf, Sea Harvest Seafood, Umios, Unima, and Viciunai Group, among others.

Seafood Processing Global, in halls 1 and 3, will feature processing equipment, refrigeration and freezing, packaging materials and machinery, aquaculture supplies, hygiene control, sanitation and quality, transport and logistics services. Companies include Baader, CMA CGM, JBT Marel, Multivac, ULMA Packaging, Delanchy, DP World, Mediterranean Shipping Company, Cocci Luciano and more.

Debut of the Aquaculture Innovation Zone

A key highlight of the 2026 edition is the launch of the Aquaculture Innovation Zone, a dedicated platform designed for first-time exhibitors showcasing cutting-edge aquaculture solutions.

This new space will bring together suppliers, startups and researchers presenting breakthrough innovations in areas such as farm management and monitoring, animal health and welfare, and sustainable feed. It will connect companies at the forefront of aquaculture technology, software and equipment with a highly targeted global audience, including hatchery professionals, investors and policymakers.

Confirmed participants include AquaBioTech Group (Malta), Bioceanor (France), Nōka AI (USA), LiceDefence AS (Norway) and Sagar Aquaculture (India), Sagare Smart Innovation (Spain), Octona (Croatia) and Qingdao Hishing Smart Equipment Co., Ltd. (China).

In addition, the zone will spotlight an Innovation Theatre, hosting product presentations and expert insights. To foster collaboration and knowledge exchange across the sector, a dedicated aquaculture meet-up open to all attendees will take place on the first day of the event.

Conference Program: Insights From Global Industry Leaders

The 2026 Conference Program will bring together more than 90 international seafood and industry experts across over 30 educational sessions, offering practical insights into the trends shaping the global seafood industry.

Speakers will include representatives from leading organizations such as the FAO, WTO and WWF, as well as executives from major seafood companies and industry associations.

A keynote address will take place on the first day of the event by economist and geopolitical strategist Dr. Nomi Prins titled, “High Stakes, Shifting Tides: The Global Outlook on Seafood, Trade, Economic Pressure Points and Opportunities.” Dr. Prins will provide attendees with a forward-looking economic outlook for the global seafood industry, addressing key macroeconomic forces, trade dynamics and emerging risks impacting the sector.

Across the three-day program, sessions will explore topics including aquaculture development, sustainability, supply chain transparency, emerging markets, consumer trends and technological innovation, offering a comprehensive view of the opportunities and challenges facing the industry.

The Seafood Excellence Global Awards, the event’s prestigious annual award competition, will recognize the best seafood products represented at the Expo and highlight the latest trends in the sector. The winners will be chosen from the list of finalists with two top prizes awarded to the Best Retail Product and the Best Hotel/Restaurant/Catering (HORECA) Product. Another four special prizes will be given for innovation, convenience, retail packaging and the best line of seafood products.

Constantí Serrallonga (Fira), Wynter Courmont (Seafood) and Brenna Hensley (Seafood).

For more information on Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global and to register: www.seafoodexpo.com/global.

About Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global

Seafood Expo Global and Seafood Processing Global make up the world’s largest seafood trade show. Thousands of buyers and sellers from around the world attend the three-day annual event to meet, connect, and do business. Buyers include importers, exporters, wholesalers, restaurants, supermarkets, hotels, and other companies in the retail and foodservice sectors. Exhibitors showcase the latest innovations in seafood products, processing and packaging machinery, and services for the seafood industry. SeafoodSource.com is the official media partner of the event. The organizer is Diversified, the international leader in seafood events and media. www.seafoodexpo.com/global

About Diversified

About Fira de Barcelona

Fira de Barcelona is Spain’s leading exhibition organizer and one of the most important in Europe, especially for trade fairs and industry conferences. The institution has three venues: Montjuïc, Gran Via and CCIB, totalling more than 500,000 m² of exhibition space, which this year will host more than 270 trade fairs, conferences and corporate events. These include important international events like MWC Barcelona, Alimentaria, Hostelco, ISE, Seafood Expo Global, Hispack and the Smart City Expo World Congress. The institutions annual contribution to the local economy is estimated at more than USD 5.53 billion and its activity generates both social and public value.

New NSF Initiative Aims to Make Every American Worker, Business and Community AI-Ready, Including Farmers

Edusehat — Sat, 18 Apr 2026 02:15:12 +0700

They will stablish a network of 56 state and territory-based coordination hubs.

The organism will invest up to USD 1 million annually per hub over three years.

The National Science Foundation (NSF) of the United States (US) announced a new funding opportunity as part of an effort to enable all Americans to understand, apply and create with artificial intelligence. The NSF TechAccess: AI-Ready America (NSF AI-Ready America) initiative aims to expand access to AI knowledge, tools, training and capacity building so all Americans can participate in — and benefit from — the AI economy. And this includes all the farmers.

As a first step, NSF and federal partners -the Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA NIFA), the Department of Labor, and the Small Business Administration- are releasing a funding opportunity to establish AI-ready Coordination Hubs in every US state and territory.

“USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture is proud to partner with NSF on this national effort to ensure that every community — including the most rural — can benefit from the power of artificial intelligence,” assured Jaye Hamby, USDA NIFA director. And he added: “By investing in tools and training that meet farmers and ranchers where they are, we’re helping build an agricultural future that is more resilient, more efficient and more accessible for all. This collaboration strengthens our commitment to ensuring that agricultural producers have the innovations they need to thrive in and provide food and fiber for a rapidly evolving world.”

Closing the Gap

Informed by the White House AI Action Plan, the NSF AI-Ready America initiative is designed to close the gap between the nation’s AI capabilities and the workforce, businesses, and communities that need to use them. The initiative targets three areas where that gap is widest: expanding AI literacy and applied skills across the American workforce; equipping small businesses and local governments with the tools and technical assistance to adopt AI; and building hands-on learning pathways -including internships and project-based programs- that translate AI skills into real-world application.

“America’s AI competitiveness depends on a strong research and development ecosystem paired with access to advanced science and technology knowledge for our current and future workforce,” said for his part Brian Stone, performing the duties of the NSF director. “NSF AI-Ready America provides that foundation — giving workers, businesses, and communities in every state and territory the tools and knowledge to advance AI together.”

It Will Operate Through a Network

The initiative will operate through a network of state and territory-based Coordination Hubs — up to 56 in total, covering all US states, territories and the District of Columbia — selected through three rounds of competition. Each Hub will connect local partners, coordinate deployment, and scale proven approaches based on the priorities of state and local stakeholders. NSF will invest up to USD 1 million annually per Hub over three years, with the possibility of a fourth year for Hubs demonstrating continued need during transition.

“Winning the AI race is vital to ensuring continued American dominance in defense, innovation, and economic strength,” said SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler. “SBA looks forward to collaborating with NSF and our partners across the Trump Administration to empower small businesses with the training and resources to enhance efficiencies and drive prosperity for the next generation.”

NSF plans to release a funding opportunity in the future to select a national coordination lead who will facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing among the Coordination Hubs. NSF also anticipates issuing AI-Ready Catalyst award competitions focused on a series of topics to pilot and scale innovative approaches that address critical AI readiness needs.

ALDI Süd Is the Latest of the UK’s 11 Leading Supermarket Chains to Commit to Shrimp Welfare Goals

Edusehat — Sat, 18 Apr 2026 02:15:06 +0700

After the International Council for Animal Welfare (ICAW) published an investigation into conditions on prawn farms linked to the supply chain

The German retailer ALDI Süd announced a few days ago they will use electrical stunning or similar methods, before slaughtering all farmed shrimp by 2035 and end eyestalk ablation across its supply chain by 2030. The policy will apply across its markets, including Europe, the United States and Australia. Other United Kingdom’s retailers, including Waitrose, M&S and Tesco, have already set similar goals, though their timelines vary. Some aim to make the changes by 2026, while ALDI Süd’s plan stretches to 2035.

“With ALDI Süd’s commitment, every major United Kingdom (UK) supermarket has now drawn a line on prawn welfare,” said Jonas Becker, head of Invertebrate Welfare, International Council for Animal Welfare. “We believe the global scale of this pledge will make effective electrical stunning the norm well beyond Europe.”

Now, with the announcement, every one of the eleven major UK supermarkets has now set a time-bound commitment on prawn welfare. What began with Waitrose, M&S and Tesco has become a new baseline across UK grocery -though the timelines for full implementation vary significantly, with some retailers targeting 2026 and Aldi Süd’s global pledge extending to 2035.

The Most Widely Consumed

Shrimp are the most widely consumed farmed animal in the UK, with more than 1.2 billion sold each year. Research from the London School of Economics and the University of Stirling has found they are sentient and capable of feeling pain, a view reflected in the UK’s Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022.

Two practices have drawn particular scrutiny. In hatcheries, breeding females may have one eyestalk removed to stimulate egg production. At slaughter, shrimp are often placed in ice-water baths, which research suggests may not render them unconscious.

Electrical stunning is being introduced as an alternative, designed to render shrimp unconscious within seconds and already in use in parts of the UK supply chain.

ALDI Süd was the last of the 11 major UK supermarkets to set a timeline, but its pledge is broader than most, applying across all of its global markets and including a commitment to publish annual progress updates.

Most retailers have taken a more limited approach. Lidl, for example, has committed to electrical stunning for shrimp sold in Great Britain but has not set timelines for its operations elsewhere in Europe.

Commitments

The pace of change has picked up quickly. As recently as mid-2024, no major UK supermarket had set a timeline. Commitments followed over the next two years, and some retailers have already begun making changes. Lidl GB says its core own-brand range is now ablation-free, while Ocado has completed its transition to electrical stunning.

“The ALDI South Group is investing in an industry-led research project to assess the effectiveness of electrical stunning and other potentially higher-welfare methods for warm-water shrimp,” wrote Aldi Süd in its factsheet.

“This project will conclude in 2028, and from this date, ALDI will start transitioning to electrical stunning or other measures confirmed by the study for its own-brand warm-water shrimp, with the aim of completion by 2035. We are committed to transparently report annually on the implementation status of preslaughter stunning methods from 2028 onwards.”

Investigation

In late 2025, the International Council for Animal Welfare (ICAW) published an investigation into conditions on prawn farms linked to ALDI’s supply chain. The investigation was shared widely and reached hundreds of thousands of people. ICAW organized protests at ALDI‘s UK headquarters in Atherstone and its German headquarters in Essen.

Why Fish Farms Collapse After Sudden Growth Spikes

Edusehat — Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:20:08 +0700

Why Fish Farms Collapse After Sudden Growth Spikes

Rapid growth can look like success. More fish, faster turnover, and higher revenue all seem like signs that a farm is moving in the right direction. However, in aquaculture, sudden expansion can also push a system beyond its limits. What works at one scale does not always work at the next. As a result, when growth outpaces system capacity, collapse becomes much more likely.

At the center of this problem is uncontrolled scaling.

Biological Load Exceeds System Capacity

Every fish farm operates within a biological carrying capacity. In simple terms, water can only hold so much oxygen, process so much waste, and support a stable microbial balance for a given level of production. When stocking density rises too quickly, waste production can increase faster than the system can safely handle.

Consequently, ammonia, nitrites, and organic matter begin to build up while oxygen demand rises. Both FAO’s guidance on water quality management and its technical material on water quality and fish health emphasize how critical dissolved oxygen and ammonia control are in intensive aquaculture.

At first, the system may appear to absorb the added pressure. Eventually, though, it can reach a tipping point. Then even a relatively small change in feeding, temperature, or oxygen availability can trigger a much larger problem.

Delayed System Feedback

Just as importantly, aquaculture systems often do not fail immediately. Water quality may still look acceptable on the surface while deeper imbalances are quietly building underneath. Microbial communities can shift, waste can accumulate, and oxygen reserves can tighten before obvious warning signs appear.

This delayed feedback is one reason fish farms can seem stable right up until they are not. Because of that delay, farmers may develop a false sense of security. By the time fish start showing visible stress, the system may already be unstable. Therefore, corrective action becomes reactive instead of preventive.

Feed Input Escalation

At the same time, sudden growth nearly always means more feed. Increased feeding raises nutrient loading, which directly affects water quality. Uneaten feed and fish waste stimulate microbial activity, and that process consumes oxygen while contributing to harmful byproducts.

In addition, feed efficiency often declines when fish are under stress. So, more feed goes in, but less of it turns into healthy growth. That creates both biological strain and financial pressure. Research and industry guidance on feed management and production efficiency consistently point to the importance of adjusting feed to real-time conditions rather than simply increasing volume.

In other words, the system becomes heavier, more fragile, and less efficient all at once.

Infrastructure Mismatch

Moreover, rapid expansion often happens before infrastructure is truly ready. Aeration systems, filtration units, water exchange capacity, and monitoring tools may still be sized for a smaller operation. As production rises, these systems can become bottlenecks.

Oxygen distribution may become uneven, filtration may become inadequate, and water circulation may weaken. NOAA’s work on aquaculture planning and best practices highlights the importance of matching farm design, monitoring, and management capacity to production scale. You can explore more through NOAA’s Coastal Aquaculture Planning Portal and its review of biosecurity and disease management best practices.

Instead of scaling smoothly, the farm develops weak points. Then, under pressure, those weak points are usually where failure begins.

Disease and Stress Amplification

Furthermore, high-density conditions combined with unstable water quality create ideal conditions for disease. Fish under chronic stress tend to have weaker immune responses, which makes them more vulnerable to pathogens. At the same time, crowded conditions allow disease to spread faster through the population.

Environmental stressors such as low dissolved oxygen, high ammonia, and poor water conditions are widely recognized as major contributors to fish health problems. You can read more in this overview of fish health management.

As a result, outbreaks that would have been manageable at a smaller scale can quickly become severe. Mortality rises, treatment costs increase, and apparent growth turns into financial loss.

Economic Overextension

Finally, sudden expansion can strain the business side just as much as the biological side. More fish usually means more feed purchases, higher stocking costs, more labor, and greater operating expenses. However, when biological performance slips, revenue often fails to keep up with those rising costs.

This leaves the farm carrying bigger expenses with lower efficiency. Then a single mortality event, oxygen crash, or production delay can push the entire operation into loss. For that reason, fast growth is not always healthy growth.

Conclusion

Fish farms collapse after sudden growth spikes because biological systems do not scale instantly. Water quality, infrastructure, and ecosystem balance all need time, planning, and careful design to adjust. When growth happens without matching system expansion, hidden instability builds below the surface. The farm may look successful for a while, but eventually several limits are reached at the same time.

Therefore, sustainable scaling in aquaculture must be controlled, incremental, and supported by strong infrastructure and close monitoring. The goal is not just rapid growth. Instead, the goal is stable growth.

In fish farming, expanding too fast is not true acceleration. It is a compression of risk.

Build Your Own Fish Farm

Want to build a fish farm that grows without breaking under pressure? Join the Ecolonomics Action Team and learn from experienced farmers who understand how to scale aquaculture systems in a practical, resilient, and profitable way.

Resources

FAO, Water Quality Management
FAO, Water Quality and Fish Health
NOAA, Review of Best Practices for Biosecurity and Disease Management in Aquaculture
NOAA, Coastal Aquaculture Planning Portal
The Fish Site, Feed Management for Improving Production and Economic Returns
The Fish Site, An Introduction to Fish Health Management

The post Why Fish Farms Collapse After Sudden Growth Spikes first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

Effects of Shrimp Aquaculture on Mangrove Soil Carbon Stocks and Sustained-Flux Global Warming Potentials

Edusehat — Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:35:05 +0700

* By Aquaculture Magazine Editorial Team

Mangrove forests provide critical ecosystem services, including serving as nursery habitats for fish, protecting coastlines from erosion, and supporting local livelihoods. They are also among the most efficient carbon sinks on Earth, storing large amounts of “blue carbon” in deep, organic-rich soils that can retain carbon for centuries. Globally, mangroves store between 3.7 and 20 petagrams (Pg) of carbon, with soils accounting for up 90% of total carbon stocks.

Despite their importance, mangroves are being lost at a rate of 1-2% annuals due to sea-level risen pollution and especially coastal development. Aquaculture, particularly shrimp farming, is a major driver, responsible for about 38% of mangrove deforestation. The conversion process involves clearing vegetation, excavating soil, and constructing pond systems, which significantly disrupts the ecosystem.

This transformation leads to substantial carbon emissions through both physical removal of carbon-rich soils and biogeochemical processes.

However, accurately estimating these emissions remains challenging due to variability in environmental conditions, species, and aquaculture practices. Existing assessment methods may underestimate total emissions by overlooking certain pathways or including regenerated systems.

Mangrove forests are highly efficient carbon sinks, storing ‘blue carbon’ in organic-rich soils for centuries. However, shrimp aquaculture drives 38% of global mangrove deforestation, disrupting these ecosystems through vegetation clearing and soil excavation, which triggers massive greenhouse gas emissions.

Given these uncertainties, more comprehensive research is needed to evaluate the full climate impact of mangrove conversion. Understand-ing both physical and biogeochemical carbon losses is essential for improving management strategies and integrating mangrove conservation into climate change mitigation efforts.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted using soil and water samples from a mangrove system in Estero Bay, Florida, to simulate aquaculture conversion through controlled microcosms. Intact mangrove soils and modified soils representing shrimp pond construction were maintained under controlled temperature and light conditions for
2.5 years, covering drainage, operational and abandoned phases.

Hydrochemical parameters such as salinity, temperature, pH, nutrients, and carbon content were measured regularly. Soil carbon, bulk density, and greenhouse gas emissions were analyzed using standardized methods, including closed chamber techniques to estimate CO₂-equivalent fluxes and global warming potential.

Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare soil carbon across studies, while statistical analyses assessed differences between mangrove and aquaculture conditions and enabled broader extrapolation of results.

The conversion to aquaculture ponds leads to a significant reduction in soil carbon stocks, averaging 46.82%. Systematic reviews confirm that mangroves contain approximately 819.38 Mg C ha⁻¹, whereas operational aquaculture ponds drop to 435.77 Mg C ha⁻¹ due to physical and biogeochemical losses.

Results

Carbon losses and bulk density

During aquaculture construction, the removal of 1 m of soil resulted in an estimated loss of 422.1 ± 14.6 Mg C ha¹ (1,549.11 Mg CO₂e ha-1), with resampling indicating an actual loss of ~242.9 Mg C ha-1 (57.78%). In comparison, mangrove microcosms contained approximately 242.1 Mg C ha-1 within the top 0.5 m (Table 1).

Table 1. Carbon losses and potential CO2e emissions due to simulated shrimp aquaculture compared with mangrove microcosms. Total carbon in removed soil is shown but how much of this is lost is not well constrained – limited measurement of actual loss in italics. Lifetime emissions assuming typical 3–9 years operational duration with 5 years of abandoned emissions, with and without a year’s drainage. SGWP denotes Sustained-flux Global Warming Potential. Six microcosms were used per treatment.

Comparisons between mangrove and operational aquaculture microcosms revealed a significant carbon loss of 30.1% ± 0.8% (74.67 Mg C ha-¹ or 274.04 Mg CO₂e ha-¹; p < 0.001; Figure 1a), observed across all soil depths (Figure 1b). Bulk density also decreased by 54.59% (Figure 1c; p < 0.001), with a strong negative correlation between bulk density and carbon stock (r = −0.885; p < 0.001; Figure 1d).

Figure 1. (a) Total carbon stock in mangrove (no fill) and aquaculture (fill) microcosms. Lines and cross within the box denote the median and mean value, bars represent the interquartile range, “whiskers” represent range (excluding outliers) and points denote outliers (beyond either the upper quartile + 1.5 x the interquartile range or lower quartile + 1.5 x the interquartile range). (b) Carbon stock depth profiles for mangrove (no fill) and aquaculture (fill) microcosms. Error bars denote standard error of the mean. (c) Bulk density in mangrove (no fill) and aquaculture (fill) microcosms. Lines and cross within the box denote the median and mean value, bars represent the interquartile range, “whiskers” represent range (excluding outliers) and points denote outliers (beyond either the upper quartile + 1.5 x the interquartile range or lower quartile + 1.5 x the interquartile range). (d) Carbon stock as a function of bulk density (aquaculture and mangrove microcosms denoted by filled diamonds and open circles respectively). (e) Sustained-flux Global Warming Potentials (SGWP) for each phase of simulated shrimp aquaculture (fill) compared with mangrove (no fill) microcosms. Six microcosms were used per treatment. Significance at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 denoted by *, ** and *** respectively.

Potential CO₂e emissions

Under drainage conditions, sustained global warming potential (SGWP) increased by 34,075.38 mg m-² d-¹ (172.39%), with all greenhouse gases contributing moderately. This represents a difference of 21,565.39 mg m-² d-¹ or 0.79 Mg CO₂e ha-¹ yr-¹ compared to mangrove systems (Figure 1e).

The largest emissions occurred during the operational phase, with an increase of 65,343.26 mg m-² d-¹ (522%), equivalent to 2.39 Mg CO₂e ha-¹ yr-¹. Significant increases in CH₄ and N₂O effluxes were observed, while CO₂ uptake exceeded that of mangrove systems.

In the abandoned phase, after one year, emissions increased by 393.59% (49,238.68 mg m-² d-¹), corresponding to 1.80 Mg CO₂e ha-¹ yr-¹. CH₄ and N₂O contributed significantly, while CO₂ emissions remained lower than in mangrove systems.

Aquaculture construction involves removing topsoil layers, resulting in an estimated physical carbon loss of 422.1 Mg C ha⁻¹. This transformation significantly increases bulk density and degrades soil porosity, creating a strong negative correlation between soil compaction and total carbon retention.

Total lifetime emissions and extrapolation

Considering five years after abandonment, an additional 5.19 Mg CO₂e ha-¹ yr-¹ is generated. Assuming operational periods of 3–9 years, total SGWP ranges from 12.35 to 26.66 Mg CO₂e ha-¹, or up to 27.44 Mg CO₂e ha-¹ when including drainage.

Including biogeochemical soil carbon losses increases total emissions to 286.39 – 301.48 Mg CO₂e ha-¹. When construction-related soil loss is added, total emissions reach approximately 1,174.84 – 1,189.93 Mg CO₂e ha-¹ (Table 1). Biogeochemical emissions account for roughly 24–25% of total emissions.

Systematic review and meta-analysis

The meta-analysis showed a consistent and significant reduction in soil carbon due to aquaculture (effect size−1.63; p < 0.001). On average, man-groves contain 819.38 Mg C ha-¹, com-pared to 435.77 Mg C ha-¹ in aquaculture ponds, representing a reduction of 46.82% ± 8.70% (p < 0.001).

Carbon reductions were observed at all depths, with larger differences below 30 cm. At depths greater than 100 cm, mangroves contained 62.55% more carbon than aquaculture systems. In both systems, most carbon was stored below 100 cm depth.

Significant differences in bulk density were also found, with lower values in mangrove soils (p < 0.001) and a negative correlation with carbon stocks (rs = −0.490).

Estimates based on the Land Use Change Stock (LUCS) approach ranged from 1,390 to 3,799 Mg CO₂e ha-¹, with a mean soil carbon loss equivalent to 1,407.85 Mg CO₂e ha-¹. However, few studies account for all greenhouse gases or total SGWP, suggesting potential underestimation of emissions.

Sustained-flux Global Warming Potentials (SGWP) spike during the operational phase of shrimp farming, increasing by 522%. High organic matter inputs stimulate anaerobic degradation and methanogenesis, while nitrogen from fertilizers drives significant increases in nitrous oxide (N₂O)

Discussion

Effects of aquaculture on carbon loss pathways

Aquaculture conversion resulted in significant soil carbon loss, with 74.67 Mg C ha-1 lost during the operational phase compared to mangrove systems (Figure 1a). These losses are driven by biogeochemical processes such as root decomposition and anaerobic degradation stimulated by nutrient inputs. Construction activities further contribute through the removal of approximately 1 m of soil containing around 422.1 Mg C ha-1 (Table 1), with an estimated 57% lost through oxidation, leaching, and decomposition.

The systematic review (SR) confirms a strong and consistent reduction in soil carbon (effect size -1.63), suggesting that aquaculture conversion leads to substantial carbon loss regardless of environmental variability. Physical processes, particularly soil removal and compaction, are key drivers. Mangrove soils show higher carbon stocks, with losses averaging 43-46% after conversion.

Bulk density (rb) increased significantly in aquaculture systems (Figure 1c), indicating soil degradation and re-duced porosity. The inverse relationship between rb and carbon (Figure 1d) highlights the impact of compaction from construction activities.

Microcosm simulations reveal that biogeochemical pathways contribute approximately 25% to the total sustained-flux global warming potential (SGWP). These often-overlooked pathways, including root decomposition and nutrient-stimulated degradation, are essential for accurate life cycle assessments (LCA) in the aquaculture sector.

Additionally, hydrological changes such as dyke construction limit tidal flooding, reducing carbon inputs and contributing to long-term declines. These processes suggest that carbon losses may continue over time, potentially being underestimated.

Effects of aquaculture on potential CO₂e emissions and SGWP

Drainage increased emissions by Mg CO2e ha-1yr-1 (Figure 1e; Table 1), con-sistent with enhanced decomposition under oxygen exposure. Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions also increased, indicating peat degradation.

During the operational phase, emissions rose by 2.39 MgCO2 ha-1 yr-1 (Figure 1e), driven by high organic matter inputs from feed and fertilizers. Anaerobic sediment conditions promote methanogenesis, while nitrogen inputs stimulate nitrification and denitrification, increasing N₂O emissions. Some systems may act as CO₂ sinks when algal production exceeds emissions, although management practices such as aeration influence outcomes.

Even after abandonment, former aquaculture ponds exhibit legacy effects, with emissions remaining nearly 400% higher than intact mangrove systems. Long-term climate mitigation requires better management of abandoned systems and the prioritization of pond reuse to minimize further land-use changes

In the abandoned phase, emissions remained elevated at 1.80 Mg-CO2e ha-1 yr-1, indicating long-term legacy effects. Over five years. This adds 5.19 Mg CO₂e ha-1. Total emissions across the system life cycle range from 1,174.83 to 1,189.93 Mg CO2e ha-1 (Table 1), with biogeochemical processes contributing about 24–25%. While soil carbon loss dominates emissions, these pathways are often underestimated, emphasizing the need to include them in life cycle assessments.

Comparison of the microcosm model experiments and systematic review

Microcosm experiments effectively replicate field conditions, showing similar carbon loss patterns, depth profiles, and relationships between carbon and bulk density. Both top-down (microcosm) and bottom-up (SR) approaches produced compara-ble results up to 100 cm depth. Differences at greater depths likely reflect methodological uncertainties in field studies.

The hydrologically closed nature of ponds appears to drive consistent carbon loss patterns. However, mi-crocosms may underestimate deeper biogeochemical losses, while field studies may include additional vari-ability. Factors such as sediment type, hydrology, and nutrient pollution influence results.

Although microcosms did not include live shrimp processes, they captured major emission pathways. Additional sources, such as gut-de-rived N₂O and methane production, may further increase emissions. The LUCS method remains useful for large-scale estimates but may underestimate short-term emissions. A combined microcosm and SR approach is recommended for more accurate assessments.

Globally, soil carbon losses from mangrove-to-aquaculture conversion could represent up to 40% of all anthropogenic emissions related to mangrove loss. Conserving these blue carbon habitats is a critical strategy for meeting international climate targets and improving industry sustainability.

Exploration of the importance of mangrove aquaculture in climate mitigation

At a national scale, emissions from mangrove conversion appear mod-est, contributing around 0.01% of anthropogenic emissions. However, at a global scale, aquaculture-related soil carbon loss could account for 2.48–3.01 Pg CO₂e, representing up to 40% of anthropogenic emissions.

These findings highlight the importance of mangrove conservation in climate mitigation strategies. However, uncertainties remain due to variability in environmental conditions and methodological limitations. Current estimates may under-estimate total emissions by excluding biomass losses, deeper soil impacts, and downstream effects.

Overall, reducing mangrove de-forestation and improving aqua-culture practices are essential to minimize emissions and enhance sustainability.

Conclusion

Microcosm simulations indicate that biogeochemical pathways may contribute about 25% to total SGWP beyond LUCS estimates, although soil carbon loss during construction and operation remains the dominant source. Reusing ponds and extending operational periods could improve sustainability, while soil fate, drain-age effects, and abandoned system management require further study. Results align with systematic review findings showing consistent carbon loss across systems, though sediment type remains understudied. Global extrapolations suggest emissions of~3 Pg CO₂e, highlighting the critical role of mangroves in climate mitigation and the need for improved management and conservation strategies.

This is a summarized version developed by the editorial team of Aquaculture Magazine based on the review article titled “EFFECTS OF SHRIMP AQUACULTURE ON MANGROVE SOIL CARBON
STOCKS AND SUSTAINED-FLUX GLOBAL WARMING
POTENTIALS” developed by: Fenner, N. and Hayward, E. – Bangor University, Bovard, B. – Florida Gulf Coast University, Creer, S. and Dunn, C.
• Bangor University. The original article, including tables and figures, was published on MARCH, 2026 , through FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE. The full version can be accessed online through this link: DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2026.1729512

All Eleven Major UK Supermarkets Now Committed on Prawn Welfare After Aldi Süd Sets Global Timeline

Edusehat — Sun, 12 Apr 2026 02:15:17 +0700

By International Council for Animal Welfare

The German discounter commits to electrical stunning or similarly effective methods for all farmed prawns worldwide by 2035 — the broadest scope of any retailer commitment to date

Aldi Süd has committed to implementing electrical stunning or similarly effective methods before slaughter for all farmed prawns by 2035, and to ending eyestalk ablation across its supply chain by 2030. The commitment applies to all Aldi Süd markets worldwide, including Europe, the USA and Australia.

With Aldi Süd‘s announcement, every one of the eleven major UK supermarkets has now set a time-bound commitment on prawn welfare. What began with Waitrose, M&S and Tesco has become a new baseline across UK grocery — though the timelines for full implementation vary significantly, with some retailers targeting 2026 and Aldi Süd’s global pledge extending to 2035.

Why Prawns

Prawns are the most consumed farmed animal in the UK — over 1.2 billion individuals sold each year, more than chickens. Research from the London School of Economics and the University of Stirling has established that prawns are sentient and capable of feeling pain. The UK government recognized crustaceans as sentient beings under the Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022.

Two standard industry practices have come under particular scrutiny. In prawn hatcheries, breeding females routinely have one eyestalk cut off while alive to stimulate egg production. At slaughter, prawns are immersed in ice-water baths — a method that research suggests often fails to render them unconscious, leaving animals to suffocate over prolonged periods. Electrical stunning offers an alternative: it renders prawns unconscious within seconds, and the equipment is commercially available and already being rolled out across UK supply chains.

***Aldi*: From Holdout to the Broadest Commitment**

Aldi Süd was the last of the eleven major UK supermarkets to set a timeline. But the scope of its pledge goes well beyond the UK: it is the first retailer to commit across all its global markets in a single announcement. Aldi Süd has also committed to annual public progress reporting on its transition.

That distinction matters because prawn welfare commitments have so far largely been a market-by-market affair. Lidl, for instance — also a German-headquartered discounter with global operations — has so far only committed to introducing electrical stunning for prawns sold in Great Britain. It has not set a timeline for its operations in Germany, France or elsewhere in Europe. Aldi Süd’s global approach sets a different precedent.

Concern for Prawn Welfare Rapidly Growing

In mid-2024, not a single major UK supermarket had a firm timeline on prawn stunning methods. The commitments then came in quick succession:

2024: Tesco, Sainsbury’s, M&S, Ocado.
2025: Waitrose, Co-op, Morrisons, Iceland.
2026: Asda, Lidl GB, Aldi Süd.

Several retailers are already implementing changes. Lidl GB reports its core own-brand range has been ablation-free since January 2026. Ocado has reported completing its transition to electrical stunning. The momentum has also spread internationally, with Jumbo in the Netherlands and Intermarché in France committing in 2025.

“With Aldi Süd’s commitment, every major UK supermarket has now drawn a line on prawn welfare. We believe the global scale of this pledge will make effective electrical stunning the norm well beyond Europe”, Jonas Becker, Head of Invertebrate Welfare, International Council for Animal Welfare.

Background

In late 2025, the International Council for Animal Welfare (ICAW) published an investigation into conditions on prawn farms linked to Aldi’s supply chain. The investigation was shared widely and reached hundreds of thousands of people. ICAW organized protests at Aldi‘s UK headquarters in Atherstone and its German headquarters in Essen.

Aldi had previously acknowledged that electrical stunning is considered best practice for prawns but had not committed to a timeline.

Aldi South policy in verbatim (Fish and Seafood Factsheet, page 8): The ALDI SOUTH Group is investing in an industry-led research project to assess the effectiveness of electrical stunning and other potentially higher-welfare methods for warm-water shrimp. This project will conclude in 2028, and from this date ALDI will start transitioning to electrical stunning or other measures confirmed by the study for its own-brand warm-water shrimp, with the aim of completion by 2035. We are committed to transparently report annually on the implementation status of preslaughter stunning methods from 2028 onwards.

https://sustainability.aldisouthgroup.com/files/fish-and-seafood-factsheet

About ICAW

The International Council for Animal Welfare is a registered nonprofit born from a coalition of animal welfare advocacy professionals from around the globe, uniting decades of expertise to reduce as much animal suffering as possible.

(Photo by CSIRO, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=35474696)

Unlocking Innovation: Powering Shrimp Performance with Plant Sterols

Edusehat — Sun, 12 Apr 2026 02:15:12 +0700

By ADM

Shrimp farming has grown rapidly over the past three decades, helping meet rising global demand for seafood. But this growth has also increased pressure on marine resources traditionally used in aquaculture feeds, including fishmeal and fish oil. Key opportunities to promote farmer efficiencies and environmental stewardship include development of innovative ingredients that deliver higher nutritional value while addressing possible environmental and animal health challenges. For shrimp, in particular, one nutrient has posed a unique challenge: cholesterol.

Cholesterol plays a vital role in maintaining cell structure, aiding fat digestion and serving as the building block for key hormones that regulate development. Without enough cholesterol, shrimp can experience poor growth, molting problems and reduced reproductive performance.

Traditionally, shrimp diets have relied on marine-derived ingredients or purified cholesterol concentrates to meet this requirement. However, these ingredients often come with higher costs, sustainability concerns and supply chain constraints, which has prompted the industry to explore alternative options.

ADM‘s Plant Sterols AN offers an innovative, science-backed approach for tackling the cholesterol challenge in shrimp feeds. Plant sterols are naturally occurring compounds found in plants that are structurally similar to cholesterol. In a recent study, ADM researchers evaluated whether plant sterols could effectively replace animal-derived cholesterol in Pacific whiteleg shrimp diets. In a 62-day feeding study, shrimp were fed one of three diets: a basal diet with no added sterols, a diet supplemented with cholesterol, or a diet supplemented with Plant Sterols AN.

The results were clear and easy to interpret. Shrimp receiving either cholesterol or Plant Sterols AN showed significantly greater weight gain and improved feed utilization compared to shrimp fed the non-supplemented diet. Importantly, there were no significant differences in growth performance between the cholesterol and plant sterol groups. In addition, shrimp fed Plant Sterols AN had similar cholesterol levels in their hepatopancreas – a key metabolic organ – as those fed purified cholesterol. Collectively, the data indicates that plant sterols can effectively fulfill cholesterol-related functions in shrimp to support healthy development.

Recently presented at one of the largest aquaculture conferences and tradeshows globally¹, results from the ADM study reinforce other scientific findings showing plant sterols offer an economical and sustainable alternative to cholesterol in shrimp diets. Because plant sterol concentrates are significantly cheaper than cholesterol concentrates, integrating them into low-cholesterol formulations reduces production costs by improving shrimp growth and feed efficiency. As the industry shifts toward plant-based ingredients to address cost and overfishing, plant sterols provide a critical safeguard against cholesterol deficiency in shrimp. Moreover, Plant Sterols are a side-stream from ADM‘s vitamin E production, helping us as a company reduce waste in our production.

By enabling formulators to reduce reliance on marine animal-derived cholesterol sources without compromising shrimp performance, Plant Sterols AN represents a practical step forward. ADM helps producers with a next generation approach that elevates animal well-being, optimizes nutrient utilization to reduce losses and helps drive profitability, all while supporting the continued growth of sustainable aquaculture worldwide.

¹Grayson et al. Utilization of a phytosterols concentrate in practical diets for Pacific whiteleg shrimp. Aquaculture America, Las Vegas, NV, February 16-19th, 2026.

Disclaimer: Not all products are available in all regions. ADM makes no representation or warranty, whether expressed or implied, as to the reliability, or completeness of the information. The uses and claims should be adapted to comply with the current local/regional regulatory environment. This information does not imply any express recommendations for the cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease.

Onda and Innovafeed Announce Promising Results From Trials Using Insect-Based Ingredients in Salmon Nutrition

Edusehat — Sun, 12 Apr 2026 02:15:05 +0700

By Onda and Innovafeed

Preliminary research demonstrates antibacterial potential and strong growth performance in Atlantic salmon

Innovafeed, a global leader in insect-based ingredients (Black Soldier Fly – Hermetia illucens), and Onda, the world’s largest independent aquatic contract research organization, today announced promising results from two collaborative trials evaluating the performance and functional benefits of insect-based ingredients in aquaculture nutrition.

The trials, conducted at Onda’s world-class aquaculture research facilities in Prince Edward Island, assessed the potential of Black Soldier Fly Larvae Meal to support fish health and performance in Atlantic salmon diets.

**Promising In-Vitro Antibacterial Activity**

Initial in-vitro analyses conducted by Onda demonstrated antibacterial activity associated with Innovafeed’s Black Soldier Fly Larvae Meal (Hilucia for Aqua). The study evaluated the inhibitory effect of its hydrosoluble fraction against several aquatic pathogens commonly responsible for disease outbreaks in aquaculture.

Results showed growth inhibition against four gram-negative bacteria of major relevance for aquaculture health management: Aeromonas salmonicida, Flavobacterium psychrophilum, Vibrio anguillarum, and Photobacterium damselae. For further technical details on the methodology and results, please refer to our white paper available on our Hilucia Aquaculture page: https://innovafeed.com/en/hilucia-aquaculture/.

These results build on previous studies that have demonstrated antimicrobial activity of Black Soldier Fly Larvae against a broader range of aquatic pathogens.

The antibacterial potential of Hilucia for Aqua is believed to be linked to antimicrobial peptides naturally produced by Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Hermetia illucens). These bioactive molecules are part of the insect’s innate immune system and are known to interact with microbial cell membranes, inhibiting growth or causing pathogen death.

Given the growing challenge of bacterial diseases and antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture, these findings highlight the potential of insect-derived ingredients not only as sustainable protein sources but also as functional feed ingredients capable of supporting fish immunity and helping reduce reliance on antibiotics.

Strong Growth Performance in Salmon Trials

A second trial at Onda evaluated the use of Innovafeed’s BSFL meal as an appetite and performance booster in grower Atlantic salmon.

Throughout the 84-day trial, the Hilucia for Aqua-fed group grew from around 300 to 800 g, and achieved a perfect 100% survival rate. Results showed increased feed intake with a dose-response pattern to Hilucia inclusion rate, associated with a strong growth performance, with statistically increased growth rate and improved feed efficiency demonstrating the BSFL meal’s potential to enter grower salmon’s diets while boosting fish farming performance.

The trial also included a seawater stress test, assessing fish resilience during a critical stage of the salmon production cycle. While results are still being analyzed, this work reflects the continued efforts of Onda and Innovafeed to demonstrate the functional potential of insect-derived ingredients in aquaculture nutrition.

These results further support the use of insect-derived ingredients as both nutritionally effective and functionally beneficial components of aquaculture feeds.

Advancing Innovation in Aquaculture Nutrition

“Working with innovative partners like Innovafeed allows us to further develop our testing platforms and explore solutions that can transform aquaculture,” said Dr. Fabio Zanuzzo, Director of Aquatic Research at Onda. “Our integrated, and tailor-made research approach enables us to fully evaluate and maximize the value of our clients’ products, generating precise and actionable insights for the aquaculture industry.”

“This collaboration has been both highly effective and very promising. The scientific foundation and expertise of Onda‘s teams bring significant value to our work, and the results generated provide further evidence of the functional potential of insect-based ingredients for aquaculture nutrition” said Marine Bezagu Phd, Head of Product Development on Aquaculture at Innovafeed.

Additional trials, including in-vivo studies, will further evaluate the potential of insect-derived functional ingredients to support fish health and disease resilience in commercial aquaculture production.

About Onda

Onda is a contract research organization specializing in aquaculture research and trials. Onda offers bespoke bench top and in-tank trials and challenges for a variety of species at both our Souris & Victoria, PEI locations, presenting our clients with custom-made solutions to the challenges they are facing with best-in-class industry expertise and experience.

Onda holds a variety of certifications including, GLP, GMP, ACQ3 & ACQ2, integrating our customized service offering with the highest quality of work. Quality, consistency, and reliability are traits that we at Onda pride ourselves in each interaction with our clients. From idea to solution, Onda provides expertise, guidance, and navigation during the product development process.

www.onda.ca

About Innovafeed

Innovafeed is a global AgTech pioneer (B Corp, Next 40, Impact 40, World’s GreenTech Company 2025), specialized in producing insects (Black Soldier Fly – Hermetia illucens) for animal and plant nutrition. As one of the world’s foremost insect producers, Innovafeed develops cutting-edge technologies that replicate nature’s resource conversion processes at industrial scale.

By recreating a circular, zero-waste food chain in which insects reclaim their natural role in the ecosystem, the company contributes to building a more sustainable, resilient, and efficient agri-food system. www.innovafeed.com

The Norwegian Company Akvaplan-niva Completes a Pilot Project That Offers Hope for Successful Sex Sorting of Farmed Cod

Edusehat — Sat, 11 Apr 2026 22:40:06 +0700

• In collaboration with Aqua Kompetanse, KIME Akva and Greenfox Marine.

• It is an important step toward greater sustainability in the species farming.

• The technology for sex-sorting fish uses ultrasound in combination with AI.

The Norwegian company Akvaplan-niva, in collaboration with Aqua Kompetanse, KIME Akva, and Greenfox Marine, has now completed a pilot project that offers hope for successful sex sorting of farmed cod. The pilot project, conducted at the Rubbestad smolt facility, investigated when cod are large enough to be sexed. The goal is to ensure a robust data foundation to enable the launch of commercial sex sorting by 2027.

From September 2025 to February 2026, researchers monitored cod from the two fish groups representing Norway’s two most important cod lines: cod from the breeding programs of Nofima and Havlandet. The results show that the cod’s gonads are sufficiently developed for visual sex identification with 90% certainty when the fish weighs 200 grams.

Visual assessment using ultrasound could distinguish between female fish and “non-female fish” at 200 grams. The researchers recommend that, for the best possible image quality, feeding the fish should be avoided for two days prior to the examination.

“This could be the solution to one of the industry’s biggest challenges. Early sexual maturation and spawning in pens are detrimental to both wild cod, the welfare of farmed cod, and production profitability,” says project manager at Akvaplan-niva, Lauris Boissonnot.

Significant Morphological Differences

Cod farming faces a critical challenge: spawning in pens, which threatens both the environment and production. Separating male and female fish into separate pens could be a solution, but how can this be done effectively and reliably? Now, the groundbreaking pilot project offers hope for successful sex sorting of farmed cod.

Now, the researchers discovered significant morphological differences in the shape of the egg sacs between the two fish groups. In the Nofima Group, the egg sacs were round and compact, while in the Havlandet Group they were slender, elongated, and resembled undifferentiated gonads.

The causes of this variation have not been identified, but there may be several genetic and environmental factors that could explain it. However, gonad morphology — that is, the shape of the gonads — was homogeneous within each fish group. This suggests that factors influence gonad morphology at the group level.

To better understand the extent of and causes for the differences in gonadal morphology, further studies of additional fish groups from both strains are necessary. If the researchers also find these differences in other fish groups, this may mean that the technology must be adapted for each individual fish group. Further follow-up by the team will clarify whether this is a general trend or not.

Originally Designed to Sort Farmed Salmon

The technology for sex-sorting fish using ultrasound in combination with AI, developed by Greenfox Marine, was originally designed to sort farmed salmon. Salmon and cod have different body shapes and gonad locations, and therefore the equipment used for data collection to train the AI models is not adapted for cod. Technology providers are now working closely with researchers and fish farmers to optimize equipment and methods.

The completed pilot project, funded by Forregion Troms, has established a scientific foundation for the further development of automated sex sorting of farmed cod. A consortium consisting of fish farmers, R&D institutions, and technology suppliers is now working to establish an R&D project to ensure reliable sex sorting of juvenile cod and to study the effects of sex sorting on spawning, welfare, and performance. If such a project is successful, it will bring us one step closer to success in cod farming.

Poultry By-Product Meal for Atlantic Salmon: Growth,Welfare, and Fillet Quality in Commercial Farming

Edusehat — Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:40:05 +0700

By Aquaculture Magazine Editorial Team

Poultry by-product meal is high in protein and has a similar amino acid profile to fish meal. It also lacks any known anti-nutritional factors, making it a promising ingredient for carnivorous fish diets. This article summarizes the results of a study that evaluated the impact of including it in seawater growth diets on the quality of the pellets, the growth and welfare of the Atlantic salmon, and the quality of the fillets.

Global aquaculture production has tripled over the last two decades and continues to rise, with fed aquaculture now outpacing non-fed species (Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO], 2022). Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), the most farmed marine fish species (FAO, 2024), requires high-quality protein in its diet (National Research Council, 2011). Fishmeal has been increasingly replaced by plant-based proteins such as soy protein concentrate, but this shift poses challenges. Antinutritional factors in plants can negatively impact fish growth and health and heavy reliance on highquality plant proteins contributes to feed-food competition.

Therefore, alternative protein sources that are nutritionally sound, environmentally friendly, and support a circular bioeconomy are needed. A circular bioeconomy approach promotes nutrient recovery by using existing resources like by-products, which improves sustainability in aquaculture. In the European Union (EU), self-sufficiency in highprotein materials such as soybean meal remains low at around 28%. Animal by-products represent an underutilized yet promising circular protein source.

Up to 48% of slaughtered animal weight is not used for human consumption, yielding over 20 million tons annually in the EU (European Commission, 2024). Category 3 animal by-products ─ low risk materials ─ can legally be used in aquaculture feeds since the 2013 lifting of the EU ban (Resolution 56/2013), which had been imposed in 2001 due to bovine spongiform encephalopathy.

Poultry by-product meal (PBM) is a category 3 product widely available in Europe. PBM is rich in protein, has an amino acid profile similar to fishmeal, and lacks known antinutritional factors, making it a promising ingredient for carnivorous fish diets. While small-scale studies show PBM supports salmonid growth, largescale trials reflecting commercial farming conditions are limited.

Additionally, physical pellet quality is crucial, as poor-quality leads to feed waste and higher costs. Fillet quality — key to market value ─ is another vital factor. Thus, this study evaluates the impact of 0%, 5% and 10% PMB inclusion in seawater grow-out diets on pellet quality, growth, welfare, and fillet quality in Atlantic salmon.

Poultry by-product meal (PBM) is high in protein and has a similar amino acid profile to fishmeal. It also lacks any known anti-nutritional factors, making it a promising ingredient for carnivorous fish diets like Atlantic salmon.

Materials and Methods

PBM was produced by BHJ A/S (Gråsten Denmark) from category 3 poultry by-products (bones, skins, viscera) sourced from Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. Following EU Regulation 1069/2009, raw material was minced (<30 mm), heated to ≥70°C for 20 min, then sterilized at 100°C for 60 min.

Aller Aqua A/S produced three isoenergetic, isolipidic, isonitrogenous diets with 0% (control), 5%, and 10% PBM in 6 mm and 9 mm pellet sizes. Diets met nutritional requirements for Atlantic salmon (National Research Council, 2011), with PBM replacing other protein sources.

Results

Pellet quality

The pellet quality analysis revealed high physical pellet quality for all diets with small numerical differences between the diets. Pellet length was significantly shorter for the 5% diet compared to the other two (p = 0.001). There was a significant reduction in expansion between each of the three diets (p = 0.0001), and the reduction was larger for the 5% PBM diet than the 10% diet.

Fish health and growth performance

Fish health was regularly evaluated by external fish health biologists throughout the experimental period. A larger proportion than normally expected had jaw and spine deformities. The deformities were found equally in all dietary groups and were not related to the experimental diets. Otherwise, the fish were of good condition and fish health was evaluated as good.

Fish in all cages had three thermic delousing treatments (31 – 32◦C), and two of the cages fed 0% PBM needed a fourth treatment at the end of the experiment due to higher lice numbers. Growth performance results showed no differences between the dietary groups for initial and final weight, mortality, feed conversion ratio or specific growth rate (Table 1).

Welfare parameters

External and internal welfare parameters demonstrate good welfare for all dietary groups. Fish fed 5% PBM had a significantly higher condition factor (p = 0.0007) compared to the control group. Fish fed 10% PBM had a lower ulcer score (p = 0.03) and darker liver color (p = 0.02) compared to the control group fed 0% PBM, yet the differences between the dietary groups were numerically small. No fish in the 10% group had ulcers, 6/30 fish had ulcers in the control group and 2/30 in the 5% group. Scores for scale loss, skin bleeding, cataract, opercula deformities, viscerosomatic index, visceral fat and heart surface fat were comparable between the groups.

Product quality

Product quality results are summarized in Table 2, and similar results were found for the three dietary groups. No differences were detected in fillet color or pigment concentration, except for a modest but significant difference in the anterior Salmo- Fan measurement between the control and 5% PBM (control: 25.0 vs. 5% 24.4, p = 0.03). The chemical analysis of the fillets revealed a significant increase in dry matter content between the control group and the two PBM groups, and a significant difference in total fat between the control group and the 5% PBM group.

Histology

Samples collected before exposure to experimental diets, showed no differences between dietary groups. Inflammation scores increased throughout the experimental period with comparable scores between dietary groups (Figure 1). At the 8-month sampling, fish fed 0% PBM had a significantly higher inflammation score compared to fish fed 5% PBM (p = 0006), but compared to fish fed 10% PBM, there were no significant differences.

Replacing conventional protein with PBM supports a circular economy by transforming low-value by-products into high-quality food. Moderate inclusion of up to 10% is a suitable protein source for Atlantic salmon farmed under commercial-like conditions.

Discussion

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of poultry by-product meal (PBM) inclusion in diets for Atlantic salmon (S. salar) under commercial- like field conditions. PBM, a high-protein alternative derived from poultry processing showed comparable results across all groups (0%, 5%, 10% inclusion) for growth performance, welfare scores, gut histology, and product quality.

Previous studies found no negative effects of PBM on growth up to 28% inclusion (Hatlen et al., 2015). In this trial, deformities observed in all groups were likely due to early-life phosphorus deficiency, not diet. The 5% PBM group showed higher condition factor and fillet fat content, likely from higher final weights, though this did not translate to higher yield. Ulcer presence, a welfare concern in Norwegian salmon farming, was lowest in the 10% PMB group but differences may be confounded by delousing treatments, known to increase and handling.

A circular bioeconomy approach promotes nutrient recovery by using existing resources likeby-products, which improves sustainability in aquaculture

Overall, 83% of fish were graded as “superior,” with no significant differences among groups. Relative filled fat was higher in the 5% group, but fatty acid composition remained unchanged, likely due to PBM’s low lipid content (7.9%) and consistent use of fish oil and rapeseed oil across diets. Fishmeal inclusion decreased slightly with increased PBM, but did not affect fatty acid profile.

Pigmentation, critical for market value, was unaffected despite slightly lower astaxanthin levels in the 0% PBM group. Filled color depends not only on pigment concentration but also on stress and postmortem changes (Heia et al., 2009).

PBM inclusion had no negative effects on fillet texture or gaping. Histological analysis showed no significant impact of PBM on inflammation, vacuolization, or ectopic goblet cells in the distal intestine. While PBM could reduce reliance on plant proteins and associated antinutritional factors, inflammation severity increased with inclusion, suggesting other causes.

Despite limited use in the EU, PBM is widely accepted elsewhere. Barriers in the EU include low consumer acceptance, supply variability, and competition from the pet food sector. Further research is needed to define optimal inclusion levels and assess long-term sustainability and economic impacts.

Product quality results were comparable across all dietary groups, with no diflerences detected in fillet color or texture. Overall, 83% of fish were graded as ‘superior,’ regardless of the level of poultry by-product meal inclusion.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that PBM can replace 10% of conventional protein ingredients in diets for Atlantic salmon, without adverse effects on physical pellet quality, growth performance, welfare, distal intestine histology or product quality. Thus, we conclude that moderate inclusions of PBM of up to 10% is a suitable protein source in diets for Atlantic salmon farmed under commercial-like conditions during the grow-out phase in seawater. Additionally, the inclusion of PBM in salmon feed contributes to circular economy by transforming lowvalue by-products into high-quality food and may enhance sustainability of the aquaculture sector.

This is a summarized version developed by the editorial team of Aquaculture Magazine based on the review article titled “POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL IN DIETS FOR FARMED ATLANTIC SALMON SUPPORTS HIGH GROWTH PERFORMANCE, FISH WELFARE AND FILLET QUALITY UNDER COMMERCIAL-LIKE FIELD CONDITIONS” developed by: HAUG EIDE, L – Eide Family AS, Eikelandsosen and Norwegian University of Life Sciences; FORMANOWICZ, J., RØSVIK, M., DJORDJEVIC, B., and ØVERLAND, M. – Norwegian University of Life Sciences; KUIPER, R. and BENDIK DALE, O. – Norwegian Veterinary Institute. The original article was published, including tables and figures, on MAY, 2025, through AQUACULTURE REPORTS. The full version can be accessed online through this link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2025.102843

Beyond the Label – Why Sourcing “Sustainable Seafood” Isn’t Enough

Edusehat — Mon, 06 Apr 2026 09:50:05 +0700

By Seafood Consumers Association

The Seafood Consumers Association (SCA) is calling for a fundamental reset of how “sustainability” is defined and awarded in the Australian seafood sector. Following a formal exchange with Simplot Australia regarding the Woolworths “Bricks” plastic toy promotion, the SCA has uncovered a significant “responsibility vacuum” in corporate marketing.

The Core Contradiction

In February 2026, the SCA queried Simplot and Woolworths on the alignment of their “Responsible Sourcing” claims with a campaign that distributed mass-produced plastic toys to children. While Simplot provided a constructive response admitting that environmental assessments for such promotions were “not part of our standard assessment,” Woolworths chose not to respond to consumer concerns.

Shortly after this exchange, both organizations were recognized with Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Awards for their commitment to sustainable seafood.

SCA Interrogation of the Current System

The Marketing Blind Spot: Current sustainability awards focus strictly on biological catch methods but ignore the environmental impact of the plastic-heavy marketing used to sell those products.
A “Siloed” Approach: Simplot’s admission that they did not undertake a lifecycle assessment for the promotion reveals that “Ocean Stewardship” often ends at the processing plant or board room table, failing to reach the marketing department.
The Consumer Trust Gap: Australians are told to “look for the blue tick” for sustainability, yet that same tick is being used to drive the consumption of millions of additional plastic items—the very “enemy” of a healthy ocean. They even award organizations for this!

The SCA Call to Action

The SCA believes whilst this is a small “victory for transparency” it is only the beginning of a larger journey that must be taken. We are calling for:

Expanded Award Criteria: The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and other bodies must include “Total Marketing Integrity”, including fraud controls, as a prerequisite for any sustainability award.
Mandatory Impact Assessments: Major retailers and suppliers must commit to the same environmental rigor for their promotional campaigns as they do for their sourcing.
End to “Responsibility Deflection”: Producers can no longer claim a promotion is purely “retailer-led” to avoid accountability for the plastic footprint associated with their brands.

“We have written today to MSC about this and other issues. We are happy for this to be done transparently. The SCA is not adversarial; we are the voice of the person at the dinner plate,” says Roy Palmer, CEO of the SCA. “If an organization claims to protect our oceans, that protection must extend to the toys they promote to our children. You cannot save the fish with one hand while polluting their habitat with the other.”

Irbi and Innovafeed Join Forces to Create Frenchfly to Unlock the Final Scientific and Technological Barriers to Sustainable Insect Protein Production in France

Edusehat — Sun, 05 Apr 2026 08:45:16 +0700

By Innovafeed

An academic-industrial partnership supporting a French excellence sector, with the backing of Bpifrance and the “I-Démo” program.

A strategic project contributing to food sovereignty and green reindustrialization.

The FrenchFly project, led by IRBI and Innovafeed, aims to sustainably structure and strengthen the French Black Soldier Fly (BSF) sector by addressing the key scientific and technological challenges that still limit its large-scale industrial deployment.

At a time when food sovereignty, decarbonization, and industrial relocation have become national priorities, FrenchFly stands out as a strategic initiative for the future of sustainable proteins in France.

Addressing France’s Key Strategic Challenges

The FrenchFly consortium is built on an open, collaborative approach, fostering the sharing of scientific and technological advances for the benefit of the entire sector, notably through academic publications, specialized conferences, and the dissemination of results across European professional networks.

The insect sector indeed plays a key role in addressing several national priorities: food security and sovereignty, green reindustrialization, the creation of skilled industrial jobs across regions, and a significant contribution to the decarbonization of the agri-food industry.

In a context where some historical players in the sector are facing challenges, it is more important than ever to support structuring initiatives capable of completing the demonstration of the model and securing the future of this strategic industry for France.

A Unique Academic–Industrial Partnership

Innovafeed, now a global leader and a French industrial player capable of demonstrating a commercially viable model at scale, brings to the project its industrial deployment capabilities, operational expertise, and strategic vision for the sector.

Alongside it, IRBI, a leading research center in insect biology, provides a world-class scientific foundation to deepen the understanding of the Black Soldier Fly, optimize rearing conditions, assess its interactions with the environment, and strengthen the overall competitiveness of the sector through the generation of robust, open-access knowledge.

Christophe Bressac – Professor and Researcher in Biology and Ecology, University of Tours: “The biology of insects is fascinating: at IRBI, we study how they grow, reproduce, and interact with both their peers and their environment. Thanks to FrenchFly, the different levels of insect biology, from genome to populations, are being integrated into food systems. The synergy with Innovafeed will provide precise insights to optimize the life cycle of this new farmed species while minimizing its environmental footprint.”

Mathieu Vanderstraete– Director of Innovafeed’s Research Center in Gouzeaucourt: “This partnership between Innovafeed and IRBI is a major accelerator for the generation of scientific knowledge. The synergy between our respective areas of expertise enables us to broaden and deepen our understanding of Hermetia illucens biology, while promoting the sharing and valorization of this knowledge for the benefit of the entire insect industry ecosystem.”

About The Project

This project has been funded by the French government as part of the France 2030 investment plan.

About IRBI

IRBI (Institute for Research on Insect Biology) is a leading academic research center dedicated to the study of insect development, physiology, and interactions with their environment.

Affiliated with the University of Tours and the CNRS, IRBI conducts research at the heart of major environmental and societal challenges. Leveraging state-of-the-art infrastructure and recognized scientific expertise, IRBI contributes to the development of innovative solutions supporting agricultural and industrial sectors based on insect science. https://irbi.univ-tours.fr/

About Innovafeed

Innovafeed is a global AgTech pioneer (B Corp, Next 40, Impact 40, World’s GreenTech Company 2025), specializing in the production of insects (Hermetia illucens — Black Soldier Fly) for animal and plant nutrition. As one of the world’s leading insect producers, Innovafeed develops cutting-edge technologies to replicate, at industrial scale, the natural processes of resource conversion.

By recreating a circular food chain in which insects regain their natural role within the ecosystem, the company contributes to building a more sustainable, resilient, and efficient agri-food system. www.innovafeed.com

Growth Mapping Project from Ace Aquatec Shows Patterns of Success

Edusehat — Sun, 05 Apr 2026 08:45:11 +0700

By Ace Aquatec

**A pioneering project between Ace Aquatec and Hendrix Genetics is shifting the dial from mass fish monitoring to individualized growth strategies using AI driven biomass camera technology.**

Hendrix Genetics is using Ace Aquatec’s A-BIOMASS® system to identify spot patterns in fish ‘families’, meaning growth can be monitored over time rather than in one single snapshot.

Plotting patterns of growth in this way has allowed Hendrix Genetics to fully understand the conditions under which their stock grows best, for example, which fish grow most in summer and which see the most growth in colder months. They can then supply the best broodstock to their customers by matching the right fish to the right farms.

Gathering detailed patterns of growth among their stock has also meant Hendrix Genetics can optimize their feed strategy in line with peak growth periods, meaning fish receive optimal nutrition when they need it most to reach maturation. As well as the economic benefits of this approach, less feed waste means higher water quality and healthier fish.

Traditional manual sampling of fish growth can stress the animals which can impact growth. Using Ace Aquatec’s AI solution in this way provides long-term high-quality data without human intervention.

Stephen Tapping, Breeding Program Manager, Hendrix Genetics said: “We found that to create a more accurate picture of growth cycles within our stock we required more snapshots and better-quality images and to do that manually would cause unnecessary stress on the fish. Ace Aquatec’s camera has given us much more precise, individualized data collection of our fish’s growth, not just the biomass of the tank, how much feed we flow in, but in plotting the actual growth of the fish. This will ultimately benefit our customers by providing the best stock for their own farming practices.”

“Aquaculture has the potential to be one of the most efficient means of protein creation for a growing population and using AI driven technology in this way is the progression that the industry needs to achieve a sustainable and affordable source of food.”

Nathan Pyne-Carter, CEO of Ace Aquatec, said: “Our work with Hendrix Genetics has proven the application of biomass technology outside of simply monitoring the biomass of the tank. This project has shown us how data can influence everything from feed strategy to optimizing fish stock for the conditions they are to be farmed, as well as early disease detection.”

“The future of aquaculture is increasingly data driven and by working with partners like Hendrix Genetics, we are building a detailed picture to inform how fish production will look in the coming decades – one where seafood is providing an accessible, high welfare source of protein for the global population.”

About Ace Aquatec

Ace Aquatec is a cutting-edge aquaculture technology company focused on creating welfare-first products to make fish farming more efficient and sustainable.

Backed by bluegrowth fund Aqua-Spark, Chroma Ventures (who brought Minecraft to console), deeptech fund Earth Capital, Stolt Ventures and Scottish Enterprise, we are on a mission to accelerate global adoption of sustainable and welfare-focused aquaculture practices.For more information about Ace Aquatec, visit www.aceaquatec.com

Pure Salmon Japan Secures an Investment of Over USD 180 Million Led by Fortress Investment Group

Edusehat — Sun, 05 Apr 2026 08:45:06 +0700

The facility in construction is expected to be one of the most advanced land-based salmon farms in the world

Pure Salmon Japan -know before as Soul of Japan-, a portfolio company of 8F Asset Management (8F), just announced the successful closing of a preferred note investment of over USD 180 million, led by funds managed by affiliates of Fortress Investment Group with participation from Tor Investment Management, an existing investor in the project. The transaction completes the preferred note financing for the project and marks a significant milestone in the continued development of its land-based salmon farming facility in Japan, where construction is well underway.

“We are deeply encouraged by the dedication and conviction shown by our investors in supporting Pure Salmon Japan through this financing. Their commitment underscores the strategic importance of this project and the growing relevance of sustainable domestic seafood production in Japan. We are grateful for that support, and we remain fully focused on executing the project responsibly and successfully” said Erol Emed, CEO of Pure Salmon Japan.

Pure Salmon Japan is spearheading a state-of-the-art recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) facility designed to deliver high-quality, sustainable Atlantic salmon locally in Japan. With a target production of 10,000 tons, the facility will become the largest land-based salmon farm in the country.

The investment highlights Fortress’ support for the Pure Salmon Japan project, bringing substantial institutional capital and first-class regional expertise to advance the development of one of the most ambitious land-based aquaculture facilities in the world.

Focus on Enhancing Food Security

The project meets growing domestic demand for premium seafood while strengthening national food security and reducing reliance on imports through stable, locally produced supply of salmon. By leveraging advanced RAS technology, the facility ensures efficient, environmentally responsible production close to key consumption markets. The project aligns with Japan’s increasing policy focus on enhancing food security and promoting domestic seafood production through sustainable aquaculture solutions.

“We are very pleased to complete this financing and to partner with Fortress on Pure Salmon Japan,” said Pier Paolo Sfara, Chief Investment Officer at 8F Asset Management. “Fortress brings not only strong institutional capital but also deep experience investing across global markets, including Japan. Their involvement represents another important step forward for the project and reflects strong confidence in our platform. With construction well underway, we are focused on delivering a world-class facility for the Japanese market.”

Building a Network of Large-Scale, Land-Based Facilities

This financing will support the ongoing construction and development of the Pure Salmon Japan facility as it progresses toward operations. Once completed, the facility is expected to be one of the most advanced land-based salmon farms in the world, contributing to a more sustainable and resilient seafood supply chain in Japan. The company also expects to engage with a select group of long-term equity partners as the project continues to advance.

The transaction underscores continued institutional investor interest in sustainable aquaculture and the growing demand for locally produced protein in key global markets.

Located in Mie Prefecture

Pure Salmon Japan is part of the Pure Salmon platform developed by 8F Asset Management, focused on producing sustainable, high-quality Atlantic salmon through land-based recirculating aquaculture systems. The project is located in Mie Prefecture and is designed to supply fresh, locally produced salmon to the Japanese market.

“Pure Salmon Japan is a key project within our global Pure Salmon platform,” said Stephane Farouze, Founder and Chairman of 8F Asset Management and Pure Salmon. “We are building a network of large-scale, land-based aquaculture facilities to sustainably produce high-quality salmon close to end consumers. Japan is a strategically important market, and this project reflects our long-term commitment to developing resilient, local food production systems.”

8F Asset Management is a global investment group focused on sustainable food systems, with a particular emphasis on aquaculture and the development of scalable, environmentally responsible protein solutions.

Aqua-Spark Founders Break Silence on eFishery Fraud: A Call for Accountability and Industry Resilience

Edusehat — Sun, 05 Apr 2026 01:35:05 +0700

Amy Novogratz and Mike Velings publish their first public statement more than a year after discovering the Indonesian aquaculture startup had fabricated financial data for years, costing the Dutch impact fund approximately $250 million.

April 2026 | Aquaculture Magazine

More than a year after one of the most damaging fraud cases in the history of aquaculture investment came to light, the founders of Dutch impact fund Aqua-Spark have broken their silence. Amy Novogratz and Mike Velings submitted a public statement — their first — sharing their reflections on the eFishery scandal and its consequences for the fund, for investors, and for the broader aquaculture industry.

The Rise and Fall of Aquaculture’s First Unicorn.

Back in 2024, Bandung, Indonesia-based eFishery was heralded as the first aquaculture unicorn, with a $1.4 billion valuation and a blue-chip investor base that included SoftBank, Temasek, and Aqua-Spark. The company’s promise was compelling: connecting smallholder fish and shrimp farmers across Indonesia to markets, financing, and better inputs through a technology-driven platform.

Aqua-Spark had been one of eFishery’s earliest backers, leading its $550,000 seed round back in 2015 and reinvesting multiple times over the years. That early bet seemed to pay off spectacularly — until December 2024, when a whistleblower exposed what investigators would later confirm to be a years-long, systematic deception.

The inquiry found that eFishery had inflated its revenues by $600 million, maintained a dual set of financial books for years, and widely overstated how many smart fish feeders it had actually deployed. In 2024 alone, the company reported a $16 million profit when in reality it had suffered a $35 million loss. At least $300 million in investors’ money remains unaccounted for.

A $250 Million Wound

The financial fallout for Aqua-Spark was severe. The fraud cost the Dutch aquaculture investment fund roughly $250 million. The company’s collapse caused Aqua-Spark to mark down its own asset valuation by nearly half, to approximately $300 million.

But for Novogratz, the damage went beyond the balance sheet. In their statement, she described a deeper kind of loss: “Discovering that the people you had held up were not who you believed them to be is a different kind of wound.”

Confronting the Industry Consequences

Beyond the fund’s internal losses, Novogratz and Velings addressed the wider damage to aquaculture’s investment landscape. Part of what made eFishery’s rise so significant was what it was bringing into the sector — mainstream technology investors, large institutional funds, and capital that rarely finds its way into aquaculture. For a space that has long struggled to attract investors beyond dedicated impact funds, that crossover mattered enormously. It was evidence that this industry could compete for serious money on its own merits. When the fraud came to light, that pipeline didn’t just slow. It closed.

The founders acknowledged that rebuilding that confidence will be difficult. They are also conscious of the broader moment: “Trust and accountability already feel scarce. People are hedging. Institutions are retreating. We are not going to add to that.”

Confronting Their Own Assumptions

Rather than deflecting responsibility, the founders chose to interrogate their own processes. Over the past year, they have examined their own assumptions about how they assess founders, verify performance data, and uphold governance standards under pressure rather than just on paper.

Still, Aqua-Spark’s Chief Portfolio Officer Maria Velkova has noted that even after reviewing their due diligence procedures, the fund does not believe much could have been done differently — it was a very well-executed fraud, including a dedicated internal team whose sole purpose was maintaining a second set of books.

What Was Lost — and What Remains

Novogratz and Velings were careful to separate eFishery’s fraud from its underlying mission. They stated that eFishery did not need to go in this direction. It was a real company with real technology and a genuinely important vision — connecting smallholder fish farmers to markets, financing, and better inputs, and empowering them with the tools to lift their practices and their livelihoods. It should have become an enduring, impactful business. The tragedy is not just what was lost, but what was possible, and what was thrown away.

Despite the scale of the setback, Aqua-Spark’s investor base has remained committed. Velkova noted that the fund’s limited partners stood up and continued believing in the industry, even as broader worries emerged about a potential ripple effect across the sector.

A Sector That Must Not Retreat

The founders’ statement is ultimately a call to keep moving forward. The companies in Aqua-Spark’s portfolio that continued working through a year that shook the industry — through difficult capital markets and the weight of having the sector’s most visible name turn out to be a fraud — kept going. That, the founders argue, says something. The sector is chronically underfunded, not because the fundamentals aren’t strong, but because the attention hasn’t followed. eFishery briefly changed that. They cannot let its failure reverse it permanently.

The full statement by Amy Novogratz and Mike Velings was originally published on LinkedIn and cross-posted by ImpactAlpha.

Aquaculture Magazine covers the global aquaculture industry across species, technology, investment, and sustainability. For editorial inquiries, contact the editorial team at aquaculturemagazine.com.

India: A Sleeping Giant?

Edusehat — Sat, 04 Apr 2026 22:00:10 +0700

* By Stephen Newman, Ph.D.

I recently had the pleasure of being a guest speaker at Aqua India 2026 at the Radisson Blu Resort, Temple Bay, Mamallapuram. I want to thank the coordinators and the sponsors of the meeting for the opportunity and an educational and informative meeting. This was my first trip to India since April of 2017 and as is usually the case between lengthy visits, considerable changes were apparent.

The central theme of the meeting was “regroup, rethink and refocus”. The focus of the meeting was to some extent a result of recent tariff impositions. The US, a major market for value added shrimp produced by India, had enacted a punitive illegal (based on US law which charges the legislative branch with the function of setting tariffs and not the executive branch) excessively high tariff “purportedly” to manipulate India into ceasing its reliance on Russian oil imports.

Just in the last few days it was reduced to 15% from 50%. Domestic consumption of shrimp in India, for a number of reasons, is relatively low contrasted with the world’s second largest country by population, China. If domestic consumption could be increased, as with China, the demand would also increase offering a large potential internal market.

India’s shrimp farming industry stands as a ‘waking giant,’ producing over 1 million MTs in 2025. This article explores the strategic shift toward ‘regrouping and refocusing’ amid global trade tariffs. By analyzing the role of SPF broodstock, biosecurity regulations, and sustainable intensification, Stephen Newman highlights how India can leverage its vast network of small-scale farms to ensure long-term profitability and global market leadership.

Shrimp farming is big business in India. Table 1 highlights production in 2024 and 2025. India produced over 1 million MTs of farmed shrimp in 2025 of which 94% was the white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei also commonly known as Penaeus vannamei and the remainder, the tiger shrimp, P. monodon. The Coastal Aquaculture Authority (CAA) is responsible for regulating and promoting coastal aquaculture activities of shrimp hatcheries to ensure sustainable environmental and economic impacts.

Approximately 500 hatcheries are in operation for the production of L. vannamei and around 40 for P. monodon. In conjunction with the Marine Product Development Authority (MPEDA) the Central Institute of Brackish Water Aquaculture (ICARCIBA) regular inspections of farms ensure compliance with discharge permits and biosecurity regulations (the use of pond reared broodstock is prohibited). More than 130,000 ha of L. vannamei were under cultivation with an estimated total production of 1.2 million MTs in the 2024 to 2025 period.

Approximately 66,000 ha produced roughly 66,000 MTs of P. monodon during the same time period (MPEDA Annual report 2024- 2025). The total hectares under cultivation are slightly less than in Ecuador. The table below summarizes data presented at the meeting.

After the meeting we traveled to Gujarat state on the West Coast to visit a few shrimp farmers that are currently using our tableted probiotic to the exclusion of all other similar microbial products, PRO4000X, with excellent success. We were a bit early to see farms operating as stocking is seasonal, starting in late February. These were what would be considered to be larger farmers. Construction of new ponds was ongoing (Figures 1 and 2).

Ongoing expansion of Penaeus monodon farms.

Typical small dirt ponds in early stages of preparing for stocking.

Unlike Ecuador, the world’s largest producer of farmed white shrimp for export, which produced around 1.5 million MTs in 2025, India’s industry is made up of a large number of small producers. CAA as of Oct 2024, reported close to 47,000 coastal aquaculture farms. Overall, there are around 50,000 shrimp farms versus around 4,000 in Ecuador. The average shrimp farm in India is less than 2 ha contrasted with around 55 ha average in Ecuador. Stocking densities are highly variable with averages for India reported in the 10 to 70 and much higher per m2 range contrasted with 15 to 25 per m2 (with some twice this) in Ecuador.

Cycles are longer in India while Ecuador’s are shorter and 4 or more cycles per year are not uncommon. Ecuador in many respects has an ideal environment for farming shrimp. The larger shrimp producing nations (with the exception of China) typically export much of what they produce. At the time of the meeting India had been the focus of a punitive tariff. This crippling tariff was of serious concern as the US has traditionally been a major market for Indian shrimp. Thus, the title and focus of the meeting to explore what options are available to India.

The Coastal Aquaculture Authority (CAA) and ICAR-CIBA enforce strict biosecurity regulations to ensure sustainability. This oversight includes regular farm inspections and a mandatory prohibition on pond reared broodstock to mitigate the risk of pathogen introduction.

Many were discussed including seeing what could be done to expand the domestic market. Shortly before my return an agreement was reached whereby the tariff was reduced to much more manageable 15% from 50%. Indias export volumes for 2025 are in the 800,000 MT range, an increase over the prior year despite the tariff. They were able to shift their sales to non- US markets. Shrimp Bytes (https:// www.shrimpinsights.com/content) offers a detailed description of what is occurring. I expect to see the trend of increased production continue as the US market has “reopened”.

My talk was entitled “Managing Vibrio and EHP Infections in Shrimp Farming”. It is posted on www.aqua-in-tech.com. Much as with any shrimp farming nation there are challenges to ensuring optimal productivity. Return on investments (ROI) must be consistent and sufficient to justify ongoing investment and continued growth. Animal health is a neverending challenge for shrimp farmers everywhere. Shrimp can be produced with little impact from disease, but this requires adjusting various elements of the production cycle and process to ensure true sustainability.

Some of these elements are relatively easy to control, such as ensuring that no broodstock are used from ponds and that external sources of Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) animals from Nucleus Breeding Centers (NBCs) are used and that those who ignore this are punished accordingly. I would expect that India (they may already be working on this) will develop their own programs although for the time being external sources offer genetically improved animals that perform very well under the proper production environments. Some elements are much harder to control.

I have discussed what I think that this means elsewhere although given the large variability between individual elements the ultimate measure of this is to produce a consistent profit. As I was visiting during the off season, I had a limited opportunity to visit a few farms that were in the early stages of preparing for the next cycle. This was in the Gujarat where many farms are producing P. monodon some with significant ROIs.

Enterocytozoonhepatopenaei (EHP) is not a significant problem for P. monodon although it remains a challenge in the production of L.vannamei.

Unlike Ecuador’s large-scale operations, India’s industry comprises approximately 50,000 small farms averaging less than 2 hectares. This fragmented structure necessitates consolidation and vertically integrated models to better control costs and weather global market volatility

White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) remains an ongoing challenge for all species. The general principles that all shrimp farms must address is to break the cycle of transmission into the ponds from infected PLs. The use of SPF broodstock is an important component of this. This ensures that when hatcheries follow proper biosecurity protocols that the source of the virus (or EHP spores and pathogenic vibrios, etc.) are not from the broodstock.

This however will not prevent these pathogens from impacting animals in environments where adequate attempts to control the myriad of potential vectors are not a routine part of SOPs and preventable stressors are not addressed. These are well documented but not always readily achievable economically. One of the farms I visited had mud goby’s in the entrance canal which are known to carry the WSSV virus.

Ponds are filled and the water chlorinated prior to stocking. The sheer number of farms ensures challenges will persist. Small farmers just do not have the resources needed to ensure that every effort is made to keep pathogen loads low, control vectors and reduce stress.

I was impressed with the organization of the Aquaculture Professionals of India and their efforts to educate and reshape the industry. I have been working with the global shrimp farming industry for over 35 years, having worked with producers in a dozen or more nations consulting on virtually every aspect of the process, from genetics of broodstock, to biosecurity issues in hatcheries, nursery ponds and farms, to feed mills and processing plants, etc., everything short of selling shrimp. I am convinced that in the long run consolidation is essential for sustainability.

Strategic shifts in export markets have allowed India to remain resilient despite punitive tariffs. By focusing on ‘regrouping, rethinking, and refocusing,’ the industry aims to expand domestic consumption and improve production efficiency to become a ‘waking giant’.

Vertically integrated companies have greater control of costs and are better able to weather the invariable challenges that farming animals in water creates. We are seeing this in Ecuador. India and its neighbors, such as Indonesia, both of which have huge potentials for increased production of farmed crustaceans (as well as Africa which is a source of SPF P. monodon), face different challenges.

India’s farms and hatcheries are subject to government oversight. This is a critically important step to ensuring the consistency of biosecure production, one of the pillars sustainability. However, poverty driven production paradigms carry risks. The misuse of antibiotics is one of these. I think that India is making great strides in ensuring that this is not an issue although I would think that it is a daunting task to inspect 50,000 farms and 500 hatcheries to ensure consistent compliance.

The practice of processing plants, typically the portal to the market, is to pool shrimp from many smaller operations. This dilution allows, in theory, for some product to slip through the cracks. Another issue that needs to be addressed is the widespread use of products that have little or no science to support their efficacy as well as the use of “natural” remedies to address disease issues and stress. Most importing nations have strict controls over what they will allow to be present in food that is being imported. The use of plant extracts might have science to support their application (at least under lab conditions) but the specter of residues remains.

Label claims are regulated and when products are sold for the prevention of disease and/or to cure sick animals these are typically considered drugs. If they are not approved for these applications within the importing territory their use can be considered to be a potential adulteration of the final product. Proof of safety and efficacy as well as the lack of harmful residues are important.

I am optimistic that India will get a handle on these issues and that they will continue to expand production. They have come a long way since my last visit. Challenges abound and as long as no new serious diseases occur and they can improve efficiency they will be a waking giant.

* Stephen G. Newman has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Maryland in Conservation and Resource Management (ecology) and a Ph.D. from the University of Miami, in Marine Microbiology. He has over 40 years of experience working within a range of topics and approaches on aquaculture such as water quality, animal health, biosecurity with special focus on shrimp and salmonids. He founded Aquaintech in 1996 and continues to be CEO of this company to the present day. It is heavily focused on providing consulting services around the world on microbial technologies and biosecurity issues.
sgnewm@aqua-in-tech.com
www.aqua-in-tech.com
www.bioremediationaquaculture.com
www.sustainablegreenaquaculture.com.

INVE Aquaculture and Chinese Tianjin University of Science and Technology Establish Joint Laboratory for Artemia Innovation

Edusehat — Sat, 04 Apr 2026 22:00:06 +0700

The initiative will support research, development and the application of new knowledge to aquaculture production systems

INVE Aquaculture and Tianjin University of Science and Technology (TUST) have announced the establishment of a joint laboratory for innovative artemia applications, marking an important step in their long-standing collaboration in aquaculture research and innovation. The signing and inauguration ceremony took recently place at the university’s Binhai campus in Tianjin, China.

The event brought together representatives from both organizations, including Patrick Waty, CEO of INVE Aquaculture, and Wang Min, Vice President of Tianjin University of Science and Technology. The ceremony was also attended by Patrick Sorgeloos, a pioneer in Artemia research, together with representatives from the Asian Regional Artemia Reference Center (ARARC).

The joint laboratory aims to strengthen collaboration between academia and industry by combining TUST’s expertise in aquatic science and brine biotechnology with INVE Aquaculture’s long-standing experience in Artemia biology, live food technologies and early-stage nutrition for hatcheries. The initiative will support research, technology development and the application of new knowledge to aquaculture production systems, with particular focus on Artemia and early-stage nutrition, key factors in hatchery performance.

Long Story of Cooperation

Over the years, Tianjin University of Science and Technology and INVE Aquaculture have maintained close cooperation in areas such as product development, technical expertise and talent development. The new laboratory will further expand this collaboration, creating a platform for applied research, innovation and knowledge exchange.

The initiative also reflects INVE Aquaculture’s broader R&D approach, which promotes science-based innovation through strategic partnerships with leading research institutions worldwide. In China, this collaboration contributes to a local-for-local R&D strategy, supporting solutions tailored to the needs of the local aquaculture industry while strengthening international scientific cooperation.

Largest Nauplii Center at Long Cheng Hatchery

For INVE Aquaculture, Artemia production plays a critical role in the performance and consistency of early shrimp larval stages. In hatcheries, live food remains one of the main sources of biological, operational and economic variability during larval and early post-larval phases.

According to Amir Khalil, Regional Sales Director at INVE Aquaculture, “China’s shrimp hatchery sector has evolved rapidly in recent years, with leading producers investing in larger and more structured production systems. As hatcheries scale up, improving the consistency and efficiency of live food production becomes increasingly important for the improvement of stability in larval performance and maximize cost efficiency.”

To address this challenge, the INVE Aquaculture team, led by Francesco Lenzi, Global Technical Expert for Live Food, and supported by Product Manager Geert Rombaut, has developed a comprehensive program to support hatcheries in establishing, modernizing or optimizing their Artemia production systems. Built on proven standards and validated operational protocols, the program is designed to improve hatching efficiency, reinforce biosecurity and standardize the artemia production workflow. The objective is to help hatcheries produce high-quality nauplii in a more consistent and efficient way while reducing live-food-related costs.

Following successful implementations in several regions, this concept has now been deployed at a significantly larger scale in China with the development of the country’s largest Artemia nauplii center at Long Cheng, powered by INVE technology and technical support.

The facility at Long Cheng represents a major step forward in scaling artemia production within commercial shrimp hatcheries. It includes two dedicated artemia production modules. Each module consists of 40 hatching tanks of 3 MT capacity, operating at approximately 2.5 MT working volume, arranged in four rows of ten tanks to ensure efficient workflows and standardized operations.

Automation and precision are central to the system. Each tank line is connected to an INVE SEP-Art Automag tool, which automates key Artemia processing steps, reducing manual handling and improving overall operational consistency. Under these conditions, each module can process approximately 240 kg of artemia cysts per day.

A dedicated quality control room equipped with SnappArt 360 L-SENSE, INVE’s advanced AI-powered solution for automated live food counting, processing and data management, enables technicians to monitor Artemia hatching performance on a daily basis.

“Scaling artemia production is not only about increasing tank capacity,” explains Francesco Lenzi, Global Technical Expert on Live Food at INVE Aquaculture. “The key is to standardize every step of the process. The successful implementation of this project was made possible through the close collaboration between INVE’s global, regional and local technical teams and the hatchery staff, who worked together throughout the design, installation and operational start-up of the facility.”

This INVE artemia production approach goes beyond product supply. It combines optimized infrastructure, biotechnology solutions, validated operational protocols and technical knowledge transfer into a single operational framework designed to strengthen hatchery capabilities. Implementation is supported by INVE technical teams, who transfer protocols, methodologies and operational know-how directly to hatchery staff, ensuring the facility can independently manage and control every stage of artemia production.

“What we see at Long Cheng is part of a broader shift in the shrimp hatchery industry,” says Fernando Garcia, Commercial Director at INVE Aquaculture. “Across major shrimp-producing regions such as China, India, Indonesia and Ecuador, hatcheries are increasingly looking for ways to transform artemia production from a variable live-food operation into a more standardized and controlled process capable of delivering large volumes of high-quality nauplii.”

The Genetics of Resilient Fish in Sustainable Aquaculture

Edusehat — Fri, 03 Apr 2026 10:05:07 +0700

The Genetics of Resilient Fish in Sustainable Aquaculture

Not all fish are created equal. Even within the same species, individual fish differ in growth rate, disease resistance, stress tolerance, and reproductive success. Many fish farms focus heavily on environmental factors such as feeding, water quality, and stocking density, but often overlook one of the most important drivers of long-term productivity: genetics. According to NOAA Fisheries, genetic selection in aquaculture often targets traits such as improved growth rate, disease resistance, feed conversion, and product quality.

Understanding the genetics of resilient fish can help aquaculture producers build stronger, healthier populations that perform better under real-world farming conditions.

Understanding Resilience in Fish

Resilient fish are those that survive and thrive under changing or imperfect conditions. They are better able to tolerate temperature fluctuations, resist common pathogens, and maintain steady growth even when nutrition is less than ideal or water quality temporarily declines.

These characteristics are strongly influenced by DNA and can be passed from one generation to the next through selective breeding. The FAO’s aquaculture breeding and genetics resources emphasize the importance of managing aquatic genetic resources effectively to support sustainable aquaculture development.

Resilience is often polygenic, which means it is controlled by multiple genes working together and interacting with the environment. Traits such as immune system strength, stress response, and metabolic efficiency are shaped by complex genetic pathways. Research published through PubMed Central notes that selective breeding for improved disease resistance has proven to be an effective strategy for reducing infectious disease impacts in aquaculture species.

Selective Breeding for Better Performance

One of the most effective ways to improve aquaculture outcomes is through selective breeding. Farmers can choose broodstock that consistently show desirable traits such as fast growth, strong disease resistance, better feed conversion, or tolerance to low oxygen conditions. The FAO selective breeding manual was developed specifically to help aquaculturists improve cultured fish populations through structured breeding programs.

Over multiple generations, these traits become more common within the population. The result is a stock of fish that performs more reliably and requires fewer costly interventions. This can also reduce dependence on antibiotics, chemical treatments, and highly controlled environments. WOAH has highlighted disease prevention, aquatic animal health, and improved management practices as central to more sustainable aquaculture systems, especially as the industry works to reduce risks linked to disease and antimicrobial resistance.

Why Genetic Diversity Matters in Aquaculture

The genetics of resilient fish is not only about selecting the strongest individuals. It is also about maintaining diversity within the population.

Resilient fish populations are built through selective breeding, genetic diversity, and strong aquaculture management.

Genetic diversity helps prevent inbreeding, which can reduce growth, weaken immune function, and lower the ability of fish to adapt to changing conditions. FAO guidance on inbreeding and broodstock management explains that loss of genetic variation can make selective breeding less effective over time, while inbreeding increases homozygosity and can reduce the adaptive capacity of farmed populations.

Fish farms that source broodstock from multiple lineages, or occasionally incorporate outside genetic material where appropriate and legal, often build more adaptable populations than farms relying on a single closed line. FAO also notes that farmers can maintain higher genetic diversity by using more brooders, avoiding close-relative mating, and keeping careful records of production practices. See FAO’s guidance here.

How Genetics and Environment Work Together

Genetics sets the potential, but the environment determines how fully that potential is expressed. Even fish with strong genetic resilience can underperform if farming conditions are poor. Water quality, nutrition, stocking density, and stress management still matter greatly.

The most successful aquaculture systems align good genetics with strong farm management practices. Fish with a genetic tolerance for low oxygen may survive stressful pond conditions better than others, but they will still grow faster and remain healthier if aeration is adequate and stocking density is properly managed. Genetics and environment are partners; neither one alone is enough to guarantee success.

The Long-Term Value of Resilient Fish

Resilient fish are built by DNA as much as they are shaped by daily care. Understanding the genetics behind disease resistance, stress tolerance, and growth potential allows farmers to develop populations that are more dependable, efficient, and profitable.

Fish farms that invest in selective breeding, protect genetic diversity, and combine those efforts with sound environmental management gain several long-term advantages. These include more stable growth, lower mortality, reduced treatment costs, and greater adaptability when conditions change. FAO has said that wider and appropriate application of genetic improvement in aquaculture can significantly strengthen sustainable food supply and long-term productivity.

In aquaculture, genetics is the foundation of resilience and long-term profitability. It is not optional.

For more valuable information on sustainable fish farming, visit EAT Community.

The Role of Probiotics in Disease Control for Sustainable Shrimp Aquaculture

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:56:33 +0700

Shrimp aquaculture is one of the fastest-growing sectors of global aquaculture, contributing significantly to economic growth and food security. However, intensification of shrimp farming systems to meet rising global demand has also increased the risk of devastating disease outbreaks. Pathogens such as Vibrio spp., Early Mortality Syndrome (EMS), and White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) have caused massive losses for farmers worldwide.

In recent years, probiotics have emerged as a safe, eco-friendly, and effective alternative to antibiotics and harmful chemicals for disease prevention in shrimp farming.

The Role of Probiotics in Disease Control for Sustainable Shrimp Aquaculture

Probiotics are live microorganisms that benefit the host when administered in adequate amounts. In shrimp aquaculture, they work by:

Strengthening the immune system
Preventing harmful bacteria colonization
Balancing gut microflora

Unlike antibiotics, which kill both beneficial and harmful microbes, probiotics selectively support beneficial microbial communities that naturally suppress pathogens through competitive exclusion. This means they outcompete harmful bacteria for nutrients and attachment sites in the shrimp’s digestive tract.

How Probiotics Prevent Shrimp Diseases

Probiotics combat disease in several ways:

Production of Bioactive Substances – Certain probiotics produce bacteriocins, organic acids, and enzymes that directly inhibit pathogens. For example, lactic acid bacteria reduce gut pH, creating an environment hostile to harmful microorganisms.
Immune System Stimulation – Probiotics enhance shrimp immunity by increasing antimicrobial peptide production and activating hemocytes, which are essential in defending against bacterial, fungal, and viral infections.
Improved Digestion and Growth – Probiotics increase digestive enzyme production, improving feed efficiency, growth rate, and disease resistance.

Probiotics and Water Quality Management

Maintaining good pond water quality is vital in shrimp aquaculture. Certain probiotic strains, such as Bacillus species, degrade organic waste, reducing ammonia and nitrite levels. This improves water quality, lowers stress, and decreases disease susceptibility.

Microbial Balance for Sustainable Shrimp Aquaculture

By combining microbial balance, competitive exclusion, immune stimulation, and water quality improvement, probiotics offer a holistic approach to disease prevention. They represent a sustainable alternative to antibiotics—supporting healthier shrimp, reducing losses, and ensuring the long-term viability of shrimp farming.

However, correct probiotic strain selection, dosage, and application method are key to achieving the best results. Continued research and training are essential for maximizing benefits.

Start Your Shrimp Aquaculture Journey Today

Are you ready to venture into sustainable shrimp aquaculture? The Ecolonomics Action Team provides valuable resources, expert guidance, and networking opportunities with experienced shrimp farmers.

Join the EAT Community today and gain the knowledge and support you need to succeed in eco-friendly shrimp production.

References & Related Articles:

Freshwater Shrimp Aquaculture Techniques to Adopt
FAO. (2016). The Use of Probiotics in Aquaculture. Read here
Verschuere, L., et al. (2000). Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64(4), 655–671.
De Schryver, P., et al. (2012). Probiotics in aquaculture: A review. Aquaculture, 356–357, 1–14.

The post The Role of Probiotics in Disease Control for Sustainable Shrimp Aquaculture first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

How to Apply Biofloc Technology in Sustainable Shrimp Production

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:56:29 +0700

Shrimp farming has become one of the fastest-growing sectors in aquaculture, but traditional methods often rely on high water exchange, costly feeds, and practices that strain the environment. Biofloc Technology offers a sustainable solution by turning waste into a valuable resource. This innovative system not only improves water quality but also provides shrimp with a natural protein-rich food source, reducing production costs and minimizing environmental impact. As global demand for shrimp rises, adopting Biofloc Technology ensures that farmers can achieve profitability while supporting long-term ecological balance.

As the global population grows, food production industries — including aquaculture — face the challenge of producing enough food without harming the planet. Shrimp farming, one of the most profitable aquaculture sectors, has expanded rapidly but often at the cost of high water usage, waste production, and dependence on expensive feed inputs.

Biofloc Technology (BFT) offers a sustainable alternative, improving shrimp health, reducing environmental impact, and cutting production costs.

Understanding Biofloc Technology

Biofloc Technology is an innovative recirculating aquaculture system that creates a controlled microbial ecosystem in shrimp ponds. By adding carbon sources such as molasses or starch, farmers maintain a balanced carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. This balance stimulates the growth of beneficial bacteria, algae, and protozoa, which clump into bioflocs.

These bioflocs recycle waste, improve water quality, and serve as a high-protein, natural feed for shrimp — reducing reliance on commercial diets.

Benefits of Biofloc Technology in Shrimp Aquaculture

1. Reduced Water Exchange

Traditional shrimp ponds require constant water exchange, which can discharge nutrient-rich waste into nearby ecosystems. Biofloc systems recycle nutrients internally, minimizing waste discharge and conserving water. This makes BFT especially valuable in regions with limited freshwater or strict environmental regulations.

2. Lower Feed Costs

Since bioflocs contain proteins, lipids, and essential micronutrients, they act as a natural feed supplement. This reduces the need for expensive formulated diets and makes shrimp production more economical.

3. Improved Shrimp Health

Bioflocs compete with harmful bacteria, lowering the risk of disease outbreaks. They also strengthen the shrimp’s immune system, resulting in higher survival rates, faster growth, and improved production efficiency.

Challenges and Best Practices for BFT

Despite its many advantages, managing biofloc systems requires technical know-how. Farmers must:

Maintain the right carbon-to-nitrogen ratio.
Monitor key water parameters (pH, dissolved oxygen, ammonia).
Ensure strong aeration systems for proper circulation.
Receive proper training to avoid system failures that could cause production losses.

With good management, BFT can become a game-changer in shrimp aquaculture.

Conclusion: The Future of Sustainable Shrimp Farming

Biofloc Technology represents a transformative step toward sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly shrimp farming. By recycling waste into valuable biomass, conserving water, and reducing dependence on costly feeds, BFT aligns with global goals for sustainable food production.

With proper training and support, shrimp farmers can use biofloc systems to meet growing demand while protecting the environment.

Get more insight on biofloc technology and sustainable aquaculture at EAT Community

Biofloc Technology Related Articles & References

Biofloc Shrimp Farming: Cultivation and Principles of Growing Shrimp
Avnimelech, Y. (2012). Biofloc Technology: A Practical Guidebook. The World Aquaculture Society.
Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P., & Verstraete, W. (2012). Biofloc technology in aquaculture: Beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture, 356–357, 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046
Emerenciano, M., Gaxiola, G., & Cuzon, G. (2013). Biofloc Technology (BFT): A Review for Aquaculture Application and Animal Food Industry. Biomass Now – Cultivation and Utilization, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/53902
Hargreaves, J. A. (2013). Biofloc Production Systems for Aquaculture. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Publication No. 4503. https://srac.tamu.edu/
Kuhn, D. D., Boardman, G. D., Craig, S. R., Flick, G. J., & McLean, E. (2009). Use of microbial floc generated from tilapia effluent as a nutritional supplement for shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 40(4), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2009.00274.x
Martínez-Córdova, L. R., Emerenciano, M., Miranda-Baeza, A., & Martínez-Porchas, M. (2015). Microbial-based systems for aquaculture of fish and shrimp: An updated review. Reviews in Aquaculture, 7(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12058
The World Aquaculture Society (WAS). (2020). Advances in Biofloc Technology for Sustainable Aquaculture. https://www.was.org/
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in Action. http://www.fao.org/fishery

The post How to Apply Biofloc Technology in Sustainable Shrimp Production first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

Shrimp Aquaculture: Managing Salinity Levels for Optimal Shrimp Growth

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:56:25 +0700

Water salinity is one of the most critical factors in shrimp aquaculture, directly influencing shrimp survival, growth, and overall health. The optimal salinity range for most farmed shrimp is between 15–25 parts per thousand (ppt). Careful management of this parameter ensures stability, resilience, and long-term productivity.

As the global aquaculture industry expands, contributing significantly to both rural livelihoods and global seafood production, sustainable salinity management has become essential for shrimp farmers.

Effects of Salinity on Shrimp Growth in Shrimp Aquaculture

Salinity fluctuations can cause physiological stress in shrimp. Sudden changes—whether from rainfall, evaporation, or poor water management—disrupt osmoregulation, leading to:

slower growth,
reduced feeding activity, and
greater susceptibility to disease.

Species differ in salinity tolerance:

Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) tolerates 0.5–40 ppt but thrives best at 15–25 ppt (FAO fact sheet).
Black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) prefers slightly higher salinity levels, around 15–30 ppt (World Aquaculture Society).

Keeping salinity within these preferred ranges enhances shrimp immunity, improves feed conversion ratios, and accelerates growth.

Techniques for Managing Salinity in Shrimp Aquaculture

1. Monitoring Water Exchange

Controlled water exchange in shrimp farming helps stabilize salinity while improving water quality. Farmers can balance freshwater and seawater inputs in coastal areas, while inland farms often rely on mineral supplements such as brine or sea salt.

Zero-water exchange systems and biofloc methods are also increasingly popular, reducing environmental impact while maintaining stable water parameters (MDPI study).

2. Pond Design and Construction

Well-designed shrimp ponds reduce sudden salinity fluctuations. Important features include:

Adequate pond depth for buffering changes,
Clay or plastic linings to prevent seepage,
Aeration systems for mixing and uniform salinity distribution.

These designs ensure consistent conditions and prevent stress to shrimp stocks.

3. Use of Salinity Meters and Record-Keeping

Routine monitoring with refractometers and digital salinity meters ensures accuracy. During storms, droughts, or seasonal transitions, these tools allow farmers to act quickly to prevent harmful shifts.

Maintaining long-term records helps identify patterns, anticipate changes, and support better decision-making in integrated systems where shrimp may co-exist with tilapia, mollusks, or seaweed.

Conclusion: Basics of Shrimp Aquaculture

Maintaining optimal salinity levels is fundamental to success in shrimp aquaculture. By stabilizing water conditions through water exchange management, pond design, and routine monitoring, farmers can:
improve shrimp growth and survival,
reduce disease risks,
boost production efficiency, and
build long-term sustainability.

Learn more about sustainable shrimp farming and ecolonomic practices at the EAT Community.

References & Further Reading

FAO. Litopenaeus vannamei culture fact sheet.
Boyd, C.E. (2018). Water Quality Management for Shrimp Farming. Auburn University.
Funge-Smith, S., & Briggs, M. (1998). Nutrient budgets in intensive shrimp ponds. Aquaculture Research.
JALA. The Key to Successful Water Exchange in Shrimp Farming.
FAO Fisheries. Pond construction and design.
Global Aquaculture Alliance. Water quality in shrimp ponds.
Song, Z., Liu, C., Luan, Y., Qi, Y., & Xu, A. (2023). Effect of Zero Water Exchange Systems for Litopenaeus vannamei. Sustainability, 15(2).

The post Shrimp Aquaculture: Managing Salinity Levels for Optimal Shrimp Growth first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

Regenerative Aquaculture: Applying Soil Health Principles to Ocean and Freshwater Farming

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:56:20 +0700

Regenerative agriculture has evolved from being a buzzword to a vital global movement focused on restoring ecosystems, improving soil health, and addressing the impacts of climate change. Today, this same philosophy is being extended to aquatic environments through regenerative aquaculture.

As the demand for seafood grows and wild fish populations decline, aquaculture has become a key player in global food systems. Unfortunately, conventional fish farming often mirrors industrial agriculture—relying on synthetic feeds, antibiotics, and monoculture systems that can contaminate waterways and disrupt marine ecosystems.

Regenerative aquaculture challenges this paradigm by applying soil health principles to oceans and freshwater. Its core aim is not just to produce seafood, but to restore aquatic ecosystems, increase biodiversity, and enhance resilience.

What is Regenerative Aquaculture?

Regenerative aquaculture is about cultivating species that improve their environment instead of harming it. Similar to regenerative farming’s focus on soil organic matter and microbial life, regenerative aquaculture enhances aquatic ecosystems by improving nutrient cycling and water quality.

For example, filter feeders such as clams, mussels, and oysters naturally clean the water as they feed—removing excess nutrients and boosting ecosystem health.

At the same time, seaweed farming requires no fertilizer or feed while absorbing carbon and nitrogen, sequestering greenhouse gases, and creating habitat for marine life. These living systems act as underwater “forests,” supporting marine biodiversity while producing sustainable food and raw materials.

Polyculture and Ecosystem Mimicry

One of the defining features of regenerative aquaculture is ecosystem mimicry. Unlike monoculture fish farms, which often lead to disease and pollution, regenerative systems embrace polyculture.

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) combines species like seaweed, shellfish, and finfish so that the waste from one species becomes food for another. This natural balance creates:

Nutrient-rich environments that mimic wild food webs
Higher productivity with reduced reliance on synthetic inputs
Healthier seafood with a lower environmental footprint

Regenerative Aquaculture and Climate Change

Regenerative aquaculture is also a natural ally in the fight against climate change. Seaweed, in particular, is a powerful carbon sink capable of absorbing large amounts of CO₂ while growing rapidly. Responsible harvesting opens pathways to industries like:

Human nutrition and superfoods
Animal feed alternatives
Biodiesel production
Biodegradable packaging

By reducing ocean acidification and capturing greenhouse gases, regenerative aquaculture helps mitigate climate change while creating sustainable economic opportunities.

Community Resilience and Food Sovereignty

Beyond environmental benefits, regenerative aquaculture fosters food sovereignty and community resilience. Small-scale, diversified aquaculture systems:

Support local jobs and coastal economies
Provide year-round, nutritious seafood
Restore degraded aquatic habitats

Projects such as GreenWave’s ocean farming model demonstrate how regenerative aquaculture can empower communities to produce food locally while protecting ecosystems for future generations.

Conclusion

Regenerative aquaculture represents a fundamental shift in how we approach seafood production. By synchronizing with natural cycles, enhancing biodiversity, and restoring ecosystems, it offers a resilient and sustainable way to nourish a growing global population.

This approach moves us beyond exploitation, toward a future where oceans, rivers, and lakes thrive alongside humanity.

Want to dive deeper into regenerative solutions for food and the planet?
Get access to valuable information and community resources at EAT Community.

References & Related Articles

FAO (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture.
NOAA Fisheries. Aquaculture and Sustainability.
Naylor, R. et al. (2021). “A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture.” Nature. Link.
Chung, I. et al. (2017). “Seaweed as a global solution for carbon capture and climate change.” Nature Sustainability. Link.
Duarte, C. et al. (2017). “The role of marine vegetation in climate change mitigation and adaptation.” Frontiers in Marine Science. Link.
GreenWave (2023). Regenerative Ocean Farming.

The post Regenerative Aquaculture: Applying Soil Health Principles to Ocean and Freshwater Farming first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

Shrimp Aquaculture and Climate Change Adaptation Strategies

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:56:16 +0700

Shrimp aquaculture plays a vital role in global seafood production and rural livelihoods, but it faces growing threats from climate change. Rising sea levels, temperature extremes, and unpredictable weather events are disrupting traditional farming practices and putting shrimp health at risk. To ensure long-term sustainability, shrimp farmers are adopting innovative adaptation strategies that build resilience while protecting ecosystems.

The effect of climate change is felt globally, and shrimp farming is one of the industries facing significant challenges. Rising sea levels, altered precipitation patterns, and increasing water temperatures directly impact aquaculture operations. This article explores the strategies shrimp producers are adopting to build resilience and adapt to climate change while ensuring sustainable production.

Climate Change’s Effects on Shrimp Aquaculture

Understanding how climate change affects shrimp aquaculture is essential for developing effective adaptation methods:

Temperature Extremes – Warmer waters influence shrimp growth rates and increase disease risks. According to the FAO, shrimp are highly sensitive to temperature fluctuations.
Sea Level Rise – Coastal farms face saltwater intrusion, which can reduce water quality and shrimp survival rates (World Bank).
Extreme Weather Events – Stronger storms and flooding damage ponds and disrupt farming operations, a challenge noted in the IPCC 2023 report.

Strategies for Adaptation in Shrimp Aquiculture

Shrimp producers are implementing multiple adaptation techniques to reduce risks and ensure sustainability:

Better Farm Design – Raised pond platforms, reinforced embankments, and advanced drainage systems help withstand floods and storms.
Salinity Control – Farmers manage saltwater intrusion with barriers, drainage systems, and strategic water management (Aquaculture Stewardship Council).
Selective Breeding for Disease Resistance – Breeding shrimp that tolerate higher temperatures and resist disease supports long-term resilience (ScienceDirect: Selective Breeding in Aquaculture).
Technological Tools – Real-time monitoring systems and early-warning tools provide critical insights into temperature shifts, disease threats, and water quality (NOAA Climate Data).
Sustainable Land Use – Protecting mangroves and applying eco-friendly land management reduces environmental impact while boosting climate resilience (IUCN Mangrove Conservation).

Collaborative Research and Knowledge Exchange

Adaptation is strengthened through collaboration between researchers, governments, and shrimp farmers. Sharing best practices, advancing selective breeding, and testing innovative farm designs through global partnerships ensures shrimp aquaculture adapts to diverse climate challenges.

Be Part of the Solution for Sustainable Shrimp Aquaculture

Shrimp aquaculture can thrive in a changing climate if farmers, researchers, and communities work together. You can:

Support sustainable seafood certification programs like the Aquaculture Stewardship Council.
Learn more about climate-resilient aquaculture from the FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Division.
Join conversations and explore resources at EAT Community.

Together, we can ensure shrimp aquaculture remains a viable source of food and livelihood while protecting ecosystems for generations to come.

References & Related Articles

Enhancing Fish Production: Mitigating Climate Change Effects in Aquaculture
Advanced Freshwater Shrimp Aquaculture Techniques to Adopt
FAO. (2022). Aquaculture and Climate Change.
IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. IPCC Report.
World Bank. (2021). Aquaculture and Climate Change.
IUCN. (2020). Mangrove Conservation and Climate Adaptation.
Aquaculture Stewardship Council. (2023). Sustainable Shrimp Standards.
ScienceDirect. (2014). Selective Breeding in Aquaculture.
NOAA Climate Data. (2023). Climate Monitoring Tools.

The post Shrimp Aquaculture and Climate Change Adaptation Strategies first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

Why Seaweed Could Be the Secret Ingredient That Transforms Fish Farming

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:56:12 +0700

Fish farming has gone from niche to mainstream. Today, aquaculture supplies over half of the world’s seafood. However, with growth comes scrutiny: water pollution, high feed costs, and disease outbreaks have raised serious questions about its sustainability.

Here’s the twist: the next big breakthrough in fish farming may not be expensive tech or synthetic feed. It may be something simple, natural, and already abundant in our oceans — seaweed.

From boosting fish health to cleaning polluted waters, seaweed is proving to be a game-changer in aquaculture. Let’s break down why it’s capturing attention from farmers, scientists, and investors alike.

Seaweed in Fish Feed: A Natural Performance Enhancer

Feed is the single largest cost in aquaculture, sometimes making up 60–70% of total expenses. Traditionally, farms rely on fishmeal, soy, and corn — ingredients that are expensive, resource-intensive, and environmentally questionable.

Adding seaweed into feed changes everything:

Faster Growth – Seaweed is packed with proteins, amino acids, and bioactive compounds that boost metabolism and immunity. Fish grow faster and healthier, with less reliance on antibiotics.
Better Digestibility – Studies show seaweed improves gut health in fish, reducing disease outbreaks and mortality rates.
Lower Emissions – Some seaweed varieties (like Asparagopsis) are proven methane-reducers in livestock. In aquaculture, they increase feed efficiency, cutting waste and greenhouse gas emissions.

In short, seaweed makes fish healthier, farmers more profitable, and the industry more sustainable.

Seaweed as a Built-In Water Filter in Fish Farming

Fish farms struggle with nutrient pollution. Uneaten feed and fish waste release nitrogen and phosphorus into surrounding waters, triggering algae blooms and oxygen depletion.

Seaweed cultivation solves this. When grown alongside fish cages or tanks, seaweed absorbs excess nutrients, effectively filtering and cleaning the water.

This practice — called Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) — has been adopted in parts of Asia and Europe. The results are impressive:

Cleaner waters
Healthier fish
A second income stream from harvesting the seaweed itself

It’s farming synergy at its best: fish feed the seaweed, seaweed cleans the water, and farmers profit twice.

Seaweed’s Role in Climate Solutions in Fish Farming

Seaweed isn’t just an aquaculture tool — it’s a climate ally.

Carbon Sequestration – Seaweed absorbs massive amounts of CO₂ during growth.
Methane Reduction – Seaweed feed additives cut methane emissions in cattle by up to 80%. Imagine applying that at scale in aquaculture.
Ocean Restoration – Large-scale seaweed farming can restore ecosystems, protect coastlines, and create jobs.

Why Fish Farming Investors Are Paying Attention

The global seaweed industry is projected to reach $30–40 billion in the next decade. Its applications go far beyond fish farming — from human nutrition to cosmetics, bioplastics, and even biofuels.

For aquaculture, the business case is compelling:

Lower feed costs → higher profit margins
Cleaner water → reduced regulatory risk
Sustainable branding → stronger consumer trust

Consumers increasingly want climate-conscious seafood. Farms that integrate seaweed aren’t just sustainable — they’re marketable.

Challenges Holding Back Adoption

Seaweed isn’t a silver bullet. To scale successfully, the industry needs:

Reliable supply chains for consistent feed quality
Research into the best seaweed strains for each fish species
Farmer training on IMTA systems

The good news? Governments, startups, and investors are already pouring money into seaweed innovation. These challenges are solvable.

Final Takeaway

Seaweed could be the secret ingredient that transforms aquaculture — making it healthier, more profitable, and climate-friendly.

Want to dive deeper into fish farming innovation?
Explore more insights at EAT Community

References & Related Articles:

The post Why Seaweed Could Be the Secret Ingredient That Transforms Fish Farming first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

Why Shrimp Farms Are Moving On-Land: Let’s Talk About It

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:56:08 +0700

Shrimp is America’s favorite seafood, but the way it’s traditionally farmed is changing fast. Today, more and more shrimp farms are moving on-land — and for good reason. Disease outbreaks, environmental damage, and unstable imports are pushing producers to rethink how shrimp should be grown. Indoor, land-based systems promise cleaner water, healthier shrimp, and a steady supply all year long. So let’s talk about why this shift is happening and what it means for the future of sustainable seafood.

You probably know how much Americans love shrimp — more than 1 billion pounds every year. But here’s the surprising part: almost 90% of that shrimp is imported. That means when something goes wrong overseas — disease, bad weather, rising costs — shrimp prices and availability in the U.S. get hit too.

But now, something new is happening: shrimp farms are moving indoors and on land. And yes — this could change the entire seafood industry.

Why Traditional Shrimp Farms Are Hitting Limits

Let’s talk about why outdoor, open-pond shrimp farming is becoming harder to rely on.

1. “Disease can destroy everything.”

Traditional farms use open ponds, which makes it easy for viruses to enter and wipe out shrimp populations.

2. “It harms the environment.”

Ponds often replace mangroves and wetlands, and wastewater can pollute local ecosystems.

More info: Seafood Sustainability Report

3. “Weather is not predictable anymore.”

Storms, heatwaves, and droughts can destroy shrimp ponds and disrupt production.

Background reading: Global Seafood Alliance

4. “Buyers want cleaner, safer seafood.”

Imported shrimp often lacks traceability and may involve antibiotics or poor-quality water.

Reference: SEC Report

The Indoor Shrimp Farming Revolution

Now imagine this: shrimp growing in indoor tanks, with clean recycled water, controlled temperature, and 24/7 monitoring. That’s indoor shrimp farming using a Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS).

1. “We can control everything.”

Temperature, water quality, and environment are fully managed.

Learn about RAS: Wikipedia: RAS

2. “Shrimp grow all year round.”

Indoor farms avoid seasonal challenges and weather issues.

More details: Texas A&M Extension Report

3. “It’s better for the planet.”

Indoor systems reduce water use and lower pollution compared to coastal ponds.

Learn more: Environmental Impact Study

4. “Shrimp can be farmed close to big cities.”

This lowers transport time and carbon emissions while producing fresher shrimp.

Good explanation: University of Michigan Sustainability Research

Challenges to Scaling Indoor Shrimp Farms (Because Nothing Is Perfect)

1. High startup cost

Indoor shrimp facilities require millions in upfront investment.

Overview: Economic Breakdown

2. High energy use

Heating and filtration systems require steady energy input.

More details: Tech Pros & Cons

3. Technical knowledge required

Indoor systems require expertise similar to running a factory.

Background: University Research

Why This Shift Matters for You? What This Shift Means for the Shrimp Farms

Here’s why indoor shrimp farming is important:

More stable prices due to year-round supply.
Cleaner, safer shrimp raised in controlled environments.
Less environmental damage to coastal regions.
Fresher seafood with shorter travel distances.

Want to Learn More?

Land-Based vs. Cage Fish Farming: A Practical Guide to Choosing the Right Aquaculture System

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:56:04 +0700

Fish farming is not just a local decision—it’s part of a much larger global system. If you want broader context on how different aquaculture models are being used, regulated, and scaled across regions, explore our Worldwide Aquaculture overview to see how land-based and cage systems fit into global production trends.

If you’re researching fish farming methods, you’ll quickly run into two dominant models:
land-based fish farming and cage fish farming. This guide breaks down the real trade-offs
so you can choose the best aquaculture system for your goals.

Here’s the truth most articles won’t tell you:
neither system is “best” by default. One is simply better for your location, budget, market, and risk tolerance.
The difference comes down to control, cost, environmental exposure, and scalability.

What Is Land-Based Fish Farming?

Land-based fish farming happens entirely on land using ponds, tanks, raceways, or recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS).
This is the model people usually mean when they say “controlled aquaculture.”

Why farmers choose land-based systems

The biggest advantage is simple: you’re in control.

Water quality and oxygen levels
Stocking density
Feeding schedules
Disease exposure
Harvest timing

That control leads to more predictable production and typically higher survival rates.
Land-based farms can also align more easily with wastewater rules because waste can be captured and treated.
For regulatory context, see the U.S. EPA aquaculture guidance.

The downside of land-based fish farming

Control comes at a cost. Land-based systems usually require higher capital investment and ongoing operating costs, including:

Infrastructure (tanks/ponds, plumbing, buildings)
Pumps, aeration, and filtration
Energy and backup power
Skilled monitoring and maintenance

Important: RAS facilities can be unforgiving. A power outage or mechanical failure can escalate quickly without redundancy.

Want deeper background on RAS? Start with this overview of recirculating aquaculture systems (FAO).

What Is Cage Fish Farming?

Cage fish farming uses net pens placed directly into lakes, reservoirs, rivers, or coastal waters.
Instead of building full water-treatment infrastructure, the surrounding environment provides water exchange and oxygen.

Why cage farming is attractive

The main advantage: lower startup costs.

Faster to launch
Easier to expand
Lower cost per unit of fish (in many settings)

When conditions are favorable, growth rates can be excellent due to steady water flow and stable temperatures.

The risks of cage fish farming

Here’s the catch: you don’t control the environment.
Water quality, pollution events, and disease pressure are external factors. If something changes,
intervention options are limited—and problems can spread quickly between cages and farms.

Cage systems often face higher environmental scrutiny because waste and excess feed enter the ecosystem directly.
For broader sustainability perspective, explore the FAO aquaculture sustainability resources.

Productivity vs. Risk: The Real Trade-Off

Most decisions come down to this:

Land-based systems prioritize survival, consistency, and biosecurity.
Cage systems prioritize volume and lower production costs.

Simple rule of thumb:
Cage farming tends to externalize risk to the environment.
Land-based farming tends to internalize risk inside your operation.

Environmental Impact and Market Demand

Buyers are paying closer attention to traceability, waste control, and biosecurity—especially in premium and export markets.
Land-based operations often have an advantage because inputs and outputs can be documented more precisely.

If you’re thinking about certification-driven markets, review:
Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP)
and the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC).

Land-Based vs. Cage Fish Farming: Which Is Better?

Here’s the honest answer: they are not interchangeable.

Land-based fish farming offers control, predictability, and regulatory resilience—at higher cost.
Cage fish farming offers affordability and scalability—with higher biological and environmental risk.

The best aquaculture system is the one that matches your:

Local regulations
Water availability and quality
Target markets and buyer expectations
Environmental carrying capacity
Budget and risk tolerance

The wrong system choice rarely fails slowly. It usually fails decisively.

Ready to Explore Aquaculture the Smart Way?

If you’re serious about aquaculture—and you want to do it in a way that’s economically viable and environmentally responsible—
you don’t have to figure it out alone.

Connect with the Ecolonomics Action Team (EAT) to access practical resources, expert guidance, and a community focused on
making a little money while making the planet better.

Join the Ecolonomics Action Team here

The post Land-Based vs. Cage Fish Farming: A Practical Guide to Choosing the Right Aquaculture System first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

From Water to Carbon: The New Sustainability Equation Reshaping Aquaculture

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:55:52 +0700

How to Measure, Manage, and Monetize Environmental Impact in a Market Where Every Drop of Water and Ton of CO₂ Matters

By: Salvador Meza

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the First Strategic Carbon and Water Summit with Sustainable U.S. Soy, organized by the U.S. Soybean Export Council (USSEC), held in Mexico City on March 18–19, 2026.

What emerged from this summit is not just a set of technical insights, but a clear transformation in how sustainability is understood and managed. Today, water footprint, carbon footprint, and carbon markets are no longer abstract environmental concepts—they are measurable business variables that directly influence profitability, risk exposure, and market access.

This article is designed to guide you step by step—from foundational concepts to strategic application—so you can fully understand how to measure, manage, and even monetize environmental impact.

Climate Change and Business Risk: Why Sustainability Is Now a Core Strategy

Climate change is often discussed in environmental terms, but its most immediate impact is economic. Global temperatures have increased by approximately 1.1°C since pre-industrial times, driven primarily by greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

This seemingly small increase has triggered significant disruptions:

– More frequent droughts and floods.
– Changes in rainfall patterns.
– Increased volatility in agricultural and aquaculture production.
– Rising operational and insurance costs.

For industries that depend on natural resources—such as aquaculture—these changes are not theoretical. They affect water availability, feed production, and biological performance.

But there is a deeper shift: financial institutions, regulators, and buyers are now incorporating climate risk into their decision-making.

This means companies are no longer evaluated only on productivity, but also on how well they manage environmental risks.

Sustainability is no longer about reputation—it is about resilience, risk management, and long-term profitability.

What Is Water Footprint? Understanding Water Use Beyond the Surface

The concept of water footprint is one of the most important tools for understanding environmental impact.

At first glance, water use seems simple: how much water a farm or facility consumes. However, this view is incomplete. Water footprint expands the analysis to include all water used throughout the entire value chain.

For example, in aquaculture:

– Water used in ponds is only one part of the equation.
– Water used to grow feed ingredients can be significantly larger.

This is why many companies underestimate their true water impact.

The Three Components of Water Footprint Explained

To make the concept actionable, water footprint is divided into three types:

1. Blue Water (Direct Use)

This includes surface and groundwater extracted for operations.
Examples:

– Filling ponds.
– Water exchange in aquaculture systems.
– Irrigation of crops.

Blue water is often the most regulated because it directly competes with human consumption and other industries.

2. Green Water (Rainwater Use)

This refers to rainwater stored in soil and used by crops. It is especially important in feed production. Although it is not “extracted,” it is still a limited resource. Its availability depends on climate patterns and geography.

3. Grey Water (Water Quality Impact)

This represents the volume of water needed to dilute pollutants to safe levels.

In aquaculture, this is linked to:

– Nutrient discharge (nitrogen, phosphorus).
– Organic waste.
– Effluent management.

Understanding these three components is critical because they behave differently depending on location and production system.

Water footprint is not about how much water you see—it’s about where water is actually consumed across the value chain.

How to Measure Water Footprint: From Theory to Actionable Metrics

Measuring water footprint transforms a conceptual idea into a decision-making tool. To ensure consistency, companies rely on standardized methodologies such as:

– Water Footprint Assessment (WFA).
– ISO 14046 Water Footprint Standard.

These frameworks allow companies to calculate water use across the full lifecycle of a product.

What Does Measurement Include?

– Direct water consumption in operations.
– Indirect water use in feed and raw materials.
– Pollution levels and dilution requirements.
– Local environmental conditions (water scarcity, climate).

Results are expressed in measurable units such as:

– Cubic meters per ton of production.
– Cubic meters per kilogram of product.

Why Measurement Matters

Without measurement:

– Companies cannot identify inefficiencies.
– Improvements cannot be quantified.
– Performance cannot be compared.

Measurement reveals hotspots—areas where the greatest impact occurs—and enables targeted interventions.

Water Management: Optimizing Systems, Not Just Reducing Use

Once water footprint is measured, the next step is management. A common misconception is that water management means simply reducing consumption. In reality, it involves optimizing the entire production system.

Key Management Levers

– Feed sourcing: Different regions have different water footprints.
– Production systems: Closed systems may reduce water use but increase energy demand.
– Nutrient management: Reducing waste lowers grey water footprint.
– Production intensity: Higher efficiency can reduce total impact per unit.

These decisions often involve trade-offs. For example:

– Reducing water use may increase energy consumption.
– Improving feed efficiency may reduce both water and carbon impacts.

This is why water must be managed as part of a system, not in isolation.

Additionally, water should be treated as an ecosystem service, meaning its use must remain within ecological limits.

The goal is not to minimize water use at all costs, but to maximize efficiency while maintaining environmental balance.

Carbon Footprint: Measuring and Managing Emissions

While water footprint focuses on resource use, carbon footprint focuses on emissions. It measures the total greenhouse gas emissions generated by an operation, including:

Scope 1: Direct emissions (fuel, on-site processes)
Scope 2: Indirect emissions from energy use
Scope 3: Emissions across the value chain

Carbon management follows a structured approach:

1. Measurement

Using frameworks such as:

– GHG Protocol.
– ISO 14064.

2. Reduction

Through:

– Energy efficiency.
– Renewable energy adoption.
– Process optimization.

3. Compensation

By purchasing carbon credits to offset unavoidable emissions

Why Water and Carbon Must Be Managed Together

A critical insight from the summit is that water and carbon are interconnected.

Examples:

– Energy-intensive systems reduce water use but increase emissions.
– Efficient feed reduces both water and carbon footprints.
– Logistics decisions impact emissions and indirect water use.

This interdependence means companies must adopt an integrated sustainability strategy, rather than treating each metric separately.

Sustainability decisions must balance water, energy, and emissions simultaneously.

Sustainability Reporting: Turning Data into Market Value

Measuring and managing impact is only part of the equation. Companies must also report their performance.

The GRI Standards (Global Reporting Initiative) provide a global framework for sustainability reporting, including:

– GRI 303: Water and Effluents.
– GRI 305: Emissions.

Why Reporting Is Critical

– Investors require ESG data
– Regulators demand. transparency.
– Buyers prioritize sustainable suppliers.
– Markets reward credible reporting.

More than 90% of large companies already use GRI standards, highlighting the shift toward standardized disclosure.

Carbon Markets: Monetizing Sustainability Efforts

One of the most advanced topics discussed at the summit was carbon markets. These markets allow companies to turn sustainability into a financial asset.

How Carbon Markets Work

– Companies that reduce emissions can generate carbon credits.
– Companies that cannot fully reduce emissions can buy credits.
– Each credit represents a verified reduction of one ton of CO₂.

These markets are expanding rapidly due to:

– Increasing regulation.
– Corporate net-zero commitments.
– Global climate policies.

How to Participate in Carbon Markets: Step-by-Step

1. Measure emissions

Establish a baseline using recognized methodologies.

2. Reduce emissions

Implement efficiency and sustainability strategies.

3. Develop projects

Examples include:

– Regenerative agriculture.
– Renewable energy.
– Carbon capture.

4. Verify results

Third-party certification ensures credibility

5. Trade credits

Sell in voluntary or regulated markets. However, not all projects qualify. They must meet strict criteria such as:

– Additionality.
– Permanence.
– Verifiability.

Conclusion: Sustainability as a Strategic Advantage

The key message from the summit is clear: Sustainability is no longer optional—it is a core driver of competitiveness.

Companies that:

– Understand their water footprint.
– Manage their carbon footprint.
– Integrate both into their strategy.

Will gain advantages in:

– Cost efficiency.
– Risk management.
– Market access.
– Revenue generation through carbon markets.

In today’s economy, environmental performance is becoming a key business metric. The question is no longer whether companies should act—but how quickly they can adapt. Because in a resource-constrained world: every drop of water and every ton of CO₂ will define who leads—and who falls behind.

Owned, Paid, and Earned Media for Effective Marketing

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:55:46 +0700

* By Sarah Cornelisse

This article outlines an effective omni-channel marketing strategy by integrating owned, paid, and earned media. Owned media serves as the foundation for building customer trust, while paid media strategically amplifies messages, and earned media provides essential third-party credibility. Successful integration of these types fosters brand loyalty, strengthens engagement, and maximizes overall marketing impact.

Astrong marketing strategy is crucial for reaching customers and establishing and maintaining trust and loyalty. Many marketing channel options exist (TV, radio, social media, newsletters, websites, email, etc.), and as a business owner and marketer, you must determine the most effective mix of channels to reach your target audience and achieve your business and marketing goals.

A key point often emphasized is the necessity for a business to provide and maintain a consistent presence and experience across its chosen channels, a concept known as omni-channel marketing. Consistency builds and strengthens loyalty among customers, which in turn translates to increased engagement and sales (Gardner, 2025).

Effective omni-channel marketing requires considering the different types of marketing media: owned, paid, and earned. Each plays a crucial role in the marketing strategy, and it is important to understand how each can be leveraged.

Media Types

Owned media are the channels and content your business controls. Examples include your business website, social media accounts (e.g., Facebook pages, YouTube channels), and newsletter. Social media accounts are sometimes referred to as partiallyowned media, since while your business does not own the social media platform(s) you use, you do control the content shared from those accounts.

Paid media is content that you promote through advertising. Paid advertisements in newspapers or magazines, boosted Facebook posts, event sponsorships, and ads on social media or search engines are all examples of paid media. Because marketing budgets are often limited, especially for small businesses, consider paid media as a way to strategically amplify your messages.

Earned media is publicity gained through others’ media and is arguably the most valuable form of media, as individuals are known to place greater credibility on “word-of-mouth” recommendations. For example, a feature story published by your local newspaper, mentions and post shares from social media influencers (who are not paid by you), or invitations from community organizations to partner with them.

Each media type has its own advantages and disadvantages. Owned and paid media allow you to craft and manage the content, message, and timing, whereas, by definition, earned media requires that you rely on others to share your messages and promote your brand. Owned media content must be relevant, requiring commitment and investment in creating, updating, and maintaining quality content.

However, owned content is typically evergreen and can aid customers wherever they may be on their customer journey. Additionally, the effort expended to develop owned media can pay off with your ability to reuse content in the future for various purposes and in different formats. It is through owned media that you provide value to your audience, building trusting relationships with current and potential customers.

Paid media can effectively increase awareness, convey value, and encourage engagement and sales. Ideally, you use paid media to direct your audience to owned media. Building strong and trusting relation-ships with customers, the community, industry members, and partners is key to generating strong and positive earned media. Earned media further enhances trust while also developing credibility and a positive reputation for you and your business.

Paid media is content that you promote through advertising. Paid advertisements in newspapers or magazines, boosted Facebook posts, event sponsorships, and ads on social media or search engines are all examples of paid media.

Intentional Integration

To achieve maximum impact from your marketing, consider how these three media types can work together rather than approaching them individually. This demands intention and planning, starting with clearly defined marketing objectives and selecting media channels that your target audience uses or visits, before tackling content development. Consider owned media your foundation. Without robust owned media content, there is little to leverage or amplify with paid or earned media. The following example illustrates how owned, earned, and paid media can work together in a cohesive manner.

Assume that you publish a blog discussing your business’s sustainable production practices. The blog is owned media since the blog lives on a website that you control and manage. Your blog content showcases your experience, expertise, and brand values. Audience members for whom the content resonates may decide to share your post(s) on social media. Their posts are earned media, extending your reach and positioning you as a thought leader. You can also create social media ads for your blog, paying to strategically target new audiences and further amplify your message with the goal of generating new business customers.

Earned media is publicity gained through others’ media and is arguably the most valuable form of media, as individuals are known to place greater credibility on “word-of-mouth” recommendations.

A final key for maximizing the impact of owned, earned, and paid media is to measure your actions and the overall impact. Specific metrics that can be used include social media engagement rates, referrals, and sales conversions. It can be challenging, however, to accurately attribute sales to specific marketing activities. For instance, if a customer receives and opens your email newsletter (owned content) and also clicks your boosted Facebook post (paid media) before making a purchase, which should be credited?

A successful and comprehensive marketing strategy will integrate owned, paid, and earned media together in a complementary manner. By building a robust collection of owned media, you will be wellpositioned to leverage paid media to strategically boost your messages while also generating and supporting earned media. Through all media types, remember to maintain a focus on building connections, trust, and loyalty with your audience by providing short and long-term value.

References and sources consulted by the author on the elaboration of this article are available under previous request to our editorial staff.

* Sarah Cornelisse is a Senior Extension Associate of agricultural entrepreneurship and business management at Penn State University in the Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology and Education. Sarah has expertise in direct marketing, value-added dairy entrepreneurship and marketing, the use of digital and social media for agricultural farm and food business marketing, and business and marketing planning and decision making. Originally from New York State, she has a B.A in Mathematics from the State University of New York at Geneseo, and M.S. degrees in Agricultural Economics and Animal Science, both from Penn State University.
Correspondence email: sar243@psu.edu

Sunnyrich Group & FIMER: Pioneering Sustainable Aquaculture with Advanced Solar Solutions

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:55:41 +0700

By FIMER

SunnyRich Group, leading company in Taiwan focused on the symbiosis between fishing and solar energy (fishery-electricity symbiosis), is committed to transforming the aquaculture industry, driven by a vision to enhance production efficiency, sustainability, and product quality.

Leveraging its proprietary technologies and extensive experience in integrating large-scale photovoltaic systems with ultra-high voltage facilities, SunnyRich Group has pioneered the world’s largest single-area greenhouse SPF non-toxic aquaculture park.

This innovative park combines advanced greenhouse technical aquaculture with SPF (Specific Pathogen-Free) non-toxic shrimp farming, ensuring a pollution-free, antibiotic-free, and environmentally friendly production environment.

SunnyRich Group’s initiatives not only improve yield and efficiency for local fishermen but also modernize traditional aquaculture methods, addressing the long-standing development challenges of fishing communities. Their approach emphasizes symbiotic fishery-electricity integration, creating sustainable energy and aquaculture ecosystems.

Project Overview

Located in Chiayi City, Taiwan, the project represents a major milestone in large-scale renewable energy deployment within aquaculture environments.

With a total installed capacity of 132 MW, the plant is designed according to the innovative fishery–electricity symbiosis model, where photovoltaic generation and aquaculture activities coexist in a mutually beneficial ecosystem.

1,100 FIMER PVS-120-TL string inverters have been specifically selected to ensure high efficiency, operational stability, and long-term reliability in this unique operating environment.

The PVS-120-TL architecture enables optimized energy conversion and flexible system design, supporting the large-scale photovoltaic infrastructure integrated within the aquaculture facilities.

The system configuration allows the solar installation to generate substantial clean energy while simultaneously preserving the functionality of the aquaculture operations below the PV structures. This approach maximizes land-use efficiency and contributes to the creation of a sustainable production model that integrates renewable energy generation with modern shrimp farming practices.

FIMER PVS-120-TL plays a crucial role in these demanding environments, maintaining stable performance under high humidity and harsh symbiotic aquaculture conditions.

Its robustness and reliability perfectly support Sunnyrich Group’s mission to deliver premium, non-toxic shrimp and advance greenhouse technical aquaculture on a global scale.

FIMER is proud to be a long-term partner of Sunnyrich Group. Together, Sunnyrich Group and FIMER are redefining sustainable aquaculture — where cutting-edge solar technology meets innovative, eco-friendly seafood production.

Product Overview

PVS-100/120-TL is FIMER’s cloud connected three-phase string solution for cost efficient decentralized photovoltaic systems. This platform, for extreme high power string inverters with power ratings up to 120 kW, maximizes the ROI for decentralized ground mounted and large rooftop applications. With up to six MPPT, energy harvesting is optimized even in shading situations.

The extreme high-power modulesaves installation resources as less units are required. Due to its compact size further savings are generated in logistics and in maintenance.

Thanks to the integrated DC/AC disconnection, 24 string connections, fuses and surge protection no additional boxes are required. Standard wireless access from any mobile device makes the configuration of inverter and plant easier and faster.

Improved user experience thanks to a build in User Interface (UI) enables access to advanced inverter configuration settings. The installer mobile APP, available for Android/iOS devices, further simplifies multi-inverter installations.

About FIMER

FIMER is a brand owned by MA Solar Italy and a leading manufacturer of renewable energy solutions. The Company, specializing in the production of solar inverters, offers a wide range of solutions designed for any application. With local training centers, 2 production sites, one in Italy and one in India, FIMER is close to its customers in the evolving dynamics of the energy sector.

For further information visit www.fimer.com

About Sunnyrich Group

SunnyRich Group promotes local revitalization, rebuild fishing villages, and attract young farmers to return to their hometowns. They fully support and lead the development of Taiwan’s composite fishery-electricity symbiosis industry. The Company wants to create a brand-new ecosystem for the aquaculture industry of next generation through greenhouse anti-disease technical aquaculture.

IFFO Announces China Summit 2026 – Registration now Open

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:55:36 +0700

By IFFO

IFFO – The Marine Ingredients Organization is pleased to announce that registration is now open for the IFFO China Summit 2026, taking place in Shanghai on 10–11 June 2026. The Summit will once again convene leading industry stakeholders from across the global marine ingredients value chain to explore market dynamics, regulatory developments and future opportunities.

Maggie Xu, IFFO’s China Director, states:”We are delighted to welcome the industry back to China for another edition of what has now become an annual event. China continues to play a central role in the global aquaculture sector, both as the world’s largest producer and as a leading user of marine ingredients to support its rapidly developing feed and farming industries. According to OECD-FAO estimates, China is expected to account for 42% of global fishmeal consumption by 2034.”

Side Event on 10 June 2026

The Summit will be preceded by a dedicated Side Program and Reception on Wednesday 10 June: the Forum for High Quality Development of China’s Fish Oil Industry. The side event will feature expert insights into dietary supplement trends, global regulatory frameworks, and quality standards for fish oil products.

Main Program – 11 June 2026

The main day of the Summit, Thursday 11 June, will offer a full program of presentations and Q&A sessions, covering global supply and demand, market developments across key producing regions (Northern Europe, Chile, Peru, India, Vietnam, China, as well as global perspectives) and certification systems.

Registration now Open

Registration for the IFFO China Summit 2026 is officially open at https://www.iffo.com/china-summit-2026

Great Lakes St. Lawrence Governors & Premiers Launches 100% Great Lakes Sportfish

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:55:30 +0700

By Conference of Great Lakes St. Lawrence Governors & Premiers.

• Walnut Creek Marina’s sportfish cleaning station becomes first on the Great Lakes to join international initiative aimed at using 100% of fish parts

The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) and the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Governors & Premiers (GSGP) announced today that the Walnut Creek Fish Cleaning Station has signed the Governors’ and Premiers’ 100% Great Lakes Fish Pledge. The Station is the 45^th pledge signatory and the first sportfish cleaning station to join the regional initiative.

As part of the pledge, Walnut Creek will work alongside other participating organizations to promote the full use of each fish caught, raised, or processed in or from the Great Lakes region. This includes helping raise awareness of opportunities for innovative applications of fish byproducts, such as compost, fertilizer, protein, marine collagen, leather, and other new, high-value products.

The pledge is part of the 100% Great Lakes Fish initiative created by GSGP, an organization representing the Governors of the Great Lakes States and the Canadian Premiers of Ontario and Québec. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro serves as GSGP’s Chair.

PFBC and GSGP are also planning to cooperate in the coming months on a pilot effort related to fish byproducts at Walnut Creek. The pilot would explore practical approaches for handling material from sportfish cleaning stations and identifying productive uses for it as part of the broader 100% Great Lakes Fish initiative.

Sportfish cleaning stations are an important part of the Great Lakes region’s recreational fishing economy, providing convenient places for anglers to process fish. They collectively handle substantial volumes across the region. But only about 40% of each fish (the fillets) is usually eaten or used productively. In contrast, the remaining 60% of the fish is often relegated to inexpensive uses or discarded. The 100% Great Lakes Fish initiative seeks new and innovative ways to use every part of each fish to reduce waste, create more value and jobs, and support rural economic development. Iceland pioneered this approach and has seen the value of products made from each cod skyrocket from USD 12 for just the filet to a remarkable USD 5,000 for products including cosmetics, medical bandages, nutritional supplements, and a range of other products.

“Pennsylvania anglers care deeply about our fisheries, and this commitment reflects that ethic,” said Tim Schaeffer, Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission. “By making Walnut Creek the first fish cleaning station to sign the 100% Great Lakes Fish Pledge, we are setting a clear expectation that fish byproduct should be handled responsibly and, wherever possible, put to productive use.”

“Welcoming fish cleaning stations into the 100% Great Lakes Fish Pledge is an important next step for the region,” said David Naftzger, Executive Director of the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Governors & Premiers. “Walnut Creek is helping lead by example, showing how sportfish sites can be part of a more efficient system that reduces waste, supports local solutions, and strengthens Great Lakes fisheries.”

More information on 100% Great Lakes Fish, including a copy of the Pledge, is available at htps://gsgp.org/projects/100-great-lakes-fish/

About the Conference of Great Lakes St. Lawrence Governors & Premiers

www.gsgp.org

The Conference of Great Lakes St. Lawrence Governors & Premiers unites the chief executives from Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Ontario, Pennsylvania, Québec, and Wisconsin. The Governors and Premiers work as equal partners to grow the region’s $9.3 trillion (US) economy and protect the world’s largest surface freshwater system.

Contacts:
Fish Pledge:John Schmidt, jschmidt@gsgp.org
Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission: Mike Parker, michparker@pa.gov
Photos (credit Gibbens Creative):

Canadian Cooke Aquaculture Enters Into Preliminary Agreement to Acquire the Debt of Avramar Greece

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:55:25 +0700

The company will pay USD 230.89 million to take control of the subsidiary.

Cooke Aquaculture announced that it has executed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) under which the company will acquire from the lenders thereof the existing debt facilities of Avramar Aquaculture, Andromeda, Perseus and Avramar Commercial and Logistics -collectively named Avramar Greece-, a leading marine aquaculture producer of sea bass and seabream in the Mediterranean country. Together with Cooke’s existing agreement to acquire the equity of Avramar Greece, upon closing, Cooke will acquire operational control of Avramar Greece. Cooke will pay USD 230.89 million to take control of the subsidiary.

The original companies comprising the Avramar Greece group were established in 1981, and the company has grown to become a leader in Mediterranean aquaculture. It is a vertically integrated operation, which includes hatcheries, marine farm sites, processing and packaging facilities, and feed production operations. The company’s sustainability certifications are recognized by the Global Sustainable Seafood Initiative (GSSA) and Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI).

The acquisition is subject to definitive documentation and customary closing conditions and is expected to close at the earliest opportunity.

The Largest Private Family-Owned Seafood Company in the World

Cooke Aquaculture was established in 1985 by the Cooke family in New Brunswick, Canada. From humble beginnings of one farm site and 5,000 salmon, Cooke is the largest private family-owned seafood company in the world employing 13,000 people worldwide. The Cooke family of companies operate global aquaculture and wild fishery divisions in 15 countries providing a sustainable seafood source reaching tables all over the world. Cooke’s core purpose is to “cultivate the ocean with care, nourish the world, provide for our families, and build stronger communities”.

Expansion of Liverpool Bay Salmon Farm, approved

On the other hand, and some weeks before of the announcement, Kelly Cove Salmon welcomed the Nova Scotia Aquaculture Review Board’s (ARB) decision, approving the lease boundary amendment and expansion for salmon farm AQ1205, located offshore from Coffin Island in Liverpool Bay.

Kelly Cove has operated the farm since 2011 in compliance with the government’s Environmental Monitoring Program. The approval allows Kelly Cove to add 6 cages to the site for the culture of Atlantic salmon bringing the total number of cages to 20.

“Our members are very pleased to see the salmon farm expansion approval. As sea farmers, we are focused on providing sustainable meals grown right here at home. Supporting and encouraging growth in our resource sectors strengthens rural and urban parts of our province. We look forward to future ARB decisions that will help guide investment within the aquaculture sector, and our province,” said Jeff Bishop, Executive Director, Aquaculture Association of Nova Scotia.

For his part, Joel Richardson, Vice President of Public Relations for Cooke Aquaculture, parent company of Kelly Cove, commented: “The week-long ARB public hearing in October was rigorous and brought together input from multiple stakeholders and intervenors,” said Joel Richardson, Vice President of Public Relations for Cooke Aquaculture, parent company of Kelly Cove. “We appreciate that the Board allowed the time necessary for everyone to make presentations, ask questions and gain an understanding of how our aquaculture farming works.”

In its decision, the ARB concluded that it is satisfied that there will be no negative, or any, impact of this amendment on any of the statutory conditions. The ARB further concluded that the re-drawing of the boundary to encompass the infrastructure, as well as adding six new cages, represents the optimum use of marine resources, in that the site will be used to efficiently produce thousands of kilograms of food.

According to Cooke, this farm makes a genuine contribution to community and Provincial economic development. “The existing farm does not cause significant negative impacts to other fishery activities in Liverpool Bay. The oceanographic and biophysical characteristics of the public waters surrounding the proposed aquacultural operation are suitable for salmon aquaculture. And the proposed expansion will not have a negative impact on the other users of the public waters surrounding the proposed aquacultural operation”, they assured.

Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global to Bring Together More Than 90 Industry Experts, with Dr. Nomi Prins as Keynote Speaker

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:55:20 +0700

By Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global

• The 32nd edition of Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global will take place at Fira de Barcelona from 21–23 April 2026, bringing together leading companies from more than 80 countries and serving as a global business hub for the seafood industry.

• Speakers will include representatives from organizations such as the FAO, WTO and WWF, as well as leading seafood companies, addressing key topics including aquaculture, sustainability and transparency, among others.

• Economist and geopolitical strategist Dr. Nomi Prins will deliver the keynote address offering attendees an economic outlook for the global seafood industry.

The 32nd edition of Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global announces a conference program that will bring together more than 90 international seafood and industry experts to lead over 30 educational sessions. Taking place from 21-23 April at the Gran Vía venue of Fira de Barcelona, the event’s program will offer attendees valuable insights and practical perspectives on the key trends shaping the global seafood industry.

Speakers will include representatives from leading organizations such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the World Trade Organization (WTO) and WWF, as well as executives from major seafood companies and industry associations. Notable speakers include Shirlene Maria Anthonysamy (FAO GLOBEFISH), Dominic Andradi-Brown (WWF-US), Chris Ninnes (Aquaculture Stewardship Council), Jayson Berryhill (Wholechain), Michelle Beritzhoff-Law (FishWise), Valentina Sannino (EUMOFA), Libby Woodhatch (MarinTrust Ltd.), Daniel Rejón (Lineage – Europe Region 2), Sunneva Sverrisdóttir (CO/PLUS) and Sébastien Metz (Global Seafood Alliance – GSA).

Sessions will address a wide range of topics including aquaculture development, emerging markets and species, supply chain compliance, traceability and transparency, sustainable innovation and responsible management, among others, highlighting both current challenges and future opportunities across the seafood sector.

Global Seafood Markets: Economic Outlook and Trade Pressures

A highlight of the program will be the keynote address by economist and geopolitical strategist Dr. Nomi Prins, titled “High Stakes, Shifting Tides: The Global Outlook on Seafood, Trade, Economic Pressure Points and Opportunities,” taking place on Tuesday, 21 April, from 13:00 to 14:00 in Room 5.1 at the Gran Vía venue of Fira de Barcelona.

Dr. Prins is an independent journalist, author and former Wall Street executive, widely sought after for her ability to bridge the worlds of politics, finance, and global economics. She is the author of seven influential books, including “Collusion: How Central Bankers Rigged the World,” “All the Presidents’ Bankers,” and “It Takes a Pillage,” and is known for delivering accessible, actionable insights that help organizations navigate volatility, trade disruptions and regulatory complexity.

In this address, free and open to all, Dr. Prins will deliver a forward-looking economic outlook for 2026, tailored to the global seafood sector – connecting macro forces to daily decisions, from U.S.–China trade tension fallout to evolving E.U. labeling regulations, traceability mandates and energy price swings. Whether you’re navigating Latin American shrimp exports, Middle East shipping chokepoints, or European labeling mandates, Prins will break down the real forces behind the headlines and what they mean for seafood’s global future.

Exploring Market Trends, Innovation and Industry Transformation

Throughout the three-day program, sessions will explore the rapid transformation of seafood markets, including changing consumer preferences, product innovation and marketing strategies aimed at increasing seafood consumption. On Tuesday (21 April), “Blue Ports and the Fisheries Industry: Building Resilient and Efficient Value Chains,” presented by Roberto Alonso, Secretary General, ANFACO-CYTMA (Spain); Shirlene Maria Anthonysamy, Fishery Officer (Markets), Fisheries and Aquaculture Division, FAO (Rome); Javier Garat Pérez, Secretary General, CEPESCA; Audun Lem, Chair of the International Board of FiTI; and Yolanda Molares, Blue Ports Initiative Consultant, FAO, will explore how ports serve as key hubs for quality control, traceability, processing, and logistics, supporting both competitiveness and sustainability across coastal economies.

Later that day, “Seafood Trade in the Tariff Era: An Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities Between the E.U. and U.S.,” presented by Richard Barry, Senior Market Analyst and Director of Programs, National Fisheries Institute, Guus Pastoor, President of Seafood Europe and Robert DeHaan, Executive Vice President for Government Affairs and General Counsel, National Fisheries Institute, will bring together trade and industry experts to examine shifting supply flows, evolving tariffs and opportunities for exporters navigating a more fragmented global seafood market.

Wednesday (22 April) highlights sessions focused on consumer behavior and market resilience. “Emerging Seafood Consumption Trends in Japan in a Changing Global Supply,” presented by Tina Peneva, Co-Founder and Head of European Office, Meros Consulting, will explore cultural and economic factors driving demand shifts in Japan, including product formats, channels and sustainability considerations influencing consumer choice. Complementing this, “Navigating Uncertainty: Building a Resilient E.U. Market for Fisheries and Aquaculture Products,” presented by Valentina Sannino, Market Intelligence Deputy Coordinator, EUMOFA, will analyze how COVID-19, Brexit, and geopolitical shocks have reshaped E.U. supply chains, highlighting strategies for adaptation, diversification and long-term resilience.

On Thursday (23 April), Dr. Dominic Andradi-Brown, Director of Blue Forests at WWF; Dane Klinger, Senior Director of Blue Foods at Conservation International, Dale Galvin, CEO at Deliberate Capital, LLC, Shannon Roberts, Aquaculture and Fisheries Biologist at Sea Farms Ltd. and Merrielle Macleod, Director of Aquaculture, WWF-US, will present “Mangroves + Aquaculture: A New Collaboration Frontier for Nature-Positive Seafood,” exploring how partnerships between seafood producers and NGOs can protect critical ecosystems while scaling responsible aquaculture. “Perfect Symphony: Sustainable Seafood by Low CO2, Circular Byproducts and New Technology,” presented by Frederik Geert Hoekstra, Economic Researcher at Wageningen University & Research, will highlight innovations in low-carbon seafood production, waste valorization, and digitalization across fisheries, aquaculture, and processing, offering actionable insights on how technology and sustainability are transforming seafood value chains.

Sustainability, Transparency and Responsible Supply Chains

Sustainability continues to be a central theme throughout the conference program. Experts from NGOs, academia, and the private sector will discuss strategies for improving responsible aquaculture practices, supply chain transparency, and environmental performance across the seafood industry. Sessions will address issues such as traceability systems, labor and human rights considerations, certification and reporting requirements, and collaborative initiatives designed to strengthen responsible seafood sourcing worldwide.

Notable panels include “From Port to Plate: What Shifting Seafood Consumption Means for the Cold Chain” on Wednesday, which examines how cold chain strategies support compliance, freshness, and operational efficiency, and “Rethinking Seafood: Business Development, Branding and Growth Beyond Commodities” on the same day, which highlights how innovative branding and category creation can unlock new market opportunities while driving sustainability. Thursday sessions will continue this topic, showing how industry-wide collaboration, circular economy approaches, and ecosystem-positive initiatives are creating more resilient, transparent and responsible seafood supply chains globally.

The 32nd Edition Will Feature Exhibitors from More Than 80 Countries

Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global, the world’s largest and most diverse seafood trade event, will bring together leading seafood companies from more than 80 countries, with 62 national and regional pavilions, and participation continuing to grow.

The complete conference program can be found on the event website at https://www.seafoodexpo.com/global/conference-program/. Attending the conference program requires a conference pass.

For further information about Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global, and to register, visit: www.seafoodexpo.com/global.

About Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global

Seafood Expo Global and Seafood Processing Global make up the world’s largest seafood trade show. Thousands of buyers and sellers from around the world attend the three-day annual event to meet, connect, and do business. Buyers include importers, exporters, wholesalers, restaurants, supermarkets, hotels, and other companies in the retail and foodservice sectors. Exhibitors showcase the latest innovations in seafood products, processing and packaging machinery, and services for the seafood industry. SeafoodSource.com is the official media partner of the event. The organizer is Diversified, the international leader in seafood events and media. www.seafoodexpo.com/global

About Diversified

Diversified is a global B2B events and media company that strengthens business communities by fostering a space, in person and online, for professionals and businesses to connect and grow. The company serves as a trusted partner across several industries including active lifestyle, business management, clean energy, commercial marine, healthcare, seafood, technology and more. The company’s global seafood portfolio of expositions and media includes Seafood Expo North America/Seafood Processing North America, Seafood Expo Global/Seafood Processing Global, Seafood Expo Asia/Seafood Processing Asia and SeafoodSource.com. Established in 1949 and headquartered in Portland, Maine, the global company has divisions and offices around the world in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Diversified is a third-generation, family-owned business. For more information, visit: www.divcom.com.

Aquaintech Inc. Launches Dual-Sided Tablets for Advanced Bioremediation in Aquaculture Systems

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:55:14 +0700

By Aquaintech Inc.

Aquaintech Inc. announces the launch of its new Dual-Sided Tablet, a next-generation solution designed to improve water quality and simplify pond management in aquaculture systems.

The Dual-Sided Tablets introduces a double-action microbial approach, combining Bacillus

based bioremediation with a lactic acid–producing Bacillus strain in a single, stable format. Unlike conventional solutions, the product is designed for dry storage with no refrigeration required, offering both operational and logistical advantages.

Each tablet is engineered with two functional sides to deliver complementary benefits:

Bioremediation Side: Formulated with Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis, proven species that digest organic matter and metabolize ammonia, impacting the microbiome and reducing loads of other bacteria including vibrios.

Lactic Acid–Producing Side: Contains Bacillus coagulants selected for its ability to produce lactic acid and the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Bacillus and Saccharomyces have better shelf stability than Lactobacillus-based solutions.

This dual-sided design enables more targeted and efficient microbial activity, helping aquaculture producers maintain balanced pond ecosystems while reducing reliance on refrigerated or liquid products.

Key Benefits

✓ Reduction of ammonia and organic waste.

✓ Improved water quality.

✓ Support for beneficial microbial balance.

✓ Healthier and more stable pond environments.

✓ No refrigeration required, lowering storage and transportation costs.

Application

The tablets are designed for direct application in areas with high organic loads, providing a simple and efficient approach to pond management.

Dosage

Recommended application rates range from 200–500 g/ha (at 1.5 m depth) per week to start, with higher frequency application rates as the cycle progresses.

Dosage should be adjusted based on system conditions and biomass. It is recommended to start at lower application rates and increase as needed based on performance.

Available Sizes

Dual-Sided Tablets are available in multiple formats, including: 1 g, 3.5 g, 4 g, and 15 g, providing flexibility across different aquaculture systems and operational needs.

Storage

Store in a cool, dry place. No refrigeration required.

About Aquaintech Inc.

Aquaintech Inc., entering its 31st year of providing innovative tools for the global aquaculture community, based in Lynnwood, Washington State specializes in microbial and bioremediation solutions for aquaculture. The company focuses on delivering practical, science-driven solutions to support water quality management and system optimization.

Contact Information:
Stephen G. Newman Ph.D. President and CEO
Aquaintech Inc. Lynnwood, WA 98037 USA Tel: 425-787-5218
E-mail: sgnewm@aqua-in-tech.com / info@aqua-in-tech.com
URLs: www.aqua-in-tech.com/ bioremediation-aquaculture.com

Our Premium Sustainable Barramundi Selected for Australian Open 2023

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:40:17 +0700

We are proud to announce that our barramundi was selected for the Australian Open 2023. It is a moment of immense pride for us to be the exclusive supplier of barramundi for one of the biggest sporting events in the country.

The Australian Open is one of the most prestigious sporting events in the world, and being selected as a supplier is a testament to the quality of our product. Our barramundi is not only delicious but also sustainable, which sets us apart from other suppliers in the market.

At our company, we are committed to providing our customers with the highest quality, sustainably sourced barramundi. We take pride in the fact that our fish is raised in a way that is both environmentally and socially responsible.

We are proud to be able to offer our customers a premium product that is not only delicious but also sustainable. We believe that it is our responsibility to protect the environment and promote sustainable practices, and we take this responsibility very seriously.

If you are looking for a delicious and sustainable seafood option, our barramundi is the perfect choice. We are proud to offer our customers a premium product that is not only delicious but also sustainable and environmentally responsible.

The post Our Premium Sustainable Barramundi Selected for Australian Open 2023 appeared first on MainStream Aquaculture.

Importance of Airfreight – MainStream Aquaculture CEO, Boris Musa, explains

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:40:16 +0700

We salute the entire team at Melbourne Airport who give Australian businesses global access. Here’s our CEO, Boris Musa, talking about our business and how airfreight plays a key role.

Boris MUSA, CEO of MainStream Aquaculture

The post Importance of Airfreight – MainStream Aquaculture CEO, Boris Musa, explains appeared first on MainStream Aquaculture.

The Center for Aquaculture Technologies Appoints Matt Kramer as Senior Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:38:27 +0700

Matt Kramer has joined the growing team at the Center for Aquaculture Technologies (CAT) as the Senior Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing. He will lead the company’s expanding global rollout of innovation in genetic improvement, particularly in commercial-scale genome editing for aquaculture.

Matt is a seasoned commercial leader with more than two decades of experience driving commercial growth in genomics and various life sciences sectors, with a specialty in commercializing innovation in the genomics field. He joins CAT following senior roles at QIAGEN, ThermoFisher, Element Biosciences, and Psomagen, where he led transformative sales initiatives, built high-performing teams, and established strategic, value-based partnerships. His expertise spans the commercial spectrum of sales, marketing, and product management, anchored in a strong foundation in genomics, molecular diagnostics, and next generation sequencing technologies.

Commenting on his appointment, Matt Kramer said:

“I was drawn to this role for its combination of strategic scope and purpose — with the opportunity to help shape how genomic and genome-editing technologies transition from research tools into real-world impact. CAT’s culture, scientific and aquaculture industry expertise, and long-term vision align strongly with my own values as a leader. I’m particularly looking forward to bringing the benefits of genome editing into the aquaculture market and delivering responsible, science-based adoption worldwide.”

He added:

“Genome editing offers transformative benefits for the global aquaculture industry by enabling targeted genetic improvements that enhance operational productivity, resilience, and sustainability, as complementary methods to traditional selective breeding strategies. My passion has always been to work for companies that drive innovation, and CAT provides exactly that opportunity. As the global population grows, CAT’s genome editing services offer a safe, efficient, and effective way to increase the availability of nutritious food while reducing pressure on wild fish stocks.”

Dr. John Buchanan, CEO of CAT, welcomes Matt:

“We are pleased to have Matt join our team. His experience and leadership will be instrumental as we expand the commercialization of genome editing in aquaculture globally. I look forward to introducing him to our clients and am confident that, together with the rest of our team, we will lead CAT into an exciting new era – further driving innovation, boosting productivity and sustainability, and supporting our core mission of feeding people responsibly.”

The post The Center for Aquaculture Technologies Appoints Matt Kramer as Senior Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

The Center of Aquaculture Technologies Partners with UMBC to Advance Sterility Solutions in Aquaculture

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:38:26 +0700

The Center of Aquaculture Technologies (CAT), a global leader in sustainable genetic innovation for aquaculture, today announced the signing of an exclusive licensing agreement with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) covering two patents related to the induction of sterility in finfish using Morpholinos. This strategic collaboration strengthens CAT’s intellectual property portfolio and further backs their strategy in bringing responsible genome editing solutions to aquaculture.

There are many reasons to produce animals that do not undergo sexual maturation, reasons that align closely with the core goals of the aquaculture industry. Sterility in farmed fish offers benefits across performance, environmental protection, and animal welfare.

Why sterility matters

Improved Performance – Sterile fish avoid early sexual maturation, enhancing growth rates and feed conversion efficiency, reducing production costs, and minimizing waste.
Environmental Protection – Sterility safeguards the distinctive traits of wild populations, protecting biodiversity and supporting balanced ecosystems. This also addresses regulatory concerns with fish escapes from aquaculture production systems.
Animal Welfare – By reducing stress and aggression associated with sexual maturation, sterile fish experience improved health and lower mortality rates.

“CAT is committed to advancing Next-Gen Breeding solutions that combine scientific innovation with environmental and economic responsibility,” said Dr. John Buchanan, CEO of CAT. “Our partnership with UMBC allows us to bring further pioneering sterility technology closer to commercial reality, supporting healthier fish, stronger ecosystems, and more efficient production systems. With a growing global population to feed, sustainable aquaculture solutions have never been more critical, and genome editing, underpinned by sterility, is a key part of that future.”

Commenting on the signed agreement Dr. Yonathan Zohar, Professor at UMBC and Chair of the Department of Marine Biotechnology at IMET shared, “We are pleased to be working with CAT to advance the development of sterility technology in aquaculture. This collaboration, including a sponsored research agreement, aims to improve sterility success rates in Atlantic salmon, with potential applications across all finfish species. Our partnership with CAT will enable us to achieve 100% sterility and bring this technology to the aquaculture industry.”

Ten-Tsao Wong, DMB Associate Professor adds; “Morpholinos have been approved by the FDA for human medicine and are being used to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). This new agreement with CAT can accelerate our efforts to expand this technology to produce sterile fish. We look forward to collaborating with CAT to bring this technology to market.”

Morpholino sterility induction silences genes critical for germ cell development in fish embryos through bath immersion. The fish grow normally but are sterile, avoiding the negative effects of early sexual maturation on growth, flesh quality, and survival. Unlike other methods like triploidy, this approach preserves high-performance genetics while addressing animal welfare concerns.

John concludes,

“The Morpholino technology complements our genome editing solutions for sterility by offering a quick and flexible alternative. It can be used in situations where sterility is urgently needed, and while the introduction of sterility through genome editing into a breeding population is still in progress. For example, in salmonids, where breeding cycles are longer, this technology provides a timely option.”

Adding, “our Morpholino technology will be made available in situations where genome editing is not being used. Sterility is a critical issue for the aquaculture industry, and this gives us another reliable tool that we can call on.”

The post The Center of Aquaculture Technologies Partners with UMBC to Advance Sterility Solutions in Aquaculture appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Center for Aquaculture Technologies Shares Breakthroughs in Genome Editing at the First International Meeting on Genome Editing in Aquaculture

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:38:25 +0700

The Center for Aquaculture Technologies (CAT) team joined leading scientists, industry experts, and policymakers in Chile at the end of November for the First International Meeting on Genome Editing in Aquaculture.

On the opening day of the event, organized by EDIGEN and the University of Chile in Puerto Varas, participants heard presentations on advances in genome editing and genomics applied to atlantic salmon, coho salmon, tilapia and trout. Topics included editing for disease resistance traits, including SRS, IPN, BKD , and sea lice, as well as the regulatory requirements for implementation in Chile.

The first CAT speaker was Dr. Matthew Josephson , Genome Editing – Commercialization Manager, who shared the transformative potential of genome editing and the value it can deliver to producers; higher growth, improved FCR, increased yield, and reduced management costs when sterility is included as a production trait.

Matt outlined the key requirements for integrating genome editing into breeding programs and highlighted several milestones CAT has achieved while scaling this technology for commercial aquaculture. He also shared practical examples from his work with both salmon and tilapia.

Dr. Matthew Josephson during his talk

“Successful use of genome editing in commercial aquaculture demands high-throughput, high-efficiency editing capabilities and the ability to work where the fish are – through our mobile laboratory. Importantly, genome editing will not replace traditional breeding; it will become a powerful addition to the toolbox, accelerating genetic improvement and enabling performance gains.”

Setting the stage for a key theme that his colleague Dr. Yehwa Jin would explore in depth, Matt emphasized the foundational role of sterility in responsible and scalable genome editing.

“Achieving 100% sterility remains the key that unlocks broader biotechnology adoption by addressing the concerns of regulators, producers, and stakeholders alike. Over the next five years, genome editing will drive major sustainability benefits, boost productivity, and reduce the resources required to produce fish and shellfish -ultimately allowing integrated genome-edited breeding programs to reach true commercial scale.”

The second day of the event continued with a series of scientific presentations showcasing the latest advances in genomics and genome editing applications in aquaculture.

During the “In Vivo Gene Editing” session, CAT Research Scientist Yehwa presented on the importance and opportunity of sterility as a foundational trait. She explained that a core requirement for commercial deployment of genome editing is ensuring edited fish are sterile or otherwise effectively contained. Yehwa shared CAT’s most recent strategies for reliably producing sterile, monosex populations at scale.

Dr. Yehwa Jin

Yehwa concluded:

“Sterile stocks have the potential to fundamentally transform the sustainability of aquaculture. We now know that 100% sterility is achievable through a genome-editing approach, giving us a reliable and scalable pathway to enhance performance while directly addressing key farming challenges. This work not only resolves regulatory and stakeholder concerns, it also lays the foundation for the next generation of aquatic biotechnologies.”

The event closed with a series of short presentations on emerging technologies. Genome Editing Research Manager Dr. Ashutosh Pudasaini presented CAT’s progress in genome editing for Pacific white shrimp (L. vannamei). While several editing methods have been reported in shrimp, with varying degrees of success, Ashutosh highlighted that challenges remain around enzyme delivery and achieving commercially viable survival rates to adulthood.

Despite these hurdles, CAT is in the early R&D stages of applying genome editing at a commercial scale in shrimp and has successfully created and grown edited shrimp beyond PL20+, demonstrating meaningful progress toward scalable deployment.

Ashutosh noted:

“Microinjection remains one of the most technically advanced approaches available, and our recent successes in precise genome editing show just how powerful it can be. With consistent access to embryos and state-of-the-art facilities, CAT is exceptionally well-positioned to scale this work and lead innovation in the field.”

Dr. Ashutosh Pudasaini

CAT’s contributions at the First International Meeting on Genome Editing in Aquaculture underscored the organization’s leadership in advancing practical and scalable genome editing solutions. With major progress across finfish and shrimp, a strong focus on sterility, and technologies designed for real-world breeding programs, CAT is shaping the future of sustainable aquaculture and accelerating the deployment of next-generation breeding in aquaculture.

CAT team at the event in Puerto Varas, Chile

The post Center for Aquaculture Technologies Shares Breakthroughs in Genome Editing at the First International Meeting on Genome Editing in Aquaculture appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Reflecting on 2025: Milestones Achieved, Innovation Accelerated

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:38:23 +0700

Dr John Buchanan, CEO

As 2025 comes to a close, we celebrate another year of reaching milestones and accelerating genetic advancements for our clients through CAT’s Next-Gen Breeding approach.

When asked to share his highlights, CEO Dr. John Buchanan reflects on a noteworthy year for the Center for Aquaculture Technologies (CAT) and offers a glimpse of what’s ahead for 2026 and beyond.

Commercializing Genome Editing

This year marked a major leap forward in the commercialization of genome editing for aquaculture. CAT’s collaboration with tilapia producer Brazilian Fish was announced in early 2025, celebrating the first introduction of commercial-scale, genome-edited tilapia in Brazil. This partnership highlights that the integration of genome editing into breeding programs is no longer theoretical – it’s happening.

Stay tuned in 2026 for updates on how genome editing has fast-tracked the selection of desirable traits that traditionally would have required many generations, driving faster genetic improvement and unlocking value across the entire supply chain for our partners.

Genetics: A Key Tool to Increase Value

In today’s competitive global market, we’ve continued to help our clients maximize returns by designing breeding strategies that balance input costs with genetic and economic gains. It’s been rewarding to see how these improvements compound generation after generation, supporting clients in building stronger, more sustainable operations.

This year, we added 10 new genotyping tools to our growing library of solutions developed specifically for aquatic species. This enables our team to match the right tool to each client’s program needs, ensuring they receive the insights required to maximize their genetic improvement plans. CAT’s collaborative approach brings innovative solutions to meet the increasing technical demands of our clients.

In addition, we added 6 new breeding programs to our portfolio of clients for Genetic Services, expanding our role in helping companies design and execute elite genetic improvement strategies.

CAT’s genotyping lab in San Diego, CA

Industry Leadership

Throughout the year, our team shared insights at major industry events and scientific conferences on topics including use of genomic tools, the practical benefits of selective breeding, commercial-scale genome editing, evolving regulatory frameworks for new technologies, benefits of sterility for the aquaculture industry, and new advancements in genome editing for P. vannamei. Thank you to everyone who invited us to speak, and to those who attended and engaged in our discussions – we look forward to sharing even more in 2026.

5th INFOFISH World Tilapia Trade and Technical Conference 2025, Bangkok

Looking Ahead

As we look ahead, CAT remains focused on supporting our core mission of feeding people responsibly by delivering customized precision breeding solutions that drive value and sustainability for our clients. From advancing our Sterility+® solution which enabling CAT to add sterility as a foundational trait in genome editing, to expanding access to the latest genotyping tools across aquatic species, our global team is committed not only to pushing the boundaries of aquaculture genetics through R&D, but also to ensuring these innovations are practical, scalable, and accessible to the entire aquaculture industry.

Following our recent partnership announcement with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), there will be more to share as we bring Morpholino technology to clients where sterility is immediately needed, as genome-editing approaches to introduce sterility into breeding populations continue to progress. In species such as salmonids, where breeding cycles are longer, the morpholino technology provides a timely and practical solution, and we look forward to delivering this capability to the industry.

Thank you to our incredible clients, partners, and team – your trust, collaboration, and dedication are the foundation of our success. We’re excited to continue this journey together, making our industry more productive, resilient, and sustainable.

Here’s to a collaborative and successful New Year, and to making 2026 our best year yet!

The post Reflecting on 2025: Milestones Achieved, Innovation Accelerated appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Meet CAT at Aquaculture America 2026

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:38:22 +0700

We’re excited to be back at Aquaculture America 2026! The CAT team will be sharing practical insights on genetics, breeding strategies, and our Next-Gen Breeding approach to building resilient aquaculture systems.

Join us for our talks or stop by Booth 426 to learn how we help producers launch new breeding programs or strengthen existing ones, targeting the traits that deliver the greatest commercial impact. Learn about CAT’s existing technologies and future plans to help producers dramatically enhance commercial output.

This year’s Aquaculture America returns to Las Vegas. Organized annually by the U.S. Aquaculture Society in partnership with the National Aquaculture Association and the Aquaculture Suppliers Association, this event brings together the leading minds in aquaculture, and we can’t wait to be a part of it.

CAT Talks at Aquaculture America 2026

Breeding for the Future: Enhancing Resilience in Aquaculture with Genomic Offsets

Tuesday, Feb 17 | 3:00 PM

Finfish Genetics / Selection / Genomics Session

Speaker: Samuel May

Integrating Genome Editing into Breeding Programs: Achieving Commercial Scale

Tuesday, Feb 17 | 3:15 PM

Finfish Genetics / Selection / Genomics Session

Speaker: Takeshi Umazume

Harnessing Efficient Genetic Improvement in Tilapia to Maximize Economic Return

Wednesday, Feb 18 | 1:30 PM

Florida Marine Aquaculture Coalition

Speaker: Adriana Artiles

Choosing the Right Breeding Program: Comparative Strategies for Genetic Improvement

Thursday, Feb 19 | 12:00 PM

Annual U.S. Marine Finfish Aquaculture Session

Speaker: Samuel May

Visit Us at Booth 426

Between sessions, we invite you to stop by Booth 426 to meet the team, discuss your breeding goals and challenges, and learn how CAT is helping producers achieve faster, more predictable genetic gains through our NextGen Breeding TM solutions.

Whether it’s discovering what genotyping tools we have available, or what you need to consider to integrate genome editing gains, or how we design custom breeding programs, our team will be on hand to answer your questions and share practical strategies to improve animal performance and profitability.

See you at Aquaculture America 2026!

The post Meet CAT at Aquaculture America 2026 appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Revolutionising Aquaculture Through Genetics: The role of genetics in Aquaculture

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:38:21 +0700

Aquaculture has been evolving fast. Producers continue to be under growing pressure to deliver more – more efficiency, more resilience, more sustainability and often with fewer resources and tighter financial constraints. So how does genetics help?

Genetics isn’t just about growing better animals. It’s about building aquaculture systems that are robust, adaptable, long-term, and commercially viable. At CAT, we demonstrate that genetics is a powerful lever producers have to future-proof their operations, and we exist to help capitalise on that potential.

Why Genetics Matters in Aquaculture

Aquaculture breeding programs have been improving fish and shellfish for many years, using approaches similar to those in other agricultural industries. At their core, these programs involve choosing the best animals as parents and consistently selecting for traits that improve performance over time.
What makes aquaculture unique is the biology of aquatic species. Many produce large numbers of offspring are fertilised externally, and a multitude of external factors can cause a varying range in how quickly they grow and mature. This creates a significant opportunity to make meaningful improvements through well-designed breeding programs. Producers typically focus on traits such as faster growth and better feed efficiency, higher yields, improved survival and robustness, product quality, and, in some cases, sterility.

Our Mission

CAT’s mission is simple – deliver custom genetic solutions that improve efficiency, sustainability, and profitability for aquaculture producers, genetics companies, and researchers worldwide.

We don’t believe in providing only off-the-shelf answers, because every species, environment, and market is different. That’s why we design breeding programs around what matters most to each client, whether that’s growth, survival, disease resistance, robustness, product quality, or a combination of traits that drive real commercial impact. We’ll work with you to agree on a plan suited to your goals.

Our tailored approach to choosing the most appropriate genotyping tool(s) for your breeding strategy is shaped by each client’s specific needs. Complex programs, such as multi-trait genomic selection, require high-density markers, whereas simpler programs may require only low-density markers for relatedness and family assignment.

By aligning cutting-edge genetic science with on-farm realities, we help producers make confident, data-driven decisions that deliver measurable results.

A True Client Partnership

Personalized Engagement, Hands-on Expertise
One of the biggest frustrations we hear from producers is feeling unsupported once a program is underway. At CAT, client engagement isn’t an add-on; it’s fundamental to how we work.

For all our annual breeding clients, we are committed to bi-weekly meetings, ensuring we stay closely involved throughout the entire breeding cycle. These regular touchpoints allow us to track progress, respond quickly to challenges, and refine strategies as conditions change.
And we don’t just show up on screens.

Guaranteed On-Site Support
CAT guarantees at least one on-site visit per year, because we know that effective genetic programs are built on real-world understanding. Being present matters. Seeing the facilities, meeting the teams, and understanding operational nuances enable us to deliver customised solutions.

Global Reach, Local Expertise and 24/7 When It Matters
Aquaculture doesn’t operate on a single time zone, and neither do we.
CAT has a genetic services team member in every major aquaculture region, providing local, on-hand support where and when it’s needed. This regional presence ensures cultural understanding, regulatory awareness, and timely response.

Our global team structure means we can provide support around the clock, with a CAT expert always available somewhere in the world.

Benefiting from the latest Genetic Improvement technologies

CAT’s clients are already benefiting from our expertise and leadership in bringing the latest genetic improvement to reality. We are working with several commercial producers to integrate genome editing into their breeding programs, giving them access to the latest advances in genetic improvement technologies.
In the same way as selective breeding, which delivers improved genetic progress over time, genome editing precisely targets and delivers genetic changes that could naturally occur. However, instead of taking many years of careful, selective breeding, this beneficial variation can now be introduced in a single generation. Our scientists directly create genetic variants in precise locations in the genome to deliver major improvements in performance, without introducing new DNA.
We can also leverage our patented approaches to induce sterility to provide clients with a guaranteed method of containment and improved growth and performance by reallocating reproductive energy.

With CAT’s guidance, clients harness these cutting-edge tools to achieve faster, more predictable improvements.

Building the Future of Aquaculture Together

At CAT, we see genetics as a collaborative journey. By working closely with producers, staying engaged throughout the breeding cycle, and delivering cutting-edge science that translates into real performance, we help producers reach their goals faster. Together, we are shaping a more resilient and profitable future for aquaculture.

The post Revolutionising Aquaculture Through Genetics: The role of genetics in Aquaculture appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Genetic Innovation for Blue Food Security: Production and Resilience in Aquaculture

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:38:20 +0700

A 10-minute presentation by Debbie Plouffe

As the world searches for sustainable ways to feed a growing population, the future does not lie only on land, but also in our waters.

In this 10-minute talk recorded for Sea the Future 2026, Debbie Plouffe explores how genetic innovation is transforming aquaculture into a smarter, more resilient, and more sustainable engine for global food security.

Aquaculture has been documented as the fastest-growing source of animal protein, but growth by scale alone is no longer enough. Climate volatility, disease pressure and environmental constraints demand a more sophisticated approach: precision genetic innovation.

Debbie reveals how CAT’s genome editing work has moved beyond theory and into commercial deployment, reshaping what’s possible for aquaculture production.

An important part of this innovation is the ability to address containment concerns through genome editing and to reliably produce 100% sterile fish. Sterility is not just a biological feature; it is a foundational safeguard. It:

Addresses environmental and regulatory concerns
Prevents interbreeding with wild populations
Enables responsible commercial deployment of enhanced traits
Enhances growth by redirecting energy from reproduction to biomass
Protects proprietary genetics

Through our strategic partnership with Brazilian Fish, the CAT team have already applied genome editing at a commercial scale in tilapia production in Brazil. Guided by our expertise in breeding and leveraging our mobile genome-editing laboratory, the CAT team has worked to deliver sterility as well as improved growth, feed efficiency, and fillet yield into existing breeding programs, all while preserving genetic diversity and preventing genetic drag.

Thousands of edited fish are now growing as broodstock in Brazil, with regulatory processes underway and commercialization on track.

The economic implications of incorporating genome editing are staggering. Financial modelling shows that genome editing in Brazil’s tilapia sector alone could create incremental growth of hundreds of millions of dollars annually, driven by improvements in growth performance, feed efficiency, and filet yield, all without expanding environmental footprint.

At a global scale, even a single improved trait can significantly increase food output while conserving resources. This is not simply about better fish. It’s about strengthening food systems.

Debbie concludes with a clear vision: genome editing will not replace traditional breeding; it will significantly enhance it. As a powerful tool in the breeder’s toolbox, it offers a pathway to greater productivity, resilience, and sustainability.

If climate resilience and sustainable protein are priorities for you, this talk explores the transformative shift already underway.

Watch the full 10-minute presentation to see how genetic innovation is shaping the future of blue food security.

The post Genetic Innovation for Blue Food Security: Production and Resilience in Aquaculture appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

CAT Strengthens Focus on Client Partnerships with Ecuador and Global Support Roles

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:38:19 +0700

CAT (Center for Aquaculture Technologies) is expanding its client support services to further strengthen the company’s commitment to high-quality service and operational excellence.

The Ecuadorian shrimp Industry has experienced tremendous growth over the last 5 years. With much of Ecuador’s success as a global shrimp leader been driven by continuous genetic improvement programs. CAT supports these programs through high-quality genotyping services and close breeding partnerships; providing advanced genetic tools, CAT enables producers and breeders to achieve measurable gains in growth, feed conversion efficiency, and disease resistance across shrimp populations. CAT is the trusted partner in Ecuador and remains committed to investing in its clients and supporting the long-term sustainability and competitiveness of the industry.

Diana Lagos, recently attending Aqua Expo in Santa Elena

As part of its ongoing growth initiative, CAT strengthened its presence in Ecuador with Diana Lagos joining as the company’s on-the-ground representative. Drawing on her extensive laboratory and shrimp operations experience, Diana advises Ecuadorian clients on best practices for sample collection and shipping, which are critical to preserving sample integrity and ensuring reliable, actionable genetic data. She also plays a key role in coordinating with CAT’s global laboratory operations team to streamline project execution.

Maria Hernandez, Client Success Associate

Enhancing its clients’ experience and support, CAT now also welcomes Maria Hernandez to the Client Success team. Maria serves as a primary point of contact for any clients needing assistance with sample logistics. Maria connects all, supporting onboarding, providing technical guidance, and managing day-to-day client interactions to ensure a smooth and responsive experience. Both Maria and Diana are native Spanish speakers, which ensures CAT delivers professional and personalized support to its Ecuadorian and Spanish-speaking clients.

“Maria’s and Diana’s expertise and dedication to sustainability make them ideal advocates for our clients,” said Klara Verbyla, VP of Genetic Improvement. “Their roles reflect our ongoing commitment to not only provide cutting-edge genetic solutions but also to be a trusted partner in our clients’ long-term success.”

These investments in people and platforms are part of CAT’s broader strategy to be more than a genetic services provider. By combining infrastructure, insights, and personalized support, CAT empowers aquaculture producers to drive sustainable genetic progress.

Check out Sample Stream—our new client portal designed to make your genotyping process faster. Navigate sample submissions effortlessly through our simple 3-step system.

Discover Sample Stream

The post CAT Strengthens Focus on Client Partnerships with Ecuador and Global Support Roles appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Genome Editing: Driving Productivity at Commercial Scale

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:35:42 +0700

Genome editing is a practical, scalable tool that enables producers to unlock substantial gains in productivity, resilience, and sustainability – faster than ever before.

Unlike conventional selective breeding, which builds incremental improvement over generations, genome editing introduces significant performance gains in a single generation.

Genome editing strengthens established breeding programs, integrating seamlessly into commercial production to accelerate genetic gains and deliver faster value across the production chain.

A Tool That Delivers Across Many Traits

Genome editing can be applied across a wide range of traits that matter to every stakeholder: producers, regulators, and consumers alike.

These include:

Growth performance
Yield and fillet percentage
Feed efficiency
Disease resistance
Gender determination
Pigmentation
Monosex
Sterility

The Impact is Quantifiable

In tilapia, for example, CAT has recorded single-gene edits that have delivered up to 48% improvement in growth performance compared to non-edited siblings. That level of gain represents a meaningful shift in farm productivity, with the potential to shorten harvest cycles, improve turnover, strengthen margins, and enhance access to healthy sources of protein.

More Than Growth: Built for Sustainable Production

Genome editing can not only deliver performance gains but can also provide environmental, regulatory, and commercial confidence.

An important part of this innovation is the ability to address containment concerns. Genome editing enables the reliable production of 100% sterile fish, addressing multiple challenges simultaneously:

Prevents reproduction of escaped farmed fish with wild populations
Protects proprietary genetics and encourages investment
Addresses environmental and regulatory concerns
All whilst redirecting reproductive energy toward growth

Speed Changes Everything

One of the defining advantages of genome editing is speed.

Traditional breeding improves performance from generation to generation. Genome editing can introduce a significant improvement in a single generation. Gains that selective breeding can then continue to build upon.

This acceleration has the potential to increase genetic progress by orders of magnitude compared to conventional methods. For producers facing evolving disease pressures, feed cost volatility, and sustainability demands, speed matters.

Built for Commercial Scale

Reports show that more than 25 aquaculture species have already been successfully gene-edited, with tilapia leading research efforts due to its short generation time and robustness.

But delivering genome editing at a commercial scale requires more than scientific proof of concept. It requires:

High-throughput editing methods
Efficient egg processing
Integration into breeding programs
Careful management of relatedness and inbreeding
Robust genotyping and tracking systems

CAT’s recent advancements have achieved over 95% editing efficiency across thousands of eggs per day, demonstrating that genome editing is not just viable, it’s scalable. This progress was reinforced when CAT announced in 2025 their collaboration with tilapia producer Brazilian Fish, marking the first introduction of commercial-scale genome-edited tilapia in Brazil and confirming that integration into breeding programs is already underway.

Want to understand more about how genome editing could transform your breeding program?

START THE CONVERSATION

The post Genome Editing: Driving Productivity at Commercial Scale appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

Unlocking the Genome: Advancing Aquaculture Through Low-Pass Whole Genome Sequencing

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:35:41 +0700

At the start of the year, Sabrina Sauri, Research Associate at CAT, presented at PAG33 – the International Plant and Animal Genome Conference – one of the world’s leading forums for genomic innovation.

Her poster showcased another example of how CAT is contributing to the future of aquaculture breeding through a powerful combination of laboratory innovation and advanced bioinformatics.

Sabrina Sauri, Research Associate at CAT

The project focused on developing a high-throughput low-pass Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) pipeline for Cobia (Rachycentron canadum), an emerging aquaculture species with significant commercial potential. But the implications reach far beyond a single species, offering a scalable genomic framework for aquaculture programs worldwide.

What Is Whole Genome Sequencing – and Why Does It Matter?

Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) determines the DNA sequence across an organism’s entire genome. Unlike traditional genotyping approaches that target predefined markers, WGS captures genetic variation across all chromosomes, including both common and rare variants.

This genome-wide perspective provides several key advantages:

Unbiased genetic insight without the limitations of fixed SNP panels
Detection of variants linked to complex traits such as growth and disease resistance
A scalable platform for large breeding populations

For aquaculture, where many emerging species still lack robust genotyping tools, these advantages are transformative.

The Power of Low-Pass Sequencing

While high-coverage sequencing can be costly at scale, CAT’s approach uses low-pass WGS, sequencing genomes at shallow coverage and then applying advanced imputation methods to recover accurate genome-wide genotypes.

This strategy allows breeding programs to analyse far more animals per generation while maintaining high data quality. The result is faster, smarter decision-making that supports:

More informed broodstock selection
Shorter breeding cycles
Steady genetic improvement in key traits like survival, growth, and disease resistance

By improving scalability and return on investment, genomic selection becomes accessible even for species without custom marker panels.

Innovation from Bench to Bioinformatics

CAT’s workflow integrates both laboratory and computational expertise. The team implemented an optimized library preparation method using a TnX transposon system, combining tagmentation and ligation to minimise positional bias while increasing throughput and reducing hands-on time.

Importantly, the value of low-pass sequencing continues to grow over time. As reference genomes improve and population datasets expand, existing data can be reanalysed to achieve even higher accuracy, without recollecting samples or regenerating libraries.

A Scalable Future for Aquaculture Genomics

This work demonstrates more than a technical achievement; it highlights CAT’s ability to deliver end-to-end genomic solutions, from experimental design and wet-lab optimisation to advanced analytical pipelines.

By building efficient, scalable, and future-proof workflows, CAT is helping aquaculture producers unlock the full potential of genomic selection – accelerating sustainable production and genetic progress across species.

Unlocking growth potential, boosting feed efficiency, and enhancing disease resistance in species all begins with understanding their genetic makeup.

The post Unlocking the Genome: Advancing Aquaculture Through Low-Pass Whole Genome Sequencing appeared first on CAT-Center for Aquaculture Technologies.

The Alaska Blue Economy Center: Connecting Mariculture to the State’s “New Blue Economy”

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:33:29 +0700

In recent decades, Alaska has seen reductions in the population of working-age adults, according to the Alaska Economic Trends Magazine. This is hitting Alaska’s seafood industry, which generates billions of dollars for the state and the US economy, but is seeing declines in its output.

Maritime industries in Alaska are also being impacted by climate change. Melting ice caps, rapidly warming ocean temperatures, and ocean acidification are impacting the resilience of one of the state’s most important economic sectors.

Moreover, Alaskans are also deeply connected to the ocean on a cultural level, with Alaska Native communities having used coastal waters for thousands of years, and coastal fishing villages like Chignik suffering when their fisheries decline.

However, there is a growing movement within the last frontier to rebuild its historic ocean industries, especially in mariculture.

The Alaska Blue Economy Center (ABEC), launched in 2019, is at the forefront of this movement. It’s built around the ideas of a blue economy, which recognizes and promotes the economic significance of ocean industries in a sustainable manner.

ABEC is trying to revamp the state that produces over half of the nation’s seafood by building up future generations of workers in a state where they’re desperately needed.

UAS Applied Fisheries students preparing sampling kits for deployment to salmon hatcheries. (Credit: Angie Bowers)

Workforce Development

Tommy Sheridan has been with ABEC since 2022 and has been the director since August 2024. Before joining ABEC, which is part of the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), he worked for 20 years in the Alaskan seafood industry.

What Sheridan has seen as a vital mission of ABEC is to secure funding and resources to help Alaska’s maritime-related industries, which are part of their “blue economy.”

“We have really worked to stimulate external funding in support of the state’s blue economy,” he said during a recent fisheries seminar at UAF.

This plan has certainly worked in recent years. In 2022, the Alaska state legislature appropriated $7 million to UAF to “support mariculture research, industry support and workforce development,” of which $2 million was given directly to the ABEC.

The next year, in 2023, UAF was awarded another $20 million through an EPSCoR grant to research “culturally and commercially important” species in the Gulf of Alaska. This five-year grant, known as the Interface of Change, brings communities, universities, and researchers from across the Gulf together to build “resilience” in coastal ecosystems and economies through mariculture.

ABEC and its partners have also benefited from the US Economic Development Administration awarding $49 million to the “Alaska Mariculture Cluster.” Sheridan has seen the push that national and state organizations are making for Alaska’s mariculture industry, and wants ABEC to maximize the funding and resources the industry obtains.

However, none of this funding matters if there aren’t workers to support the mariculture industry, which ABEC is particularly focused on. This is a vital step that ABEC has recognized and is working to improve: mariculture workforce development.

ABEC’s Tommy Sheridan and PWSC’s Dr. Amanda Glazier conduct mariculture sampling in Prince William Sound. (Credit: Tommy Sheridan)

In 2023, they contributed to the Alaska Mariculture Workforce Development Plan, which was designed to meet the “current and forecasted training needs” of one of the state’s most important economic industries. Sheridan says that this plan recommended creating “glidepaths” for students, which means not only showing but also supporting clear paths toward careers in Alaskan mariculture.

ABEC has supported students as young as junior high, supporting programs like the Alaska Science Olympiad. They’ve also partnered with the Teaching Through Technology (T3) program, which offers career support for high schoolers across Alaska.

“T3 is a STEM-focused program based at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks,” Sheridan explains. “We’ve worked with them to help them develop a mariculture curriculum.”

ABEC also provides a landing place at the university level to learn about and interact with several other mariculture educational institutions around the state.

Within the University of Alaska system, ABEC connects students to programs like the Applied Fisheries Program at the University of Alaska Southeast, or the Prince William Sound College, located right on the Gulf of Alaska. Sheridan says they also funded a state-wide mariculture research initiative that resulted in significant engagement with industry and community partners.

ABEC stretches beyond Alaska as well. With national partners like the American Fisheries Society, ABEC is collecting and sharing knowledge, resources, and career pathways in the hope of rejuvenating a younger mariculture workforce and ultimately preparing them to contribute to Alaska’s blue economy.

“There was an acknowledgement for the need to prepare the workforce for the new blue economy,” Sheridan says. “[…] that includes improving STEM education in the K-12 environment.”

UAF’s Tommy Sheridan with PWSC students and staff, sampling mariculture farm sites in Prince William Sound. (Credit: Tommy Sheridan)

Alaska’s New Blue Economy?

The blue economy is an economic framework that recognizes and promotes the importance of ocean-based industries. Alaska has long been known for its productive and well-managed wild fisheries and salmon hatcheries, but Sheridan says the state’s “new blue economy” will also include mariculture.

For instance, in 2023, through its Mariculture Innovation Research Fund, the ABEC funded research exploring how salmon hatcheries and mariculture could be combined at the same locations.

“We funded research looking at Alaskan salmon hatchery release sites, doing water quality testing to determine which release sites, if any, around the state were conducive to mariculture production,” Sheridan says.

The research project supported dozens of students around the state, engaging them in the growing mariculture sector of Alaska’s blue economy.

This past summer, ABEC continued its push for incorporating mariculture in Alaska’s established salmon hatcheries. UAF is an affiliated partner with NOAA’s Cooperative Institute Fostering Aquaculture Research and Marketing proposal, which will provide $300 million for aquaculture and mariculture projects around the country. ABEC hopes to receive and direct some of those funds toward mariculture development in Alaska.

In Alaska’s current economy, Sheridan says the mariculture industry is only a small component compared to the much bigger commercial fishing and processing industries. However, their goal is to transform it within the new blue economy into a thriving industry.

This transformation must be thought-out, however, and Sheridan says the new direction for the state’s ocean industries also prioritizes sustainable extraction.

He wants to bring outside organizations, such as the Marine Stewardship Council, to teach students about sustainable fisheries and possibly create a sustainability certification at UAF.

Sustainable extraction from ocean ecosystems requires understanding the ecology and habitat where mariculture farms and fisheries exist, to ensure that populations remain balanced.

Sheridan explains that this is another reason ABEC wants to promote higher education in the mariculture workforce, because the new blue economy requires its workers to understand the ocean on a scientific and data-driven level.

“The new blue economy is really […] technologically advanced, very heavy on big data,” Sheridan explains.

With Alaska experiencing rapid global warming in the Arctic and northern latitudes, ABEC recognizes the importance of creating not only a growing mariculture industry but also a sustainable one. Recent studies have shown that the term “blue economy” has become increasingly linked with the word “sustainability” and global sustainability frameworks.

Following this path, ABEC is promoting Alaska’s blue economy by emphasizing a sustainable, data-informed, and knowledge-driven attitude.

“The new blue economy is a knowledge-based economy,” Sheridan says, “looking to the sea, not just for the extraction of material goods, but for data and information to address societal challenges.”

UAF staff and Teaching Through Technology high school students attending a City of Valdez City Council meeting. (Credit: Tommy Sheridan)

The post The Alaska Blue Economy Center: Connecting Mariculture to the State’s “New Blue Economy” appeared first on FishSens Magazine.

Using AI to Revolutionize Gut Microbiome Analysis in Aquaculture

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:33:28 +0700

Aquaculture is an increasingly vital player in the global food market, and currently supplies over half of the world’s seafood, according to the US Department of Agriculture. As demand for aquaculture products grows, the industry’s response works to keep pace.

One way farmers are doing this is by integrating observational and proactive systems that monitor fish in real time. Keeping tight tabs on fish populations and water quality allows farmers to better understand their operational conditions.

An important aspect of this is fish health and growth. Problems like disease can run rampant in farms, hampering fish growth and ultimately the quality of the end product, according to the World Aquaculture Society, underscoring the importance of stopping health problems before they spread.

Now, some companies are looking toward creating new technologies that can monitor fish populations and detect changes in health instantaneously, before they become a problem.

An example of Aquagut sample acquisition with salmon. (Credit: AquaGut)

Challenges with Monitoring Fish Health in Aquaculture

Horaizon AI started off in human healthcare by analyzing gut microbiomes, and has recently moved into gut microbiome analysis for terrestrial animals and, now, aquatic species. Alan Cook is an aquaculture consultant who has partnered with Horaizon AI to develop their new aquaculture diagnostics program: AquaGut.

“They found that using a fecal sample, they were able to quantify the metabolic activity present in a gut sample,” Cook says of Horaizon’s technology.

Across both terrestrial and aquatic species, the gut microbiome serves as an indicator of health, performing the same basic functions in animals. However, Cook says that the aquaculture industry has historically relied on more observational or easily accessible tests, such as measuring weight or gill microbiome analysis, rather than examining gut health.

Getting fecal samples is the primary method for analyzing gut health, and traditionally, samples had to be sent to labs for analysis. Cook says this method was laborious, expensive, and often took several weeks for analysis to be completed. This timeline, similar to historic observation methods, might only catch onto health changes when they’re already a problem.

Cook says that AquaGut lays out a process to observe and track changes in population health as they happen, rather than waiting until a problem shows up visibly.

How Does AquaGut Work?

Cook primarily sees AquaGut as a proactive method that could tell farmers to try different foods and maximize growth. He explains that choosing the right feed source can proactively prevent health problems while also minimizing costs.

“The biggest application for me is around feeding efficiency and getting better growth and reducing the amount you spend on feed,” Cook states.

The process starts by collecting a small fecal sample, dewatering it, and smearing it on AquaGut’s premade template. Then, users take a picture and upload it to the AquaGut app, where the Horaizon AI analyzes it.

An example of fecal smear microbiome results. (Credit: AquaGut)

Cook says that the analysis looks for biomarkers, like color and texture, of common functional microbes.

“It looks for those key types, butyrate producers, fatty acid producers, fermenters, and pathogen inhibitors,” Cook explains, “and then gives you a diversity score.”

High microbial diversity indicates a healthy gut and, therefore, a healthy fish. However, the analysis isn’t a one-off test, as farmers must have a large sample size. Rather, for the first few months, farmers must conduct multiple tests to understand the normal diversity levels in the species they’re raising.

Then, they can track changes in their stock’s gut diversity over time, and look for when fish are falling below that benchmark. Cook believes this method can be used in multiple ways, for both disease prediction and for choosing the best food.

“If you see a real drop in diversity or a real increase in pathogen inhibitors, it can suggest to you that you’ve got an impending health issue,” Cook says.

He continues, “If your use is about trying to figure out whose feed is better, you should also see that indicated in the diversity […]. You should see which gut is delivering better performance.”

Cook believes it’s a way for aquaculture farmers to get a snapshot of gut health and growth, without the need for traditional labor and time-intensive sampling and observation.

He also explains that it can be paired with water quality measurements, which have seen advances in real-time monitoring in the industry. This can provide a holistic view of farm conditions, and also show whether water quality conditions are impacting fish gut health or how they feed.

“This should allow farmers to have insight into gut biome populations, and that should be a very powerful tool for water quality, understanding the impact the environment has on the selection of diets,” Cook says.

However, he admits that, although AquaGut is trying to simplify the process, implementation isn’t always easy.

A flowchart of the AquaGut microbiome analysis. (Credit: AquaGut)

Challenges with Implementing Gut Health Analyses

AquaGut, AI in aquaculture, and gut microbiome analysis are all relatively new in the industry. Therefore, a large part of Cook’s job as a consultant with Horaizon is to talk with farmers about this new technology. He explains that while many of them see the value in instantaneous health and growth readings, they may find trouble when trying to implement a technology like AquaGut.

“Fish farming is hard, and trying to bring something new online requires extra effort and needs to deliver enough value to carve out time in your already busy day,” Cook says.

While the value of healthy populations may be obvious to farmers, using the gut as a surrogate for population health may be uncharted territory.

Sometimes, this is simply because they’re used to alternative methods of tracking health and feeding. If that’s the case, and they’ve never incurred the costs of gut microbiome analysis before, Cook says the selling point on cutting costs becomes null.

“If they’re not currently testing [gut health], the fact that it’s 10% of the existing costs, when they don’t have even that cost today, is not very compelling,” Cook explains.

To address the issue of implementing quicker microbiome analysis at a broad scale, Cook says that AquaGut is prioritizing showing instances of its use in the real world.

AquaGut Case Studies

AquaGut’s primary method for testing its technology is by offering farmers low-cost or free field trials. Cook says they are planning trial runs with a shrimp farm in Thailand and a tilapia hatchery.

“Once you have those commercial use cases that demonstrate the importance of what you’re doing, then you start to get some traction,” Cook says.

Cook says that, while lab results and research studies are helpful, they aren’t always enough. In an industry that’s demanding and results-based, farmers want to see real-world applications before incurring the costs and time it takes to implement new technologies.

That’s why AquaGut is conducting case studies early, to build up the data and show positive changes from their technology. Ultimately, Cook hopes that these case studies will show the importance of gut analysis and push aquaculture health monitoring in a better, more efficient direction.

“My hope is that this becomes another tool in the tool chest for farmers to monitor the health of their fish at a more microbial level, on a day-to-day basis,” Cook says.

The post Using AI to Revolutionize Gut Microbiome Analysis in Aquaculture appeared first on FishSens Magazine.

Strategies for Profitable Fish Species Selection for Aquaculture

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:32:15 +0700

If you want to make money in aquaculture, start with the right fish.

That decision shapes almost everything else: your feed costs, growth speed, survival rate, market demand, and day-to-day management. Choose the wrong species, and your costs can rise fast. Choose the right one, and you give yourself a much better chance to grow efficiently and sell profitably. Aquaculture already supplies more than half of the seafood produced for human consumption worldwide, so the opportunity is real—but species choice still makes or breaks the business.

Why species choice matters so much

Think of species selection as a business decision first, not just a biological one. You need to ask a few clear and practical questions. How fast is this fish likely to grow? How much feed will it need to reach market size? Will it survive well in your system and under your local conditions? And just as importantly, will buyers be willing to pay a price that makes the effort worthwhile? When you answer those questions early, you make it much easier to choose a species that supports both production success and profit.

In other words, profitability usually comes down to a few core factors working together: growth rate, feed conversion, survival, operating cost, and market value. When those lines are in place, your chances of building a resilient farm go up. Studies from FAO also emphasize that feed efficiency has a direct effect on profitability.

Look for species that grow fast and sell well

If you are looking for a practical starting point, tilapia often stands out.

Why? Because tilapia is widely farmed, adapts to many production systems, and is commonly favored for its suitability across a broad range of farming environments. It also benefits from extensive production knowledge and established markets in many parts of the world.

Catfish can also be a strong choice, especially when you want a hardy species with dependable demand in many markets. Carp remains important in lower-input systems and in price-sensitive markets, where affordability matters. Meanwhile, salmon can command a higher selling price, but it usually requires more sophisticated systems, tighter environmental control, and significantly higher investment. NOAA notes the importance of matching species and systems carefully, and highlights the specialized nature of marine aquaculture, such as Atlantic salmon production.

So the message is simple: do not ask only, “What fish is popular?” Ask, “What fish fits my farm and my buyers?”

Match the fish to your environment

Next, be honest about your conditions.

If you are in a warm region, species such as tilapia often make more sense. If you are working in cooler water, trout or salmon may be better options. Water temperature, oxygen levels, water supply, and energy costs all matter. NOAA’s regional aquaculture materials make this point clearly: different ecosystems support different farmed species and production methods.

So instead of forcing the environment to suit the fish, choose fish that already fit the environment you have.

That one move can reduce your spending on heating, aeration, filtration, and system correction. As a result, your operation becomes easier to manage and more profitable over time. FAO climate-related work on tilapia also shows that changes in feed cost, mortality, and fish price can sharply affect profitability, which reinforces the importance of environmental fit and risk planning.

Do not ignore the market

Now let’s make this practical: a fish that grows well but does not sell well is still a bad business choice.

Before you stock ponds, tanks, or cages, talk to buyers. Check local prices. Talk to restaurants, wholesalers, retailers, and processors. Learn what sizes they want, what species move steadily, and what customers already recognize.

This matters because stable demand is often more valuable than trendy demand. If you can sell consistently, you reduce risk. World Bank aquaculture research also points to the importance of operating costs, input use, and market structure in determining sector performance and profitability.

So say it this way: “I am not just raising fish. I am producing a product for a market.”

That mindset helps you make better decisions from the beginning.

Watch feed costs closely

Feed is usually your biggest expense.

Because of that, feed conversion ratio is not just a technical metric—it is a profit metric. A species that turns feed into body mass more efficiently can give you a real financial advantage. FAO feed-management publications on tilapia repeatedly stress that feed performance and feed conversion are central to farm economics.

This is one reason herbivorous and omnivorous species are often attractive to producers. In many cases, they are less expensive to feed than carnivorous species that depend more heavily on high-protein inputs.

So when you compare species, do not stop at selling price. Ask, “How much will it cost me to grow each kilogram?”

That is the number that protects your margin.

Choose species that help you reduce risk

If you are new to aquaculture, hardier species are often the smarter choice.

Fish that tolerate handling, crowding, and fluctuations in water quality can help reduce losses. Lower mortality means more predictable harvests, steadier cash flow, and fewer expensive surprises.

That does not mean premium species are bad choices. It means you should match complexity to your level of experience, infrastructure, and available capital. High-value fish can be profitable, but only when the production system is ready for them. NOAA’s aquaculture guidance and regional materials both support the idea that species choice should reflect the production environment and management capacity.

Think long term, not just short term

In the end, the most profitable aquaculture businesses usually do not chase hype. They build around fit.

They look at the whole picture: environment, feed cost, survival, infrastructure, labor, and buyer demand. Then they choose the species that balances those factors best.

That is the real strategy.

Do not ask only, “What fish makes the most money?” Ask, “What fish gives me the best chance to grow well, survive well, and sell well in my actual situation?”

That is how you build an aquaculture operation that can scale, stay resilient, and keep generating returns over time.

Make Your Aquaculture Business More Profitable

If you want your aquaculture business to be more profitable, do not guess on species selection.

Take time to evaluate your water conditions, climate, feed costs, infrastructure, and local buyer demand before you stock your system. Then choose the species that fits your farm financially and biologically.

For more practical insights on aquaculture, sustainability, and ecolonomic strategies, visit the Ecolonomics Action Team at EAT Community.

I can also turn this into a stronger SEO blog version with a focus keyword, meta description, internal link suggestions, and subheadings optimized for WordPress.

4 Reasons Fish Farms Fail After Scaling and How to Avoid Them

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:32:11 +0700

Scaling a fish farm can seem like the natural next step after early success. However, many fish farms fail after scaling because larger operations are far more difficult to manage than small ones. Expanding a farm is not just about adding more ponds, tanks, or fish. It also means dealing with more complex water quality issues, higher disease pressure, feeding inefficiencies, and a less stable production environment.

In many cases, fish farms fail after scaling because the systems that worked well at a small level do not perform the same way at a commercial level. Without careful planning, growth can quickly lead to poor fish health, lower survival rates, and financial losses.

Below are four major reasons fish farms fail after scaling and what producers need to watch closely.

1. Water Quality Problems Increase as Fish Farms Scale

One of the biggest reasons fish farms fail after scaling is poor water quality management. In small systems, operators can usually control oxygen levels, water turnover, temperature, and waste buildup more easily. As the farm expands, maintaining the same balance becomes much harder.

Large ponds and tanks often develop uneven circulation, poor aeration, and waste accumulation in certain areas. These conditions can create dead zones where dissolved oxygen drops and ammonia levels rise. Even slight variations in pH or temperature can stress fish and reduce growth.

According to the FAO’s guidance on dissolved oxygen, oxygen is one of the most important factors in fish survival and performance. Likewise, the FAO’s material on water quality and fish health shows how water chemistry directly affects fish health and production.

To avoid failure after scaling, fish farms need stronger monitoring systems, better aeration design, and faster response protocols.

2. Disease Outbreaks Spread Faster in Large-Scale Fish Farms

Another major reason fish farms fail after scaling is the increased risk of disease. As stocking density rises, fish are packed more closely together, which makes it easier for pathogens to spread. At the same time, stress from poor water quality weakens immune response and leaves fish more vulnerable.

A disease event in a small fish farm may affect one section of the operation. In a large-scale farm, the same outbreak can move rapidly through the entire stock and cause major losses. This is one of the clearest ways fish farms fail after scaling.

FAO emphasizes the importance of aquatic health management and biosecurity in reducing disease risks in aquaculture. Stronger biosecurity systems are essential when farms grow larger because equipment, water sources, workers, and routine movement can all introduce pathogens.

Fish farms that scale successfully treat disease prevention as a core management system, not an afterthought.

3. Feeding and Nutrition in Fish Farms Become Less Efficient at Scale

Feeding problems are another common reason fish farms fail after scaling. A feeding strategy that works well with a small population may become inefficient or inconsistent in a much larger system.

In larger ponds or tanks, feed may not be distributed evenly. Some fish get too much, while others get too little. Overfeeding raises nutrient loads and contributes to poor water quality. Underfeeding reduces growth rates and can increase competition and aggression.

The FAO’s aquaculture resources on water quality management explain that feeding intensity directly affects production performance and environmental conditions. Poor feeding practices can quickly damage both water quality and profitability.

To reduce the risk of failure, larger fish farms need better feed delivery systems, more consistent monitoring, and nutrition plans built specifically for higher stocking levels.

4. Ecosystem Balance Breaks Down in Larger Fish Farming Systems

Fish farms are not just production units. They are living ecosystems. Water, oxygen, microbes, fish behavior, plants, and mechanical systems all interact. As a farm grows, those interactions become much more difficult to balance.

This ecosystem complexity is a hidden reason fish farms fail after scaling. Larger operations often rely more heavily on pumps, aerators, filters, and circulation systems. If one part fails, the impact can be immediate and severe. Smaller farms sometimes have enough natural buffering to absorb a problem. Larger farms usually do not.

FAO’s guidance on water quality management notes that prolonged low oxygen and unstable conditions can reduce growth, lower disease resistance, and trigger mortality.

Scaling a fish farm means scaling biological complexity at the same time. Producers who ignore this often discover too late that bigger systems are also far more fragile.

How to Prevent Fish Farms’ Failure After Scaling

Fish farms fail after scaling when growth happens without stronger systems in place. Expansion should include more than infrastructure. It should also include better water monitoring, tighter biosecurity, improved feeding management, and a deeper understanding of system balance.

Fish farms that succeed at scale usually have:

reliable water quality monitoring
strong aeration and circulation design
biosecurity protocols for staff, equipment, and water
feeding systems suited for larger populations
backup systems for pumps, aerators, and filtration
management practices built around fish health and environmental stability

Conclusion

Fish farms fail after scaling for several predictable reasons. Water quality becomes harder to manage, disease spreads faster, feeding becomes less efficient, and ecosystem complexity increases. These problems do not always show up on a small farm, but they often become severe once the operation expands.

The fish farms that thrive at scale are the ones that prepare for these challenges early. They understand that growth is not just about size. It is about maintaining control, balance, and biological stability as complexity increases.

Start your own fish farm

Are you thinking about starting or expanding a commercial fish farm? The Ecolonomics Action Team provides practical guidance, valuable information, and access to experienced fish farmers who understand what it takes to build a resilient and profitable aquaculture operation. Join the team and get connected.

References

The post 4 Reasons Fish Farms Fail After Scaling and How to Avoid Them first appeared on WorldWide Aquaculture.

Norwegian RAS-Suppliers Strengthen Team in North America

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:30:51 +0700

By NACA

Norwegian Aquaculture in America (NACA) was established in 2025 by five Norwegian companies with a targeted focus on the land-based aquaculture market in the United States. Alex Tsappis will now be their local representative in the North-American market.

Alex Tsappis brings more than 20 years of experience in U.S. aquaculture and has in-depth knowledge of the industry. He was recently hired by NACA to represent the five Norwegian supplier companies: Silikal, Simona Stadpipe, Dynamic FishEye, Mat-Kuling, and Helland Silosystem across both the USA and Canada.

“It was necessary to establish a dedicated sales organization for the USA and Canada. Alex Tsappis will also handle logistics, service, aftersales, and eventually the local assembly of partners’ equipment,” says Bjørn Dørum, General Manager of Mat-Kuling.

NACA’s presence in North America is also strengthened by the partnership with, Structural Armor in Indiana. The company produces modular composite tanks for aquaculture as well as membranes for upgrading older tanks.

In May, all companies will participate in RasTech 2026 with their own NACA stand. NACA will also host a dedicated RAS workshop on the conference’s opening day.

Alex Tsappis was also present representing the NACA network at Aquaculture America 2026, held in Las Vegas in mid-February. NACA shared a booth with its partner Structural Armor, which is based in Indiana. The company produces modular composite tanks for aquaculture as well as membranes for upgrading older tanks.

With Alex Tsappis present in the USA to present their compete RAS-solutions to engineering firms, developers and fish farmers, the NACA-companies will have a much better outreach in their new market.

Alex Tsappis and Inge Stian Helland.

The website Home – Norwegian Aquaculture in America has been launched to promote the network’s initiative in USA and Canada. The NACA business network is supported by Innovation Norway.

“The engagement and support from Innovation Norway were decisive in our decision to enter the land-based aquaculture market in the USA and Canada, says Dørum on behalf of the NACA partners.

The 5 NACA-Companies:

Mat-Kuling Vannbehandling AS

MAT-KULING is a “non-stop shop for RAS equipment” with 30 years of experience in water treatment. The company designs, manufactures, and supplies RAS equipment for land-based farming of both saltwater and freshwater fish. Equipment is developed and built in their own factory. The company also offers systems and specialized MEP services (mechanical, electrical, and plumbing) for land-based aquaculture facilities.

Simona Stadpipe

Simona Stadpipe has over 30 years of experience in aquaculture and is one of Norway’s leading specialists in advanced piping systems and custom products for the industry. The company provides expertise across the entire value chain, from design and production to installation of land-based aquaculture facilities.

Helland Silosystem

Helland Silo is a family-owned company founded in 1965. It produces and supplies feed handling equipment such as silos, feeding systems, and various conveyors tailored for land-based aquaculture. The company has designed and delivered feed handling solutions to land-based aquaculture facilities both in Norway and the international market.

Silikal Aquaculture Solutions

Silikal Aquaculture Solutions has developed a specialized coating for land-based tanks and RAS facilities. The coating is designed to meet strict requirements from the Norwegian aquaculture industry, including durability through repeated production cycles and resistance to strong cleaning agents and high-pressure water for biosecurity purposes.

Dynamic FishEye AS

Dynamic FishEye provides advanced control systems specifically developed for land-based aquaculture, based on One Core technology. The FishEye platform enables real-time data collection and analysis for optimized feeding and improved fish health. FishEye Sense monitors water quality around the clock.

Australia’s Sustainable Seafood Champions Recognized for Advancing Responsible Production and Safeguarding the Future of Seafood

Edusehat — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:30:45 +0700

By Aquaculture Stewardship Council and the Marine Stewardship Council

• Retailers, producers and innovators honored at the Australian Sustainable Seafood Awards 2026

Australia’s seafood leaders have been recognized for setting the benchmark in responsible seafood production at the 2026 Sustainable Seafood Awards.

An initiative of the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) and the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), two global non-profit organizations that set internationally recognized standards for seafood farming and wild capture fisheries, the awards celebrate farms, fisheries, retailers and individuals working to secure the long-term sustainability of Australia’s seafood industry.

The global population is projected to reach around 8.6 billion by 2030, and relies on seafood as a vital, nutritious and efficient protein source. Sustainably managed fisheries and responsibly farmed seafood are critical to meeting the world’s growing demand and long-term food security.

According to the United Nations more than one third of global fish populations are in decline and around 60 per cent are fished to their biological limit. With more than 60 per cent of seafood now farmed and global demand continuing to rise, sustainable production practices are increasingly critical and Australia’s leadership in certified blue foods supports climate resilience.

Independent certification and science-based standards play an important role in ensuring trust and transparency across seafood supply chains. Consumers can now choose from more than 500 ASC and MSC labelled seafood products on Australian retail shelves, spanning chilled, ambient and frozen seafood, as well as products used in pet food, supplements and beauty products.

ASC Market Development Manager Ellie Dixon said the award winners represent best practice across Australia’s seafood sector.

“As expectations from customers, NGOs, regulators and investors continue to rise, transparency, traceability and credible assurance have become more important than ever,” Dixon said.

“These trailblazing businesses are demonstrating leadership through the adoption of independent, science-based standards.”

MSC Program Director for Oceania and Singapore Anne Gabriel said Australians increasingly want confidence that their seafood comes from sustainable sources.

“At a time when sustainability claims are under increasing scrutiny and concerns about greenwashing are growing, credible, science-based certification is more important than ever,” Gabriel said.

“The winners recognized this year are helping build confidence across seafood supply chains and among the public.”

Seafood industry expert John Susman AM said the winners reflect a growing commitment across the sector to responsible production.

“The initiatives and dedication of this year’s nominees demonstrate significant industry progress,” Susman said.

“Across both farmed and wild seafood, we’re seeing producers, retailers, scientists and innovators working together to lift standards, ensuring Australians can enjoy seafood with confidence while protecting our marine environments.”

Award Winners – Highlights

Major Australian retailers ALDI, Coles and Woolworths were recognized for their leadership in sustainable seafood.

ALDI Australia received the ASC Best Responsible Seafood Retailer Award for the fourth consecutive year.

“ALDI distinguished itself through accessible, affordable ASC-certified seafood and national campaigns that helped millions of Australians choose responsible aquaculture,” the judging panel said.

Coles was awarded MSC Best Sustainable Seafood Supermarket, with judges commending its strong sourcing policies, transparent reporting and consumer engagement.

“Coles has demonstrated an exceptionally comprehensive commitment to MSC-certified sustainable seafood, showing excellence in policy, traceability, reporting and industry leadership,” the panel said.

Woolworths Group received both the MSC Community Champion Award and the ASC Aquaculture Champion Award for embedding sustainability initiatives across its seafood supply chain.

“Through initiatives such as the Ocean Pool Fund, Woolworths is investing in suppliers to enable innovation, continuous improvement and credible pathways toward certification,” judges said.

Humpty Doo Barramundi was awarded ASC Best Responsible Producer for its pioneering wetland recirculating aquaculture system and strong community engagement, including partnerships with First Nations communities.

I&J received ASC Best Responsible Seafood Brand for its progress in adopting ASC-certified products across its supply chain and Little Tuna won MSC Best Sustainable Seafood Brand based on a public vote – winning over 50% of the votes.

Two of Tasmania’s emerging stars were awarded the ASC Young Person in Aquaculture Awards recognizing Ryan Stallard (Skretting Australia) and Laura Hodge (Tassal Group) for their leadership in advancing environmental performance and innovation across aquaculture operations.

About the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC)

ASC is advancing the leading certification program for responsible farmed seafood, partnering to increase demand for ASC-labelled products, and championing innovation through industry collaboration.

Find out more: asc-aqua.org/about-asc

About the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)

The MSC was created in response to the growing threat of overfishing globally to help incentivize fisheries to become more sustainable.

The MSC is an international non-profit on a mission to end overfishing and restore fish stocks for future generations. With a vision of the world’s ocean teeming with life and seafood supplies safeguarded for this and future generations.

More than one-third of fish stocks are estimated to be fished at unsustainable levels. With the global human population set to reach 10 billion by 2050, the need to harness our natural resources more responsibly is more urgent than ever. Billions of people worldwide depend on seafood for their livelihoods, and, for many, seafood is their primary protein source.

The MSC blue fish tick label on a wild-caught seafood product or menu can be traced back to an MSC-certified sustainable fishery. By looking at each fishery individually using science, fisheries prove and improve their sustainability performance.

Edusehat - : Akuakultur

Your opportunity to Join in a FREE Webinar with FAO-SCA to Discuss Seafood Fraud

Canadian Cascadia Seaweed Announces the Official Opening of an Advanced Seaweed Processing Facility in Port Edward

The Canadian company Cascadia Seaweed announced a few days ago the official opening of an advanced seaweed processing facility in Port Edward, British Columbia, marking a major milestone in the Company’s development as a vertically integrated seaweed production and biomanufacturing business.

Long Story

Strengthened Presence

WellFish Tech Received Approval From the Norwegian Food Safety Authority for Its Non-Lethal Salmon Blood Sampling

Two studies demonstrated that the procedure does not compromise fish survival, growth, or welfare when executed by trained personnel using their standardized protocol

Temperatures Between 5 and 8 Degrees Celsius

Performed Under the Professional Authorized Fish Health Personnel

Hidden Information

From Ocean Depths to Farm Ponds: How Lallemand’s Marine Microbial Treasure Is Fueling the Next Wave of Aquaculture Innovation

Reshaping Aquaculture Production

The Marine-Origin Advantage

Field-Led Innovation: Starting Where It Matters Most

Scientific Rigor at Every Stage

From Controlled Conditions to Farm Performance

Lalsea Biorem and the LMCC in Action

Anticipating Tomorrow’s Challenges

An Innovation Ecosystem Built for the Long Term

FAO Puts Seafood Consumers at the Centre —Why That Changes Everything

Four Triggers for Transformation

1. Institutions and Governance: Making Transparency Non- Negotiable

2. Consumer Awareness: From Passive Eaters to Active Market Shapers

1. Income and Wealth Distribution: Fair Value for Honest Fishers

1. Innovative Technologies: Traceability Consumers Can Actually Use

What This Means for Seafood — and for Australia

Aquaculture UK Gears Up for Largest Ever Exhibition in Glasgow

The UK’s leading aquaculture show is gearing up for a bigger than ever exhibition this year as it prepares to launch at its new home in Glasgow.

GenoMar Strengthens Animal Welfare Through Partnership With FAI

GenoMar is strengthening its approach to animal welfare across all operations through a strategic partnership with FAI — a globally recognized organization with scientific expertise in animal welfare across multiple species and production systems.

A Science-Based Approach to Animal Welfare

Training and Implementation: From Brazil to Asia

Digital Tools Driving Continuous Improvement

How GenoMar Monitors Animal Welfare

Advocates for Open Ocean Aquaculture Bring Facts, Food to Capitol Hill in Major MARA Act Fly-In

As global demand for protein rises, advocates highlight need for federal legislation to expand domestic seafood production, drive jobs, and strengthen economies

Producer Connect Workshops in Asia Strengthen Readiness for ASC Farm and Feed Standards

Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) recently held two successful Producer Connect Workshops in Bangkok and Tokyo, with ASC experts supporting Asian producers and partners as they prepare for the transition to the new Farm Standard and Feed Standard.

Empowering Small-Scale Seafood Producers

Learning Beyond the Room

ASC Team Visits a Farm in Thailand

About the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC)

Bakkafrost Scotland Officially Opens Its Multi-Million-Pound Applecross Facility

The state-of the art development in Wester Ross is now the United Kingdom’s largest freshwater RAS

Precise Control

The Potential to Be a Real Gamechanger

Minnesota and Texas Host National Aquaculture Leadership Academy

The academy is expected to train at least 60 aquaculture extension professionals from Sea Grant programs, Land Grant universities, and federal agencies

Freshwater Aquaculture Systems

Saltwater Aquaculture

Collaborative Strength

How Transportation Networks Help Keep Aquaculture Businesses Running

Final Thoughts

Video

INCAR² Brings the World’s Leading Marine Epigenetics Meeting to Chile

The INCAR² Center will host the Fourth International Symposium on Epigenetics in Marine and Aquatic Research (EPIMAR 2027), to be held in Puerto Varas, Chile, from May 25 to 28, 2027.

Pivotal Roles of Fish Nutrition and Feeding: Recent Advances and Future Outlook for Brazilian Fish Farming

Pivotal Roles of Feed in Fish Farming

Improved digestibility and nutrient absorption

Increased immunity and health

NutritionalApproachesin Brazilian Marine Fish Farming

Recent Advances for Feeding in Brazilian Fish Farming

Future outlook for nutrition and feeding in Brazilian fish farming

Nutreco Expands Its Smart Shrimp Ecosystem

• Eruvaka’s expansion now spans 12 countries while their tools ensure USD 1.25 billion in harvest value

• The platform’s technology includes AI-based sonic feeding, automatic feeders, and water quality monitoring

Biomass Increases of Between 40% and 60%

Strategic Importance of the Integration

Proactive Farm Optimization

New Country, Growing Impact: First ASC-Certified Feed Mills in Venezuela

Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) continues to see building global momentum for its Feed Certification Program, with the first two ASC-certified feed mills in Venezuela.

About the ASC Feed Standard

About the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC)

Aquaintech Marks 30 Years as a Global Leader in Sustainable Aquaculture Solutions

Aquaintech today celebrates 30 years of advancing sustainable aquaculture through its Bacillus– based microbial solutions designed to improve water quality and support resilient, high-performance aquatic farming systems worldwide.

About Aquaintech

The Norwegian Cod Farming Company Ode Acquires Mowi Facility in Vanylven

• Some weeks before, they acquired Lumarine, that currently operates the largest juvenile cod production facility in the country

Without Interruption

**How GenoMar Monitors Animal Welfare**

• **Some weeks before, they acquired Lumarine, that currently operates the largest juvenile cod production facility in the country**